Midnight Marauder
Rookie
- Feb 28, 2009
- 12,404
- 1,939
- 0
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #101
:yawn:What would the bias of the site have to do with the destabalization of stable atoms by the neutron blast of a fission bomb? Or with the black rain?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
:yawn:What would the bias of the site have to do with the destabalization of stable atoms by the neutron blast of a fission bomb? Or with the black rain?
Yeah, we stopped using it after all of the atmospheric nuclear tests and wartime detonations, and all of the underwater tests.Hopefully just thousands of miles away in open water.
Toldja I was up in the crazy tree!
yeah, it's not like we use the ocean
It's four, but after one, who's counting!Yeah, we stopped using it after all of the atmospheric nuclear tests and wartime detonations, and all of the underwater tests.yeah, it's not like we use the ocean
because nuking 6 nuclear reactors that have large quantities of radioactive materials is exactly the same as your examples, einstein.
Realizing the potential for 44 million irradiated people makes one crazy!Hopefully just thousands of miles away in open water.
Toldja I was up in the crazy tree!
Yeah, hoping it stays away from populated areas for the weeks it would take to dissipate enough is the crazy part.
It's possible. Sudden change of wind after detonation.... Nasty.Realizing the potential for 44 million irradiated people makes one crazy!Yeah, hoping it stays away from populated areas for the weeks it would take to dissipate enough is the crazy part.
And a tactical nuke would do that AND cause more people to be put in harms way.
It's four, but after one, who's counting!Yeah, we stopped using it after all of the atmospheric nuclear tests and wartime detonations, and all of the underwater tests.
because nuking 6 nuclear reactors that have large quantities of radioactive materials is exactly the same as your examples, einstein.
I stand corrected! Again!It's four, but after one, who's counting!because nuking 6 nuclear reactors that have large quantities of radioactive materials is exactly the same as your examples, einstein.
Actually, 6.
4 that are in danger. 2 that are operating normally. 6 total at the plant.
Most of the other test blasts were done underground or underwater. I doubt you'd want to go to Bikini Atoll even today. And Trinity New Mexico? Still a little hazardous for those long weekends in some regards. We don't know how messy the blast spots are in Russia and China.To where?There are zero upsides, and doing so would actually make things much, much, much worse.
The biggest danger in Japan is that 6 reactors, all of which are 30+ years old and which are laden with 30 years of nuclear waste and contamination would explode and send that contamination into the upper atmosphere.
Nuking the plant would destroy very little of that radiation. But it would spread it magnificently.
Same place 100+ atmospheric detonations went?
The site would be vaporized. Fissionable material, vaporized. It would go into atmosphere and be carried off into the ocean by the winds.
I'm not talking using a H-Bomb, or even one of our big ones. Just a mid-sized tactical nuke. No massive mushroom cloud, just enough destructive power to clear the site and carry the particulates off into the ocean we've also detonated warheads in dozens of times.
Compared to the damage this plant has the potential to do?
You haven't given this much thought.
It seems to be beyond your comprehension that this isn't a serious proposal, it is a parlor-type mental exersize that is FUN.I do believe poor old Midnight has gone senile. It seems simply beyond his ability to comprehend that the nuclear blast would only create even more unstable isotopes, and then loft them into the stratosphere to be carried worldwide.
Uranium comes up out of the ground... Not 238 of course though.I seem to recall someone once saying that there are at least a few atoms of uranium in every living being in the world because of the nuclear tests. Hard to really believe, but an odd thing to consider.
The problem I see with sandbagging it is, the cores are not really all that exposed. At Chernobyl, they didn't have a containment vessel per se, and the sandbagging helped. I suppose the buildings housing the reactors could act as the form for the concrete, but we are talking untold TONS of the stuff needed, for each reactor.I'd rather see them pump in a lead slurry or liquid lead into those things. Since lead melts at like 400degrees, even that is cooler than those rods and lead absorbs radiation. Of course, I don't know how you'd get that much lead there in time.
I do believe poor old Midnight has gone senile. It seems simply beyond his ability to comprehend that the nuclear blast would only create even more unstable isotopes, and then loft them into the stratosphere to be carried worldwide.
Back from taking care of your munchies and changing your Depends?I do believe poor old Midnight has gone senile. It seems simply beyond his ability to comprehend that the nuclear blast would only create even more unstable isotopes, and then loft them into the stratosphere to be carried worldwide.
He almost certainly knows as much, he's just a dickhead, pimpled up little kid trying to jerk people off for his own entertainment.
Nobody could possibly be as tarded as that MM dude and be a mod on Gunny's board.
He's just a manipulative bottom dweller undeserving of the attention he is addicted to manufacturing.
Leave him alone and watch him curl and crawl like a worm in withdrawal.
Back from taking care of your munchies and changing your Depends?I do believe poor old Midnight has gone senile. It seems simply beyond his ability to comprehend that the nuclear blast would only create even more unstable isotopes, and then loft them into the stratosphere to be carried worldwide.
He almost certainly knows as much, he's just a dickhead, pimpled up little kid trying to jerk people off for his own entertainment.
Nobody could possibly be as tarded as that MM dude and be a mod on Gunny's board.
He's just a manipulative bottom dweller undeserving of the attention he is addicted to manufacturing.
Leave him alone and watch him curl and crawl like a worm in withdrawal.
Back from taking care of your munchies and changing your Depends?He almost certainly knows as much, he's just a dickhead, pimpled up little kid trying to jerk people off for his own entertainment.
Nobody could possibly be as tarded as that MM dude and be a mod on Gunny's board.
He's just a manipulative bottom dweller undeserving of the attention he is addicted to manufacturing.
Leave him alone and watch him curl and crawl like a worm in withdrawal.
one shouldn't do those two things simultaneously.
Did you get banned for laughing at MM?I do believe poor old Midnight has gone senile. It seems simply beyond his ability to comprehend that the nuclear blast would only create even more unstable isotopes, and then loft them into the stratosphere to be carried worldwide.
He almost certainly knows as much, he's just a dickhead, pimpled up little kid trying to jerk people off for his own entertainment.
Nobody could possibly be as tarded as that MM dude and be a mod on Gunny's board.
He's just a manipulative bottom dweller undeserving of the attention he is addicted to manufacturing.
Leave him alone and watch him curl and crawl like a worm in withdrawal.
I'm talking about pumping it INTO the reactor to stop the reaction. Destroys the reactor, but stops, (hopefully) the reaction.Uranium comes up out of the ground... Not 238 of course though.I seem to recall someone once saying that there are at least a few atoms of uranium in every living being in the world because of the nuclear tests. Hard to really believe, but an odd thing to consider.The problem I see with sandbagging it is, the cores are not really all that exposed. At Chernobyl, they didn't have a containment vessel per se, and the sandbagging helped. I suppose the buildings housing the reactors could act as the form for the concrete, but we are talking untold TONS of the stuff needed, for each reactor.I'd rather see them pump in a lead slurry or liquid lead into those things. Since lead melts at like 400degrees, even that is cooler than those rods and lead absorbs radiation. Of course, I don't know how you'd get that much lead there in time.
Melting point 600.61 K,  327.46 °C,  621.43 °F Boiling point 2022 K,  1749 °C,  3180 °F Heat of fusion 4.77 kJ·mol−1 Heat of vaporization 179.5 kJ·mol−1 Specific heat capacity (25 °C) 26.650 J·mol−1·K−1