Discussion in 'Current Events' started by basquebromance, Dec 4, 2019.
Too bad Faucohontas' mom wasn't as big of a fan of killing kids in the womb as Liawatha is.
I guess she's written off the unborn baby vote.
Let's call Liz Warren what she is: a baby butcher.
Should look great with her pink p-word hat.
I can't think of a better way to start unifying the country...
A presidential inauguration is not where you poke people in the eye. It would be so nice to get past that. It's going to take someone besides Warren I guess or that is what we continue to get.
Whether PP is coercive or not is not the issue.
At the very least you should admit you wrote a post which erroneously claimed PP was leading the way in religious freedoms which you already denied doing.
So go ahead and compound a simple error by denying it...it's not as though anyone will lose respect for you (having none to lose). It's not the error, it's the sad cover up.
The point is that the women providing the infant body parts don't make a dime. Planned Parenthood gets charity or The .women pay for abortions. Then PP gets to sell the body parts making money on both ends. Pay the women for getting abortions. Then they can fuck for real payment. Getting pregnant followed by an abortion will be an easy way to make money. Of course if the democrat dream of infants as a food source becomes a reality those women will become viable farm animals. It wouldn't matter if they are disabled or even conscious.
I didn't say that PP was "leading the way in religious freedoms." I said that PP operates according to the principle of religious freedom, as it maintains neutrality on religious issues and does not proselytize, direct, influence, or judge the clients. The clients do their own thinking. PP just provides its clients with accurate medical information and the services they ask for.
I have engaged in no error or cover up.
Hmmm, I wasn't aware PP was fighting for my right
to sell my pussy and fighting for the guy wanting to buy it
Separate names with a comma.