BluePhantom
Educator (of liberals)
- Thread starter
- #101
A job approval poll is not an election poll. Why is that so difficult for you to understand?
The approval polls are taken during the election polls. My fucking God. They don't do one poll to see who people support for president and a completely different poll for job approval. They ask both questions (plus about 20 more) in the same fucking interview. So when your election poll is LV your approval poll will be.....GASP....LV too. Holy fucking shit. What a God damned revelation. Hopefully I have led you to a realization that would be easy pickin's for a fourth grade education.
Now dude....do you realize that even if we use the liberal hero Nate Silver's "I hate Rasmussen" cooked numbers that the difference in accuracy between Rasmussen at #20 and Field Poll at #1 is less than 1%? Now I want you to think about this for a second. Really let it cook inside that troubled little brain of yours. The difference according to even that liberal fuck is less than 1% where the standard margin of error is 3.5%-4%.
In other words this is day three that you have tenaciously argued a point that is completely statistically insignificant. And you wonder why I have resorted to calling you a fucking idiot.
Now let me explain to you, in detail, what is happening in your head. You heard somewhere that Rasmussen is biased toward the GOP. Without bothering to really try to understand the difference between LV polls, A polls, and RV polls; who uses them, why they use them, when they use them, why they use them when they do, etc you went with it because probably someone showed you a chart much like the one you tried to throw at me earlier. Your ignorance of the difference in polling methodology made you say "ahhhh....well look at that. It's true." Well that's exactly what the left was hoping you would conclude because early in the race, when everyone else is using RV polls, the Democratic candidate will have the appearance of a superior position.
It's is their hope that this will create a bandwagon effect so that when everyone shifts to LV polls and their data suddenly starts to come in line with Rasmussen and SurveyUSA (not the other way around), the Democratic candidate will have created enough of a lead from that bandwagon effect to overcome any bandwagon effect that results from the Republican candidate's resulting surge in the polls when everyone switches to LV. Now it's not the polling agencies themselves that are involved in this evil plot. They do RV polls early because it's cheaper, but that doesn't stop the liberal establishment from using that to their advantage and creating the illusion of a far stronger position than they really have.
In other words: "congratulations, you have just been played for a fool by the liberal establishment".
Now I want to reiterate something: this is day three that you have tenaciously argued a point that is completely statistically insignificant.. I am not going to continue to waste my time arguing a statistically insignificant point just so you can look for something.....anything....that will allow you to comfortably ignore one specific pollster because the liberal establishment claims they are biased and you lack the intelligence and objectivity to look deeper into the situation and realize the illusion created by the RV and LV difference.
So here's what I want you to do, chum. So far about the only thing you haven't argued is that Scott Rasmussen is bald and bald men are Republican sympathizers so Rasmussen is biased according to the owner's follicle deficiencies. But I am sure you will come up with something. So take some time today and really think hard about all this. Ask yourself: "do I really want to spend another day arguing a statistically insignificant point?", "do I really want to be seen spending a third day arguing a statistically insignificant point - do I want to proudly display that for all to see?"
If the answer is "no", then shut the fuck up and quit cherry picking one single poll that relates to one single element in the overall theme of the OP and throwing a tantrum over it. If the answer is "yes", then wrap up all your further arguments into a single post (however long it might be....feel free to indulge yourself) and I will discredit them all in one fell swoop.
I will say again: this is day three that you have argued a point that is completely statistically insignificant. I am not going to give you a fourth.