Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Citizens United.We need that NOW more than EVER..
Thanks Supremes.
Citizens United, another example of a grievous error of interpretation by the conservative wing of the Supreme Court, except in that case it got the other vote.
They like everything in the bill. They just don't like the name "Obama".
oh that's right, not only do they hate his skin but now his name too
good gawd
What's funny is watching the democrats try to run away from the TAX! Even insisting that SCOTUS was WRONG.
If obamatax is not a tax, it is unconstitutional, that's what the ruling was.
The conservative wing of the Supreme Court, i.e., the one that people like you like to worship and like to claim are the true protectors of the Constitution,
THEY WERE WRONG. THEY said it was not a tax.
In fact, if Roberts had made that same mistake, the healthcare bill would have been overturned on a grievous constitutional error by the conservatives on the court,
and btw idiots like you would be then defending that erroneous decision to the death.
What's funny is watching the democrats try to run away from the TAX! Even insisting that SCOTUS was WRONG.
If obamatax is not a tax, it is unconstitutional, that's what the ruling was.
The conservative wing of the Supreme Court, i.e., the one that people like you like to worship and like to claim are the true protectors of the Constitution,
THEY WERE WRONG. THEY said it was not a tax.
In fact, if Roberts had made that same mistake, the healthcare bill would have been overturned on a grievous constitutional error by the conservatives on the court,
and btw idiots like you would be then defending that erroneous decision to the death.
Good to know we don't need a SCOTUS when we have you around to point out the constitutionality of things.
The only thing wrong here is nyour post.
Roberts made the mistake of actually finding a way to make it constitutional when the basis for Oblather's argument was, in fact, wrong.
The conservative wing of the Supreme Court, i.e., the one that people like you like to worship and like to claim are the true protectors of the Constitution,
THEY WERE WRONG. THEY said it was not a tax.
In fact, if Roberts had made that same mistake, the healthcare bill would have been overturned on a grievous constitutional error by the conservatives on the court,
and btw idiots like you would be then defending that erroneous decision to the death.
Good to know we don't need a SCOTUS when we have you around to point out the constitutionality of things.
The only thing wrong here is nyour post.
Roberts made the mistake of actually finding a way to make it constitutional when the basis for Oblather's argument was, in fact, wrong.
Wow, because you are such an incredible constitutional scholar and you understand these things.
George Stephanopoulos Interviews Obama - Obamacare - YouTube
Let me make a point, Obama compares this to Auto insurance. Is there a vast segment of the citizens that get free auto insurance?
How does this reduce the cost of medical care? Not the premiums but the overall cost?
No but they're wrong. IT IS A GARGANTUAN TAX.. ASK the MAJORITY vote on the COURT.. THE losers don't get to say it's not a tax because it has been RULED A TAX. now stop looking so damn foolish. IT"S a fucking TAX.
I said it was a tax months ago. In fact I just spent 15 minutes trying to find my post. So shut up.
but the dude you voted for lied to you and said it wasn't a tax. did you believe him? gonna vote for him again. he looked right into your face and lied to you.
You are a jackass.
His Solicitor General had one of the worst performances in the history of the court and everybody saw the justices slam him on the Commerce Clause. That was the whole basis of their argument and it's what the four moron libs on the court wanted written into the decisions.
It wasn't written in because Roberts essentially rewrote the law and allowed it to pass through the backdoor.
Obama was completely wrong in his assertions on the constitutionality of the law...he got shot down big time.
Pull your head out of your ass and enjoy some fresh air.
The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 majority, just ruled this law constitutional.
That's what happened.
Sucks to be you.
Didn't you get your lolipop in daycare today ?
The SCOTUS wrote a majority decision and two 4 member dissents.
In the main decision they said the law was not constitutional under the Commerce Clause.
Please try to keep up.
The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 majority, just ruled this law constitutional.
That's what happened.
Sucks to be you.
Didn't you get your lolipop in daycare today ?
The SCOTUS wrote a majority decision and two 4 member dissents.
In the main decision they said the law was not constitutional under the Commerce Clause.
Please try to keep up.
The law was upheld as constitutional based because Congress' ability to tax is quite broad. The commerce clause justification was struck down, however there were justices who said even this should be valid.
Please try to keep up.
Didn't you get your lolipop in daycare today ?
The SCOTUS wrote a majority decision and two 4 member dissents.
In the main decision they said the law was not constitutional under the Commerce Clause.
Please try to keep up.
The law was upheld as constitutional based because Congress' ability to tax is quite broad. The commerce clause justification was struck down, however there were justices who said even this should be valid.
Please try to keep up.
Not explaining it again after this....
For the 100th time.
The Admin argued on the Commerce Clause....and lost.
Roberts essentially dug up another pathway to so-called constitutionality.
It appears he was late in developing that argument.
The whole thing is a tremendous travesty. Roberts is going to go down as another Earl Warren (who should be dug up, shot, burned and not buried again).
The law was upheld as constitutional based because Congress' ability to tax is quite broad. The commerce clause justification was struck down, however there were justices who said even this should be valid.
Please try to keep up.
Not explaining it again after this....
For the 100th time.
The Admin argued on the Commerce Clause....and lost.
Roberts essentially dug up another pathway to so-called constitutionality.
It appears he was late in developing that argument.
The whole thing is a tremendous travesty. Roberts is going to go down as another Earl Warren (who should be dug up, shot, burned and not buried again).
Please don't. Some idiot might think you're right.
Which you're not. You're wrong. The law...is constitutional...on tax grounds. Which the WH attorneys almost didn't argue in court, as it wasn't their main theory.
The reason why Republicans are talking repeal...is because it was upheld... talk about dense.
Romney needs to ram this up Obama/Axelrod/Jarrett's asses.
Romney needs to ram this up Obama/Axelrod/Jarrett's asses.....Like he did to the folks in Massachusetts, right?
In the main decision they said the law was not constitutional under the Commerce Clause.
Voters are reacting in broadly negative ways to the Supreme Courts decision to uphold the legislation known as Obamacare, a new Newsweek/Daily Beast poll finds, with a majority disapproving of the ruling, fearing health-care costs and taxes will rise, and preferring Mitt Romney to President Obama on the issue.
At the same time, voters scored the ruling a short-term political win for the president by a huge margin.
Overall, 50 percent of those polled said they disapprove of the courts 54 decision, while 45 percent said they support it. Consistently, a majority of voters said that they oppose the individual mandate (53 percent); believe taxes will increase (52 percent); believe their personal health-care costs will increase (56 percent); and disapprove of Obamas handling of health care in general (58 percent). Only 24 percent of those polled said that they believe the ruling will make the country better off.
New Poll: Voters Dislike Supreme Court
Not that it matters to me because justices don't vote to be popular....unless you listen to Charles Krautwhatever....who think Roberts only did this to preserve the integrity of the court (and if he did...boy did he blow that one).
However, it does have some thought provoking information with regards to how people might vote come November.
Romney needs to ram this up Obama/Axelrod/Jarrett's asses.
