If Romney is so strong in area of the economy...if his private business experience is such an asset, why couldn't he translate than into jobs when he was Governor of Massachusetts?
Texas under Perry created more jobs in two months than Massachusetts under Romney did in four years.
Massachusetts under Romney was 47th lowest in the country in job creation.
Only three states were worse.
While Texas under Perry created more jobs than the other 49 state COMBINED.
If Romney can create jobs in the private sector...that's what he should do to help the country, because he was a failure at leading Massachusetts to job growth as Governor.
A fair question. I think the difference is that Texas is a pro-business state with a strong GOP majority in every major category and government agency. Massachusetts is the opposite:
Texas has a GOP House, GOP Senate, and no State income tax. Right to work, Low regulation.
Mass has a DEM house, DEM Senate, Highest state income tax in the country. Non "right to work, high regulation.
As much as "government" can "create" jobs (a dubious claim, to say the least) , I believe any Governor could have created/encouraged more jobs in Texas over the past decade. All they need to do is simply get the hell out of the way! Thousands of businesses fled to "low tax", "low regulation" , "right to work" Texas from other "high tax", "high regulation", "non right to work" states over the past 10 years. It's not that complicated.
PS- Perry is a horrible debater- if he continues to perform like he has in the first two- he won't be a factor anyway....his star is fading faster than the Dallas Cowboys in the fourth quarter......
I don't think it is productive to attack the other Republican Candidates. I'd take any of them over the dilettante that is stinking up the West Wing now.....
Except, before Perry, and during his First term, Democrats controlled at least one house of the Texas Legislature:
So Perry not only began his unprecedented run of job creation under split houses in the legislature.
Very similar to what we might expect in the US Congress 2012.
And the domination of the Texas legislature by Republican was engineered by Perry.
Even the 2008 Democratic tide wasn't strong enough to sweep Republicans from power in Texas.
I agree, Perry is not a strong debater, but I think Obama has proven that a great speaker does not a great president make.
I also agree that it is counter productive to in fight...but I have gotten tired of seeing one Perry knocking thread after another started by Republican/Conservatives.
I figured a taste of their own medicine might be just what the doctor ordered.
You make some good points there.
Personally I don't dislike Rick Perry. If he is nominated I will vote for him. I prefer Romney. I think he's got the right combination of experience and demeanor for the job. I like all of the Republican candidates except Santorum (no real experience, uber socially conservative) and the democrat pretending to be a republican, John Huntsman.