PP Shooter is just a Crazy Loser

[SassyIrishLass]

We know he was anti-abortion.

How do we know he's anti-abortion? How many people inside the clinic did he kill?

1. His comment "no more baby parts" after the shooting..
2. He committed the massacre at the PP clinic.
2. His ex-wife said he was anti-abortion, conservative Christian.

1. His comment "no more baby parts" after the shooting..

The police are not in the business of being quoted, you need to provide a source for this information, until then it is just Internet speculation, to be kind.



2. He committed the massacre at the PP clinic.

According to CNN and a PP employee NO ONE at the PP clinic was injured, no one. Hardly a massacre at the PP clinic as you claim.


2. His ex-wife said he was anti-abortion, conservative Christian.

Provide the quote, and a link to this info, I have read the news report and didn't find that information. Besides I don't believe him and his wife has anything to do with each other. Besides your statement is a damn smear job. Being anti-abortion or a conservative Christian has absolutely NOTHING to do what this guy did. Using your twisted logic, I can make the claim if you were not so pro-abortion these things wouldn't happen, so you are the one responsible. But that would be ridiculous as is the claim you made.

1. Official says gunman made 'no more baby parts' comment
1a. (CNN)Suspected Colorado Springs Planned Parenthood shooter Robert Lewis Dear mentioned "baby parts" to investigators and in later interviews expressed anti-abortion and anti-government views, a law enforcement official briefed on the investigation told CNN."
Source: Colorado shooting suspect spoke of 'baby parts' - CNN.com

2. You don't call it a massacre? Wow. Six officers shot, one killed, two others killed and four more civilian casualties. "Hardly a massacre."

The only reason clinic workers were saved was they has a safe room with bullet proof vests, and he couldn't advance much further. He opened fire on the clinic.

"The encounter could be heard in transfixing detail on the police scanner, with the authorities describing how they had driven a BearCat armored vehicle into the Planned Parenthood building, smashing through two sets of doors into the lobby and rescuing some of those inside.

“We’re exchanging gunfire,” one officer said on the radio. “We are trying to keep him pinned down.”

“Put gunfire through the walls,” came a reply. “Whatever, we got to stop this guy.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/28/us/colorado-planned-parenthood-shooting.html

3. 'Planned Parenthood attacker' was once a happily married father

1. so the statement made by the shooter is relayed to us second hand? Do police officers give out statements made by defendents? Really?

2. Not one person injuried at PP, that part is hardly a massacre at PP which was the statement implying that people were murdered at PP. Whether or not they escaped to a "safe" room, which they all did not, no one was killed at PP. As you point out, who did they rescue with the bear cat if they all were in the safe room?

The truth is that this guy has no more of an idea who he was attacking then we do. PP may have been his target because he needed a target but if it were he certainly didn't hurt anyone at the clinic, employees and patients. At least as reported by CNN.

The left's hope that it was a white, Christian, conservative, gun nut is circling the drain

 

[Freewill]

How do we know he's anti-abortion? How many people inside the clinic did he kill?

1. His comment "no more baby parts" after the shooting..
2. He committed the massacre at the PP clinic.
2. His ex-wife said he was anti-abortion, conservative Christian.

1. His comment "no more baby parts" after the shooting..

The police are not in the business of being quoted, you need to provide a source for this information, until then it is just Internet speculation, to be kind.



2. He committed the massacre at the PP clinic.

According to CNN and a PP employee NO ONE at the PP clinic was injured, no one. Hardly a massacre at the PP clinic as you claim.


2. His ex-wife said he was anti-abortion, conservative Christian.

Provide the quote, and a link to this info, I have read the news report and didn't find that information. Besides I don't believe him and his wife has anything to do with each other. Besides your statement is a damn smear job. Being anti-abortion or a conservative Christian has absolutely NOTHING to do what this guy did. Using your twisted logic, I can make the claim if you were not so pro-abortion these things wouldn't happen, so you are the one responsible. But that would be ridiculous as is the claim you made.

1. Official says gunman made 'no more baby parts' comment
1a. (CNN)Suspected Colorado Springs Planned Parenthood shooter Robert Lewis Dear mentioned "baby parts" to investigators and in later interviews expressed anti-abortion and anti-government views, a law enforcement official briefed on the investigation told CNN."
Source: Colorado shooting suspect spoke of 'baby parts' - CNN.com

2. You don't call it a massacre? Wow. Six officers shot, one killed, two others killed and four more civilian casualties. "Hardly a massacre."

The only reason clinic workers were saved was they has a safe room with bullet proof vests, and he couldn't advance much further. He opened fire on the clinic.

"The encounter could be heard in transfixing detail on the police scanner, with the authorities describing how they had driven a BearCat armored vehicle into the Planned Parenthood building, smashing through two sets of doors into the lobby and rescuing some of those inside.

“We’re exchanging gunfire,” one officer said on the radio. “We are trying to keep him pinned down.”

“Put gunfire through the walls,” came a reply. “Whatever, we got to stop this guy.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/28/us/colorado-planned-parenthood-shooting.html

3. 'Planned Parenthood attacker' was once a happily married father

1. so the statement made by the shooter is relayed to us second hand? Do police officers give out statements made by defendents? Really?

2. Not one person injuried at PP, that part is hardly a massacre at PP which was the statement implying that people were murdered at PP. Whether or not they escaped to a "safe" room, which they all did not, no one was killed at PP. As you point out, who did they rescue with the bear cat if they all were in the safe room?

The truth is that this guy has no more of an idea who he was attacking then we do. PP may have been his target because he needed a target but if it were he certainly didn't hurt anyone at the clinic, employees and patients. At least as reported by CNN.

The left's hope that it was a white, Christian, conservative, gun nut is circling the drain

Have we even found out what type of gun he was using? I might be wrong but it sounds like a hunting rifle.

 

[paperview]

1. so the statement made by the shooter is relayed to us second hand? Do police officers give out statements made by defendents? Really?

2. Not one person injuried at PP, that part is hardly a massacre at PP which was the statement implying that people were murdered at PP. Whether or not they escaped to a "safe" room, which they all did not, no one was killed at PP. As you point out, who did they rescue with the bear cat if they all were in the safe room?

The truth is that this guy has no more of an idea who he was attacking then we do. PP may have been his target because he needed a target but if it were he certainly didn't hurt anyone at the clinic, employees and patients. At least as reported by CNN.

OK. I didn't realize I was talking to such an idiot.

 

[Vigilante]

'Planned Parenthood Shooter' Identifies as Unaffiliated Voter, Female
Much to the consternation of liberals.

The Gateway Pundit is reporting information today which suggests that, contrary to the dearest hopes of rush-to-judgment liberals, the so-called Planned Parenthood shooter is not a right-winger driven to "domestic terrorism" by "anti-Planned Parenthood rhetoric."

The man who killed three, including Police Officer Garrett Swasey, and wounded several more in a shootout yesterday that ended in a Planned Parenthood office in Colorado Springs, has been identified as 57-year-old Coloradan Robert Lewis Dear, originally from South Carolina.

Before any verified details about the shooter or the incident came to light, the left - never letting a crisis go to waste - decided to run with the narrative that the shooter was at Planned Parenthood to kill workers there in response to the shocking series of undercover videos earlier this year. Those videos exposed the organization's abhorrent practices and attitudes toward aborted fetuses. Twitchy has some vile examples of the left's accusatory rhetoric on social media here. So far there is no evidence that Planned Parenthood was Dear's target, nor is there any indication of a motive.

Pundit has more details about Dear:

'Planned Parenthood Shooter' Identifies as Unaffiliated Voter, Female

 

[Vigilante]

OK. I didn't realize I was talking to such an idiot.

Just keep talking to yourself.... idiot!

 

[Valerie]

A crazy loser that used GOP faux rage to justify killing people.

i wonder if he ever posted among us cuz his stoopid rhetoric sounds so familiar!

 

[SassyIrishLass]

1. His comment "no more baby parts" after the shooting..
2. He committed the massacre at the PP clinic.
2. His ex-wife said he was anti-abortion, conservative Christian.

1. His comment "no more baby parts" after the shooting..

The police are not in the business of being quoted, you need to provide a source for this information, until then it is just Internet speculation, to be kind.



2. He committed the massacre at the PP clinic.

According to CNN and a PP employee NO ONE at the PP clinic was injured, no one. Hardly a massacre at the PP clinic as you claim.


2. His ex-wife said he was anti-abortion, conservative Christian.

Provide the quote, and a link to this info, I have read the news report and didn't find that information. Besides I don't believe him and his wife has anything to do with each other. Besides your statement is a damn smear job. Being anti-abortion or a conservative Christian has absolutely NOTHING to do what this guy did. Using your twisted logic, I can make the claim if you were not so pro-abortion these things wouldn't happen, so you are the one responsible. But that would be ridiculous as is the claim you made.

1. Official says gunman made 'no more baby parts' comment
1a. (CNN)Suspected Colorado Springs Planned Parenthood shooter Robert Lewis Dear mentioned "baby parts" to investigators and in later interviews expressed anti-abortion and anti-government views, a law enforcement official briefed on the investigation told CNN."
Source: Colorado shooting suspect spoke of 'baby parts' - CNN.com

2. You don't call it a massacre? Wow. Six officers shot, one killed, two others killed and four more civilian casualties. "Hardly a massacre."

The only reason clinic workers were saved was they has a safe room with bullet proof vests, and he couldn't advance much further. He opened fire on the clinic.

"The encounter could be heard in transfixing detail on the police scanner, with the authorities describing how they had driven a BearCat armored vehicle into the Planned Parenthood building, smashing through two sets of doors into the lobby and rescuing some of those inside.

“We’re exchanging gunfire,” one officer said on the radio. “We are trying to keep him pinned down.”

“Put gunfire through the walls,” came a reply. “Whatever, we got to stop this guy.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/28/us/colorado-planned-parenthood-shooting.html

3. 'Planned Parenthood attacker' was once a happily married father

1. so the statement made by the shooter is relayed to us second hand? Do police officers give out statements made by defendents? Really?

2. Not one person injuried at PP, that part is hardly a massacre at PP which was the statement implying that people were murdered at PP. Whether or not they escaped to a "safe" room, which they all did not, no one was killed at PP. As you point out, who did they rescue with the bear cat if they all were in the safe room?

The truth is that this guy has no more of an idea who he was attacking then we do. PP may have been his target because he needed a target but if it were he certainly didn't hurt anyone at the clinic, employees and patients. At least as reported by CNN.

The left's hope that it was a white, Christian, conservative, gun nut is circling the drain

Have we even found out what type of gun he was using? I might be wrong but it sounds like a hunting rifle.

I haven't read anything, some loon said it was an AK-47 but they always assume it was an "assault rifle"

 

[Vigilante]

• Colorado shooter identifies as woman in voter registration
  Washington Examiner ^ | November 28, 2015 | Rudy Takala
  A voter registration file indicates that the shooter who allegedly killed three in Colorado Springs on Friday identifies as a woman with no party affiliation. The file indicates that Robert Lewis Dear, Jr. of Hartsel, Colo., registered to vote in Park County on Oct. 17, 2014. Dear's party affiliation is UAF, which is used to mean unaffiliated or independent, and selected "female" for gender. The genealogy website "Colorado Voters," which works by pulling public voter lists, has Dear's voter registration file posted online......

 

[Iceweasel]

He was anti-a lot of things. Using your simple binary thought process you can blame it on pot too. The tinfoil is on your head.

We know he was anti-abortion.

How do we know he's anti-abortion? How many people inside the clinic did he kill?

1. His comment "no more baby parts" after the shooting..
2. He committed the massacre at the PP clinic.
2. His ex-wife said he was anti-abortion, conservative Christian.

No, she said he went off the deep end after the divorce and got into pot and sado-masichism. That's a conservative Christian in your pea brain?

Yes, it is. Cons usually practice what they preach against.

Dims think so. Because they are dims.

 

[Freewill]

1. His comment "no more baby parts" after the shooting..

The police are not in the business of being quoted, you need to provide a source for this information, until then it is just Internet speculation, to be kind.



2. He committed the massacre at the PP clinic.

According to CNN and a PP employee NO ONE at the PP clinic was injured, no one. Hardly a massacre at the PP clinic as you claim.


2. His ex-wife said he was anti-abortion, conservative Christian.

Provide the quote, and a link to this info, I have read the news report and didn't find that information. Besides I don't believe him and his wife has anything to do with each other. Besides your statement is a damn smear job. Being anti-abortion or a conservative Christian has absolutely NOTHING to do what this guy did. Using your twisted logic, I can make the claim if you were not so pro-abortion these things wouldn't happen, so you are the one responsible. But that would be ridiculous as is the claim you made.

1. Official says gunman made 'no more baby parts' comment
1a. (CNN)Suspected Colorado Springs Planned Parenthood shooter Robert Lewis Dear mentioned "baby parts" to investigators and in later interviews expressed anti-abortion and anti-government views, a law enforcement official briefed on the investigation told CNN."
Source: Colorado shooting suspect spoke of 'baby parts' - CNN.com

2. You don't call it a massacre? Wow. Six officers shot, one killed, two others killed and four more civilian casualties. "Hardly a massacre."

The only reason clinic workers were saved was they has a safe room with bullet proof vests, and he couldn't advance much further. He opened fire on the clinic.

"The encounter could be heard in transfixing detail on the police scanner, with the authorities describing how they had driven a BearCat armored vehicle into the Planned Parenthood building, smashing through two sets of doors into the lobby and rescuing some of those inside.

“We’re exchanging gunfire,” one officer said on the radio. “We are trying to keep him pinned down.”

“Put gunfire through the walls,” came a reply. “Whatever, we got to stop this guy.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/28/us/colorado-planned-parenthood-shooting.html

3. 'Planned Parenthood attacker' was once a happily married father

1. so the statement made by the shooter is relayed to us second hand? Do police officers give out statements made by defendents? Really?

2. Not one person injuried at PP, that part is hardly a massacre at PP which was the statement implying that people were murdered at PP. Whether or not they escaped to a "safe" room, which they all did not, no one was killed at PP. As you point out, who did they rescue with the bear cat if they all were in the safe room?

The truth is that this guy has no more of an idea who he was attacking then we do. PP may have been his target because he needed a target but if it were he certainly didn't hurt anyone at the clinic, employees and patients. At least as reported by CNN.

The left's hope that it was a white, Christian, conservative, gun nut is circling the drain

Have we even found out what type of gun he was using? I might be wrong but it sounds like a hunting rifle.

I haven't read anything, some loon said it was an AK-47 but they always assume it was an "assault rifle"

If I read it correctly, the guy that was shot at in the car said he didn't think it was an auto or semi-auto because of the time delay between shots. But then again, time might have expanded do to him crapping his pants.

 

[Freewill]

• Colorado shooter identifies as woman in voter registration
  Washington Examiner ^ | November 28, 2015 | Rudy Takala
  A voter registration file indicates that the shooter who allegedly killed three in Colorado Springs on Friday identifies as a woman with no party affiliation. The file indicates that Robert Lewis Dear, Jr. of Hartsel, Colo., registered to vote in Park County on Oct. 17, 2014. Dear's party affiliation is UAF, which is used to mean unaffiliated or independent, and selected "female" for gender. The genealogy website "Colorado Voters," which works by pulling public voter lists, has Dear's voter registration file posted online......

How is this relevant?

 

[koshergrl]

Anti-Obama, tin-foil hatter afraid the gov't is out to get him, shooting up people at a PP clinic and saying afterwards "no more baby parts."

Hard to say where his leanings are.

He was anti-a lot of things. Using your simple binary thought process you can blame it on pot too. The tinfoil is on your head.

We know he was anti-abortion.

How do we know he's anti-abortion? How many people inside the clinic did he kill?

1. His comment "no more baby parts" after the shooting..
2. He committed the massacre at the PP clinic.
2. His ex-wife said he was anti-abortion, conservative Christian.

No, she said he went off the deep end after the divorce and got into pot and sado-masichism. That's a conservative Christian in your pea brain?

I think it's the fact that he's anti obama, according to one neighbor who spoke to him one time. OBVIOUSLY he's a Christian, therefore.

 

[Freewill]

1. so the statement made by the shooter is relayed to us second hand? Do police officers give out statements made by defendents? Really?

2. Not one person injuried at PP, that part is hardly a massacre at PP which was the statement implying that people were murdered at PP. Whether or not they escaped to a "safe" room, which they all did not, no one was killed at PP. As you point out, who did they rescue with the bear cat if they all were in the safe room?

The truth is that this guy has no more of an idea who he was attacking then we do. PP may have been his target because he needed a target but if it were he certainly didn't hurt anyone at the clinic, employees and patients. At least as reported by CNN.

OK. I didn't realize I was talking to such an idiot.

In a way I wish we were talking, instead of you playing Internet bully.

 

[paperview]

Ex-wife said he's a christian, who read the bible from cover to cover.

 

[paperview]

1. so the statement made by the shooter is relayed to us second hand? Do police officers give out statements made by defendents? Really?

2. Not one person injuried at PP, that part is hardly a massacre at PP which was the statement implying that people were murdered at PP. Whether or not they escaped to a "safe" room, which they all did not, no one was killed at PP. As you point out, who did they rescue with the bear cat if they all were in the safe room?

The truth is that this guy has no more of an idea who he was attacking then we do. PP may have been his target because he needed a target but if it were he certainly didn't hurt anyone at the clinic, employees and patients. At least as reported by CNN.

OK. I didn't realize I was talking to such an idiot.

In a way I wish we were talking, instead of you playing Internet bully.

Hard to talk with someone who thinks LEO's relaying what the shooter said should be dismissed, and doesn't realize LEO's relay information about people's statements after they are in custody all the time.

Or that you don;t think PP was the target, and that it wasn't a massacre - even though there were 12 casualties, half of them cops.

 

[Iceweasel]

Ex-wife said he's a christian, who read the bible from cover to cover.

And? I know a lot of liberals that are Christian. Many are not white. The point is the world is bigger than your pea brain.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

1. Official says gunman made 'no more baby parts' comment
1a. (CNN)Suspected Colorado Springs Planned Parenthood shooter Robert Lewis Dear mentioned "baby parts" to investigators and in later interviews expressed anti-abortion and anti-government views, a law enforcement official briefed on the investigation told CNN."
Source: Colorado shooting suspect spoke of 'baby parts' - CNN.com

2. You don't call it a massacre? Wow. Six officers shot, one killed, two others killed and four more civilian casualties. "Hardly a massacre."

The only reason clinic workers were saved was they has a safe room with bullet proof vests, and he couldn't advance much further. He opened fire on the clinic.

"The encounter could be heard in transfixing detail on the police scanner, with the authorities describing how they had driven a BearCat armored vehicle into the Planned Parenthood building, smashing through two sets of doors into the lobby and rescuing some of those inside.

“We’re exchanging gunfire,” one officer said on the radio. “We are trying to keep him pinned down.”

“Put gunfire through the walls,” came a reply. “Whatever, we got to stop this guy.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/28/us/colorado-planned-parenthood-shooting.html

3. 'Planned Parenthood attacker' was once a happily married father

1. so the statement made by the shooter is relayed to us second hand? Do police officers give out statements made by defendents? Really?

2. Not one person injuried at PP, that part is hardly a massacre at PP which was the statement implying that people were murdered at PP. Whether or not they escaped to a "safe" room, which they all did not, no one was killed at PP. As you point out, who did they rescue with the bear cat if they all were in the safe room?

The truth is that this guy has no more of an idea who he was attacking then we do. PP may have been his target because he needed a target but if it were he certainly didn't hurt anyone at the clinic, employees and patients. At least as reported by CNN.

The left's hope that it was a white, Christian, conservative, gun nut is circling the drain

Have we even found out what type of gun he was using? I might be wrong but it sounds like a hunting rifle.

I haven't read anything, some loon said it was an AK-47 but they always assume it was an "assault rifle"

If I read it correctly, the guy that was shot at in the car said he didn't think it was an auto or semi-auto because of the time delay between shots. But then again, time might have expanded do to him crapping his pants.

Anti gunners think a pop tart eaten into the shape of a gun is an assault rifle

 

[Freewill]

1. so the statement made by the shooter is relayed to us second hand? Do police officers give out statements made by defendents? Really?

2. Not one person injuried at PP, that part is hardly a massacre at PP which was the statement implying that people were murdered at PP. Whether or not they escaped to a "safe" room, which they all did not, no one was killed at PP. As you point out, who did they rescue with the bear cat if they all were in the safe room?

The truth is that this guy has no more of an idea who he was attacking then we do. PP may have been his target because he needed a target but if it were he certainly didn't hurt anyone at the clinic, employees and patients. At least as reported by CNN.

OK. I didn't realize I was talking to such an idiot.

In a way I wish we were talking, instead of you playing Internet bully.

Hard to talk with someone who thinks LEO's relaying what the shooter said should be dismissed, and doesn't realize LEO's relay information about people's statements after they are in custody all the time.

Or that you don;t think PP was the target, and that it wasn't a massacre - even though there were 12 casualties, half of them cops.

I didn't say that what the LEO related was true. I am saying that the LEOs didn't relay that information, if they did then i want to hear them say it not some journalist trying to make news.

 

[paperview]

I didn't say that what the LEO related was true. I am saying that the LEOs didn't relay that information, if they did then i want to hear them say it not some journalist trying to make news.

You see folks. ^

This is what I'm talking about.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Ex-wife said he's a christian, who read the bible from cover to cover.

And? I know a lot of liberals that are Christian. Many are not white. The point is the world is bigger than your pea brain.

And the same is true if he read the Koran from cover to cover, where if that were the case you and others on the right would be screaming about 'Muslims,' 'ISIS,' 'terrorism,' 'refugees,' and propagating your usual lies about all Muslims being 'terrorists' and Islam being a 'terrorist religion.'

That the Planned Parenthood shooter was a Christian doesn't mean all Christians are 'terrorists,' or that Christianity is a 'terrorist religion.'

You and others on the right can't have it both ways – if Christians who commit acts of terror aren't representative of all Christians and Christianity as a religion as a whole, then the same is true when a Muslim commits an act of terror.