Poll: ONLY 29% see Obama winning in 2012....

[JakeStarkey]

What's Romney going to run against, government health care?

No, he will run on reform of it, and 85% of the voters will support that.

He has no credibility on reforming government run health care.

Answered and sustained.

 

[Mr Natural]

Two years before he was elected, Reagan was still very much an outsider, a joke.

He was a formidable opponent at the time, while you are the joke here with such stupid comments.

He had the same image problems Palin has within their own party.

Reagan was a successful governor of one of the largest states in the country and one of the largest economies in the world.

Palin was governor of little more than an outpost and even at that she didn't have what it takes to finish her term.

 

[JakeStarkey]

She was a quitter. Rehab is for quitters, not the White House.

 

[Revere]

Why nominate Romney and give away the Obamacare repeal issue?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Because it is no longer a viable issue. By 2012, more than 65% of voters will support because sustained educational awareness by the Dems. The GOP will be outflanked as usual.

 

[Cain]

I do not see Obama winning in 2012, but I am a single voter. I will vote, for sure, but I will vote happily, if we ever have a candidate who isn't paid off by companies/corporations to do certain things, etc. In all essence, I dream of a non-corrupt president, and that is what it is, a dream.

 

[rdean]

I do not see Obama winning in 2012, but I am a single voter. I will vote, for sure, but I will vote happily, if we ever have a candidate who isn't paid off by companies/corporations to do certain things, etc. In all essence, I dream of a non-corrupt president, and that is what it is, a dream.

Very little of Obama's money came from corporations or companies. The vast bulk came from regular Americans who sent average contributions of less than 100 dollars.

In fact, even companies like Freddie/Fannie gave much more to McCain. The difference is the people that worked there, the secretaries, the janitors, the desk jockies, gave fundraisers and bundled their money together and sent it as having come from "Freddie/Fannie" because that is where those people worked. The company itself gave money to McCain. More went to Obama but from the people that work there, not the company itself.

Can you see the difference?

The same thing happened where I worked. The employees gave much more to Obama, but the company gave to McCain. But the workers sent the money to Obama saying it came from the company, and it did, because we all work at that company.

That's how it worked. So when Republicans say Obama received money from BP, they are right. It came from the employees. Not a dime from any PAC or from the company itself. BP sent 90% of the campaign money they sent out to Republicans. That's why Republicans apologized. I still can't figure out how the Republican base isn't outraged at their leadership for apologizing to BP. What a bunch of sheeple.

 

[Revere]

I think I speak for all Americans when I say we are done with being poor.

 

[Cain]

I do not see Obama winning in 2012, but I am a single voter. I will vote, for sure, but I will vote happily, if we ever have a candidate who isn't paid off by companies/corporations to do certain things, etc. In all essence, I dream of a non-corrupt president, and that is what it is, a dream.

Very little of Obama's money came from corporations or companies. The vast bulk came from regular Americans who sent average contributions of less than 100 dollars.

In fact, even companies like Freddie/Fannie gave much more to McCain. The difference is the people that worked there, the secretaries, the janitors, the desk jockies, gave fundraisers and bundled their money together and sent it as having come from "Freddie/Fannie" because that is where those people worked. The company itself gave money to McCain. More went to Obama but from the people that work there, not the company itself.

Can you see the difference?

The same thing happened where I worked. The employees gave much more to Obama, but the company gave to McCain. But the workers sent the money to Obama saying it came from the company, and it did, because we all work at that company.

That's how it worked. So when Republicans say Obama received money from BP, they are right. It came from the employees. Not a dime from any PAC or from the company itself. BP sent 90% of the campaign money they sent out to Republicans. That's why Republicans apologized. I still can't figure out how the Republican base isn't outraged at their leadership for apologizing to BP. What a bunch of sheeple.

I understand that he might not have received a lot from corporations, but I wish their was a way to not allow corporations/companies/organizations to make it where, if they have the money, they can basically pay off someone to do it. Same with Senators/Representatives. I am not saying McCain is better then Obama.

 

[Intense]

I do not see Obama winning in 2012, but I am a single voter. I will vote, for sure, but I will vote happily, if we ever have a candidate who isn't paid off by companies/corporations to do certain things, etc. In all essence, I dream of a non-corrupt president, and that is what it is, a dream.

Very little of Obama's money came from corporations or companies. The vast bulk came from regular Americans who sent average contributions of less than 100 dollars.

In fact, even companies like Freddie/Fannie gave much more to McCain. The difference is the people that worked there, the secretaries, the janitors, the desk jockies, gave fundraisers and bundled their money together and sent it as having come from "Freddie/Fannie" because that is where those people worked. The company itself gave money to McCain. More went to Obama but from the people that work there, not the company itself.

Can you see the difference?

The same thing happened where I worked. The employees gave much more to Obama, but the company gave to McCain. But the workers sent the money to Obama saying it came from the company, and it did, because we all work at that company.

That's how it worked. So when Republicans say Obama received money from BP, they are right. It came from the employees. Not a dime from any PAC or from the company itself. BP sent 90% of the campaign money they sent out to Republicans. That's why Republicans apologized. I still can't figure out how the Republican base isn't outraged at their leadership for apologizing to BP. What a bunch of sheeple.

I understand that he might not have received a lot from corporations, but I wish their was a way to not allow corporations/companies/organizations to make it where, if they have the money, they can basically pay off someone to do it. Same with Senators/Representatives. I am not saying McCain is better then Obama.

I believe the direction would have been the same, the pace a lot slower, that was our problem on the Right, after the Primaries there really was nobody to support. This Statist Progressive track we are on isn't where we need to be headed. Granted there are problems with the Market place, yet what so many fail to grasp, is that there are problems everywhere when people lose sight. It's a matter of focus and adjustment, not abandoning everything we have for some fantasy.

 

[Cain]

Very little of Obama's money came from corporations or companies. The vast bulk came from regular Americans who sent average contributions of less than 100 dollars.

In fact, even companies like Freddie/Fannie gave much more to McCain. The difference is the people that worked there, the secretaries, the janitors, the desk jockies, gave fundraisers and bundled their money together and sent it as having come from "Freddie/Fannie" because that is where those people worked. The company itself gave money to McCain. More went to Obama but from the people that work there, not the company itself.

Can you see the difference?

The same thing happened where I worked. The employees gave much more to Obama, but the company gave to McCain. But the workers sent the money to Obama saying it came from the company, and it did, because we all work at that company.

That's how it worked. So when Republicans say Obama received money from BP, they are right. It came from the employees. Not a dime from any PAC or from the company itself. BP sent 90% of the campaign money they sent out to Republicans. That's why Republicans apologized. I still can't figure out how the Republican base isn't outraged at their leadership for apologizing to BP. What a bunch of sheeple.

I understand that he might not have received a lot from corporations, but I wish their was a way to not allow corporations/companies/organizations to make it where, if they have the money, they can basically pay off someone to do it. Same with Senators/Representatives. I am not saying McCain is better then Obama.

I believe the direction would have been the same, the pace a lot slower, that was our problem on the Right, after the Primaries there really was nobody to support. This Statist Progressive track we are on isn't where we need to be headed. Granted there are problems with the Market place, yet what so many fail to grasp, is that there are problems everywhere when people lose sight. It's a matter of focus and adjustment, not abandoning everything we have for some fantasy.

One can dream.

I do not know really how to save the economy, or do much more then do what I know is best for my family & I. I just hope this country changes, and if I can help, I will do my best.

Thanks for the info.

 

[(R)IGHTeous 1]

Because it is no longer a viable issue. By 2012, more than 65% of voters will support because sustained educational awareness by the Dems. The GOP will be outflanked as usual.

Sorry, but National Socialist government sponsored brainwashing will not have the effect you desire. The public is awake now, Obamacare is unconstitutional, and will be 1 of our biggest assets in beating him.

Just when I thought this dude couldn't get make more wacko yall....

 

[william the wie]

In order to win in 2012 Obama needs the following:

A less bruising primary season than the eventual Republican candidate.

No major net downside in foreign policy.

Get the TSA aggravation of voters under control.

No more major economic negative surprises or backfiring stimuli such as cash for clunkers.

The basic problem is Obama cast himself as an alternative to Bush neo-con socialism but there is very little evidence that he has been one.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Because it is no longer a viable issue. By 2012, more than 65% of voters will support because sustained educational awareness by the Dems. The GOP will be outflanked as usual.

Sorry, but National Socialist government sponsored brainwashing will not have the effect you desire. The public is awake now, Obamacare is unconstitutional, and will be 1 of our biggest assets in beating him.

Just when I thought this dude couldn't get make more wacko yall....

Kiddo, name calling doesn't make your lies true. "National Socialist"? Stupid statement. Both parties are engaged in social democracy (look the term up), and the wailing and gnashing of teeth and name calling from the far far far right will not stop that at all.

The legislation is not unconstitutional, any more than Medicaid or Social Security.

Show me the stats that the costs are growing more quickly than in the years of the past decade. You will find overall that health care costs are slowing.

Romney is going to use the health care legislation, yes: he is going to talk about how it needs to be "reformed", when he means that nothing will change. The voters will approve that without any problem.

 

[JakeStarkey]

William, your last two comments are the most important, I think. He will not have a major opponent in the primaries. Foreign policy: North Korea? Wikileaks? TSA has been reined in. The economy is recovering slowly. The voters will have to accept that whether Romney, Huckabee, Pawlenty, even Palin, that the GOP is a party of social democracy.

 

[jillian]

Because it is no longer a viable issue. By 2012, more than 65% of voters will support because sustained educational awareness by the Dems. The GOP will be outflanked as usual.

Sorry, but National Socialist government sponsored brainwashing will not have the effect you desire. The public is awake now, Obamacare is unconstitutional, and will be 1 of our biggest assets in beating him.

Just when I thought this dude couldn't get make more wacko yall....

1. braindead morons who liken democrats to nazis really aren't worth listening to and it's a pretty good indication said braindead moron is an ignorant troll.

2. Obama in Good Shape for 2012 Despite Current Woes, Poll Finds

oops...sucks being you

 

[editec]

I CERTAINLY this Bush II is doing a better job of being an EX-POTUS than Obama is doing being POTUS.

I mean as EX POTUS Bush has largely dropped off the radar.

And I for one cannot thank him enough for doing so, either.

 

[editec]

I do not see Obama winning in 2012, but I am a single voter. I will vote, for sure, but I will vote happily, if we ever have a candidate who isn't paid off by companies/corporations to do certain things, etc. In all essence, I dream of a non-corrupt president, and that is what it is, a dream.

We could elect a Saint to the oval office and it wouldn't change much because our POTUS is not a dictator.

I share your sense of disgust with the overt and covert corruption of our representative democratic republic, but the corruption is legislated as a legal part of our system, so really who is elected POTUS isn't going to change all that much in the grander scheme of things.

The FIRST thing we need to do is change our campaign finance laws and in order to do that in such a way that the SCOTUS won't find on behalf of big corporations and big CAPITAL, we'd need a consitutional amendment to insure that the law wouldn't be overturned.

Good luck making that happen.

 

[(R)IGHTeous 1]

Because it is no longer a viable issue. By 2012, more than 65% of voters will support because sustained educational awareness by the Dems. The GOP will be outflanked as usual.

Sorry, but National Socialist government sponsored brainwashing will not have the effect you desire. The public is awake now, Obamacare is unconstitutional, and will be 1 of our biggest assets in beating him.

Just when I thought this dude couldn't get make more wacko yall....

1. braindead morons who liken democrats to nazis really aren't worth listening to and it's a pretty good indication said braindead moron is an ignorant troll.

2. Obama in Good Shape for 2012 Despite Current Woes, Poll Finds

oops...sucks being you

Keep trolling sweetie, I can also pull up more credible polls disproving that BS.

Unless unemployment falls below 7.5% @ LEAST, Afghanistan drastically improves, he stops being so authoritarian, backs off his health care BS, he's very likely toast.

No amount of BS by you, Starkey troll, or any other lefty here will change that, he fooled the people once, but they're awake now.

But on the bright side, keep posting lame spam like this and I can add you to my lil list....finally some real exposure for you.

 

[geauxtohell]

Last I heard there was something like 11 or 12 states that have passed new laws since obama got elected that say if a presidential candidate wants to be put on their state ballot, then they have to prove they're a "natural born citizen," and the only thing that will suffice for proof will be a "real birth certificate." One with a doctors name, a hospitals name, witnessed and signed, not some cooked up bull shit posted on some left wing website.

Now I know the obama ass lickers will implode when they read that, but that's not going to change anything. If obama wants to run for President again, MARK MY WORDS, the "is he a natural born citizen or not" debate will rear it's ugly head again, but next time nobody is going to back down until obama produces this purported BC. If he's got one, he's going to have to show it, period, or he's not going to get on all the states ballots. It's just that simple.

My guess is, he doesn't even run, just to avoid the problem, and to quite possibly keep his ass out of prison. He knows what will happen.

Birther retard alert!