Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
Seems that states legalizing federally illegal substances are running into problems:
So CA's leadership is saying "look, we're going to break the law and the fed had better get it's act together and legalize what we've decided to illegally do" Technically, CA leaders should have never approved legalization for the ballot to even be voted on. Which was within their powers (and obligation) to deny given federal regulations. Now they're saying "we're doublin' down on being outlaws...bitches!"
In response to that hubris it seems the fed has these states by the short hairs inasmuch as their state tax forms must also match the federal ones... ...and the banks...oh yeah, the banks...
...it seems that the fed is telling banks that get FDIC coverage that doing business with federally-illegal drugs is a no-no.
Ooopsies! So now those states fallback is "let's convince the fed to pull pot off the controlled substance list"? What happens when a state wants to grow opium latex for sale? Petition the fed on that too?
This could get interesting. I mean, do you also file federal taxes for hits you did for the mob and the money they paid you? Where does the fed draw the line at revenue from what it considers crime? And if the fed takes crime money, is that legal for the fed to do?
Discuss.
California treasurer wants the state to study a public bank option for pot businesses
along with looking into the creation of a public bank, another of the recommendations from Chiang’s group is to form a multistate group to lobby Congress to ease federal restrictions on cannabis.
“A definitive, bulletproof solution will remain elusive” without federal deregulation, Chiang said at a news conference Tuesday announcing the recommendations. “That is not an excuse for inaction.”
So CA's leadership is saying "look, we're going to break the law and the fed had better get it's act together and legalize what we've decided to illegally do" Technically, CA leaders should have never approved legalization for the ballot to even be voted on. Which was within their powers (and obligation) to deny given federal regulations. Now they're saying "we're doublin' down on being outlaws...bitches!"
In response to that hubris it seems the fed has these states by the short hairs inasmuch as their state tax forms must also match the federal ones... ...and the banks...oh yeah, the banks...
...it seems that the fed is telling banks that get FDIC coverage that doing business with federally-illegal drugs is a no-no.
Ooopsies! So now those states fallback is "let's convince the fed to pull pot off the controlled substance list"? What happens when a state wants to grow opium latex for sale? Petition the fed on that too?
This could get interesting. I mean, do you also file federal taxes for hits you did for the mob and the money they paid you? Where does the fed draw the line at revenue from what it considers crime? And if the fed takes crime money, is that legal for the fed to do?
Discuss.
Last edited: