Police State: Surveillance Drones Over U.S. Get Ok By Congress...

paulitician

Platinum Member
Oct 7, 2011
38,401
4,162
1,130
But it could never happen here right? Well, guess again. It's here. I guess it wasn't all just 'crazy paranoia' after all. Big Brother will be employing the use of Thousands of Surveillance Drones on the American People. Interesting because I actually remember a time when most would just laugh at and ridicule those who said the U.S. Government would use these Drones to spy on their own People. Well i assure you, it's nothing to laugh at. Enjoy America.


Look! Up in the sky! Is it a bird? Is it a plane? It’s … a drone, and it’s watching you. That’s what privacy advocates fear from a bill Congress passed this week to make it easier for the government to fly unmanned spy planes in U.S. airspace.

The FAA Reauthorization Act, which President Obama is expected to sign, also orders the Federal Aviation Administration to develop regulations for the testing and licensing of commercial drones by 2015.

Privacy advocates say the measure will lead to widespread use of drones for electronic surveillance by police agencies across the country and eventually by private companies as well.

“There are serious policy questions on the horizon about privacy and surveillance, by both government agencies and commercial entities,” said Steven Aftergood, who heads the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation also is “concerned about the implications for surveillance by government agencies,” said attorney Jennifer Lynch.

The provision in the legislation is the fruit of “a huge push by lawmakers and the defense sector to expand the use of drones” in American airspace, she added.

According to some estimates, the commercial drone market in the United States could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars once the FAA clears their use.

The agency projects that 30,000 drones could be in the nation’s skies by 2020.

Read More:
Drones over U.S. get OK by Congress - Washington Times
 
predator-Drone-firing-missiles.jpg



Big Brother sees you.
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKkFoSt6aKQ]Police State 2012: No Need to Wait, It's Already Here - YouTube[/ame]

Thank you James Corbett. Now, what can we do about it?
 
It's no 'Crazy Paranoid Conspiracy' people. The Drones are watching, and those 'Black Helicopters' are too.
 
George Orwell was ahead of his time. With the constant improvement of technology this was pretty much inevitable.
 
George Orwell was ahead of his time. With the constant improvement of technology this was pretty much inevitable.

Yes, he sure was. Most of the things most claimed could never happen here, are now happening. Yet so many stay silent or even cheer Big Brother on. It's so sad.
 
This is the stuff people should be out there protesting. Yet so few are.
 
“There are serious policy questions on the horizon about privacy and surveillance, by both government agencies and commercial entities,” said Steven Aftergood, who heads the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists.

Agreed, let us do something about it. Speak to any military people you may know. Help them to defend our constitution and restore constitutional government. Here is an absolutely lawful method.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...d-the-constitution-from-a-domestic-enemy.html
 

That's a pretty shitty attitude to take for a man who has a newborn daughter. You'll be the one 'waaaaaaaa-ing' when the government starts telling you how to raise her.

Well, maybe not, you seem to be acclimated well to the group-think they prefer...

They cant tell me how to raise her - because when they do, I won't be poo-pooing about it on message boards with hyperbole. I'll be too busy actually doing something about it, unlike these pussies who always cry the sky is falling from the convenience of their warm, cuddly, protected homes.
 
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr658enr/pdf/BILLS-112hr658enr.pdf

SEC. 332. INTEGRATION OF CIVIL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS
INTO NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM.
(a) REQUIRED PLANNING FOR INTEGRATION.—
(1) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.—Not later than 270 days after
the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation,
in consultation with representatives of the aviation
industry, Federal agencies that employ unmanned aircraft systems
technology in the national airspace system, and the
unmanned aircraft systems industry, shall develop a comprehensive
plan to safely accelerate the integration of civil
unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system.

The plan required under paragraph (1)
shall provide for the safe integration of civil unmanned aircraft
systems into the national airspace system as soon as practicable,
but not later than September 30, 2015.

(5) ROADMAP.—Not later than 1 year after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall approve and make
available in print and on the Administration’s Internet Web
site a 5-year roadmap for the introduction of civil unmanned
aircraft systems into the national airspace system, as coordinated
by the Unmanned Aircraft Program Office of the Administration.
The Secretary shall update the roadmap annually.

PILOT PROJECTS.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 180 days after the
date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall establish
a program to integrate unmanned aircraft systems into the
national airspace system at 6 test ranges. The program shall
terminate 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act.

EXPANDING USE OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS IN
ARCTIC.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date
of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall develop a plan
and initiate a process to work with relevant Federal agencies
and national and international communities to designate
permanent areas in the Arctic where small unmanned aircraft
may operate 24 hours per day for research and commercial
purposes. The plan for operations in these permanent areas
shall include the development of processes to facilitate the
safe operation of unmanned aircraft beyond line of sight. Such
areas shall enable over-water flights from the surface to at
least 2,000 feet in altitude, with ingress and egress routes
from selected coastal launch sites.
 
I know a thing or two about drones, and one of the most dangerous things about them is that the pilot has no peripheral vision when launching and landing one. They can be a serious hazard to navigation.

It's one thing when they are bumping and crashing into other aircraft in a war zone, quite another when they do so in civil airspace.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top