Police officer uses "civil forfeiture" to take all of the money out of a hot dog vendor's wallet

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Confounding, Sep 11, 2017.

  1. Rustic
    Offline

    Rustic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    30,641
    Thanks Received:
    3,145
    Trophy Points:
    1,240
    Ratings:
    +18,427
    Political correctness gives them more rights than citizens, unfortunately
     
  2. radical right
    Offline

    radical right Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2017
    Messages:
    5,209
    Thanks Received:
    581
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +2,345
    FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions.

    United States Supreme Court
    UNITED STATES v. VERDUGO-URQUIDEZ, (1990)
    No. 88-1353
    Argued: November 7, 1989 Decided: February 28, 1990




    After the Government obtained an arrest warrant for respondent - a Mexican citizen and resident believed to be a leader of an organization that smuggles narcotics into this country - he was apprehended by Mexican police and transported here, where he was arrested. Following his arrest, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agents, working with Mexican officials, searched his Mexican residences and seized certain documents. The District Court granted his motion to suppress the evidence, concluding that the Fourth Amendment - which protects "the people" against unreasonable searches and seizures - applied to the searches, and that the DEA agents had failed to justify searching the premises without a warrant. The Court of Appeals affirmed.

    Relying on INS v. Lopez-Mendoza, 468 U.S. 1032 - where a majority assumed that illegal aliens in the United States have Fourth Amendment rights - the court observed that it would be odd to acknowledge that respondent was entitled to trial-related rights guaranteed by the Fifth and Sixth Amendments, but not to Fourth Amendment protection.
     
  3. Rustic
    Offline

    Rustic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    30,641
    Thanks Received:
    3,145
    Trophy Points:
    1,240
    Ratings:
    +18,427
    Like a said illegal aliens have more rights than citizens in this country because of political correctness… Fuck the nanny state
     
  4. Confounding
    Offline

    Confounding Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2016
    Messages:
    1,339
    Thanks Received:
    339
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +1,486
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  5. hazlnut
    Offline

    hazlnut Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2012
    Messages:
    11,003
    Thanks Received:
    1,722
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +5,073
  6. danielpalos
    Offline

    danielpalos Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    23,757
    Thanks Received:
    629
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Alta California, federalist.
    Ratings:
    +2,884
    Why does the right wing claim it is a "work ethic from the Age of Iron" that is important in modern corporate welfare times?
     
  7. busybee01
    Offline

    busybee01 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2017
    Messages:
    2,838
    Thanks Received:
    308
    Trophy Points:
    80
    Ratings:
    +1,753
    No it is not boom. The officer just says what he saw and that is it. The money is not proof of anything by itself and any fine is not dependent on how much he made. It was a illegal seizure.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. Syriusly
    Offline

    Syriusly Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    40,472
    Thanks Received:
    5,302
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Ratings:
    +15,249
    According to the Constitution they do have rights- but who are we kidding- you have never read the Constitution....
     
  9. Syriusly
    Offline

    Syriusly Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    40,472
    Thanks Received:
    5,302
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Ratings:
    +15,249
    Civil Forfeiture laws are really a Rightwing thing- which is why Jeff Sessions has announced he will be increasing Federal civil forfeiture.

    I am against civil forfeiture laws myself- I don't think anyone's property should be legally seized unless convicted of a crime- and that property is related to the crimes.
     
  10. Syriusly
    Offline

    Syriusly Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    40,472
    Thanks Received:
    5,302
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Ratings:
    +15,249
    And by 'more rights' you mean 'less rights'

    Everyone in the United States is protected by the Bill of Rights- but citizens are protected by other rights- among them is that a citizen cannot be deported.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page