Pelosi says that Trump is worse than Nixon and that he should resign

[Slade3200]

I dont even try to flame but can destroy you, with out trying

Sorry buddy, you just ruined yourself in this thread. Go take a nap, how embarrassing

 

[Frankeneinstein]

So that's one yes for 'IF true'.

If you ignore the proof requirement

Fair enough.

Assuming if you understood the answer was NO!

 

[cnm]

If you ignore the proof requirement

Ffs! The question was IF TRUE!

If there is proof then it is true.

 

[Nostra]

Trump doesn't have the dignity Nixon had We'll have to hog tie the crook and drag him out

Due process, assumption of innocence are the bedrock of U.S. law. What country do you live in?

Innocence and Trump??? Those words are not compatible

What has he been found guilty of?

 

[cnm]

Assuming if you understood the answer was NO!

Your answer was YES if true.

 

[cnm]

What has he been found guilty of?

Loving the uneducated.

 

[gtopa1]

What has he been found guilty of?

Loving the uneducated.

Hence Brexit and Trump. ONLY THE ELITISTS NEED APPLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Blue collar workers now vote Trump and they voted for Brexit. GOOD!

Greg

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Ffs! The question was IF TRUE!

And my answer was only if true with proof

If there is proof then it is true.

and if there is no proof then there are no grounds for impeachment.

 

[Nostra]

What has he been found guilty of?

Loving the uneducated.

I'm glad you feel loved.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Your answer was YES if true.

can you copy and paste that? [give the post number]

 

[gtopa1]

What has he been found guilty of?

Loving the uneducated.

I'm glad you feel loved.

What's new? Elitists have always had contempt for the workers. Guys like Trump know that without workers they can't make a dollar or get anything done. Mutual respect matters.

Greg

 

[The Original Tree]

That bitch needs impeached. She’s a Liar and has her Senile mind made made up despite No F’n Evidence and another failing COUP Started by her laid at her feet.

 

[whitehall]

By the looks of it Pelosi was a mature politician when Nixon was in office. Poor old Tricky Dick was the democrat party's high water mark in the 20th century and they have been declining ever since but they can't let go of the glory days.

 

[The Original Tree]

I think she will be dead or too senile to serve office somewhere in the middle of President Trump’s 2nd term.

By the looks of it Pelosi was a mature politician when Nixon was in office. Poor old Tricky Dick was the democrat party's high water mark in the 20th century and they have been declining ever since but they can't let go of the glory days.

 

[Desperado]

The socialist old bitch should retire because she is senile

 

[edward37]

Trump doesn't have the dignity Nixon had We'll have to hog tie the crook and drag him out

Due process, assumption of innocence are the bedrock of U.S. law. What country do you live in?

Innocence and Trump??? Those words are not compatible

What has he been found guilty of?

Nothing yet but even Nixon was able to step down

 

[kyzr]

Stupid democrats are really getting desperate. With no hint of any crime being committed Pelosi wants Trump to resign because they can't get him out of office any other way. Impeachment won't work, and the 2020 election with the democrat clown car looks like a disaster. Hey Nancy, RBG isn't looking too good either.

Pelosi says Trump's actions are worse than Richard Nixon's and suggests he should resign
“I mean, what the president did was so much worse than even what Richard Nixon did, that at some point Richard Nixon cared about the country enough to recognize that this could not continue,” Pelosi said on CBS’ “Face the Nation.”

View attachment 290367

I’m curious... I know you don’t believe the accusations are true BUT IF the quid pro quo that the Dems are accusing Trump of was true, would that constitute a crime or impeachable offense in your mind?

Its funny that you can even ask that fucking question after 2016 and how the democrats broke the law going after Trump. Let me refresh your memory:
1. Hillary pays RUSSIANS to FABRICATE LIES about Trump and put them in several versions of the Steele Dossiers.
2. The Obama admin used foreign assets to entrap Popadope such that the DOJ/FBI could illegally spy on Trump via a bullshit FISA warrant using Hillary's Steele Dossier
3. The FBI entrapped General Flynn and used very high pressure tactics to get him to lie about Trump
4. Hillary had an illegal server in her bathroom, that the FBI and DOJ gave her a pass on
5. The deep state conspirators have "insurance policies" against the Trump admin, leakers and whistle-blowers that pop up on occasion
6. The deep state conspirators enabled the Mueller Investigation into Russian Collusion, making Trump basically prove his innocence, which he did
7. Barr, Huber, Durham, and Horowitz are going to issue indictments for real crimes.

So to answer your question.
1. Trump said "no quid pro quo" to Sondland, meaning no US "demand" for an investigation
2. Law Professors Dershowitz and Turley both said that the Ukraine call was not a crime nor impeachable
Why the Framers would reject the Democrats' impeachment criteria
Trump's Ukraine transcript: Unwise words but no proof of a crime

I think that Trump is so used to dancing on the edge of the Law that he thought that he could "finesse" Ukraine to investigate Burisma (and the Bidens) with a short delay in the military aid. Zelensky didn't bite and authorize the investigation, he's new and basically a comedian. Trump got burned by that stunt. I hope he learned his lesson. He should have gone all in on investigating Burisma without mentioning the Bidens. He could have quoted the law that requires him to investigate corruption. All 3 witnesses have said that Burisma is corrupt. Trump could have said that future relations depend on what happens to Burisma's investigation.

 

[The Original Tree]

The socialist old bitch should retire because she is senile

The socialist old bitch should retire because she is senile

She’s already on my death watch pool for 2020

 

[edward37]

Stupid democrats are really getting desperate. With no hint of any crime being committed Pelosi wants Trump to resign because they can't get him out of office any other way. Impeachment won't work, and the 2020 election with the democrat clown car looks like a disaster. Hey Nancy, RBG isn't looking too good either.

Pelosi says Trump's actions are worse than Richard Nixon's and suggests he should resign
“I mean, what the president did was so much worse than even what Richard Nixon did, that at some point Richard Nixon cared about the country enough to recognize that this could not continue,” Pelosi said on CBS’ “Face the Nation.”

View attachment 290367

I’m curious... I know you don’t believe the accusations are true BUT IF the quid pro quo that the Dems are accusing Trump of was true, would that constitute a crime or impeachable offense in your mind?

They've moved on to bribery.

Are you memo-less?

Slade, like Eddie, is QUITE dim.

And you supporting a lying cheating bully think you're right???

And the stupidity of this one goes on......................

You a trump supporter and I'm stupid?? Look in the mirror idiot

 

[The Original Tree]

This should be a Thread Pinned at the top of this page!

Stupid democrats are really getting desperate. With no hint of any crime being committed Pelosi wants Trump to resign because they can't get him out of office any other way. Impeachment won't work, and the 2020 election with the democrat clown car looks like a disaster. Hey Nancy, RBG isn't looking too good either.

Pelosi says Trump's actions are worse than Richard Nixon's and suggests he should resign
“I mean, what the president did was so much worse than even what Richard Nixon did, that at some point Richard Nixon cared about the country enough to recognize that this could not continue,” Pelosi said on CBS’ “Face the Nation.”

View attachment 290367

I’m curious... I know you don’t believe the accusations are true BUT IF the quid pro quo that the Dems are accusing Trump of was true, would that constitute a crime or impeachable offense in your mind?

Its funny that you can even ask that fucking question after 2016 and how the democrats broke the law going after Trump. Let me refresh your memory:
1. Hillary pays RUSSIANS to FABRICATE LIES about Trump and put them in several versions of the Steele Dossiers.
2. The Obama admin used foreign assets to entrap Popadope such that the DOJ/FBI could illegally spy on Trump via a bullshit FISA warrant using Hillary's Steele Dossier
3. The FBI entrapped General Flynn and used very high pressure tactics to get him to lie about Trump
4. Hillary had an illegal server in her bathroom, that the FBI and DOJ gave her a pass on
5. The deep state conspirators have "insurance policies" against the Trump admin, leakers and whistle-blowers that pop up on occasion
6. The deep state conspirators enabled the Mueller Investigation into Russian Collusion, making Trump basically prove his innocence, which he did
7. Barr, Huber, Durham, and Horowitz are going to issue indictments for real crimes.

So to answer your question.
1. Trump said "no quid pro quo" to Sondland, meaning no US "demand" for an investigation
2. Law Professors Dershowitz and Turley both said that the Ukraine call was not a crime nor impeachable
Why the Framers would reject the Democrats' impeachment criteria
Trump's Ukraine transcript: Unwise words but no proof of a crime

I think that Trump is so used to dancing on the edge of the Law that he thought that he could "finesse" Ukraine to investigate Burisma (and the Bidens) with a short delay in the military aid. Zelensky didn't bite and authorize the investigation, he's new and basically a comedian. Trump got burned by that stunt. I hope he learned his lesson. He should have gone all in on investigating Burisma without mentioning the Bidens. He could have quoted the law that requires him to investigate corruption. All 3 witnesses have said that Burisma is corrupt. Trump could have said that future relations depend on what happens to Burisma's investigation.