Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It's man's fault. It's always man's fault. But not just man's fault. It's white western civilization's fault.
Mad king Lud would be very proud of you people.
Even if it retained heat it can't transport it back towards the surface. Vector going outwards in all directions means that it can't be transferred to another molecule of the same kind? Which means there is no such thing as the green house effect. It has been falsified and is a lie.
Riiiiiiiight.It's man's fault. It's always man's fault. But not just man's fault. It's white western civilization's fault.
Mad king Lud would be very proud of you people.
Are you enjoying your life and death political battle with strawmen, Fritz?
That's just the natural cycle. What about increasing CO2 acting as an insulator to keep more heat in? Where's that coming from, if not from man? I'm afraid I'll fo with the science, rather than just accept on "faith" that we can't possibly be doing something to the climate of a planet as big as Earth.
Once again konradv, describe the mechanism by which CO2 keeps more heat in. A packet of energy leaving the surface of the earth, passing through CO2 takes about 0.0049 seconds to radiate into space. That same packet of energy radiating through water vapor takes 0.0245 seconds. Clearly water vapor does retain heat within the atmosphere. CO2, on the other hand, does not.
But hey, if you want to describe the mechanism and show your math, have at it.
Even if it retained heat it can't transport it back towards the surface. Vector going outwards in all directions means that it can't be transferred to another molecule of the same kind? Which means there is no such thing as the green house effect. It has been falsified and is a lie.
Oh yes, we are warmering. Proof is here, folks .. . @ 1:10.
Go out and say that there is no global climate change, and you know, Im not gonna cite the anecdotal evidence. Just walk out the street and your glasses are gonna fog up today.
Rep. Ackerman has just found evidence that air conditioning works, not that the world is getting warmer.
The PJ Tatler » Video: Dem. Rep. Gary Ackerman PROVES that Global Warming is Real!
tff
I swear to fucking god measuring from a super massive nino in 1998 to a huge nina in 2008 is NO GOOD WAY TO MEASURE GLOBAL TEMPERATURES. What you do more or less is find a neutral year like 1981,1990, 1995, or maybe 2003, but there is a damn good reason why you don't chose a warm or cool enso year.
Then draw the mother fucking line in between the low(cool years) and highs(warmer years). What this does is give you a trend of the normal conditions. That is what is changing my friends. A nina and nino over the course of the past 30 years have also changed. In the 1970s a nina would of given us around -.15 to -.1c within the giss, but today a year will be at least .3c within the deepest nina imaginable.
The attachment is me doing as I said above with choosing the favorable years that i point out and drilling a line through the means. Do you see any fucking cooling even through we're supposed to be cooling? I don't think so---Anyways, I may not be winning, but I'm surely right. O'hell even not winning, I will be laughing my ass off.
The second attachment is the future of humanity and our planet
People are tensed. Too many personal and worldwide issues going on. Economy and Politics are not helping. We need God.
I swear to fucking god measuring from a super massive nino in 1998 to a huge nina in 2008 is NO GOOD WAY TO MEASURE GLOBAL TEMPERATURES. What you do more or less is find a neutral year like 1981,1990, 1995, or maybe 2003, but there is a damn good reason why you don't chose a warm or cool enso year.
Then draw the mother fucking line in between the low(cool years) and highs(warmer years). What this does is give you a trend of the normal conditions. That is what is changing my friends. A nina and nino over the course of the past 30 years have also changed. In the 1970s a nina would of given us around -.15 to -.1c within the giss, but today a year will be at least .3c within the deepest nina imaginable.
The attachment is me doing as I said above with choosing the favorable years that i point out and drilling a line through the means. Do you see any fucking cooling even through we're supposed to be cooling? I don't think so---Anyways, I may not be winning, but I'm surely right. O'hell even not winning, I will be laughing my ass off.
The second attachment is the future of humanity and our planet
So...how's that hissy fit working out for you?
Riiiiiiiight.It's man's fault. It's always man's fault. But not just man's fault. It's white western civilization's fault.
Mad king Lud would be very proud of you people.
Are you enjoying your life and death political battle with strawmen, Fritz?
Tell me. Is there ONE non-governmental solution to global warming? Anything in the private industry that doesn't require government mandate, subsidy or law requiring it's use?
Every strange phenomenon that occurs from hemorrhoids to earthquakes are being blamed on global warming. And the only thing being blamed with regularity is western industrialized activity.
Strawman? Hardly. A track record since the 1960's? Definitely.
Why wouldn't be able to transport back to the surface? Do you have some evidence for a photon-stopping force field?
If vectors are going out in all directions, wouldn't that mean some are pointed back towards Earth? After all, you said ALL directions. So what if it can't be absorbed by a molecule of the same kind, we're concerned about heating the earth and you just proved that's where at least half would be going!!!
I don't lie. I don't have to.I swear to fucking god measuring from a super massive nino in 1998 to a huge nina in 2008 is NO GOOD WAY TO MEASURE GLOBAL TEMPERATURES. What you do more or less is find a neutral year like 1981,1990, 1995, or maybe 2003, but there is a damn good reason why you don't chose a warm or cool enso year.
Then draw the mother fucking line in between the low(cool years) and highs(warmer years). What this does is give you a trend of the normal conditions. That is what is changing my friends. A nina and nino over the course of the past 30 years have also changed. In the 1970s a nina would of given us around -.15 to -.1c within the giss, but today a year will be at least .3c within the deepest nina imaginable.
The attachment is me doing as I said above with choosing the favorable years that i point out and drilling a line through the means. Do you see any fucking cooling even through we're supposed to be cooling? I don't think so---Anyways, I may not be winning, but I'm surely right. O'hell even not winning, I will be laughing my ass off.
The second attachment is the future of humanity and our planet
So...how's that hissy fit working out for you?
So how is fucking lying and ignoring the major problem facing humanity going to work out for our descendents? Oh, I forgot. You are a 'Conservative', and those bastards don't count.
Remember, folks: Only conservatives fear-monger.Riiiiiiiight.Are you enjoying your life and death political battle with strawmen, Fritz?
Tell me. Is there ONE non-governmental solution to global warming? Anything in the private industry that doesn't require government mandate, subsidy or law requiring it's use?
Every strange phenomenon that occurs from hemorrhoids to earthquakes are being blamed on global warming. And the only thing being blamed with regularity is western industrialized activity.
Strawman? Hardly. A track record since the 1960's? Definitely.
Well, idiot child, there is going to be a non-governmental solution applied. When enough people die from the affects of global warming on the world's agriculture, much of the sources of emissions will shut down. And you 'Conservatives' can piss all over yourselves in happiness that there wasn't a govermental solution.