Pete Buttigieg: America Isn’t ‘Much Of A Democracy’ Because Of That Electoral College Thing

Democrats used to get all upset at the very idea of "disenfranchising" even single a voter.

Now they're all on the same bandwagon of disenfranchising more than half the voters in the entire nation with this stupidity of doing away with the Electoral College.
 
It's rather funny the left has totally forgotten before election night 2016 Hillary had a 90% chance of winning all the political and media experts were predicting she would win pointing how much of an easier path to 270 electoral votes she had no one was questioning the electoral college system until she lost.

Link?
Ok.
Clinton's chances for the White House on the rise - CNNPolitics
Political scientists predict Clinton will win 334 electoral votes, compared to 204 for Donald Trump – PollyVote
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...o-270-electoral-votes-donald-trump-has-three/
 
Someone should inform BootyJudge that we have never been a democracy. Presidential candidates should know these things.
You should watch his announcement speech from yesterday. Then you wouldn't sound so miserably uninformed.

Why is it that America is the only place where the candidate with fewer votes wins the election?
 
It's rather funny the left has totally forgotten before election night 2016 Hillary had a 90% chance of winning all the political and media experts were predicting she would win pointing how much of an easier path to 270 electoral votes she had no one was questioning the electoral college system until she lost.

Link?
Ok.
Clinton's chances for the White House on the rise - CNNPolitics
Political scientists predict Clinton will win 334 electoral votes, compared to 204 for Donald Trump – PollyVote
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...o-270-electoral-votes-donald-trump-has-three/

NO NO DUMBASS. Link to THIS ↓↓
no one was questioning the electoral college system until she lost.
 
It's rather funny the left has totally forgotten before election night 2016 Hillary had a 90% chance of winning all the political and media experts were predicting she would win pointing how much of an easier path to 270 electoral votes she had no one was questioning the electoral college system until she lost.

Link?
Ok.
Clinton's chances for the White House on the rise - CNNPolitics
Political scientists predict Clinton will win 334 electoral votes, compared to 204 for Donald Trump – PollyVote
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...o-270-electoral-votes-donald-trump-has-three/

NO NO DUMBASS. Link to THIS ↓↓
no one was questioning the electoral college system until she lost.

Pigo always asks for links. He doesn’t know how to use a search engine it seems
 
Mr. & Mr. Buttigieg

Ain't it sweet.......sniffle....

upload_2019-4-15_22-31-44.png


We've already had a fag president. Don't need any more.
 
Democrats used to get all upset at the very idea of "disenfranchising" even single a voter.

Now they're all on the same bandwagon of disenfranchising more than half the voters in the entire nation with this stupidity of doing away with the Electoral College.

This has already been done to death but the EC itself ALREADY disenfranchises more than half the voters.

Nationally as well as in states like.... Wisconsin... Michigan... Pennsylvania... and at least ten others including my own.
 
Someone should inform BootyJudge that we have never been a democracy. Presidential candidates should know these things.
You should watch his announcement speech from yesterday. Then you wouldn't sound so miserably uninformed.

Why is it that America is the only place where the candidate with fewer votes wins the election?

Because we are a representative republic with a constitution that mandates a fair voting system.

Don't like it? You know the legal drill.
 
Typical dumbass Democrat.
The 2020 Dem race is to see who can outstupid each other.

AMERICA IS A REPUBLIC

Twitter

what kind of name is "Peter Butt" ??

what kind of name is "Peter Butt" ??
His friends call him Pete Butt.
i wonder if he is related to Richard Assman

Pete Butt's 3d grade graduation picture
View attachment 256087

It's rather funny the left has totally forgotten before election night 2016 Hillary had a 90% chance of winning all the political and media experts were predicting she would win pointing how much of an easier path to 270 electoral votes she had no one was questioning the electoral college system until she lost.

buttergeege sounds like the name of a super hero.

Mr. & Mr. Buttigieg

Ain't it sweet.......sniffle....

View attachment 256094

We've already had a fag president. Don't need any more.

This being the brightest and best it would appear nobody has an actual cogent argument against Mr Buttigieg.
 
Democrats used to get all upset at the very idea of "disenfranchising" even single a voter.

Now they're all on the same bandwagon of disenfranchising more than half the voters in the entire nation with this stupidity of doing away with the Electoral College.

This has already been done to death but the EC itself ALREADY disenfranchises more than half the voters.

Nationally as well as in states like.... Wisconsin... Michigan... Pennsylvania... and at least ten others including my own.

Obviously you haven't even the faintest idea what you're talking about.
 
Typical dumbass Democrat.
The 2020 Dem race is to see who can outstupid each other.

AMERICA IS A REPUBLIC

Twitter

what kind of name is "Peter Butt" ??

what kind of name is "Peter Butt" ??
His friends call him Pete Butt.
i wonder if he is related to Richard Assman

Pete Butt's 3d grade graduation picture
View attachment 256087

It's rather funny the left has totally forgotten before election night 2016 Hillary had a 90% chance of winning all the political and media experts were predicting she would win pointing how much of an easier path to 270 electoral votes she had no one was questioning the electoral college system until she lost.

buttergeege sounds like the name of a super hero.

Mr. & Mr. Buttigieg

Ain't it sweet.......sniffle....

View attachment 256094

We've already had a fag president. Don't need any more.

This being the brightest and best it would appear nobody has an actual cogent argument against Mr Buttigieg.

If he's against the EC, that makes him just another mediocre dumbass leftist ideologue. A non-starter.
 
Typical dumbass Democrat.
The 2020 Dem race is to see who can outstupid each other.

AMERICA IS A REPUBLIC

Twitter

what kind of name is "Peter Butt" ??

what kind of name is "Peter Butt" ??
His friends call him Pete Butt.
i wonder if he is related to Richard Assman

Pete Butt's 3d grade graduation picture
View attachment 256087

It's rather funny the left has totally forgotten before election night 2016 Hillary had a 90% chance of winning all the political and media experts were predicting she would win pointing how much of an easier path to 270 electoral votes she had no one was questioning the electoral college system until she lost.

buttergeege sounds like the name of a super hero.

Mr. & Mr. Buttigieg

Ain't it sweet.......sniffle....

View attachment 256094

We've already had a fag president. Don't need any more.

This being the brightest and best it would appear nobody has an actual cogent argument against Mr Buttigieg.

He is well spoken and charming, but indifferent towards constitutional America.

We just got off eight years of that game. We don't want a rerun.
 
It's rather funny the left has totally forgotten before election night 2016 Hillary had a 90% chance of winning all the political and media experts were predicting she would win pointing how much of an easier path to 270 electoral votes she had no one was questioning the electoral college system until she lost.

Link?
Ok.
Clinton's chances for the White House on the rise - CNNPolitics
Political scientists predict Clinton will win 334 electoral votes, compared to 204 for Donald Trump – PollyVote
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...o-270-electoral-votes-donald-trump-has-three/

NO NO DUMBASS. Link to THIS ↓↓
no one was questioning the electoral college system until she lost.
First be specific DUMBASS don't just say link. Second you can't really provide a link to something no one was saying.
 
Democrats used to get all upset at the very idea of "disenfranchising" even single a voter.

Now they're all on the same bandwagon of disenfranchising more than half the voters in the entire nation with this stupidity of doing away with the Electoral College.

This has already been done to death but the EC itself ALREADY disenfranchises more than half the voters.

Nationally as well as in states like.... Wisconsin... Michigan... Pennsylvania... and at least ten others including my own.

Obviously you haven't even the faintest idea what you're talking about.

Oh but I do. Have been in all the Electoral College threads, for years. All of those states I mentioned, as well as Virginia, Colorado, Utah, Aridzona, and several others, disenfranchised more than half their own voters. Nobody got as much as 50% of the vote in any of them. Yet every damn one of those states went to Congress and lied through their teeth claiming "oh wow man it's amazing, literally everybody in our state voted for the same person". Which disenfranchised most of each of those state's voters.

Let me know if you need me to diagram this with stick figures.

(/offtopic)
 
Someone should inform BootyJudge that we have never been a democracy. Presidential candidates should know these things.
You should watch his announcement speech from yesterday. Then you wouldn't sound so miserably uninformed.

Why is it that America is the only place where the candidate with fewer votes wins the election?

Because we are a representative republic with a constitution that mandates a fair voting system.

Don't like it? You know the legal drill.
Twice in 16 years the candidate with fewer votes won the election. Meanwhile districts were gerrymandered so egregiously that candidates are choosing their voters, not voters choosing their candidates.

And in all these things we find the bony, pale fingers of the Republican Party. No wonder you have no complaints. Winning counts for more than Justice. Power counts more than fairness. And the fewer people who get to vote means the greater chance you can hold power.

Could it be possible for each vote to carry equal weight? Is it possible in the 21st century to count all the votes, see who got the most and declare that person the winner?
 
It's rather funny the left has totally forgotten before election night 2016 Hillary had a 90% chance of winning all the political and media experts were predicting she would win pointing how much of an easier path to 270 electoral votes she had no one was questioning the electoral college system until she lost.

Link?
Ok.
Clinton's chances for the White House on the rise - CNNPolitics
Political scientists predict Clinton will win 334 electoral votes, compared to 204 for Donald Trump – PollyVote
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...o-270-electoral-votes-donald-trump-has-three/

NO NO DUMBASS. Link to THIS ↓↓
no one was questioning the electoral college system until she lost.
First be specific DUMBASS don't just say link. Second you can't really provide a link to something no one was saying.

Then you don't have a legitimate point, do you.

YOU LOSE.
 
Typical dumbass Democrat.
The 2020 Dem race is to see who can outstupid each other.

AMERICA IS A REPUBLIC

Twitter

what kind of name is "Peter Butt" ??

what kind of name is "Peter Butt" ??
His friends call him Pete Butt.
i wonder if he is related to Richard Assman

Pete Butt's 3d grade graduation picture
View attachment 256087

It's rather funny the left has totally forgotten before election night 2016 Hillary had a 90% chance of winning all the political and media experts were predicting she would win pointing how much of an easier path to 270 electoral votes she had no one was questioning the electoral college system until she lost.

buttergeege sounds like the name of a super hero.

Mr. & Mr. Buttigieg

Ain't it sweet.......sniffle....

View attachment 256094

We've already had a fag president. Don't need any more.

This being the brightest and best it would appear nobody has an actual cogent argument against Mr Buttigieg.
Democrats used to get all upset at the very idea of "disenfranchising" even single a voter.

Now they're all on the same bandwagon of disenfranchising more than half the voters in the entire nation with this stupidity of doing away with the Electoral College.

This has already been done to death but the EC itself ALREADY disenfranchises more than half the voters.

Nationally as well as in states like.... Wisconsin... Michigan... Pennsylvania... and at least ten others including my own.

Obviously you haven't even the faintest idea what you're talking about.

Oh but I do. Have been in all the Electoral College threads, for years. All of those states I mentioned, as well as Virginia, Colorado, Utah, Aridzona, and several others, disenfranchised more than half their own voters. Nobody got as much as 50% of the vote in any of them. Yet every damn one of those states went to Congress and lied through their teeth claiming "oh wow man it's amazing, literally everybody in our state voted for the same person". Which disenfranchised most of each of those state's voters.

Let me know if you need me to diagram this with stick figures.

(/offtopic)
I can't read so put up some pictures.
 
pete butt is not charming, if anything, he reminds us macho men of the class clown in 5ft grade
 

Forum List

Back
Top