Discussion in 'Politics' started by rtwngAvngr, Feb 9, 2006.
More worldview shattering gems. from the same article.
Point of Discussion tonight "Naturalistic Nationalism". WTF does that mean?
I don't remember offhand. Do you think the nebulousness of the above term refutes one of the premises of the paper: Positive nationalism exists.
No, not at all. Naturalistic Nationalism would more than likely refer to landscape influencing or building culture, nothing else. Although I didn't know nationalism was being threatened as a result of communist influences. Seems unlikely.
Communism is a destroyer of all existing orders. To the extent that nationalism strengthens any sort of anti-communist, or simply non-communist identity, it is destroyed by communists.
Lefties like Islam, as it's already a totalitarian ideology, which is really what communism is.
You mean good nationalism.
Nationalism and communism have gone hand in hand before.
Is India really a nationalist state to begin with? Aren't there better examples? Like Venezuala, maybe?
I think they like because they can also use it to vilify the west. Crusades anyone? ohh, those poor repressed Muslims.
Right, good nationalism.
I don't see nationalist as an either /or designation. There are levels of it.
There might have been better examples, I concede. I will go abuse myself.
Separate names with a comma.