Please post all findings from respected scientific bodies

Discussion in 'Environment' started by Red Dawn, Mar 10, 2009.

  1. Red Dawn
    Offline

    Red Dawn Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,224
    Thanks Received:
    456
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Liberal Socialist Paradise
    Ratings:
    +456
    Request to the USMB flat earth society.

    Please post any and all recent statements from a major, established and respected scientific organization, or national science academy, with expertise in climate science, that supports your position that humans have nothing to do with climate change
     
  2. random3434
    Offline

    random3434 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2008
    Messages:
    25,903
    Thanks Received:
    7,188
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +7,194
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. Red Dawn
    Offline

    Red Dawn Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,224
    Thanks Received:
    456
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Liberal Socialist Paradise
    Ratings:
    +456
  4. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    Irreversible ? Pretty damn egomaniacal don't you think ?
     
  5. Red Dawn
    Offline

    Red Dawn Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,224
    Thanks Received:
    456
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Liberal Socialist Paradise
    Ratings:
    +456


    that was a great article.
     
  6. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    bet ya a nickle that climate warning can always be reversed.
     
  7. Red Dawn
    Offline

    Red Dawn Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,224
    Thanks Received:
    456
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Liberal Socialist Paradise
    Ratings:
    +456


    you might be right, but you don't believe humans are affecting climate, so if your wrong and we follow your position, your kids and grandkids will be paying for your ignorance.
     
  8. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    It's ok---I'm probably paying for your grand-parents mistakes too. It all comes out in the wash.
     
  9. manu1959
    Offline

    manu1959 Left Coast Isolationist

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2004
    Messages:
    13,761
    Thanks Received:
    1,625
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    california
    Ratings:
    +1,626
    affecting...sure......sole cause......no......

    biggest offenders china.....india in my opinion....
     
  10. Bern80
    Offline

    Bern80 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,094
    Thanks Received:
    720
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Ratings:
    +726
    As they will if YOU are wrong and we implement policies that assume we are the main cause of the warming cycle (that appears to have ended a little over ten years ago).

    A piece of advice about your vaunted scientific bodies.; follow the money. Considering the FACT that THE 'scientific body' (the IPCC) spear heading AGW has a now established record of blatant omissions, fudging, misrepresenting you might not want to put quite so much stock in that.

    I love how this debate has progressed. First it was provide peer reviewed material as counter evidence to AGW. That was done. As those of knew who provided such research knew, ridiculous excuses were made as to why whatever was presented didn't count. Even funnier was that some on this board who by no stretch could be called scientists attempted to spin what was provided as not saying what it actually said. Now we've moved to only statements from scientific bodies countering AGW count.

    This makes one thing fairly clear. There is little point in debating further unless you religious zealots can say yes to the following; Could you be convinced by a good counter argument? the answer to that is clearly no. I personally provided peer reveiwed research that deomonstrated the previous predictions of warming were overstated which was never meat with any real scientific counter (thought plenty of ridiculous excuses as to why it didn't count were given) You are more interested in being a right fighter than the truth.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page