poor Hillary ...

:wtf:

Damn, since you're a Hillary supporter, doesn't your ass just flame from the hypocrisy of this statement?

Nope. She's done a few things that are shifty....but within normal range for a politician. The rest of your bullshit claims are just bullshit.

Trump isn't denying any of the clams against him. He's just waving them away and his fans are happy to have him do it.

Hillary's in the "normal range for a politician." You're unreal

Sure she is. What's the worst verifiable thing that she has done, in your opinion?

What do you mean by "worst thing?" There are different measurements for that.

Taking the lead on publicly destroying victims of her sexual predator husband who dared to speak out would certainly be the most personally despicable

Killing four people because it was politically inconvenient to save them and putting classified e-mails on private servers exposing secret and top secret information to our nations worst enemies was certainly the most dangerous.

Though to me, things like lying she was named after someone no one heard of until she was six, that she came under sniper fire in Bosnia and that she couldn't breathe when she found out her husband had had "sexual relations with that woman" are probably the most scary because they are stupid lies that didn't help her, the sign of a compulsive liar

First two examples. Not verified.

Last paragraph. How AWFUL!

In thinking it through, I'm going to go with selling time slots on her schedule as Secretary of State for donations to the Clinton Foundation. That hits every level of corruption.

You don't think she's corrupt, you're an unbelievable Democrat whore. You'd believe anything. And obviously this isn't your standard for Trump.

On the last paragraph, I told you why I consider it bad, dumb ass. I said it wasn't the magnitude of what she did but what it indicates. Reading comprehension issues?
 
Nope. She's done a few things that are shifty....but within normal range for a politician. The rest of your bullshit claims are just bullshit.

Trump isn't denying any of the clams against him. He's just waving them away and his fans are happy to have him do it.

Hillary's in the "normal range for a politician." You're unreal

Sure she is. What's the worst verifiable thing that she has done, in your opinion?

What do you mean by "worst thing?" There are different measurements for that.

Taking the lead on publicly destroying victims of her sexual predator husband who dared to speak out would certainly be the most personally despicable

Killing four people because it was politically inconvenient to save them and putting classified e-mails on private servers exposing secret and top secret information to our nations worst enemies was certainly the most dangerous.

Though to me, things like lying she was named after someone no one heard of until she was six, that she came under sniper fire in Bosnia and that she couldn't breathe when she found out her husband had had "sexual relations with that woman" are probably the most scary because they are stupid lies that didn't help her, the sign of a compulsive liar

First two examples. Not verified.

Last paragraph. How AWFUL!

In thinking it through, I'm going to go with selling time slots on her schedule as Secretary of State for donations to the Clinton Foundation. That hits every level of corruption.

You don't think she's corrupt, you're an unbelievable Democrat whore. You'd believe anything. And obviously this isn't your standard for Trump.

On the last paragraph, I told you why I consider it bad, dumb ass. I said it wasn't the magnitude of what she did but what it indicates. Reading comprehension issues?

She didn't sell time slots for anything. You are a dupe.
 
Yes, clearly the best way to know what's funny is to ask the person who was made fun of ...

Silly nutter.


Theres nothing silly. She is a pathological liar.


but you could care less if Trump tells more lies than Clinton ... that not silly, iy makes you and the rest of the Trumpbots pathological hypocrties.

ya know, LOSERS.

I'm not a partisan hack for either party like you are, I oppose them both. I just laugh at you. Haven't seen any of my dozen or so anti-Trump threads, lassy? Seriously? With all the time you spend on the site? What's the problem? Learning disability?

Of the two, which would you least like to see win?

I really don't care, they are both going to be a disaster
 
Hillary's in the "normal range for a politician." You're unreal

Sure she is. What's the worst verifiable thing that she has done, in your opinion?

What do you mean by "worst thing?" There are different measurements for that.

Taking the lead on publicly destroying victims of her sexual predator husband who dared to speak out would certainly be the most personally despicable

Killing four people because it was politically inconvenient to save them and putting classified e-mails on private servers exposing secret and top secret information to our nations worst enemies was certainly the most dangerous.

Though to me, things like lying she was named after someone no one heard of until she was six, that she came under sniper fire in Bosnia and that she couldn't breathe when she found out her husband had had "sexual relations with that woman" are probably the most scary because they are stupid lies that didn't help her, the sign of a compulsive liar

First two examples. Not verified.

Last paragraph. How AWFUL!

In thinking it through, I'm going to go with selling time slots on her schedule as Secretary of State for donations to the Clinton Foundation. That hits every level of corruption.

You don't think she's corrupt, you're an unbelievable Democrat whore. You'd believe anything. And obviously this isn't your standard for Trump.

On the last paragraph, I told you why I consider it bad, dumb ass. I said it wasn't the magnitude of what she did but what it indicates. Reading comprehension issues?

She didn't sell time slots for anything. You are a dupe.

She's just persuasive? And you call me the dup, LOL
 
Silly nutter.


Theres nothing silly. She is a pathological liar.


but you could care less if Trump tells more lies than Clinton ... that not silly, iy makes you and the rest of the Trumpbots pathological hypocrties.

ya know, LOSERS.

I'm not a partisan hack for either party like you are, I oppose them both. I just laugh at you. Haven't seen any of my dozen or so anti-Trump threads, lassy? Seriously? With all the time you spend on the site? What's the problem? Learning disability?

Of the two, which would you least like to see win?

I really don't care, they are both going to be a disaster

Why not be honest?
 
Theres nothing silly. She is a pathological liar.


but you could care less if Trump tells more lies than Clinton ... that not silly, iy makes you and the rest of the Trumpbots pathological hypocrties.

ya know, LOSERS.

I'm not a partisan hack for either party like you are, I oppose them both. I just laugh at you. Haven't seen any of my dozen or so anti-Trump threads, lassy? Seriously? With all the time you spend on the site? What's the problem? Learning disability?

Of the two, which would you least like to see win?

I really don't care, they are both going to be a disaster

Why not be honest?

I am. I can't pick between them in terms of who I'd "least like to win."

Trump: I believe he will as he threatens attempt to unravel trade deals and punish companies who try to leave. He's an anti-capitalist and that's my #1 issue, capitalism. On the other hand, I think he'd be better than Hillary at other issues like fighting illegal immigration and terrorism

Hillary: She's no friend of capitalism, but I don't believe she'll be any different in that regard than the path we're on. While that's better than Trump for capitalism, it means the doors remain open to illegal aliens and terrorists

So, do I prefer the one who's worse on my #1 issue or the one who's worse on multiple other issues? How do I pick between that?

I dislike Hillary more and I think Trump would be more entertaining, particularly the left meltdown that would happen after the election. But I'm not voting on those. Those are why you think you know though when you don't
 
It really does bother you when liberals are made sport of, doesn't it?

No. I just know what is and isn't funny.

Yes, clearly the best way to know what's funny is to ask the person who was made fun of ...

Silly nutter.


Theres nothing silly. She is a pathological liar.


but you could care less if Trump tells more lies than Clinton ... that not silly, iy makes you and the rest of the Trumpbots pathological hypocrties.

ya know, LOSERS.


Im not for trump either. The first debate: she was psycho and he looked like he had just snorted 10 pounds of coke. I don't cheer either of these two reprobates.
 
but you could care less if Trump tells more lies than Clinton ... that not silly, iy makes you and the rest of the Trumpbots pathological hypocrties.

ya know, LOSERS.

I'm not a partisan hack for either party like you are, I oppose them both. I just laugh at you. Haven't seen any of my dozen or so anti-Trump threads, lassy? Seriously? With all the time you spend on the site? What's the problem? Learning disability?

Of the two, which would you least like to see win?

I really don't care, they are both going to be a disaster

Why not be honest?

I am. I can't pick between them in terms of who I'd "least like to win."

Trump: I believe he will as he threatens attempt to unravel trade deals and punish companies who try to leave. He's an anti-capitalist and that's my #1 issue, capitalism. On the other hand, I think he'd be better than Hillary at other issues like fighting illegal immigration and terrorism

Hillary: She's no friend of capitalism, but I don't believe she'll be any different in that regard than the path we're on. While that's better than Trump for capitalism, it means the doors remain open to illegal aliens and terrorists

So, do I prefer the one who's worse on my #1 issue or the one who's worse on multiple other issues? How do I pick between that?

I dislike Hillary more and I think Trump would be more entertaining, particularly the left meltdown that would happen after the election. But I'm not voting on those. Those are why you think you know though when you don't

So many words.....so little truth.

You claim to be a libertarian, right?
 
I'm not a partisan hack for either party like you are, I oppose them both. I just laugh at you. Haven't seen any of my dozen or so anti-Trump threads, lassy? Seriously? With all the time you spend on the site? What's the problem? Learning disability?

Of the two, which would you least like to see win?

I really don't care, they are both going to be a disaster

Why not be honest?

I am. I can't pick between them in terms of who I'd "least like to win."

Trump: I believe he will as he threatens attempt to unravel trade deals and punish companies who try to leave. He's an anti-capitalist and that's my #1 issue, capitalism. On the other hand, I think he'd be better than Hillary at other issues like fighting illegal immigration and terrorism

Hillary: She's no friend of capitalism, but I don't believe she'll be any different in that regard than the path we're on. While that's better than Trump for capitalism, it means the doors remain open to illegal aliens and terrorists

So, do I prefer the one who's worse on my #1 issue or the one who's worse on multiple other issues? How do I pick between that?

I dislike Hillary more and I think Trump would be more entertaining, particularly the left meltdown that would happen after the election. But I'm not voting on those. Those are why you think you know though when you don't

So many words.....so little truth.

You claim to be a libertarian, right?

You asked my opinion. You're saying that's not my opinion?

And what did I say that is not libertarian?
 
Of the two, which would you least like to see win?

I really don't care, they are both going to be a disaster

Why not be honest?

I am. I can't pick between them in terms of who I'd "least like to win."

Trump: I believe he will as he threatens attempt to unravel trade deals and punish companies who try to leave. He's an anti-capitalist and that's my #1 issue, capitalism. On the other hand, I think he'd be better than Hillary at other issues like fighting illegal immigration and terrorism

Hillary: She's no friend of capitalism, but I don't believe she'll be any different in that regard than the path we're on. While that's better than Trump for capitalism, it means the doors remain open to illegal aliens and terrorists

So, do I prefer the one who's worse on my #1 issue or the one who's worse on multiple other issues? How do I pick between that?

I dislike Hillary more and I think Trump would be more entertaining, particularly the left meltdown that would happen after the election. But I'm not voting on those. Those are why you think you know though when you don't

So many words.....so little truth.

You claim to be a libertarian, right?

You asked my opinion. You're saying that's not my opinion?

And what did I say that is not libertarian?

You will dig in your heels and claim forever that yiu don't have a preference between the two.....and I will never buy it. I can read.

Your libertarian guys are calling for open borders and they have no plan for combatting terrorism.
 
I really don't care, they are both going to be a disaster

Why not be honest?

I am. I can't pick between them in terms of who I'd "least like to win."

Trump: I believe he will as he threatens attempt to unravel trade deals and punish companies who try to leave. He's an anti-capitalist and that's my #1 issue, capitalism. On the other hand, I think he'd be better than Hillary at other issues like fighting illegal immigration and terrorism

Hillary: She's no friend of capitalism, but I don't believe she'll be any different in that regard than the path we're on. While that's better than Trump for capitalism, it means the doors remain open to illegal aliens and terrorists

So, do I prefer the one who's worse on my #1 issue or the one who's worse on multiple other issues? How do I pick between that?

I dislike Hillary more and I think Trump would be more entertaining, particularly the left meltdown that would happen after the election. But I'm not voting on those. Those are why you think you know though when you don't

So many words.....so little truth.

You claim to be a libertarian, right?

You asked my opinion. You're saying that's not my opinion?

And what did I say that is not libertarian?

You will dig in your heels and claim forever that yiu don't have a preference between the two.....and I will never buy it. I can read.

Your libertarian guys are calling for open borders and they have no plan for combatting terrorism.

The two issues I can think of off the top of my head that are completely split for libertarians are:

1) Abortion

2) Illegal immigration.

There is no "libertarian" position on those, we're too divided. Abortion at least far more of us are pro-choice. But a lot of hard core libertarians are pro-life. Illegal immigration on the other hand is completely split
 
Nazi is short for racial socialist
'nazi' is short for you have no point

I read your link, you're a new and improved Nazi, the link even said so. Hitler was great, you just want to go further. Did you read it?
what link is that?

for a guy that claims to detest lies younsure do lie a lot.

You don't remember your own link?
why do you play these dishonest games? seems you don't actually care about lies at all

It was Odium who said it, that's why you're confused. Sorry guy, I can't tell Nazis apart and your names are almost the same too
 
I really don't care, they are both going to be a disaster

Why not be honest?

I am. I can't pick between them in terms of who I'd "least like to win."

Trump: I believe he will as he threatens attempt to unravel trade deals and punish companies who try to leave. He's an anti-capitalist and that's my #1 issue, capitalism. On the other hand, I think he'd be better than Hillary at other issues like fighting illegal immigration and terrorism

Hillary: She's no friend of capitalism, but I don't believe she'll be any different in that regard than the path we're on. While that's better than Trump for capitalism, it means the doors remain open to illegal aliens and terrorists

So, do I prefer the one who's worse on my #1 issue or the one who's worse on multiple other issues? How do I pick between that?

I dislike Hillary more and I think Trump would be more entertaining, particularly the left meltdown that would happen after the election. But I'm not voting on those. Those are why you think you know though when you don't

So many words.....so little truth.

You claim to be a libertarian, right?

You asked my opinion. You're saying that's not my opinion?

And what did I say that is not libertarian?

You will dig in your heels and claim forever that yiu don't have a preference between the two.....and I will never buy it. I can read.

Your libertarian guys are calling for open borders and they have no plan for combatting terrorism.

I said clearly I dislike Hillary more. So I'm not denying at all that there is a difference.

Your question wasn't who I dislike more, it was who I want to be President less. Again, I agree with Trump on more issues, but I vividly disagree with him on my #1 issue. Capitalism is a term for economic freedom. Without economic freedom, we are not free. I could even support Trump if I knew that was his position and he didn't pound it down my throat. But he does.

I don't live in the polar world that you do where when you like Hillary better than Trump, you like her in every way better than Trump. I suppose that's why you don't understand my ability to separate my personal view of her from my political view, you aren't able to do that so it's not part of your world
 
Why not be honest?

I am. I can't pick between them in terms of who I'd "least like to win."

Trump: I believe he will as he threatens attempt to unravel trade deals and punish companies who try to leave. He's an anti-capitalist and that's my #1 issue, capitalism. On the other hand, I think he'd be better than Hillary at other issues like fighting illegal immigration and terrorism

Hillary: She's no friend of capitalism, but I don't believe she'll be any different in that regard than the path we're on. While that's better than Trump for capitalism, it means the doors remain open to illegal aliens and terrorists

So, do I prefer the one who's worse on my #1 issue or the one who's worse on multiple other issues? How do I pick between that?

I dislike Hillary more and I think Trump would be more entertaining, particularly the left meltdown that would happen after the election. But I'm not voting on those. Those are why you think you know though when you don't

So many words.....so little truth.

You claim to be a libertarian, right?

You asked my opinion. You're saying that's not my opinion?

And what did I say that is not libertarian?

You will dig in your heels and claim forever that yiu don't have a preference between the two.....and I will never buy it. I can read.

Your libertarian guys are calling for open borders and they have no plan for combatting terrorism.

The two issues I can think of off the top of my head that are completely split for libertarians are:

1) Abortion

2) Illegal immigration.

There is no "libertarian" position on those, we're too divided. Abortion at least far more of us are pro-choice. But a lot of hard core libertarians are pro-life. Illegal immigration on the other hand is completely split
To a libertarian, immigration is more of a states rights thing, down south the federal government Is letting all of them just flood over the border. There's no doubt the federal government disregards the 10th amendment...
To a libertarian, abortion should be none of the federal government business whatsoever. It should be a states rights thing.
 
I am. I can't pick between them in terms of who I'd "least like to win."

Trump: I believe he will as he threatens attempt to unravel trade deals and punish companies who try to leave. He's an anti-capitalist and that's my #1 issue, capitalism. On the other hand, I think he'd be better than Hillary at other issues like fighting illegal immigration and terrorism

Hillary: She's no friend of capitalism, but I don't believe she'll be any different in that regard than the path we're on. While that's better than Trump for capitalism, it means the doors remain open to illegal aliens and terrorists

So, do I prefer the one who's worse on my #1 issue or the one who's worse on multiple other issues? How do I pick between that?

I dislike Hillary more and I think Trump would be more entertaining, particularly the left meltdown that would happen after the election. But I'm not voting on those. Those are why you think you know though when you don't

So many words.....so little truth.

You claim to be a libertarian, right?

You asked my opinion. You're saying that's not my opinion?

And what did I say that is not libertarian?

You will dig in your heels and claim forever that yiu don't have a preference between the two.....and I will never buy it. I can read.

Your libertarian guys are calling for open borders and they have no plan for combatting terrorism.

The two issues I can think of off the top of my head that are completely split for libertarians are:

1) Abortion

2) Illegal immigration.

There is no "libertarian" position on those, we're too divided. Abortion at least far more of us are pro-choice. But a lot of hard core libertarians are pro-life. Illegal immigration on the other hand is completely split
To a libertarian, immigration is more of a states rights thing, down south the federal government Is letting all of them just flood over the border. There's no doubt the federal government disregards the 10th amendment...
To a libertarian, abortion should be none of the federal government business whatsoever. It should be a states rights thing.

You don't know what you are talking about and cut the crap you're a libertarian, you're full of it. You sure as hell don't speak for us.

Again on immigration, there really is no "libertarian" position. Libertarian purists generally argue for open borders, but the reality is that a vast number of us recognize that we have a Welfare State that needs to be destroyed first and it's a direct threat to our safety and while we want relatively free borders, we want people entering to be checked out for diseases, criminal history and their ability to support themselves. If the world were similar to us like Canada and Western Europe, it could work. Given the vast disparities it's not so practical. I don't agree the purists own the ideology.

As for abortion, the majority of us do support legal abortion for the reason you said. I already said that. But as I also said, I know many hard core libertarians who are pro-life. It comes down to the choice of the mother over her own body and the life of the baby. I don't get how a libertarian can believe that government can make that choice, I firmly believe it should be up to the mother. But wow, I know a lot of hard core libertarians who are pro-life and I have to recognize that.

I realize you read a book or something, but you have to get out and get to know more libertarians. We're not the monolithic group that you seem to think we are. Again, I picked these two issues because they are where I see the most difference
 
'nazi' is short for you have no point

I read your link, you're a new and improved Nazi, the link even said so. Hitler was great, you just want to go further. Did you read it?
what link is that?

for a guy that claims to detest lies younsure do lie a lot.

You don't remember your own link?
why do you play these dishonest games? seems you don't actually care about lies at all

It was Odium who said it, that's why you're confused. Sorry guy, I can't tell Nazis apart and your names are almost the same too
so because of what someone else linked to i am a nazi? can't you just admit your mistake and apologize?
 
I read your link, you're a new and improved Nazi, the link even said so. Hitler was great, you just want to go further. Did you read it?
what link is that?

for a guy that claims to detest lies younsure do lie a lot.

You don't remember your own link?
why do you play these dishonest games? seems you don't actually care about lies at all

It was Odium who said it, that's why you're confused. Sorry guy, I can't tell Nazis apart and your names are almost the same too
so because of what someone else linked to i am a nazi? can't you just admit your mistake and apologize?

Apologize for what? You're the Nazi. You just don't want to admit it
 
what link is that?

for a guy that claims to detest lies younsure do lie a lot.

You don't remember your own link?
why do you play these dishonest games? seems you don't actually care about lies at all

It was Odium who said it, that's why you're confused. Sorry guy, I can't tell Nazis apart and your names are almost the same too
so because of what someone else linked to i am a nazi? can't you just admit your mistake and apologize?

Apologize for what? You're the Nazi. You just don't want to admit it
in what way am i a nazi?
 
You don't remember your own link?
why do you play these dishonest games? seems you don't actually care about lies at all

It was Odium who said it, that's why you're confused. Sorry guy, I can't tell Nazis apart and your names are almost the same too
so because of what someone else linked to i am a nazi? can't you just admit your mistake and apologize?

Apologize for what? You're the Nazi. You just don't want to admit it
in what way am i a nazi?

You're a socialist, you hate Jews, you do the math
 
why do you play these dishonest games? seems you don't actually care about lies at all

It was Odium who said it, that's why you're confused. Sorry guy, I can't tell Nazis apart and your names are almost the same too
so because of what someone else linked to i am a nazi? can't you just admit your mistake and apologize?

Apologize for what? You're the Nazi. You just don't want to admit it
in what way am i a nazi?

You're a socialist, you hate Jews, you do the math
neither is true...
 

Forum List

Back
Top