Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #61
How did I give ANY indication I did not accept the poll findings?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Oh so now that you cant spam other threads with this lie you just go poof huh?
Oh so now that you cant spam other threads with this lie you just go poof huh?
is the poll I cited in post 19 valid or not.
Yes
or
No.
Even for a monumental moron like you, that should be easy to answer. you have a 50/50 chance at it. Give it a try. You might like actually committing to an answer.
unlike the idiot who started this thread I am not afarid to post shit like this to show her how fucked up polls can be
Back in May 26, 2011 a poll of New Jersry voters were done to see how they felt about obama. A couple things I noticed that did not make any sense.
More than half of N.J. voters polled approve of President Obama
President Barack Obama's job-approval has grown among registered voters surveyed in New Jersey.
ok his approval according to this source had grown
Now here's the meaty part of the link
More than half of N.J. voters polled approve of President Obama | NJ.comPoll director Peter Woolley says he believes the numbers reflect Obama's high profile in foreign policy.
Still, only 34 percent of Garden State voters say the country is headed in the right direction compared to 51 percent who say it's on the wrong track.
So the people of New Jersery care more about foreign policy than having a job? They are either wealthy liberals or on some government program.
And how is it that 51 percent think America is on the wrong track when onama approval rating is suspposed to be up? Do thses pollsters actually think they are believeable?
You see truth fuck tard polls aren't what you thiink they are.
Oh so now that you cant spam other threads with this lie you just go poof huh?
is the poll I cited in post 19 valid or not.
Yes
or
No.
Even for a monumental moron like you, that should be easy to answer. you have a 50/50 chance at it. Give it a try. You might like actually committing to an answer.
Sad ain't it?Oh so now that you cant spam other threads with this lie you just go poof huh?
is the poll I cited in post 19 valid or not.
Yes
or
No.
Even for a monumental moron like you, that should be easy to answer. you have a 50/50 chance at it. Give it a try. You might like actually committing to an answer.
cricket...cricket... cricket...
polls are what every campaign uses to make decisions.
They are used by EVERY corporation in the US to make decisions.
To say polls are worthless is to be an idiot
Your problem is half of the republican party dont like the tea party republicans and half of the republicans dont like the romeny republicans
polls are what every campaign uses to make decisions.
They are used by EVERY corporation in the US to make decisions.
To say polls are worthless is to be an idiot
Bullshit!
Why did I waste my time to even attempt to understand your POV on ANYTHING is mind boggling.
Live and learn...I have learned.
19 ?
I think Obamas numbers are low.
Not as low as the republicans
I answered you liar
Where in that post do you say whether the poll is valid or not?
TM, if the repubs are lower in the polls than the dems, explain to me why two new repubs just got elected?
Its not our reps its who is buying them.
Lets stop the buying of them MMMMkay
TM, if the repubs are lower in the polls than the dems, explain to me why two new repubs just got elected?
For one thing, conservatives are more likely to vote in special elections than liberals. I do believe that only ONE of those districts even had a chance of being Democratic (Weiner's former). In Weiner's former district the conservatives were able to run a fear campaign based on the lie that President Obama doesn't support Israel...Oh, and the very Orthodox Jewish population of that district did not like the fact that the Democrat voted in favor of granting equal civil rights to gay and lesbian couples.
Which is more representative of the country...a national poll or two random districts out of hundreds?
TM, if the repubs are lower in the polls than the dems, explain to me why two new repubs just got elected?
For one thing, conservatives are more likely to vote in special elections than liberals. I do believe that only ONE of those districts even had a chance of being Democratic (Weiner's former). In Weiner's former district the conservatives were able to run a fear campaign based on the lie that President Obama doesn't support Israel...Oh, and the very Orthodox Jewish population of that district did not like the fact that the Democrat voted in favor of granting equal civil rights to gay and lesbian couples.
Which is more representative of the country...a national poll or two random districts out of hundreds?
What Lie? Obama said for them to return to the 67 boarders. It made Netanyahu angry also.
It was the Catholics who were angry at the gay thing along with the Jewish population.
You piss off the majority of your voters you don't get elected.
The representative's are supposed to represent their districts not the whole nation.
Your collective socialism ideology is showing seawytch.
TM, if the repubs are lower in the polls than the dems, explain to me why two new repubs just got elected?