Political Correctness Run Amuck

[OKTexas]

OHHHH...NOW I get it.

My Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad!

No university police department in this country has the autonomy to circumvent any local or state police agency when a public crime is committed.

They can sure as hell obstruct justice by putting out incomplete descriptions of the suspects.

And they won't be in sync with other LEO agencies they work with who don't see anything racist about describing a suspect's skin color.

Good points - the university police can play their little PC games to placate the university.

The serious cops can use strategies that actually work. At least they can use them for now.

.

What part do you need help understanding?

"Vice President Wheelock is announcing a change that will reduce the use of suspect descriptions in Crime Alerts when there is insufficient detail to reasonably aid in individual identification."

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information. Where the information is too general to advance that goal, we will note that only a limited description of the suspect(s) is available."

The point is if the university will provide all of that limited description or will they withhold relevant parts in the name of political correctness? They are indicating the latter which is a disservice to the community.

 

[Bfgrn]

No university police department in this country has the autonomy to circumvent any local or state police agency when a public crime is committed.

They can sure as hell obstruct justice by putting out incomplete descriptions of the suspects.

And they won't be in sync with other LEO agencies they work with who don't see anything racist about describing a suspect's skin color.

Good points - the university police can play their little PC games to placate the university.

The serious cops can use strategies that actually work. At least they can use them for now.

.

What part do you need help understanding?

"Vice President Wheelock is announcing a change that will reduce the use of suspect descriptions in Crime Alerts when there is insufficient detail to reasonably aid in individual identification."

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information. Where the information is too general to advance that goal, we will note that only a limited description of the suspect(s) is available."

The point is if the university will provide all of that limited description or will they withhold relevant parts in the name of political correctness? They are indicating the latter which is a disservice to the community.

No, you are adding YOUR definition, NOT the university's.

WHAT part don't you understand?

"Vice President Wheelock is announcing a change that will reduce the use of suspect descriptions in Crime Alerts when there is insufficient detail to reasonably aid in individual identification."

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information. Where the information is too general to advance that goal, we will note that only a limited description of the suspect(s) is available."

 

[OKTexas]

They can sure as hell obstruct justice by putting out incomplete descriptions of the suspects.

And they won't be in sync with other LEO agencies they work with who don't see anything racist about describing a suspect's skin color.

Good points - the university police can play their little PC games to placate the university.

The serious cops can use strategies that actually work. At least they can use them for now.

.

What part do you need help understanding?

"Vice President Wheelock is announcing a change that will reduce the use of suspect descriptions in Crime Alerts when there is insufficient detail to reasonably aid in individual identification."

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information. Where the information is too general to advance that goal, we will note that only a limited description of the suspect(s) is available."

The point is if the university will provide all of that limited description or will they withhold relevant parts in the name of political correctness? They are indicating the latter which is a disservice to the community.

No, you are adding YOUR definition, NOT the university's.

WHAT part don't you understand?

"Vice President Wheelock is announcing a change that will reduce the use of suspect descriptions in Crime Alerts when there is insufficient detail to reasonably aid in individual identification."

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information. Where the information is too general to advance that goal, we will note that only a limited description of the suspect(s) is available."

Why are you ignoring the last sentence in your quote?

 

[Bfgrn]

And they won't be in sync with other LEO agencies they work with who don't see anything racist about describing a suspect's skin color.

Good points - the university police can play their little PC games to placate the university.

The serious cops can use strategies that actually work. At least they can use them for now.

.

What part do you need help understanding?

"Vice President Wheelock is announcing a change that will reduce the use of suspect descriptions in Crime Alerts when there is insufficient detail to reasonably aid in individual identification."

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information. Where the information is too general to advance that goal, we will note that only a limited description of the suspect(s) is available."

The point is if the university will provide all of that limited description or will they withhold relevant parts in the name of political correctness? They are indicating the latter which is a disservice to the community.

No, you are adding YOUR definition, NOT the university's.

WHAT part don't you understand?

"Vice President Wheelock is announcing a change that will reduce the use of suspect descriptions in Crime Alerts when there is insufficient detail to reasonably aid in individual identification."

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information. Where the information is too general to advance that goal, we will note that only a limited description of the suspect(s) is available."

Why are you ignoring the last sentence in your quote?

What do you want the university to do? Put out a description that says "you know it was probably a n****"

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Good points - the university police can play their little PC games to placate the university.

The serious cops can use strategies that actually work. At least they can use them for now.

.

What part do you need help understanding?

"Vice President Wheelock is announcing a change that will reduce the use of suspect descriptions in Crime Alerts when there is insufficient detail to reasonably aid in individual identification."

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information. Where the information is too general to advance that goal, we will note that only a limited description of the suspect(s) is available."

The point is if the university will provide all of that limited description or will they withhold relevant parts in the name of political correctness? They are indicating the latter which is a disservice to the community.

No, you are adding YOUR definition, NOT the university's.

WHAT part don't you understand?

"Vice President Wheelock is announcing a change that will reduce the use of suspect descriptions in Crime Alerts when there is insufficient detail to reasonably aid in individual identification."

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information. Where the information is too general to advance that goal, we will note that only a limited description of the suspect(s) is available."

Why are you ignoring the last sentence in your quote?

What do you want the university to do? Put out a description that says "you know it was probably a n****"

Most on the right would agree with this, it would be a lie but the OP and many other conservatives clearly have not problem being liars.

 

[Bfgrn]

What part do you need help understanding?

"Vice President Wheelock is announcing a change that will reduce the use of suspect descriptions in Crime Alerts when there is insufficient detail to reasonably aid in individual identification."

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information. Where the information is too general to advance that goal, we will note that only a limited description of the suspect(s) is available."

The point is if the university will provide all of that limited description or will they withhold relevant parts in the name of political correctness? They are indicating the latter which is a disservice to the community.

No, you are adding YOUR definition, NOT the university's.

WHAT part don't you understand?

"Vice President Wheelock is announcing a change that will reduce the use of suspect descriptions in Crime Alerts when there is insufficient detail to reasonably aid in individual identification."

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information. Where the information is too general to advance that goal, we will note that only a limited description of the suspect(s) is available."

Why are you ignoring the last sentence in your quote?

What do you want the university to do? Put out a description that says "you know it was probably a n****"

Most on the right would agree with this, it would be a lie but the OP and many other conservatives clearly have not problem being liars.

So true...

"Conservatism, though a necessary element in any stable society, is not a social program; in its paternalistic, nationalistic and power adoring tendencies it is often closer to socialism than true liberalism; and with its traditionalistic, anti-intellectual, and often mystical propensities it will never, except in short periods of disillusionment, appeal to the young and all those others who believe that some changes are desirable if this world is to become a better place."
Friedrich August von Hayek-The Road to Serfdom

"In general, it can probably be said that the conservative does not object to coercion or arbitrary power so long as it is used for what he regards as the right purposes. He believes that if government is in the hands of decent men, it ought not to be too much restricted by rigid rules. Since he is essentially opportunist and lacks principles..."
Friedrich August von Hayek-Why I am Not a Conservative

 

[OKTexas]

Good points - the university police can play their little PC games to placate the university.

The serious cops can use strategies that actually work. At least they can use them for now.

.

What part do you need help understanding?

"Vice President Wheelock is announcing a change that will reduce the use of suspect descriptions in Crime Alerts when there is insufficient detail to reasonably aid in individual identification."

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information. Where the information is too general to advance that goal, we will note that only a limited description of the suspect(s) is available."

The point is if the university will provide all of that limited description or will they withhold relevant parts in the name of political correctness? They are indicating the latter which is a disservice to the community.

No, you are adding YOUR definition, NOT the university's.

WHAT part don't you understand?

"Vice President Wheelock is announcing a change that will reduce the use of suspect descriptions in Crime Alerts when there is insufficient detail to reasonably aid in individual identification."

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information. Where the information is too general to advance that goal, we will note that only a limited description of the suspect(s) is available."

Why are you ignoring the last sentence in your quote?

What do you want the university to do? Put out a description that says "you know it was probably a n****"

Exactly where did I say that, if the only the only available description is one pink and purple polka dotted male and a yellow and green polka dotted female, that should be the information disseminated, not that only a limited description is available.

 

[aaronleland]

Good points - the university police can play their little PC games to placate the university.

The serious cops can use strategies that actually work. At least they can use them for now.

.

What part do you need help understanding?

"Vice President Wheelock is announcing a change that will reduce the use of suspect descriptions in Crime Alerts when there is insufficient detail to reasonably aid in individual identification."

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information. Where the information is too general to advance that goal, we will note that only a limited description of the suspect(s) is available."

The point is if the university will provide all of that limited description or will they withhold relevant parts in the name of political correctness? They are indicating the latter which is a disservice to the community.

No, you are adding YOUR definition, NOT the university's.

WHAT part don't you understand?

"Vice President Wheelock is announcing a change that will reduce the use of suspect descriptions in Crime Alerts when there is insufficient detail to reasonably aid in individual identification."

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information. Where the information is too general to advance that goal, we will note that only a limited description of the suspect(s) is available."

Why are you ignoring the last sentence in your quote?

What do you want the university to do? Put out a description that says "you know it was probably a n****"

If they did it would be HILARIOUS.

 

[Bfgrn]

What part do you need help understanding?

"Vice President Wheelock is announcing a change that will reduce the use of suspect descriptions in Crime Alerts when there is insufficient detail to reasonably aid in individual identification."

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information. Where the information is too general to advance that goal, we will note that only a limited description of the suspect(s) is available."

The point is if the university will provide all of that limited description or will they withhold relevant parts in the name of political correctness? They are indicating the latter which is a disservice to the community.

No, you are adding YOUR definition, NOT the university's.

WHAT part don't you understand?

"Vice President Wheelock is announcing a change that will reduce the use of suspect descriptions in Crime Alerts when there is insufficient detail to reasonably aid in individual identification."

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information. Where the information is too general to advance that goal, we will note that only a limited description of the suspect(s) is available."

Why are you ignoring the last sentence in your quote?

What do you want the university to do? Put out a description that says "you know it was probably a n****"

Exactly where did I say that, if the only the only available description is one pink and purple polka dotted male and a yellow and green polka dotted female, that should be the information disseminated, not that only a limited description is available.

AGAIN... WHAT don't you understand???

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information

 

[Bfgrn]

What part do you need help understanding?

"Vice President Wheelock is announcing a change that will reduce the use of suspect descriptions in Crime Alerts when there is insufficient detail to reasonably aid in individual identification."

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information. Where the information is too general to advance that goal, we will note that only a limited description of the suspect(s) is available."

The point is if the university will provide all of that limited description or will they withhold relevant parts in the name of political correctness? They are indicating the latter which is a disservice to the community.

No, you are adding YOUR definition, NOT the university's.

WHAT part don't you understand?

"Vice President Wheelock is announcing a change that will reduce the use of suspect descriptions in Crime Alerts when there is insufficient detail to reasonably aid in individual identification."

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information. Where the information is too general to advance that goal, we will note that only a limited description of the suspect(s) is available."

Why are you ignoring the last sentence in your quote?

What do you want the university to do? Put out a description that says "you know it was probably a n****"

If they did it would be HILARIOUS.

You are a sick fuck. Would it be hilarious if a description said "you know it was probably a racist right wing nut"

 

[aaronleland]

The point is if the university will provide all of that limited description or will they withhold relevant parts in the name of political correctness? They are indicating the latter which is a disservice to the community.

No, you are adding YOUR definition, NOT the university's.

WHAT part don't you understand?

"Vice President Wheelock is announcing a change that will reduce the use of suspect descriptions in Crime Alerts when there is insufficient detail to reasonably aid in individual identification."

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information. Where the information is too general to advance that goal, we will note that only a limited description of the suspect(s) is available."

Why are you ignoring the last sentence in your quote?

What do you want the university to do? Put out a description that says "you know it was probably a n****"

If they did it would be HILARIOUS.

You are a sick fuck. Would it be hilarious if a description said "you know it was probably a racist right wing nut"

Eh. Doesn't have the same ring to it.

 

[OKTexas]

The point is if the university will provide all of that limited description or will they withhold relevant parts in the name of political correctness? They are indicating the latter which is a disservice to the community.

No, you are adding YOUR definition, NOT the university's.

WHAT part don't you understand?

"Vice President Wheelock is announcing a change that will reduce the use of suspect descriptions in Crime Alerts when there is insufficient detail to reasonably aid in individual identification."

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information. Where the information is too general to advance that goal, we will note that only a limited description of the suspect(s) is available."

Why are you ignoring the last sentence in your quote?

What do you want the university to do? Put out a description that says "you know it was probably a n****"

Exactly where did I say that, if the only the only available description is one pink and purple polka dotted male and a yellow and green polka dotted female, that should be the information disseminated, not that only a limited description is available.

AGAIN... WHAT don't you understand???

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information

Why do continue to ignore the last sentence of that paragraph?

 

[OKTexas]

The point is if the university will provide all of that limited description or will they withhold relevant parts in the name of political correctness? They are indicating the latter which is a disservice to the community.

No, you are adding YOUR definition, NOT the university's.

WHAT part don't you understand?

"Vice President Wheelock is announcing a change that will reduce the use of suspect descriptions in Crime Alerts when there is insufficient detail to reasonably aid in individual identification."

To be clear: Where there is sufficient information to aid our community in identifying a suspect who presents risk, we will continue to include that information. Where the information is too general to advance that goal, we will note that only a limited description of the suspect(s) is available."

Why are you ignoring the last sentence in your quote?

What do you want the university to do? Put out a description that says "you know it was probably a n****"

If they did it would be HILARIOUS.

You are a sick fuck. Would it be hilarious if a description said "you know it was probably a racist right wing nut"

Seems I heard exactly that in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings, don't remember you complaining about that.