Pity Party! Obama, "I can't work with GOP Leadership." AW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Full-Auto]

Had the Republican leadership in congress actually proposed legislation to solve the problems caused by previous congresses and the previous administration, then maybe there would be credibility in the notion that Obama deserves a "pity party'.

But the Republican leadership's idea of 'leadership' has been to filibuster, stonewall, ignore their own culpability and responsibility for the problems.

If anyone has behaved reprehensibly, ignoring the problems and not providing solutions that were not guaranteed to further exacerbate the problems, it has been the Republican leadership in Congress.

What garbage, continually not allowing amendments, back room deals, refusing to allow time to read the bills.

Your rant has zero merit.

 

[Oddball]

Obama, "I can't work with GOP Leadership."

More sniveling from the most adolescent president in history.

Question: When has he had to work with the GOP leadership?

For about a year and a half (pre-Scott Brown), any agenda item he wanted could be rammed through congress, without any say-so from republicans, and the rest of the time all he had to do was roll easy marks, like Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe.

You Obammybots out there shouldn't be going around in public without a paper sack over your heads.

 

[Sarah G]

Perhaps if Obama could schedule happy hour or golf, it would be easier to meet with them. Otherwise, the GOP is much too busy saying no.

 

[007]

Yes, OWEbama is beginning to sound just like a snotty little third grader throwing a tantrum. But, that doesn't surprise me. The guy is a jackass... a sniveling little sophomoric jackass who's whining is starting to get irritating...

 

[007]

The GOP leadership are total douchebags and they aren't interested in working with Obama. They have made that perfectly clear.

Well THANK GOD we had someone that was willing to stand AGAINST owebama's radical, socialist agenda... THANK GOD!

 

[Missourian]

Perhaps if Obama could schedule happy hour or golf, it would be easier to meet with them. Otherwise, the GOP is much too busy saying no.

When is Obama NOT scheduling golf?

He's been president for 80 weeks. And during more than half of those weeks, mostly on weekends, President [COLOR=#005497 ! important][FONT=&quot][COLOR=#005497 ! important][FONT=&quot]Obama[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR][/COLOR] has gone golfing. [See photos of Obama behind the scenes.]


In fact, he's hit the links so many times—43—that the press is comparing him to the last presidential hyper-golfer, Dwight Eisenhower. That's led reporters to coin a new phrase for the weekend golf pool coverage: "Eisenhower duty."

Golf Becoming Obama's Passion - Washington Whispers (usnews.com)​

 

[Liability]

The GOP leadership are total douchebags and they aren't interested in working with Obama. They have made that perfectly clear.

The GOP leadership are not total douchebags. While there are (of course) a number of douchebags within the GOP "leadership," it is baseless and silly to claim that all of them are totally douchebags.

It is true to say that they are not interested in working with President Obama. GOOD! This constitutes proof that they AREN'T total douchebags. To desire to work with the douchebag in chief would be evidence of them being douchebags, however. To the extent they have made it clear that they do not wish to work with the douchebag in chief, rational folks applaud them.

I got news for you TeePeeSpammer, if you think Boner, the Turtle, and Eric CUNTer are going to be any better than the botox queen and the limpwristed whelp Harry Reid then you are more batshit insane than I thought.

Anybody -- including a box of rocks -- would be better than Pelousy and that pissant Hapless Harry Reid.

But many of us did enjoy your meltdown!

 

[Samson]

Healthcare- Passed

$750 B Stimulous- Passed

Iraq War- Over

Tax Cuts- Expiring


What can Barak Hussein possibly have to complain about?

 

[Sarah G]

Perhaps if Obama could schedule happy hour or golf, it would be easier to meet with them. Otherwise, the GOP is much too busy saying no.

When is Obama NOT scheduling golf?

He's been president for 80 weeks. And during more than half of those weeks, mostly on weekends, President [COLOR=#005497 ! important][FONT=&quot][COLOR=#005497 ! important][FONT=&quot]Obama[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR][/COLOR] has gone golfing. [See photos of Obama behind the scenes.]


In fact, he's hit the links so many times—43—that the press is comparing him to the last presidential hyper-golfer, Dwight Eisenhower. That's led reporters to coin a new phrase for the weekend golf pool coverage: "Eisenhower duty."

Golf Becoming Obama's Passion - Washington Whispers (usnews.com)​

He doesn't do happy hour and play golf as much as those fatass GOPers do.

 

[MaggieMae]

President Obama said today that he is at odds with Republican leadership in Congress -- but not necessarily Republican voters.


There are conservative and Republican voters that may disagree with some of his policies but have "basically recognized we've got to solve some big problems," Mr. Obama said on NBC's "Today Show."


Yet while regular Republicans may be willing to work together to achieve solutions, the president said that Republican leaders are instead putting forward "a set of policies that are just irresponsible."

Obama: I Can Work with Republicans, but Not GOP Leadership - Political Hotsheet - CBS News

Now the translation for this little pity party is, NOT about the GOP Leadership, although Obama may say so.

It's about the CONSERVATIVES that are going to come in to the Congress that are NOT the "cross the aisle" Rinos that are going to kiss his butt!

He's saying "individual" Republicans, aka Rinos can be manipulated to vote with him, but Tea Party conservatives won't.

Notice how careful he is NOT to mention the Tea Party.

I mean Obama is afraid of the GOP Leadership? Really?????????? I don't buy that one. The GOP leadership hasn't exactly been that rock ribbed conservative as of late.

But I've noticed that Obama has sunk so low that's he's WHINING as of late. We should all feel sorry for him.

"It's not my fault, Bush did it! You just have to give me a chance!!! WAH!!!!!!"

Yeah, the voters gave you a chance Obama. You screwed the pooch!

Voters aren't willing to give Democrats more of a chance. The Democrats in Congress have had four years and have displayed nothing but arrogant tone deafness to the American people.

It's time to send them to the unemployment lines!

But let's give Obama that pity party he so badly needs. One, two, three, AW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What has Republican leadership like Mitch McConnell and Eric Cantor actually brought to the table except whining and rhetorical propaganda?

When you people can actually come up with YOUR OWN PROVABLE SOLUTIONS, rather than addressing ONLY what you think is WRONG with ours, you will have my complete attention. In the meantime, just keep hoot'n & hollerin'. It will get you nowhere.

 

[Urkie]

You guys on the right are so laughable.

Have the Republicans had any new ideas about what to do to fix the economy? Have they made any suggestions about health care? What do they want? I know what they don't want but I sure as hell don't know what they want.

Boehner pretty much said he didn't know either and that they'd decide when they took over. So yeah, lets let a party with no ideas take over and run things. That will certainly be good for this country.

 

[hjmick]

The GOP leadership are total douchebags and they aren't interested in working with Obama. They have made that perfectly clear.

I got news for you TeePeeSpammer, if you think Boner, the Turtle, and Eric CUNTer are going to be any better than the botox queen and the limpwristed whelp Harry Reid then you are more batshit insane than I thought.

Really, Art? There is more than enough douchebaggery to go around in D.C.

Both the Dems and Repubs need a wake up call, but I fear it would go unheard as they both appear comatose when it comes to the American people.

 

[hjmick]

You guys on the right are so laughable.

Have the Republicans had any new ideas about what to do to fix the economy? Have they made any suggestions about health care? What do they want? I know what they don't want but I sure as hell don't know what they want.

Boehner pretty much said he didn't know either and that they'd decide when they took over. So yeah, lets let a party with no ideas take over and run things. That will certainly be good for this country.

Kind of sounds like Pelosi saying we won't know what's in the healthcare bill unless and until we pass it. Fucking genius that was...

 

[MaggieMae]

The GOP leadership are total douchebags and they aren't interested in working with Obama. They have made that perfectly clear.

I got news for you TeePeeSpammer, if you think Boner, the Turtle, and Eric CUNTer are going to be any better than the botox queen and the limpwristed whelp Harry Reid then you are more batshit insane than I thought.

 

[Nosmo King]

Had the Republican leadership in congress actually proposed legislation to solve the problems caused by previous congresses and the previous administration, then maybe there would be credibility in the notion that Obama deserves a "pity party'.

But the Republican leadership's idea of 'leadership' has been to filibuster, stonewall, ignore their own culpability and responsibility for the problems.

If anyone has behaved reprehensibly, ignoring the problems and not providing solutions that were not guaranteed to further exacerbate the problems, it has been the Republican leadership in Congress.

This is just a longer whine for the present them from liberals which is Republicans are the party of "NO."

This from the same hypocrites who did everything they could to block Bush and Republicans during his admin.

I guess that's only okay when Democrats are in leadership.

HEY DUMBASSES YOU EVER HEAR OF CHECKS AND BALANCES. Se Habla Constitution????????

THAT'S WHAT THE HELL THEY ARE FOR YOU BIG BABIES!

Take some classes in Civics and English and get back to us.

 

[MaggieMae]

whats scary is that plays to the stupids of the world who have no clue there are majorites in the House and Senate. Gotta admit admit though..........if there are enough stupids, might as well try to dupe them!!!!

There is no longer a super majority in the Senate with the election of Scott Brown. The House has a better balance, plus combined with 52 Blue Dog (conservative) Democrats have influenced passage of certain bills.

Pay attention.

 

[MaggieMae]

Translation: Obama is upset because the GOP leadership stand up to his economically destructive policies.

YOU MEAN I HAVE TO LISTEN TO THE VOTERS?????????​

​

....

As I now understand it, the budget deficit and the national debt are a huge national crisis, which threaten our future and our very way of life, if the proposal on the table is:

* Aid to the unemployed

* American infrastructure

* Jobs for teachers, firefighters, and police officers

* Retirement security

* Investment in a new U.S. energy policy

* Access to affordable health care for America's families

* Quality public schools and student loans

* Transportation, public works, research and development, childcare, and food stamps

On the other hand, the budget deficit and the national debt are utterly meaningless, and shouldn't even be considered, if the proposal on the table is:

* Tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires

* War

* Infrastructure in Iraq

* an expanded government role in health care through Medicare Part D

* an expanded government role in education through No Child Left Behind

What do you say, Republicans and Tea Partiers? Do I have this about right?

The Washington Monthly

......

 

[MaggieMae]

Allow me the pleasure of breaking it down for Obama once again.

Current House: 255 Democrats | 178 Republicans | 2 Vacancies

Current Senate: 59 Democrats | 41 Republicans​

It would seem Obama can't work with Democrats either.


Bush must have been much smarter than Obama...he didn't have near the majority Obama enjoys, yet he could get things done without and without all of Obama's whining and blubbering .

Only because Bush threatened a veto every time there was opposition. Obama has yet to do that.

 

[MaggieMae]

Had the Republican leadership in congress actually proposed legislation to solve the problems caused by previous congresses and the previous administration, then maybe there would be credibility in the notion that Obama deserves a "pity party'.

But the Republican leadership's idea of 'leadership' has been to filibuster, stonewall, ignore their own culpability and responsibility for the problems.

If anyone has behaved reprehensibly, ignoring the problems and not providing solutions that were not guaranteed to further exacerbate the problems, it has been the Republican leadership in Congress.

What garbage, continually not allowing amendments, back room deals, refusing to allow time to read the bills.

Your rant has zero merit.

Not allowing time to read the bills is pure bullshit. The Republicans have always managed to find time to put together little coalitions and have their backroom strategy meetings, the latest one being "The Young Guns." But they don't have time to read DRAFT BILLS as they worked their way through the process? Yeah, riiiiight...

Also, none of the actual ELECTED lawmaker "read" the bills thoroughly. That's what they have staff for.

Gullible-itis is so fucking rampant it makes me sick.

 

[Foxfyre]

Allow me the pleasure of breaking it down for Obama once again.

Current House: 255 Democrats | 178 Republicans | 2 Vacancies

Current Senate: 59 Democrats | 41 Republicans​

It would seem Obama can't work with Democrats either.


Bush must have been much smarter than Obama...he didn't have near the majority Obama enjoys, yet he could get things done without and without all of Obama's whining and blubbering .

Only because Bush threatened a veto every time there was opposition. Obama has yet to do that.

Bush was up front about what he would and would not support. So the Dems had control of the House and Senate for full two years of the Bush administration. And they couldn't get anything done because of Bush threatening a veto?????? Give me a break.

Now the Dems have had the House and Senate for four years AND the White House for two and they can't get anything done because of the Republicans in Congress????

Are you seriously making that argument?