Phil Jones Rolled...Game Over.

Gawd you really are WEAK DUDE! I am kicking your ASS on the other thread so you SLINK over here like a WEASLE and try the SAME SHIT that you are FAILING with on the other thread. WEAK Dude WEAK!!!





Cold bro..........I always did say you have the political IQ of a small soap dish!!!




McCoy.jpg




This crap never had anything to do with science s0n..............which is now the opinion of the American people!!!!!
 
Last edited:
Dude, the warmers can't help themselves--they have been brainwashed and are not responsible for their own thinking. They cannot hear you when you tell them that the data has been faked as their fingers are firmly wedged in their ears. At the same time they are saying 'nana, foo foo' to further drown out the truth. They live in the village of the damned. Do not attempt to adjust their picture for The Gorical is controlling the transmission; he controls all that they see and hear, he controls their vertical, he controls their horizontal. Salvation for the warmer zombies is futile. Be thankful that you broke free from the grasp of the covenant and that you and your loved ones are safe.

village-of-the-damned.jpg
 
After years of hectoring skeptics, Jones now suggests that there has been no statistically significant warming, but like a drowning man clinging to a straw he still claims — contrary to his own evidence — that the recent warming is predominantly man-made. Jones just happened to omit that the rate of warming in 1860-1880, 1910-1940, and 1976-1998 were exactly the same. The only warming derived from industrialization could be 1976-1998, and yet his own data suggests that all these events were natural. Furthermore, Jones conceded that it was warmer in Roman and Medieval times — when there was no heavy industry.

Pajamas Media Climategate: A Defiance of Arrogant Political Power
 
From the Washington Times...

__


...But political fraud and scientific swindle can be measured by collapsing "science." The University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit in Britain was regarded as the leader in climate research and the fount of raw data on which the science was based until leaked e-mails between researchers revealed evidence of doctoring of data and manipulation of evidence. The director of the research unit, professor Phil Jones, was regarded as an archbishop in the Church of Global Warming. He was pressured to resign in the wake of the scandal. Now he has conceded to an interviewer from the BBC that based on the evidence in his findings, the globe might have been warmer in medieval times. If so, the notion that fluctuations in earthly temperatures are man-made is rendered just that, a man-made notion.
The learned professor told his interviewer that for the past 15 years there has been no "statistically significant" warming. He conceded that he has lost track of many of the relevant papers — that his office was overwhelmed by the clutter of paper. Some of the crucial data to back up scare stories might be lying under other stuff, but he's not sure. An environmental analyst for the BBC said the professor told him that his "strengths" include "integrity" and "doggedness" but not record-keeping and "office tidying." He's just not dogged about keeping things straight.

This was good enough in the early years of the scam, but not any longer. John Christy, a professor of atmospheric science at the University of Alabama at Huntsville and once a ranking member of the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, says the temperature records have been compromised and cannot be relied on. The findings of weather stations that collected temperature data were distorted by location. Several were located near air-conditioning units and on waste-treatment plants; one was next to a waste incinerator. Still another was built at Rome's international airport and catches the hot exhaust of taxiing jetliners.

Terry Mills, a professor of applied statistics at Britain's Loughborough University, looks at the U.N. panel's data and applies a little skepticism. "The earth," he told London's Daily Mail, "has gone through warming spells like these at least twice before in the last thousand years."

The global-warming hysteria, on which the Obama administration wants to base enormous new tax burdens, is just about as reliable as the weather hysteria presented nightly on your favorite television channel. Man is driven by his ego and finds it impossible to think even the weather is not all about him


PRUDEN: The red-hot scam unravels - Washington Times
 
Really, my global warming friends... move on to another cause... this one is dead.

Noone cares what you believe anymore.
 
The data that Old Rocks is using to support this is the hottest year on record is provided by a climate change skeptic.

This does not change 2 fundamental things.
1) CO2 in too large a quantity in not a good thing
2) when we do bad things to the environment, it comes back to bite us in the ass.

But using faked data to justify bad policy is not the way to get to a greener future.

Justifying going half cocked onto bad policy by using worse data creates a problem whereby people doubt good policy supported by good data. The Warmer Scammers have done far more environmental damage than the most polluting power plant.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: del
Really, my global warming friends... move on to another cause... this one is dead.

Noone cares what you believe anymore.

The administration cares and wants to shove Cap n Tax down our throats based on this climate change . . . . which is based on false, erroneous, or faked data.
 
So the glaciers in the Cascades and Rockies that I have personally seen, are just faking their retreat?

The North Arctic Ice Cap is just faking the measured volume of it's ice since 2005?

The Greenland and Antarctic Caps are faking out the GRACE satellite into thinking that they have lost giga-tons of ice?

There have now been hundreds, if not thousands, of papers published in peer review journals stating that AGW is a fact, and measuring the effects of that fact.
 

Forum List

Back
Top