Poor Turnout For The Sewer Rat

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Sep 23, 2010
7,628
748
205
This means that 143 United Nations member states will not take refugees in the crisis created by the United Nations:

HUNDREDS of thousands of refugees will be granted free access to 50 countries as the global political community agrees to share the burden of the migrant crisis.​

I assume that 143 ambassadors did NOT listen to the Chicago sewer rat’s speech”

National ambassadors could only attend Obama's speech if they promised to pledge their support in advance.​

Shock UN agreement grants thousands of migrants FREE ACCESS to scores of countries
By Patrick Christys
04:22, Wed, Sep 21, 2016 | UPDATED: 07:58, Wed, Sep 21, 2016

Shock UN agreement grants thousands of migrants FREE ACCESS to scores of countries

Question: So how many countries did surrender their immigration policies to United Nations bureaucrats? Answer: I know of one for sure:

In truth, filthy United Nations scum now dictate America’s immigration policies to the point of erasing the line dividing illegal and legal.

It is too late to do anything about the sewer rat except tell him to go live in a totalitarian government after he leaves office. Those of us who prefer freedom in a limited form of government do not have as many choices as does the liar in chief; choices like Iran, China, North Korea, Vietnam, and the always popular Cuba. “Go live there.” is what he should be telling his kind:

Taxation Supports The Private Sector!

I did not have to read the transcript of the sewer rat’s final speech to know what he said. I do know that in his sick worldview national sovereignty means isolationism. He is not, and never was, clever enough to convince Americans that the elimination of every national border followed by mass migrations imposed on every nation by the United Nations will make a better world than will free peoples controlling their own borders.

Finally, there is a silver lining in Obama's dark cloud. The rat's


. . . strategy might have an unintended victim: the U.N.

The willingness of the U.N. to play along with these partisan games will redound negatively on the U.N. Already, it has increased skepticism and disapproval of the U.N. among conservatives and supporters of congressional prerogatives.

According to Gallup, a strong majority of the U.S. public sees the U.N. as doing a “poor job.” By enmeshing the U.N. in U.S. partisan politics, Obama may be entrenching this perspective. Further undermining U.S. support for the U.N. may end up being one of Obama’s more lasting legacies​

Obama’s Use of UN to Advance Partisan Agenda Hurts the Organization Long-Term
Brett Schaefer / September 20, 2016 /

Obama’s Use of UN to Advance Agenda Hurts UN in Long Term
 
It has come down to us against them. Hitlery is them. Stop her from turning this country into a Muslim nightmare. Our children's future is at stake.
“Damn the United States! I wish I may never hear of the United States again!”

So said the enraged antihero of “A Man without a Country,”. . .

XXXXX

At the end Nolan realizes he loves his country more than family. Without his country, he feels he is nothing.​

To The Irish Ram: You nailed it. Us against them. Nothing will make President Hillary Clinton love her country because she despises free people so much she cannot accept anything more important than her globalist vision:

Globalists embrace what [Eric] Hoffer recognized as an “unbounded contempt for history.” The erasure of history inevitably means attacking the past and established institutions possessing history; institutions such as the Church and documents such as the U.S. Constitution. Only the future matters. The present is busy with wreckage of what exists, even if what presently exists has a thousand year or more heritage.

That is because for globalists, the present is a shadow and illusion -- merely a “passageway to the glorious future.” It is a meagre “way station on the road to Utopia…The radical and the reactionary loathe the present.”

September 4, 2016
Globalism: The Religion of Empire
By Fay Voshell

Articles: Globalism: The Religion of Empire

Put every other analysis of Hillary Clinton aside, and you are left with her blindness to the inevitability of certain failure. She failed at everything she ever touched. She is bound to the failures of Obama’s betrayal after betrayal. Every one of those failures pales beside destroying this country before she allows the United Nations to fail.

Hillary’s determination is driven by a single belief: Nothing can allow sovereign nations to finally walk out of the United Nation even if it means nuclear war against Iran, Communist China, North Korea, Russia or a combination of America’s enemies.

I firmly believe that Hillary and her kind always saw a nuclear holocaust worth the price if a stronger, all-powerful, United Nations rises out of the ashes. I can see no other reason for handing Iran, North Korea, and China nuclear capabilities.

NOTE: “If everybody has them nobody will use them.” was the original cover story for treason during those few years America had a monopoly on nuclear weapons.


lead_960.jpg
https://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/img/mt/2015/09/ChinavsUSA/lead_960.jpg?1443108551

Finally, the Thucydides Trap is the flaw in Hillary’s global government thinking:

More than 2,400 years ago, the Athenian historian Thucydides offered a powerful insight: “It was the rise of Athens, and the fear that this inspired in Sparta, that made war inevitable.” Others identified an array of contributing causes of the Peloponnesian War. But Thucydides went to the heart of the matter, focusing on the inexorable, structural stress caused by a rapid shift in the balance of power between two rivals. Note that Thucydides identified two key drivers of this dynamic: the rising power’s growing entitlement, sense of its importance, and demand for greater say and sway, on the one hand, and the fear, insecurity, and determination to defend the status quo this engenders in the established power, on the other.​

The Thucydides Trap: Are the U.S. and China Headed for War?
Graham Allison Sep 24, 2015

The Thucydides Trap: Are the U.S. and China Headed for War?

Hillary & Company are convinced that all of the power held by an international organization will prevent cross-border wars. Even if you end cross-border wars you can be certain that an omnipotent United Nations will slaughter the weak and disfranchised in the billions. The justification is already in place:

1. Save the planet from global warming.

2. Save the human race from overpopulation.

The real tragedy is that America’s Founders provided the solution to cross-border wars: A world full of severely limited governments. That is the solution Hillary lacks the intelligence to grasp.

Note that America’s Founders could not foresee totalitarian governments murdering their own people in the tens of millions; nevertheless, the limited government they created prevents it. Hillary will go in the other direction with a vengeance.
 
Last edited:
This means that 143 United Nations member states will not take refugees in the crisis created by the United Nations:

HUNDREDS of thousands of refugees will be granted free access to 50 countries as the global political community agrees to share the burden of the migrant crisis.​

I assume that 143 ambassadors did NOT listen to the Chicago sewer rat’s speech”

National ambassadors could only attend Obama's speech if they promised to pledge their support in advance.​

Shock UN agreement grants thousands of migrants FREE ACCESS to scores of countries
By Patrick Christys
04:22, Wed, Sep 21, 2016 | UPDATED: 07:58, Wed, Sep 21, 2016

Shock UN agreement grants thousands of migrants FREE ACCESS to scores of countries

Question: So how many countries did surrender their immigration policies to United Nations bureaucrats? Answer: I know of one for sure:

In truth, filthy United Nations scum now dictate America’s immigration policies to the point of erasing the line dividing illegal and legal.

It is too late to do anything about the sewer rat except tell him to go live in a totalitarian government after he leaves office. Those of us who prefer freedom in a limited form of government do not have as many choices as does the liar in chief; choices like Iran, China, North Korea, Vietnam, and the always popular Cuba. “Go live there.” is what he should be telling his kind:

Taxation Supports The Private Sector!

I did not have to read the transcript of the sewer rat’s final speech to know what he said. I do know that in his sick worldview national sovereignty means isolationism. He is not, and never was, clever enough to convince Americans that the elimination of every national border followed by mass migrations imposed on every nation by the United Nations will make a better world than will free peoples controlling their own borders.

Finally, there is a silver lining in Obama's dark cloud. The rat's


. . . strategy might have an unintended victim: the U.N.

The willingness of the U.N. to play along with these partisan games will redound negatively on the U.N. Already, it has increased skepticism and disapproval of the U.N. among conservatives and supporters of congressional prerogatives.

According to Gallup, a strong majority of the U.S. public sees the U.N. as doing a “poor job.” By enmeshing the U.N. in U.S. partisan politics, Obama may be entrenching this perspective. Further undermining U.S. support for the U.N. may end up being one of Obama’s more lasting legacies​

Obama’s Use of UN to Advance Partisan Agenda Hurts the Organization Long-Term
Brett Schaefer / September 20, 2016 /

Obama’s Use of UN to Advance Agenda Hurts UN in Long Term
Obama's Dark Cloud?????

No one has had a darker cloud than Trump.
 
Put every other analysis of Hillary Clinton aside, and you are left with her blindness to the inevitability of certain failure.
I firmly believe that Hillary and her kind always saw a nuclear holocaust worth the price if a stronger, all-powerful, United Nations rises out of the ashes.
Thank You Charles Hurt:

nuclear-option.jpg
http://media.breitbart.com/media/2014/12/nuclear-option.jpg

The Nuclear Option: Hillary Clinton Has Fought the War on Terror — And Failed
by Charles Hurt
21 Sep 2016

[*BN*]The Nuclear Option[*]: Hillary Clinton Has Fought the War on Terror - And Failed - Breitbart
 
The aftermath commentary for his United Nations speech was even poorer than the speech itself. A majority of one did turnout. David Ignatius should be ashamed of himself if he truly believes the crap he laid down:

“He has been a creature of light at a time when the world has been darkening,” says David Ignatius.

Jesus? Try again. Ignatius is talking about President Obama. About his “sterling assets,” his “idealism,” his “moral clarity,” his “calm intellect,” his “personal and polyphonous” address to the United Nations General Assembly, his “valedictory” speech in defense of the “liberal international order at a time when it’s under severe stress around the world.”​

Make Black Helicopters Great Again
Column: My big problem with President Obama’s U.N. speech
BY: Matthew Continetti
September 23, 2016 5:00 am

Make Black Helicopters Great Again

I was unfamiliar with Ignatius so I looked him up. Surprise! Surprise! He does believe the crap he writes:

David R. Ignatius (May 26, 1950), is an American journalist and novelist. He is an associate editor and columnist for The Washington Post. He also co-hosts PostGlobal, an online discussion of international issues at Washingtonpost.com, with Fareed Zakaria. He has written nine novels, including Body of Lies, which director Ridley Scott adapted into a film. He is a former Adjunct Lecturer at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University and currently Senior Fellow to the Future of Diplomacy Program. He has received numerous honors, including the Legion of Honor from the French Republic, the Urbino World Press Award from the Italian Republic, and a lifetime achievement award from the International Committee for Foreign Journalism.

David Ignatius - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Coyotes: Ten Things To Remember About Smugglers
By Camilo Vargas
Sep 12, 2014

Coyotes: The Smugglers That Bring Kids To The Border

Call this one a new twist on coyotes:

FAKE%20EMBASSY

The fake embassy in Accra, Ghana, operated for a decade issuing illegal visas. U.S. Department of State photo
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nat...ure118758208/ALTERNATES/FREE_480/FAKE EMBASSY

Every Monday, Tuesday and Friday for the past decade, a pink building in Accra, the capital city of Ghana, flew an American flag from 7 a.m. to 12 p.m.

Inside, a portrait of President Barack Obama hung on the wall, and people claiming to be consulate workers speaking English sold visas to the U.S., India and other countries to rural Ghanaians for $6,000 apiece.​

December 3, 2016 9:25 PM
For 10 years, a fake U.S. embassy in Ghana sold illegal visas and ID papers
By Greg Hadley

For 10 years, a fake U.S. embassy in Ghana sold illegal visas and ID papers

NOTE: Taqiyya the Liar was president for 8 of the 10 years those phoney documents were being sold in plain sight.

Best bet.

If one of the suckers ends up in Obama’s Supreme Court their fake documents will be ruled legitimate. The sewer rat would call it a growth industry.
 

Forum List

Back
Top