Pelosi, unconstitutional impeachment

Leo123

Diamond Member
Aug 26, 2017
29,684
22,557
2,415
So far Nancy-pants has been completely riding roughshod over the Constitution with this non-impeachment/impeachment. She, or the House, has 0 authority to expect their subpoenas to be acted upon because she refuses to bring formal charges. Trump even invited her to do so. If you don't think something is rotten in the House you are oblivious. The Democrat party has hijacked the House and are denying Trump due process in a coup attempt.
 
Last edited:
So far Nancy-pants has been completely riding roughshod over the Constitution with this non-impeachment/impeachment. She, or the House, has 0 authority to expect their subpoenas to be acted upon because she refuses to bring formal charges. Trump even invited her to do so. If you don't think something is rotten in the House you are oblivious. The Democrat party has hijacked the House and are denying Trump due process in a coup attempt.

If you tell the same set of lies enough times does it become the truth? Nope, it's still a batch of lies.
 
There is nothing in the US Constitution about HOW the House shall conduct Impeachment of the President.

Everything that the House of Representatives is doing, related to this Impeachment Inquiry, is, indeed, 'constitutional'.

Now... whether it's Smart Politics to withhold a broader House vote on commencing the Inquiry, well, that's another matter.

Dems can be every bit as Optics-Blind as the Pubs - in their own foolish way.
 
So far Nancy-pants has been completely riding roughshod over the Constitution with this non-impeachment/impeachment. She, or the House, has 0 authority to expect their subpoenas to be acted upon because she refuses to bring formal charges. Trump even invited her to do so. If you don't think something is rotten in the House you are oblivious. The Democrat party has hijacked the House and are denying Trump due process in a coup attempt.

If you tell the same set of lies enough times does it become the truth? Nope, it's still a batch of lies.

Nancy refuses to make a formal impeachment which would allow Trump to defend himself. Where is the lie?
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: 007
There is nothing in the US Constitution about HOW the House shall conduct Impeachment of the President.

Everything that the House of Representatives is doing, related to this Impeachment Inquiry, is, indeed, 'constitutional'.

Now... whether it's Smart Politics, to withhold a broader House vote on commencing the Inquiry, well, that's another matter.

Dems can be every bit as Optics-Blind as the Pubs - in their own foolish way.

Nancy has not lodged a formal impeachment inquiry. So far her impeachment efforts are meaningless propaganda. Our recent impeachments (Nixon, Clinton) were formal and the defendants were allowed to call witnesses, etc. There is precedent. Nancy is ignoring the Constitution and legal precedence. Oh look! funnyface VOR has noting to say. I win again! :113:
 
So far Nancy-pants has been completely riding roughshod over the Constitution with this non-impeachment/impeachment. She, or the House, has 0 authority to expect their subpoenas to be acted upon because she refuses to bring formal charges. Trump even invited her to do so. If you don't think something is rotten in the House you are oblivious. The Democrat party has hijacked the House and are denying Trump due process in a coup attempt.

If you tell the same set of lies enough times does it become the truth? Nope, it's still a batch of lies.

Nancy refuses to make a formal impeachment which would allow Trump to defend himself. Where is the lie?

He will have plenty of chance to answer charges if impeachment charges are filed.
 
There is nothing in the US Constitution about HOW the House shall conduct Impeachment of the President.

Everything that the House of Representatives is doing, related to this Impeachment Inquiry, is, indeed, 'constitutional'.

Now... whether it's Smart Politics, to withhold a broader House vote on commencing the Inquiry, well, that's another matter.

Dems can be every bit as Optics-Blind as the Pubs - in their own foolish way.

Nancy has not lodged a formal impeachment inquiry. So far her impeachment efforts are meaningless propaganda.

I've lost count of how many times that conspiracy bullshit has been debunked. Have you ever read the Constitution? It's also hilarious that you seem to think you're smarter than Speaker Pelosi. Hilarious!
 
So far Nancy-pants has been completely riding roughshod over the Constitution with this non-impeachment/impeachment. She, or the House, has 0 authority to expect their subpoenas to be acted upon because she refuses to bring formal charges. Trump even invited her to do so. If you don't think something is rotten in the House you are oblivious. The Democrat party has hijacked the House and are denying Trump due process in a coup attempt.

If you tell the same set of lies enough times does it become the truth? Nope, it's still a batch of lies.

Nancy refuses to make a formal impeachment which would allow Trump to defend himself. Where is the lie?

Rump gets his day in court when it goes to the Senate for Senate Hearings. And that is just the way it is. Live with it.
 
There is nothing in the US Constitution about HOW the House shall conduct Impeachment of the President.

Everything that the House of Representatives is doing, related to this Impeachment Inquiry, is, indeed, 'constitutional'.

Now... whether it's Smart Politics, to withhold a broader House vote on commencing the Inquiry, well, that's another matter.

Dems can be every bit as Optics-Blind as the Pubs - in their own foolish way.

Nancy has not lodged a formal impeachment inquiry. So far her impeachment efforts are meaningless propaganda. Our recent impeachments (Nixon, Clinton) were formal and the defendants were allowed to call witnesses, etc. There is precedent. Nancy is ignoring the Constitution and legal precedence. Oh look! funnyface VOR has noting to say. I win again! :113:
If you want to "win again", then you must either...

1. cite the passage in the US Constitution where it stipulates that the House must vote on whether to BEGIN an impeachment inquiry, or...

2. cite the rule in the Rules of the US House of Representatives where it stipulates that the House must conduct a vote on whether to BEGIN...

Fail to do either, and you do not "win again"... rather, you LOSE... so... knock yourself out... let's see those citations... :21:
 
So far Nancy-pants has been completely riding roughshod over the Constitution with this non-impeachment/impeachment. She, or the House, has 0 authority to expect their subpoenas to be acted upon because she refuses to bring formal charges. Trump even invited her to do so. If you don't think something is rotten in the House you are oblivious. The Democrat party has hijacked the House and are denying Trump due process in a coup attempt.

If you tell the same set of lies enough times does it become the truth? Nope, it's still a batch of lies.

Nancy refuses to make a formal impeachment which would allow Trump to defend himself. Where is the lie?

Rump gets his day in court when it goes to the Senate for Senate Hearings. And that is just the way it is. Live with it.

Where is the lie Daryl?
 
So far Nancy-pants has been completely riding roughshod over the Constitution with this non-impeachment/impeachment. She, or the House, has 0 authority to expect their subpoenas to be acted upon because she refuses to bring formal charges. Trump even invited her to do so. If you don't think something is rotten in the House you are oblivious. The Democrat party has hijacked the House and are denying Trump due process in a coup attempt.

If you tell the same set of lies enough times does it become the truth? Nope, it's still a batch of lies.

Nancy refuses to make a formal impeachment which would allow Trump to defend himself. Where is the lie?

Rump gets his day in court when it goes to the Senate for Senate Hearings. And that is just the way it is. Live with it.

Where is the lie Daryl?

The lie is where Rump gets to have his day in court while it's still in the House. He gets his day in court if or when it goes to the Senate. It may or may not get that far. Until then, you people are just gumming yer jaws.
 
Pelosi does not have the votes!

She wont call for a vote on an impeachment investigation.
She wont call for a vote on drawing up articles of impeachment.
She wont call for a vote on impeachment itself.

She doesn't have the votes...there are atleast 40 democrats who wont vote for it.

The entire thing is a sham...but it makes a great public spectacle on TV.
 
There is nothing in the US Constitution about HOW the House shall conduct Impeachment of the President.

Everything that the House of Representatives is doing, related to this Impeachment Inquiry, is, indeed, 'constitutional'.

Now... whether it's Smart Politics, to withhold a broader House vote on commencing the Inquiry, well, that's another matter.

Dems can be every bit as Optics-Blind as the Pubs - in their own foolish way.

Nancy has not lodged a formal impeachment inquiry. So far her impeachment efforts are meaningless propaganda. Our recent impeachments (Nixon, Clinton) were formal and the defendants were allowed to call witnesses, etc. There is precedent. Nancy is ignoring the Constitution and legal precedence. Oh look! funnyface VOR has noting to say. I win again! :113:
If you want to "win again", then you must either...

1. cite the passage in the US Constitution where it stipulates that the House must vote on whether to BEGIN an impeachment inquiry, or...

2. cite the rule in the Rules of the US House of Representatives where it stipulates that the House must conduct a vote on whether to BEGIN...

Fail to do either, and you do not "win again"... rather, you LOSE... so... knock yourself out... let's see those citations... :21:

"The House of Representatives shall have the sole power of impeachment according to Article 1 Section 2 of the Constitution. It was designed to include the entire house by a vote, not just the democrats."

"Joe Biden is actually interfering in our election by promoting the use of the impeachment inquiry process for his own political gain and should be criminally investigated for his Ukrainian collusion."

October 9, 2019
 
Pelosi does not have the votes!

She wont call for a vote on an impeachment investigation.
She wont call for a vote on drawing up articles of impeachment.
She wont call for a vote on impeachment itself.

She doesn't have the votes...there are atleast 40 democrats who wont vote for it.

The entire thing is a sham...but it makes a great public spectacle on TV.

I suppose you could be right, but I guarantee you that she has a more accurate count on who is for or against it than you do.
 
There is nothing in the US Constitution about HOW the House shall conduct Impeachment of the President.

Everything that the House of Representatives is doing, related to this Impeachment Inquiry, is, indeed, 'constitutional'.

Now... whether it's Smart Politics, to withhold a broader House vote on commencing the Inquiry, well, that's another matter.

Dems can be every bit as Optics-Blind as the Pubs - in their own foolish way.

Nancy has not lodged a formal impeachment inquiry. So far her impeachment efforts are meaningless propaganda. Our recent impeachments (Nixon, Clinton) were formal and the defendants were allowed to call witnesses, etc. There is precedent. Nancy is ignoring the Constitution and legal precedence. Oh look! funnyface VOR has noting to say. I win again! :113:
If you want to "win again", then you must either...

1. cite the passage in the US Constitution where it stipulates that the House must vote on whether to BEGIN an impeachment inquiry, or...

2. cite the rule in the Rules of the US House of Representatives where it stipulates that the House must conduct a vote on whether to BEGIN...

Fail to do either, and you do not "win again"... rather, you LOSE... so... knock yourself out... let's see those citations... :21:

"The House of Representatives shall have the sole power of impeachment according to Article 1 Section 2 of the Constitution. It was designed to include the entire house by a vote, not just the democrats."

"Joe Biden is actually interfering in our election by promoting the use of the impeachment inquiry process for his own political gain and should be criminally investigated for his Ukrainian collusion."

October 9, 2019

Your first sentence cam from the constitution. The second one came out of your ass.
 
So far Nancy-pants has been completely riding roughshod over the Constitution with this non-impeachment/impeachment. She, or the House, has 0 authority to expect their subpoenas to be acted upon because she refuses to bring formal charges. Trump even invited her to do so. If you don't think something is rotten in the House you are oblivious. The Democrat party has hijacked the House and are denying Trump due process in a coup attempt.
6wfg1r4uycs31.jpg
 
There is nothing in the US Constitution about HOW the House shall conduct Impeachment of the President.

Everything that the House of Representatives is doing, related to this Impeachment Inquiry, is, indeed, 'constitutional'.

Now... whether it's Smart Politics, to withhold a broader House vote on commencing the Inquiry, well, that's another matter.

Dems can be every bit as Optics-Blind as the Pubs - in their own foolish way.

Nancy has not lodged a formal impeachment inquiry. So far her impeachment efforts are meaningless propaganda. Our recent impeachments (Nixon, Clinton) were formal and the defendants were allowed to call witnesses, etc. There is precedent. Nancy is ignoring the Constitution and legal precedence. Oh look! funnyface VOR has noting to say. I win again! :113:
If you want to "win again", then you must either...

1. cite the passage in the US Constitution where it stipulates that the House must vote on whether to BEGIN an impeachment inquiry, or...

2. cite the rule in the Rules of the US House of Representatives where it stipulates that the House must conduct a vote on whether to BEGIN...

Fail to do either, and you do not "win again"... rather, you LOSE... so... knock yourself out... let's see those citations... :21:

"The House of Representatives shall have the sole power of impeachment according to Article 1 Section 2 of the Constitution. It was designed to include the entire house by a vote, not just the democrats."

"Joe Biden is actually interfering in our election by promoting the use of the impeachment inquiry process for his own political gain and should be criminally investigated for his Ukrainian collusion."

October 9, 2019

And since it hasn't progress that far yet, now what? Are you going to hide under your bed covers and cry yourself to sleep? Will it keep you up all night in trembles? What happens if it doesn't get that far to go to a full vote?

And Joe Biden has ZERO input in the impeachment procedings in the House. If you tell a lie enough times does it make it the truth? Nope, it's still a lie.
 
I suppose you could be right, but I guarantee you that she has a more accurate count on who is for or against it than you do.
I truly want to give you, personally, the benefit of the doubt.

Why do YOU think Pelosi won't give Trump the same fairness that Newt gave Clinton?

Please answer
 
So far Nancy-pants has been completely riding roughshod over the Constitution with this non-impeachment/impeachment. She, or the House, has 0 authority to expect their subpoenas to be acted upon because she refuses to bring formal charges. Trump even invited her to do so. If you don't think something is rotten in the House you are oblivious. The Democrat party has hijacked the House and are denying Trump due process in a coup attempt.

She has a better chance of finding her g-spot, than Don getting impeached.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top