Post-Birth Abortion

This is why the fucking idiot President OPPOSED the born alive infant protection act. He was concerned that a law that protected a just born "failed abortion" might somehow turn into a slippery slope that would "qualify" the unfettered alleged "right" of women to have abortions on demand.

Yes. That's how much of a sick fuck the incumbent is.
 
The way things appear today I think abortions should be legal until the "baby" is about 16 years.By that age you can generally determine if the "baby" is going to grow up meathead, tranny, Nazi or religious nutbag.
 
Dr Ezekiel Emannuel, brother of Rahm, and advisor to the Idiot-In-Chief on healthcare believes that rationing will be essential in the wonderful universal health care system that the left salivate over. His considered opinion included:

The over 65s being the bottom of the list.
Children under the age of 3 are not "fully formed human beings" (his words, not mine) and are therefore at the bottom of the list, along with the over 65s.

That's what the left worship. Picking not on need but on 'value'. Sick freaks.
 
‘After-birth abortion’: Can they be serious? - She The People - The Washington Post

Two ethicists in the Journal of Medical Ethics.

This is the road pro-lifers knew was coming.

A number of abortion doctors have been murdered by pro-lifers, therefore all pro-lifers support the murder of abortion doctors. Those who are pro-choice should have seen this coming. Now all those who are pro-choice must fear for their lives because it is a fact that all pro-lifers want to kill those who are pro-choice. This is the road pro-choicers knew was coming.
 
The total number of abortion providers to date is 8. George Tiller is the most well known.

The number of doctors arrested for murder connected with providing abortions might be in the hundreds.
 
‘After-birth abortion’: Can they be serious? - She The People - The Washington Post

Two ethicists in the Journal of Medical Ethics.

This is the road pro-lifers knew was coming.

Don't look now, but it's not just those crazy Aussies pushing this crap.

Taking Life: Humans, by Peter Singer

peter singer is lying scum who wrote the book Animal Liberation and has stated catagoricaly that it is ok to lie to advance your agenda.
 
‘After-birth abortion’: Can they be serious? - She The People - The Washington Post

Two ethicists in the Journal of Medical Ethics.

This is the road pro-lifers knew was coming.

A number of abortion doctors have been murdered by pro-lifers, therefore all pro-lifers support the murder of abortion doctors. Those who are pro-choice should have seen this coming. Now all those who are pro-choice must fear for their lives because it is a fact that all pro-lifers want to kill those who are pro-choice. This is the road pro-choicers knew was coming.
:cuckoo:

How many abortion doctors have been killed?

and
"therefore ALL pro-lifers support murder"????

:eusa_hand:
 
‘After-birth abortion’: Can they be serious? - She The People - The Washington Post

Two ethicists in the Journal of Medical Ethics.

This is the road pro-lifers knew was coming.

Don't look now, but it's not just those crazy Aussies pushing this crap.

Taking Life: Humans, by Peter Singer

peter singer is lying scum who wrote the book Animal Liberation and has stated catagoricaly that it is ok to lie to advance your agenda.

He's also in a position to infect young minds with his poison. Which he does while nailing down a nice salary for his efforts.
He's typical of a large segment of American academia.
 
When republicans and conservatives support living children I'll take them serious, until then they remain empty moralists who only preach. All these constant threads are, is holier than thou BS when your actions contradict your presumed morals.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/clean-debate-zone/241999-abortion-rape-question-4.html#post5859215

"Having ensured that children will be born through their anti-abortion legislation, House Republicans have now ensured those children will be deprived of proper nutrition once they come into the world, ensuring that 300,000 millionaires will have more money in their pockets at the expense of nearly 500,000 women and children. Republicans on the House Appropriations Committee approved the appropriations bill which reduces WIC funding from $6.73 billion this year to $5.90 billion in 2012. The bill will also cut $38 million from the Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CSIP), as well as $63 million from the Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAB). If the Republicans had been truly interested in slashing the federal budget they could have saved more money by ending tax cuts for the rich or slashing subsidies to the oil companies. Instead they starve the infants and elderly. Why do I say that? WIC could be fully funded at the cost of just one week of Bush’s tax cuts for millionaires. According to the Center for American Progress, “one day’s worth of millionaire tax cuts would feed needy families for a year.”" The Consequences of Evil - Republican Legislation Since 2010


http://www.usmessageboard.com/healt...-a-heartbeat-is-detectable-4.html#post3814184
http://www.usmessageboard.com/healt...e-with-a-history-of-trauma-5.html#post4730878

"In the 1950s, about a million illegal abortions a year were performed in the U.S., and over a thousand women died each year as a result. Women who were victims of botched or unsanitary abortions came in desperation to hospital emergency wards, where some died of widespread abdominal infections. Many women who recovered from such infections found themselves sterile or chronically and painfully ill. The enormous emotional stress often lasted a long time." HISTORY OF ABORTION
 
When republicans and conservatives support living children I'll take them serious, until then they remain empty moralists who only preach. All these constant threads are, is holier than thou BS when your actions contradict your presumed morals.

* * * *

They do support living children and yet, despite your claim, you don't take them seriously.

So, your post is simply a compound false statement.

"Supporting living children" comes in far more forms than the ones "admitted" by the petty, narrow-minded, self-serving, sanctimonious views of far left wing hacks such as you.
 
Last edited:
Why not? The partial abortion procedure is so finely tuned legally that there is perhaps half a second between the time the baby would have been born but the fetus is (successfully?) stabbed in the back of the head without anesthesia and it's brain's sucked out with some Frankenstein contraption invented by abortionists. Why not cut out all the tension and the covered up cases of manslaughter when the baby accidentally slips out and is killed anyway? Stab them to death on the table on the table, what's the difference? Why not film it so reality show fans can use the grotesque procedure for entertainment disguised as education. Maybe they can bet on how long the baby screams before it is put out of it's misery.
 
Last edited:
The much vilified Catholic church has supported women in trouble for hundreds of years. Say what you want about priests diddling children which is terrible..but if you do you'll be confusing the issue.

There are MANY charities and organizations that help pregnant women and indigent families.

Saying that pro-lifers don't care is complete bullshit.
 
If the baby was already born, Republicans don't care what happens to it. We already know that from their policies.
 
Supporting living children to democrats is to totally remove the responsibility for those children from parents and place it in the hands of the government. Like they do in Cuba.
 
Liberals believe that expecting parents to support their children is unfair. That obligation belongs to the village. The parents are nothing more than occasional baby sitters.
 

Forum List

Back
Top