People are going to have to face the reality that there's NO GOD

that is simplistic, the original template all life evolved from in the overall progression of evolution backdating before even the first life template all can be considered a master plan directed if not created by an Almighty where their commandments are the determining factor for an outcome that is either predetermined or guided where there is either success or a termination of any offending elements. the metaphysical that is true life in some way need appease something to exist in the Everlasting without its physiology or there would be no need for it to begin with. physiology is proof of the metaphysical that represents life.

Just shut the fuck up you stupid little prick. You don't even know the difference between uni and multi-cellular organisms. Now you're going to pontificate some wacko unintelligible train wreck of a diatribe that no one can even make any rational sense out of, like you're some kind of fucking prophet! Learn how to communicate in fucking English, you insufferable moron. Good grief!
 
Unicellular life doesn't require this ...

that's because it remains a single cell, no matter the smoke and mirrors all beings are / begin as a single cell, the multicellular are subdivisions of the initial cell each subdivision having the identical OS as the first and so on till the end. it's not a theory, it is a natural progression that is readily observed and verified from a microscope.

Again, you'd absolutely FAIL a 7th grade biology exam.

No. all beings DO NOT begin as a single cell. Unicellular beings begin, live and end as a single cell because that's what they are. Multi-cellular beings begin with a male and female gamete and reproduce multiple cells from the very beginning. YOU are the one employing smoke and mirrors here. You want to grab the technicality that initial reproduction begins in the fertilized egg cell (a single cell) and claim this means it's a "single cell" organism. It's NOT! It never will be or can be! That's just YOU being completely ignorant of biology and reproduction of multi-cellular organisms.

There is a natural progression for unicellular life as well as multi-cellular life. The "OS" is completely different for each type of organism. IF multi-cellular life reproduced the same as unicellular life, your kidney cells would be indistinguishable from your skin cells. Your body would be totally unable to function if all of it's cells were identical. You are not a bacteria... you have various component parts as a multi-cellular organism. This is just plain silly and childlike. I've wasted enough time with you on this... if you want to keep on thinking your special needs viewpoint of organisms is more valid than actual biological scientists, that's up to you. I can't help you. All I can say is, you need a refresher course in 7th grade biology so you can learn the differences in uni and multi-cellular life.
.
No. all beings DO NOT begin as a single cell.


upload_2017-10-17_19-37-39.jpeg


all celular beings on earth are or begin as a single cell. multicellular organisms are derived from the subdivision of the initial fertilized cell where the subdivided cells are directed using the same DNA to multifunction and complete the organism as a distinct being.


Multi-cellular beings begin with a male and female gamete and reproduce multiple cells from the very beginning.

from the egg the subdivision occurs when the male component is introduced there is not a subdivision of any but the initial fertilized cell.


IF multi-cellular life reproduced the same as unicellular life, your kidney cells would be indistinguishable from your skin cells. Your body would be totally unable to function if all of it's cells were identical. You are not a bacteria...

your quote above is simply disingenuous by not recognizing what is common knowledge for the development of an organism after fertilization. the DNA in all the subdivided cells is the same, each cell is instructed to perform a specific function in creating the matrix that comprises the organism



at any rate maybe you could restate why from single cell to multicellular is not a natural progression,

you have done nothing to support your notion there is not physical evidence for the transition from singlecell to multicellular life, the diagram above explains the process explicitly what exactly do you not understand - and are willing to accept when the facts are presented to you.
 
all celular beings on earth are or begin as a single cell. (FALSE) multicellular organisms are derived from the subdivision of the initial fertilized cell where the subdivided cells (PLURAL) are directed using the same DNA to multifunction and complete the organism as a distinct being.

Using your very own words to describe the process negates your argumentative premise. Unicellular organisms are not dependent on fertilization or subdivided cells.

from the egg the subdivision occurs when the male component is introduced there is not a subdivision of any but the initial fertilized cell.

Unicellular life does not rely on a male component.

your quote above is simply disingenuous by not recognizing what is common knowledge for the development of an organism after fertilization.

What you are espousing is sheer ignorance the likes of which any studious 7th grader could refute. It is not common knowledge or uncommon knowledge for that matter, it is sheer stubborn ignorance and refusal to accept basic biological facts.
 
People are going to have to face the reality that there's no God. The odds of such developing out of thin space is nearly ZERO.

Sure, physics and chemistry takes some faith in the start but it most certainly explains everything since. Everything when using evidenced based science works together very well.

The first stars came around 12 or billion years ago to form the first galaxies.
Our star formed within our galaxy a little earlier then the earth as gravity had to develop the planets like earth. So earth about 4.3 billion years ago.
The first single celled life
The first muilti celled life
Land life
on up to humans is everything at odds with the 2,000 year old book. The book makes no sense and it is just a crock of shit.

That is reality.

Life formed in the oceans
The fossil record shows that man is only a few million years old as a "family" group and a few hundred thousand years old as a single species.
The sun came first in the case of our solar system
Then the planets
Then life
Then more advanced life in the oceans
Then life on land
Then after a few hundred million years humans come into the picture.

This is once again reality.

One is a fool if they attempt to put belief ahead of the facts and evidence.

Time to come to the conclusion that there probably isn't a god and you shouldn't force religion on other people...Those other people are more likely to be RIGHT.

Those are a lot of words considering it is impossible to prove that there is no god, and impossible to prove there is a god.
 
all celular beings on earth are or begin as a single cell. (FALSE) multicellular organisms are derived from the subdivision of the initial fertilized cell where the subdivided cells (PLURAL) are directed using the same DNA to multifunction and complete the organism as a distinct being.

Using your very own words to describe the process negates your argumentative premise. Unicellular organisms are not dependent on fertilization or subdivided cells.

from the egg the subdivision occurs when the male component is introduced there is not a subdivision of any but the initial fertilized cell.

Unicellular life does not rely on a male component.

your quote above is simply disingenuous by not recognizing what is common knowledge for the development of an organism after fertilization.

What you are espousing is sheer ignorance the likes of which any studious 7th grader could refute. It is not common knowledge or uncommon knowledge for that matter, it is sheer stubborn ignorance and refusal to accept basic biological facts.
.
Using your very own words to describe the process negates your argumentative premise. Unicellular organisms are not dependent on fertilization or subdivided cells.

no one said they were dependant on fertilization similar to the diagram, that is a higher form of life the resulant result is the same for the final result.


Unicellular life does not rely on a male component.

not on a male component specifically though various processes are used by the lower life form to multiply that is irrelevant to the discussion.



What you are espousing is sheer ignorance the likes of which any studious 7th grader could refute. It is not common knowledge or uncommon knowledge for that matter, it is sheer stubborn ignorance and refusal to accept basic biological facts.

it is sheer stubborn ignorance and refusal to accept basic biological facts ...

that is your issue, the diagram is the progression from the single cell to the adult where there is never more than a single initial cell involved and the one fertilized cell of the higher life form uses subdivision maintaining the same DNA information for all succeeding cells to function as directed to complete the process for the completion of the organism.

there is not a missing transition from single cell to multicell organisms as both are derived from a single cell.
 
.
You don't even know the difference between uni and multi-cellular organisms. Now you're going to pontificate some wacko unintelligible train wreck of a diatribe that no one can even make any rational sense out of, like you're some kind of fucking prophet! Learn how to communicate in fucking English, you insufferable moron. Good grief!

there is not a missing transition from single cell to multicell organisms as both are derived from a single cell.


... as both are derived from a single cell



show us, big guy where your inability to comprehend the obvious for the transition to multicellular life from unicellular is failing you and why that is an impediment for you in the explanation of evolution from an original template.
 
.
You don't even know the difference between uni and multi-cellular organisms. Now you're going to pontificate some wacko unintelligible train wreck of a diatribe that no one can even make any rational sense out of, like you're some kind of fucking prophet! Learn how to communicate in fucking English, you insufferable moron. Good grief!

there is not a missing transition from single cell to multicell organisms as both are derived from a single cell.


... as both are derived from a single cell



show us, big guy where your inability to comprehend the obvious for the transition to multicellular life from unicellular is failing you and why that is an impediment for you in the explanation of evolution from an original template.

Us? You are the only one here who doesn't seem to comprehend the biological differences between uni and multi cellular life. I don't need to keep banging my head against a brick wall with you... go on living in ignorance! Multi-cellular life does not begin as a single cell, it begins with a male and female gamete which fuse together to reproduce. The fact that it starts that process within the cellular walls of the female egg cell doesn't make it single cell life. It's akin to claiming that all automobiles are unicycles because they start with one wheel before the other three are added. It's just an ignorant argument that isn't worth addressing.
 
.
You don't even know the difference between uni and multi-cellular organisms. Now you're going to pontificate some wacko unintelligible train wreck of a diatribe that no one can even make any rational sense out of, like you're some kind of fucking prophet! Learn how to communicate in fucking English, you insufferable moron. Good grief!

there is not a missing transition from single cell to multicell organisms as both are derived from a single cell.


... as both are derived from a single cell



show us, big guy where your inability to comprehend the obvious for the transition to multicellular life from unicellular is failing you and why that is an impediment for you in the explanation of evolution from an original template.

Us? You are the only one here who doesn't seem to comprehend the biological differences between uni and multi cellular life. I don't need to keep banging my head against a brick wall with you... go on living in ignorance! Multi-cellular life does not begin as a single cell, it begins with a male and female gamete which fuse together to reproduce. The fact that it starts that process within the cellular walls of the female egg cell doesn't make it single cell life. It's akin to claiming that all automobiles are unicycles because they start with one wheel before the other three are added. It's just an ignorant argument that isn't worth addressing.
.
The fact that it starts that process within the cellular walls of the female egg cell doesn't make it single cell life.

show us, big guy where your inability to comprehend the obvious for the transition to multicellular life from unicellular is failing you and why that is an impediment for you in the explanation of evolution from an original template.

you play to an audience big guy who you speak to anyway with your derision, I was just helping you out - the diagram explains for you after the "fusion" the process where no dissimilar origin cells are involved, you have failed to provide an alternative or whatever it is that prevents you from answering the second part of the quote - and why that is an impediment for you in the explanation of evolution from an original template - including a rabid denial why transitional fossils should not be plentiful as the process is mainly a completion rather than staged events.



Us? You are the only one here who doesn't seem to comprehend the biological differences between uni and multi cellular life.

I'm sure your audience is clapping for you ...
 
The only ones needing to face reality is those that do not follow Jesus when in the afterlife they find themselves in Satans house and being tormented for an eternity - youmight want to look up some videos onpeople dying and going to hell they all seem to have the same thing happento them humph>..
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top