Peter Strzok public testimony: 10:00 am ET, Thursday, July 12, 2018

[Flash]

That asshole doesn't give a shit about our democracy.

He is absolutely a piece of shit.

A great example of the swamp that we need to drain. Fuck the asshole.

An embarrassment to the FBI.

 

[boedicca]

Eric Swalwell is a creepy slime as well.

 

[Flash]

Assholes like him is the reason the FBI has lost all credibility.

 

[iceberg]

Goudy butchered Strzok already, and Maxine couldn't resist blurting nonsense out of turn.

every time she does gowdy should just look at her and scream MY TIME, MY TIME and ignore her.

 

[LeeOnLido]

i think that if stuart smalley was there,he would be reading a penthouse waiting for his turn to question peter stroke

 

[shockedcanadian]

I know this might be hard to believe... but 100% of the time, an investigation doesn't start until some kind of intelligence information has been gathered to cause a need to start it. For Gowdy to argue that Strzok had no reason to think Trump's campaign colluded with the Russians because the investigation hadn't started yet is about as dumb as it could possibly be.

The Chairman of this hearing a is a joke.

If true, he should have stated that. He could said "I didn't interview anyone, here is why". He doesn't have to give specifics of the case, in fact, nobody should expect him to. I do think though, that the potential FORMER higher ups, close to the former president, demanding an investigation which at some level followed down from President Obama is strong.

Now, I can tell you, from personal experience, that authorities outside of America are not the same. If the FBI relied on intel from Britiain, Canada, NZ, Australia they have to understand that it is extremely dangerous in the context of an election.

What I am suggesting and accusing "allies" of, is doing what is in their best interests, they couldn't give a damn about U.S laws and liberty I know this as a fact. The CIA and FBI had better understand this. I'm not saying in an ongoing investigation, where U.S intel have started that these countries can't be of value, but to BEGIN an investigation of a potential future president? It can't happen. They would need serious corroborative information, which would have to come from direct American sources.

Let me go down a foxhole for a moment. Obama interferred in the Brexit vote. Remember his "Britain would be at the bottom of the list in trade" if they voted yes to Brexit? Well, might the British have repaid that comment with a fraudulent dossier?

I think this is the key to this debate. If the intel came from Britain, I wouldn't trust it. If it came from the CIA or FBI, then you have a legitimate case. This is coming from a guy who KNOWS how Canadian police operate. If another nation sees a massive difference in their ability to exploit America in Trump vs Clinton, I wouldn't trust it.

If Dems or anyone don't understand this, you had better. This isn't your grandpas world, the whole world was against Trump, these allies care little of U.S law.

 

[Flash]

what is shelia jackson even doing there? she still thinks the emancipation constitution constipation was written 400 years ago

She is the intellectual brain trust and moral compass for the Democrat Party nowadays.

 

[iceberg]

where is maxine waters?

where's the microphone?

 

[Flash]

Why are the filthy ass Democrats trying to run cover for this asshole?

Have they reduced themselves to that level of scum?

 

[jc456]

Republicans: “While you were discovering rampant treason in the Trump campaign... HOW DARE YOU TEXT YOUR BOO THAT YOU LIKE HILLARY????? WITCH HUNT!!! WIIITCH HUUUUUNT!!!!!”

can't make this kind of shit up.

 

[Lewdog]

I know this might be hard to believe... but 100% of the time, an investigation doesn't start until some kind of intelligence information has been gathered to cause a need to start it. For Gowdy to argue that Strzok had no reason to think Trump's campaign colluded with the Russians because the investigation hadn't started yet is about as dumb as it could possibly be.

The Chairman of this hearing a is a joke.

If true, he should have stated that. He could said "I didn't interview anyone, here is why". He doesn't have to give specifics of the case, in fact, nobody should expect him to. I do think though, that the potential higher ups demanding an investigation which at some level follows down from the President is strong.

Now, I can tell you, from personal experience, that authorities outside of America are not the same. If the FBI relied on intel from Britiain, Canada, NZ, Australia they have to understand that it is extremely dangerous in the context of an election.

What I am suggesting and accusing "allies" of, is doing what is in their best interests, they couldn't give a damn about U.S laws and liberty I know this as a fact. The CIA and FBI had better understand this. I'm not saying in an ongoing investigation, where U.S intel have started that these countries can't be of value, but to BEGIN an investigation of a potential future president? It can't happen.

Let me go down a foxhole for a moment. Obama interferred in the Brexit vote. Remember his "Britain would be at the bottom of the list in trade"? Well, might the British have repaid that comment with a fraudulent dossier?

I think this is the key to this debate. If the intel came from Britain, I wouldn't trust it. If it came from the CIA or FBI, then you have a legitimate case. That is coming from a guy who KNOWS how Canada operates. If another nation sees a massive difference in their ability to exploit America in Trump vs Clinton, I wouldn't trust it.

If Dems or anyone don't understand this, you had better. This isn't your grandpas world, the whole world was against Trump, these allies care little of U.S law.

The lawyer for the FBI TOLD HIM he could not answer it. That's all that needs to be said.

 

[Indeependent]

Why are the filthy ass Democrats trying to run cover for this asshole?

Have they reduced themselves to that level of scum?

They’ve always been that level of scum.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Republicans: “While you were discovering rampant treason in the Trump campaign... HOW DARE YOU TEXT YOUR BOO THAT YOU LIKE HILLARY????? WITCH HUNT!!! WIIITCH HUUUUUNT!!!!!”

yeah rampant treason....you have no idea what treason is........socialism over patriotism.

 

[boedicca]

I know this might be hard to believe... but 100% of the time, an investigation doesn't start until some kind of intelligence information has been gathered to cause a need to start it. For Gowdy to argue that Strzok had no reason to think Trump's campaign colluded with the Russians because the investigation hadn't started yet is about as dumb as it could possibly be.

The Chairman of this hearing a is a joke.

If true, he should have stated that. He could said "I didn't interview anyone, here is why". He doesn't have to give specifics of the case, in fact, nobody should expect him to. I do think though, that the potential higher ups demanding an investigation which at some level follows down from the President is strong.

Now, I can tell you, from personal experience, that authorities outside of America are not the same. If the FBI relied on intel from Britiain, Canada, NZ, Australia they have to understand that it is extremely dangerous in the context of an election.

What I am suggesting and accusing "allies" of, is doing what is in their best interests, they couldn't give a damn about U.S laws and liberty I know this as a fact. The CIA and FBI had better understand this. I'm not saying in an ongoing investigation, where U.S intel have started that these countries can't be of value, but to BEGIN an investigation of a potential future president? It can't happen.

Let me go down a foxhole for a moment. Obama interferred in the Brexit vote. Remember his "Britain would be at the bottom of the list in trade"? Well, might the British have repaid that comment with a fraudulent dossier?

I think this is the key to this debate. If the intel came from Britain, I wouldn't trust it. If it came from the CIA or FBI, then you have a legitimate case. That is coming from a guy who KNOWS how Canada operates. If another nation sees a massive difference in their ability to exploit America in Trump vs Clinton, I wouldn't trust it.

If Dems or anyone don't understand this, you had better. This isn't your grandpas world, the whole world was against Trump, these allies care little of U.S law.

The lawyer for the FBI TOLD HIM he could not answer it. That's all that needs to be said.

Untrue. Congress has Constitutional oversight of the FBI. A lawyer at the FBI does not have the authority to override the Constitution.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Republicans: “While you were discovering rampant treason in the Trump campaign... HOW DARE YOU TEXT YOUR BOO THAT YOU LIKE HILLARY????? WITCH HUNT!!! WIIITCH HUUUUUNT!!!!!”

Rampant treason? Do tell!!

 

[TheOldSchool]

Republicans: “While you were discovering rampant treason in the Trump campaign... HOW DARE YOU TEXT YOUR BOO THAT YOU LIKE HILLARY????? WITCH HUNT!!! WIIITCH HUUUUUNT!!!!!”

yeah rampant treason....you have no idea what treason is........socialism over patriotism.

Shit the fuck up, fascist

 

[LeeOnLido]

Republicans: “While you were discovering rampant treason in the Trump campaign... HOW DARE YOU TEXT YOUR BOO THAT YOU LIKE HILLARY????? WITCH HUNT!!! WIIITCH HUUUUUNT!!!!!”

Rampant treason? Do tell!!

this hearing is already just as funny as the soup nazi episode.all we need is the soup nazi to grill peter stoke

 

[Lewdog]

I know this might be hard to believe... but 100% of the time, an investigation doesn't start until some kind of intelligence information has been gathered to cause a need to start it. For Gowdy to argue that Strzok had no reason to think Trump's campaign colluded with the Russians because the investigation hadn't started yet is about as dumb as it could possibly be.

The Chairman of this hearing a is a joke.

If true, he should have stated that. He could said "I didn't interview anyone, here is why". He doesn't have to give specifics of the case, in fact, nobody should expect him to. I do think though, that the potential higher ups demanding an investigation which at some level follows down from the President is strong.

Now, I can tell you, from personal experience, that authorities outside of America are not the same. If the FBI relied on intel from Britiain, Canada, NZ, Australia they have to understand that it is extremely dangerous in the context of an election.

What I am suggesting and accusing "allies" of, is doing what is in their best interests, they couldn't give a damn about U.S laws and liberty I know this as a fact. The CIA and FBI had better understand this. I'm not saying in an ongoing investigation, where U.S intel have started that these countries can't be of value, but to BEGIN an investigation of a potential future president? It can't happen.

Let me go down a foxhole for a moment. Obama interferred in the Brexit vote. Remember his "Britain would be at the bottom of the list in trade"? Well, might the British have repaid that comment with a fraudulent dossier?

I think this is the key to this debate. If the intel came from Britain, I wouldn't trust it. If it came from the CIA or FBI, then you have a legitimate case. That is coming from a guy who KNOWS how Canada operates. If another nation sees a massive difference in their ability to exploit America in Trump vs Clinton, I wouldn't trust it.

If Dems or anyone don't understand this, you had better. This isn't your grandpas world, the whole world was against Trump, these allies care little of U.S law.

The lawyer for the FBI TOLD HIM he could not answer it. That's all that needs to be said.

Untrue. Congress has Constitutional oversight of the FBI. A lawyer at the FBI does not have the authority to override the Constitution.

Where the hell do you get that? Are you even watching? The Supreme Court ruled that a person being questioned by Congress on an ongoing investigation can be told NOT to answer the questions as it can interfere with the investigation. The Supreme Court interprets the Constitution, and that becomes the rule of law.

 

[tyroneweaver]

Lol first question should have been Mr Strzok are you a partisan hack?

Sincerely,
Partisan Hack

Signed frank church democrat from idaho

 

[Hellokitty]

OMG can they not speed up the voting roll call, seriously can't they just text in their votes.