Police State: Police Officer Slays Marine Sergeant In School Parking Lot...






That is true, however the deputy has changed his story at least twice. The Sheriffs dept has also changed its story at least once. So far. Based on what I've read this is a bad shooting. I have a friend with the Riverside PD and he feels the Sgt. over reacted as well.

Most likely it's a poor training issue, but with the investigation ongoing it will be awhile before we know anything.
 
The man was unarmed. Shooting him dead was not necessary. It's very sad.

A vehicle can and has been used as a weapon. But I don't expect an idiot like you to understand that.

I was 4 am in th emorning the man was driving at a high rate of speed he was acting irrational, the cop feared for his and the childrens safety.

I guess you would rather let an irrational man speed down the road with two young kids in the car at 4 in the morning.

You got shit fucked up!

No where, in any of the articles does it say the Marine was trying to run over the officer.
 
A guy crashes through a gate. So right off, he is destroying property and an obvious hazard.

The cop calls for backup. So far, so good.

The man refuses to obey police commands. So far, the cops are in the right to be ordering him to submit to their authority. He has given them probable cause.

The man is totally in the wrong for not obeying police commands.

He then allegedly makes statements which the cop says caused him to fear for the children's lives.

I can think of a few things a guy who just crashed through a gate and acting irrationally might say which would make me very concerned about the lives of his kids. Something like, "I'm going to kill my kids."

He is now behind the wheel of a motor vehicle with his kids trapped in the vehicle with him. And he starts the vehicle.

Your options are actually very, very limited at this point.

Shooting him is probably the best option as shooting the vehicle itself is no guarantee it will be disabled. Shooting the tires will not disable the vehicle but may ultimately cause the vehicle to crash and injure the children.


All this is completely logical if the facts have been accurately presented in the various news reports.

I didn't read any article that says he "crashed" through the gate, only one that said he sped through. I don't believe either story. In either case, the shooting didn't take place while the car was racing anywhere. I think it's clear the officer is lying to save his butt.
 





That is true, however the deputy has changed his story at least twice. The Sheriffs dept has also changed its story at least once. So far. Based on what I've read this is a bad shooting. I have a friend with the Riverside PD and he feels the Sgt. over reacted as well.

Most likely it's a poor training issue, but with the investigation ongoing it will be awhile before we know anything.

Seriously? Police are trained, unlike military their first thoughts are to talk first, shoot later.

In this case we'll have to wait, but I've no doubt that a police officer that kills anyone, much less a marine is going to be in a bad place, especially an unarmed marine.
 
It's terrible he put his kids in a position to witness it as well.

It was his routine to go to that school and walk around the track and take his girls with him. If he was so threatening, why is this the only time anyone took issue with him?

"The association said a deputy saw Loggins plow a car through a gate at San Clemente High School then walk away.

His daughters, ages 9 and 14, could be heard screaming in the SUV, and when approached by sheriff's personnel reported their father had been acting oddly, the statement said.

Source: New Details Released in Marine's Death | NBC San Diego"​


Maybe because at 5:00AM in the morning, a male crashing through a school gate, and having two young female children screaming in the back seat might...

....... I'm not a cop here...

................But just might not be considered a "normal routine".



If the cop had let the driver drive off and if this had been a child abduction case and the cop had drove off with two young girls in the back - many would be screaming for his head. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

Lets wait for the investigation before deciding to crucify the cop.



>>>>
 
Last edited:
A guy crashes through a gate. So right off, he is destroying property and an obvious hazard.

The cop calls for backup. So far, so good.

The man refuses to obey police commands. So far, the cops are in the right to be ordering him to submit to their authority. He has given them probable cause.

The man is totally in the wrong for not obeying police commands.

He then allegedly makes statements which the cop says caused him to fear for the children's lives.

I can think of a few things a guy who just crashed through a gate and acting irrationally might say which would make me very concerned about the lives of his kids. Something like, "I'm going to kill my kids."

He is now behind the wheel of a motor vehicle with his kids trapped in the vehicle with him. And he starts the vehicle.

Your options are actually very, very limited at this point.

Shooting him is probably the best option as shooting the vehicle itself is no guarantee it will be disabled. Shooting the tires will not disable the vehicle but may ultimately cause the vehicle to crash and injure the children.


All this is completely logical if the facts have been accurately presented in the various news reports.

Considering it was his routine to go to that school and walk the track, the officer's story is looking murkier and murkier. Why all of a sudden after all this time is there a problem?
 





That is true, however the deputy has changed his story at least twice. The Sheriffs dept has also changed its story at least once. So far. Based on what I've read this is a bad shooting. I have a friend with the Riverside PD and he feels the Sgt. over reacted as well.

Most likely it's a poor training issue, but with the investigation ongoing it will be awhile before we know anything.

Seriously? Police are trained, unlike military their first thoughts are to talk first, shoot later.

In this case we'll have to wait, but I've no doubt that a police officer that kills anyone, much less a marine is going to be in a bad place, especially an unarmed marine.

Indeed this reminds me too much of military members that come into situations where they kill women or children because of circumstances. They don't want to, but their training indeed kicks in.
 

Yeah, according the first article, he was walking away from the car when the officer yelled at him and when he turned around, the officer felt threatened so he shot him.

According to the second article, he was about to drive away, so the officer shot him.

Either way, it pretty much puts the officer in the wrong.

How do you know the conflicting stories are not the result of incompetent reporting?
 
Considering it was his routine to go to that school and walk the track, the officer's story is looking murkier and murkier. Why all of a sudden after all this time is there a problem?

My guess is that all the other times he went to the track it was not his routine to crash through the gate with his SUV.
 





That is true, however the deputy has changed his story at least twice. The Sheriffs dept has also changed its story at least once. So far. Based on what I've read this is a bad shooting. I have a friend with the Riverside PD and he feels the Sgt. over reacted as well.

Most likely it's a poor training issue, but with the investigation ongoing it will be awhile before we know anything.

Seriously? Police are trained, unlike military their first thoughts are to talk first, shoot later.

In this case we'll have to wait, but I've no doubt that a police officer that kills anyone, much less a marine is going to be in a bad place, especially an unarmed marine.




Most police are very poorly trained. BART cops in the SF Bay area are notoriously poorly trained. So much so that officers will never call them as back up. This Sgt. has changed his story and that is never good. He either royally screwed up and is trying to cover it up ala Mehserle, or he is having second thoughts about the shooting and changing his story to try and make himself sound better. Either way it is a telling change in his story.
 
What is 'erratic behavior' anyway? The man should not have been shot and killed.
 
from a link on the OP linked page, to a related piece...

Union blames Marine killed by deputy for fatal shooting - latimes.com

The union said Loggins could be heard uttering "irrational statements" after he crashed through a gate in his GMC Yukon about 4:30 a.m. that morning and left his two daughters, 14 and 9, in the SUV as he walked to the athletic field. Friends have said he frequented the track to walk with his children and read the Bible.

The union said the deputy is a 15-year veteran of the department and a decorated former Marine himself. He radioed dispatch to report a "child endangerment situation," the union said.

Other sheriff's personnel arrived and comforted the children, who said their father "had been acting oddly," the statement said. When Loggins abruptly returned to his SUV, he ignored orders not to start the car and instead put it in gear, preparing to drive "and further endanger the children."

The union said the deputy, positioned by the driver's window, fatally shot Loggins as he began to pull the vehicle forward.

two sides to every story. The truth is usually in between someplace.

And the police officers union is on the police officers side regardless of his guilt.

considering guilt or innocence has yet to be determined (except in your mind apparently), that's not really a fair statement.
 
That is true, however the deputy has changed his story at least twice. The Sheriffs dept has also changed its story at least once. So far. Based on what I've read this is a bad shooting. I have a friend with the Riverside PD and he feels the Sgt. over reacted as well.

Most likely it's a poor training issue, but with the investigation ongoing it will be awhile before we know anything.

Seriously? Police are trained, unlike military their first thoughts are to talk first, shoot later.

In this case we'll have to wait, but I've no doubt that a police officer that kills anyone, much less a marine is going to be in a bad place, especially an unarmed marine.




Most police are very poorly trained. BART cops in the SF Bay area are notoriously poorly trained. So much so that officers will never call them as back up. This Sgt. has changed his story and that is never good. He either royally screwed up and is trying to cover it up ala Mehserle, or he is having second thoughts about the shooting and changing his story to try and make himself sound better. Either way it is a telling change in his story.

I don't know about 'most' police. I know about those around me. Here they hold a BS in police science or they were MP's in military. The departments spend about $100k in training each for first 2 years and they are never alone during that time. So yeah, there are some that are let go, but I'm fairly confident with those on the street.

With that said, if any of them were making a call and shooting their gun, much less killing someone, there would be a very detailed report. Hopefully we'll get a better picture down the line.
 
I think this is very sad, something was up with the Marine. Pretty much seems like 'suicide by police,' which is horrible for the police and his daughters.

New Details Released in Marine's Death | NBC San Diego

Too many changes of stories at this point...I still think the shooting was unjustified. As I said, this was his routine, and now all of a sudden something goes wrong? The cop is covering his a** and of course the police counselors got to the kids before their family or friends so even their stories are suspect at this point.

My brother in law worked for the justice system. I know a little something about what really goes down and at this point, I don't belive the cops story. Unless you find a witness who isn't a cop or the kids after they've been brainwashed by the cops psychologists, I have to side with the Marine.

You know, if my husband was shot in front of my kids, I would want to be the first person to talk to them and I would be very upset that they brought in those "specialists" because I know what they can do and they aren't looking for the truth, they are looking for a way to protect the cops.
 

Forum List

Back
Top