PETA to the rescue!!!!

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by blastoff, Oct 26, 2011.

  1. blastoff
    Offline

    blastoff Undocumented Reg. User

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2009
    Messages:
    13,559
    Thanks Received:
    1,710
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    In a galaxy far far away...
    Ratings:
    +4,639
    According to the loons at PETA, the United States Constitution protects the rights of orca whales, porpoises, Charlie Tuna, and God knows what other creatures of the sea.

    If they have constitutional protections, doesn't that make them U.S. citizens? And if so, that might open a whole new immigration can of worms (shouldn't they also have constitutional protection?), illegal alien orcas, porpoises, etc. who wander into U.S. coastal waters?

    Save a seal. Beat a PETA person with a club.

    Read it for yourself...AP Exclusive: SeaWorld accused of enslaving orcas | General Headlines | Comcast.net
     
  2. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,791
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,807
    Why not? it protects the rights of non living entitites such as corporations.
    surely living entities deserve more protections than non living ones?
     
  3. Si modo
    Offline

    Si modo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Messages:
    41,538
    Thanks Received:
    6,382
    Trophy Points:
    1,810
    Location:
    St. Eligius
    Ratings:
    +8,703
    "PETA"

    *spits coffee on computer screen*

    :lmao:
     
  4. martybegan
    Offline

    martybegan Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    29,467
    Thanks Received:
    4,017
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +11,032
    When a school of tuna manages to form a corporation, give me a call.

    corporations are still a group of human beings, not mackerel.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. syrenn
    Offline

    syrenn BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2010
    Messages:
    47,839
    Thanks Received:
    10,387
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +10,404
    Bunch of fucking peta FREAKS!!!

    Lets see... how about working dogs? I guess the blind are slave owners.

     
  6. Sallow
    Offline

    Sallow The Big Bad Wolf. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    56,535
    Thanks Received:
    6,132
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    New York City
    Ratings:
    +7,394
    So..who gets executed for the 10,000 or so killed in Bhopal?
     
  7. martybegan
    Offline

    martybegan Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    29,467
    Thanks Received:
    4,017
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +11,032

    Executions are usually for crimes of intent. At bhopal multi layered negligence was probably the cause of the accident, but the whole situation is still pretty mucked up. BP still claims sabotage.

    Based on it not being sabotage, which would make it UC's responsibility I use the term "accident" The release was not intentional, thus missing mens rea required for most capital murder charges. Also note that UC was held accountable to the sums of hundreds of millions of dollars, and the accident probably resulted in the buyout of UC by Dow, so technically UC "died" but its liability transferred. That is actually one of the disadvantages a corportation has over a real person. When a person dies, liability dies with them. Corporate liability, however passes down to sucessor corporations.
     

Share This Page