Political Anger Rising with Obama Regime

[The Rabbi]

Ole! Yet another ripe turd from the lips of "Jake, King of the Unsubstantiated Statement"!!

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yes, Bush had a losing strategy in Afghanistan. He assured it when he invaded Iraq. The rising anger in this country has been focusing on just how much the Republican administration screwed the American public in this decade. With the party in the hands of the loony fringe right, the GOP will be in the minority for a very long time.

And Obama has a strategy to mortgage our future to the Chinese, who supported him.

Really, Jake you need to read something other than Keith Olbermann transcripts.

This is Rabbi's first post in this thread. Look at his assertion. Where is support for his comment about the Chinese, and his comment about Olbermann. And he wants others to provide substantiation for their posts? Too funny. the Rab wants others to do what he won't. Hypocritical on his part, and he will keep getting acorns.

 

[Midnight Marauder]

Yes, Bush had a losing strategy in Afghanistan. He assured it when he invaded Iraq. The rising anger in this country has been focusing on just how much the Republican administration screwed the American public in this decade. With the party in the hands of the loony fringe right, the GOP will be in the minority for a very long time.

And Obama has a strategy to mortgage our future to the Chinese, who supported him.

Really, Jake you need to read something other than Keith Olbermann transcripts.

This is Rabbi's first post in this thread. Look at his assertion. Where is support for his comment about the Chinese, and his comment about Olbermann. And he wants others to provide substantiation for their posts? Too funny. the Rab wants others to do what he won't. Hypocritical on his part, and he will keep getting acorns.

He might just do it, now that you've asked.

See how it works now?

And he won't get his panties in a bunch over the asking, or call you lazy, or anything like that either.

 

[Maple]

Gee I wonder why? Could it be that Obama and the Democrats are more than splitting the country there even demoralizing it?

(According to the Rasmussen Report)

Fifty-nine percent (59%) of U.S. voters believe that the current level of political anger in the country is higher than it was when George W. Bush was president.

The Bush days are starting to look like, The Good Olde Bush Days...!

I would expect allot more Bush bashing by Obama and the Dims now.

I agree, there is a whole lot more anger, not only are Americans angry, the French President Sarkozy is incensed over his handling of Iran and their nukes, stating that he believes Obama is so egotistical, that he listens to no one and that this characteristic makes him extremely naive and therefore dangerous. What ever happened to Obama developing a NEW respect with our allies. First he pisses off the Poles by backing off of his promise to put up a shield and now this with France.

Maybe, he just wants to be freinds of the terrorists like Akmajinadad, and the other dictators like Castro and others in the southern hemisphere. I guess we will have a whole lot of new friends but we are guaranteed to lose the old ones.

 

[JakeStarkey]

And Obama has a strategy to mortgage our future to the Chinese, who supported him.

Really, Jake you need to read something other than Keith Olbermann transcripts.

This is Rabbi's first post in this thread. Look at his assertion. Where is support for his comment about the Chinese, and his comment about Olbermann. And he wants others to provide substantiation for their posts? Too funny. the Rab wants others to do what he won't. Hypocritical on his part, and he will keep getting acorns.

He might just do it, now that you've asked.

See how it works now?

And he won't get his panties in a bunch over the asking, or call you lazy, or anything like that either.

Got it backwards, bub, it was the squirrel who get all agitated wanting what he would not do himself. Sorry, burden of proof is on the asserter. That is the Rab in this case.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Maybe he wants to hand Lumpy and Maple over to the bad guys. Do you know that the President can effect prisoner exchanges.

 

[The Rabbi]

Maybe he wants to hand Lumpy and Maple over to the bad guys. Do you know that the President can effect prisoner exchanges.

Yeah! ANother steaming ripe one from "Jake, King of the Unsubstatiated Statements."

 

[Polk]

Everything Obama ran on, Bush actually did.
Obama ran on being bipartisan. Bush actually was bipartisan. Obama ran on being post-racial. Bush actually was post racial. Obama ran on having a strategy in Afghanistan, Bush actually had one.
You obviously can beat someone with no one because Obama is a no one.

Bush was bipartisan? That's laughable.

Hello? Who wrote the No Child Left Behind legislation?
Try researching something before blowing your ignorant mouth off.

Along with Judd Gregg and it was sold to Kennedy under a false premise (that in return for accepting a movement toward the testing regime, the Republicans would increase education spending, which never happened).

 

[Polk]

Bush was constantly knuckling under to Democrats, trying to work with them. That was also teh case with the drug benefit for Medicaid. Thats why the conservatives grew to dislike him.

Medicaid already covered prescriptions. What was signed during the Bush years was a drug benefit for Medicare, and there was no caving to Democrats involved. Democrats had wanted it for years, so Bush pushed it to remove a campaign issue. Bonus, instead of having the drugs purchased in the way Democrats would have preferred (using bulk purchase like the VA does), he structures the program as a massive handout to insurance and drug companies, increasing the cost of medicine for seniors (as many who would qualify for prescription assistance programs before no long do). Furthermore, the bill was a backdoor vehicle for Medicare privatization.

 

[Polk]

Yeah, he was never the darling of the right. Which makes it ironic that the Dems all portrayed him that way. He was teh Republican that most Democrats would vote for.

The reason why he's not a darling of the right is because of his attitude, not his voting record.

 

[The Rabbi]

Yeah, he was never the darling of the right. Which makes it ironic that the Dems all portrayed him that way. He was teh Republican that most Democrats would vote for.

The reason why he's not a darling of the right is because of his attitude, not his voting record.

You must be second cousin to "Jake, King of the Unsubstantiated Statement."
Every post you have made is either factually incorrect, a distortion of reality, or undercuts your own beliefs.
You'll really need to try harder to be taken seriously.

 

[Polk]

Yeah, he was never the darling of the right. Which makes it ironic that the Dems all portrayed him that way. He was teh Republican that most Democrats would vote for.

The reason why he's not a darling of the right is because of his attitude, not his voting record.

You must be second cousin to "Jake, King of the Unsubstantiated Statement."
Every post you have made is either factually incorrect, a distortion of reality, or undercuts your own beliefs.
You'll really need to try harder to be taken seriously.

McCain had a year or two earlier this decade where he moved away from the party line somewhat, but that's not emblematic of his career (the year he voted with the party the least, 2001, he still voted with the party 67 percent of the time). Last year he voted with the party 93 percent of the time, and so far this year, he votes with the party 95 percent of the time (a rate higher than the party leadership).

CQ Politics | 2008 Annual Vote Studies Report - Presidential Support, Party Unity, Lawmaker Participation
CQ: McCain: Maverick no more? - CQ Politics- msnbc.com

 

[The Rabbi]

Without an issue by issue analysis the numbers mean nothing.
The point is that McCain consistently reached across the aisle. McCain-Feingold is just the most obvious, and the most obvious reason while conservatives hate him.

 

[Polk]

McCain reaching across the aisle on a handful of issues in over two decades in the Senate doesn't mean he's bipartisan. Take any other senator that's been there that long, and you'd find just as many reaches across the aisle.

 

[The Rabbi]

McCain reaching across the aisle on a handful of issues in over two decades in the Senate doesn't mean he's bipartisan. Take any other senator that's been there that long, and you'd find just as many reaches across the aisle.

You must be channeling "Jake, King of the Unsubstantiated Statement."

 

[Polk]

McCain reaching across the aisle on a handful of issues in over two decades in the Senate doesn't mean he's bipartisan. Take any other senator that's been there that long, and you'd find just as many reaches across the aisle.

You must be channeling "Jake, King of the Unsubstantiated Statement."

It's pretty obvious you've got nothing to go on, because instead of presenting evidence, you go into personal attacks.

 

[MaggieMae]

Gee I wonder why? Could it be that Obama and the Democrats are more than splitting the country there even demoralizing it?

(According to the Rasmussen Report)

Fifty-nine percent (59%) of U.S. voters believe that the current level of political anger in the country is higher than it was when George W. Bush was president.

The Bush days are starting to look like, The Good Olde Bush Days...!

I would expect allot more Bush bashing by Obama and the Dims now.

Love the way Rasmussen poses questions. And he wonders why he's not seen as credible among the other legitimate pollsters. The entire economy took a nosedive right after Obama was sworn in and it will be another decade before we pull out of it, if then. Why on earth WOULDN'T there be more "political anger"???? I'm "angry" too, but would Bush have handled a recovery any better? Who knows?

 

[MaggieMae]

Yes, Bush had a losing strategy in Afghanistan. He assured it when he invaded Iraq. The rising anger in this country has been focusing on just how much the Republican administration screwed the American public in this decade. With the party in the hands of the loony fringe right, the GOP will be in the minority for a very long time.

And Obama has a strategy to mortgage our future to the Chinese, who supported him.

Really, Jake you need to read something other than Keith Olbermann transcripts.

So what exactly would that strategy be, Rabbi? I'm more than curious, since you appear to be making the same argument people made when Bush mortgaged two wars to the Chinese.

 

[MaggieMae]

just wait tile they start trying to ram amnesty through again and cap and trade, and value added tax... people are gonna be pissed. I mean really pissed. but we still son't act as horribly as you liberals did in Pittsburg.

They still have plenty of time before 2010. They think we'll forget. As they wish to FORGET what they witnessed this past Summer.

People are watching, and waiting. But then the Statists will STILL Blame the Republicans if it fails.

They will fail because they still have no plans nor solutions of their own. There aren't enough of you revolutionaries to retake the majority, get used to it.

 

[Caroljo]

just wait tile they start trying to ram amnesty through again and cap and trade, and value added tax... people are gonna be pissed. I mean really pissed. but we still son't act as horribly as you liberals did in Pittsburg.

They still have plenty of time before 2010. They think we'll forget. As they wish to FORGET what they witnessed this past Summer.

People are watching, and waiting. But then the Statists will STILL Blame the Republicans if it fails.

Things have changed so much - too many things happening in such a short time (since the sheep voted in their leader). We have another year before we can change things! What's going to happen in 12 months? How much has happened in just the last 8 months?? This is why the dems want to push all their plans through NOW. Once they're in place it's not easy to change it. They'll have what they want.
More people have got to get PISSED!!! We can't let this keep going on. I pray for our country every day...it's sad