Pelosi now claims to share the values of Tea-Partiers

[uscitizen]

A neocon is a Republican that is not yet embaressed by his party?

i'll accept that as one of many definitions that would fit


of course i would never vote for a democrat cause i know they would be worse

Except for a couple of local things I have not voted FOR anyone in many years. I vote against who I consider the worst.

Kinda like deciding to die of cancer or aids.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

A neocon is a Republican that is not yet embaressed by his party?

here buddy read this, it will educate you on what a neo-con really is.

So, what is a 'neocon'? - Pittsburgh Tribune-Review

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

Good.
Arrest her in connection with the Terrorist attack in Austin, Texas.

why? did they arrest sarah palin and glen beck?

you 2 should really read the manifesto of that domestic terrorist. Railing against bush, demanding universal healthcare, knocking on capitalism, supporting communism...yeah he sounded like a real tea partier to me

 

[uscitizen]

here buddy read this, it will educate you on what a neo-con really is.

So, what is a 'neocon'? - Pittsburgh Tribune-Review

"To seek enlightenment on things neoconservative, I rang up four of the biggest names in the punditry business"
(from the article)

Richard A. Lowry is the editor of National Review, a conservative American news magazine, and a syndicated columnist.

Paul M. Weyrich was an American conservative political activist and commentator, most notable as a figurehead of the New Right. He co-founded the Heritage Foundation,

Paul A. Gigot is an American Pulitzer Prize-winning conservative political commentator

George Frederick Will Syndicated columnist, television commentator, and conservative intellectual,

Umm those are the ones in the article. You might want to try a more balanced approach to your factfinding.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

here buddy read this, it will educate you on what a neo-con really is.

So, what is a 'neocon'? - Pittsburgh Tribune-Review

"To seek enlightenment on things neoconservative, I rang up four of the biggest names in the punditry business"
(from the article)

Richard A. Lowry is the editor of National Review, a conservative American news magazine, and a syndicated columnist.

Paul M. Weyrich was an American conservative political activist and commentator, most notable as a figurehead of the New Right. He co-founded the Heritage Foundation,

Paul A. Gigot is an American Pulitzer Prize-winning conservative political commentator

George Frederick Will Syndicated columnist, television commentator, and conservative intellectual,

Umm those are the ones in the article. You might want to try a more balanced approach to your factfinding.

They are telling you what a neo-con is. thats all man.

Dont get offended.....i was trying to be nice and give you some information.

 

[uscitizen]

here buddy read this, it will educate you on what a neo-con really is.

So, what is a 'neocon'? - Pittsburgh Tribune-Review

"To seek enlightenment on things neoconservative, I rang up four of the biggest names in the punditry business"
(from the article)

Richard A. Lowry is the editor of National Review, a conservative American news magazine, and a syndicated columnist.

Paul M. Weyrich was an American conservative political activist and commentator, most notable as a figurehead of the New Right. He co-founded the Heritage Foundation,

Paul A. Gigot is an American Pulitzer Prize-winning conservative political commentator

George Frederick Will Syndicated columnist, television commentator, and conservative intellectual,

Umm those are the ones in the article. You might want to try a more balanced approach to your factfinding.

They are telling you what a neo-con is. thats all man.

Dont get offended.....i was trying to be nice and give you some information.

Like right wing pundits are going to say that Neo's are republicans that have not yet become embaressed by their party?

I am not offended, just a bit dissapointed.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

here buddy read this, it will educate you on what a neo-con really is.

So, what is a 'neocon'? - Pittsburgh Tribune-Review

"To seek enlightenment on things neoconservative, I rang up four of the biggest names in the punditry business"
(from the article)

Richard A. Lowry is the editor of National Review, a conservative American news magazine, and a syndicated columnist.

Paul M. Weyrich was an American conservative political activist and commentator, most notable as a figurehead of the New Right. He co-founded the Heritage Foundation,

Paul A. Gigot is an American Pulitzer Prize-winning conservative political commentator

George Frederick Will Syndicated columnist, television commentator, and conservative intellectual,

Umm those are the ones in the article. You might want to try a more balanced approach to your factfinding.

They are telling you what a neo-con is. thats all man.

Dont get offended.....i was trying to be nice and give you some information.

Like right wing pundits are going to say that Neo's are republicans that have not yet become embaressed by their party?

I am not offended, just a bit dissapointed.

you asked what a neo-con is. the simple short answer

"Liberals/Libertarians who were mugged by reality"

why are you acting confrontational?

here is some more info http://www.bing.com/reference/semhtml/Neoconservatism?fwd=1&qpvt=neo+con&src=abop&q=neo+con

Neoconservatism is a political philosophy that emerged in the United States of America, and which supports using American economic and military power to bring liberalism, democracy, and human rights to other countries.[1][2][3] Consequently the term is chiefly applicable to certain Americans and their strong supporters. In economics, unlike traditionalist conservatives, neoconservatives are generally comfortable with a welfare state; and, while rhetorically supportive of free markets, they are willing to interfere for overriding social purposes.[4]

The term neoconservative was used at one time as a criticism against proponents of American modern liberalism who had "moved to the right".[5][6] Michael Harrington, a democratic socialist, coined the current sense of the term neoconservative in a 1973 Dissent magazine article concerning welfare policy.[7] According to E. J. Dionne, the nascent neoconservatives were driven by "the notion that liberalism" had failed and "no longer knew what it was talking about."[8] The term "neoconservative" was the subject of increased media coverage during the presidency of George W. Bush.[9][10] with particular focus on a perceived neoconservative influence on American foreign policy, as part of the Bush Doctrine.[11]

The first major neoconservative to embrace the term, Irving Kristol, was considered a founder of the neoconservative movement. Kristol wrote of his neoconservative views in the 1979 article "Confessions of a True, Self-Confessed 'Neoconservative.'"[5] His ideas have been influential since the 1950s, when he co-founded and edited Encounter magazine.[12] Another source was Norman Podhoretz, editor of Commentary magazine from 1960 to 1995. By 1982 Podhoretz was calling himself a neoconservative, in a New York Times Magazine article titled "The Neoconservative Anguish over Reagan's Foreign Policy".[13][14] Kristol's son, William Kristol, founded the neoconservative Project for the New American Century.

 

[uscitizen]

Irving Krystol:
In July 2002, he received from President George W. Bush the Medal of Freedom, the nation's highest civilian honor.

Norman Podheartz:
In the leadup to the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq, Podhoretz argued strongly for military intervention, claiming that Saddam Hussein posed a direct threat to the United States.[10] After the 9/11 attack and more than a year before the start of the War in Iraq, Podhoretz wrote in February 2002 that "There is no doubt that Saddam already possesses large stores of chemical and biological weapons, and may ... be 'on the precipice of nuclear power.' .

Michael Harrington:
becoming a conscientious objector to the Korean War and serving as associate editor of a Christian anarchist publication, The Catholic Worker
( now this one was a loonie liberal from way out in left field that became a neocon)
1 so far that was liberal and became neocon.

 

[DiveCon]

A neocon is a Republican that is not yet embaressed by his party?

i'll accept that as one of many definitions that would fit


of course i would never vote for a democrat cause i know they would be worse

Except for a couple of local things I have not voted FOR anyone in many years. I vote against who I consider the worst.

Kinda like deciding to die of cancer or aids.

been there, done that, didn't buy the t-shirt

 

[beowolfe]

I don't think Nancy considers trail lawyer lobbyists and unions special interest groups, until she does, she is not one of us. Nice try Nancy, but that boat won't float.[/QUOTE]


I agree. I think Nancy and the Tea Party mean very different things when they say 'special interest'. And I think both their lists are not inclusive enough.

 

[masquerade]

Speaking for myself only.

I dislike her, she dislikes me because I am a member of the Tea Party.

That is all we have in common her and I.

I would high five you if I could reach through the computer screen, so I will applaud you I am a tea party member too, have been since feb of 2009 when I attended my first ever protest. They are a blast, lots and lots of fun and guess what my sign reads.

" WATCH OUT PELOSI
THE TAX PAYING
PEASANTS
ARE PISSED!!!!

I get lots of high fives and laughs out of this one, many have taken photos of it. I don't think the tea party is going to welcome her with open arms.

Nice to meet you Maple!
( masquerade lifts her hand and meets that high five in the air ..... SLAP!) lol

Great sign!
I was at the Taxpayer March on the Capitol last September. It was crazy! I met so many great people ( some of which I met online ) and everyone I met was just as friendly and kind. It was an experience I will never forget.

Again, nice to meet you and I look forward to bumping into you again here on the boards!

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

some of my favorite signs from the first tea party. This is in Hyannisport

These ones are from boston.

 

[uscitizen]

I don't think Nancy considers trail lawyer lobbyists and unions special interest groups, until she does, she is not one of us. Nice try Nancy, but that boat won't float.

I agree. I think Nancy and the Tea Party mean very different things when they say 'special interest'. And I think both their lists are not inclusive enough.[/QUOTE]

Damn! Those lists would have more pages than the health care reform bill.

 

[mudwhistle]

Pelosi has selective memory.

Before they were Nazis causing her to literally weep in front of the cameras.....now when she realizes the error of her ways she claims she has plenty in common-with them.

She doesn't realize that she is one of the main reasons they exist.....to protest her.

 

[Ame®icano]

 

[DiveCon]

Pelosi has selective memory.

Before they were Nazis causing her to literally weep in front of the cameras.....now when she realizes the error of her ways she claims she has plenty in common-with them.

She doesn't realize that she is one of the main reasons they exist.....to protest her.

i hope she never does

 

[asaratis]

Pelosi has selective memory.

Before they were Nazis causing her to literally weep in front of the cameras.....now when she realizes the error of her ways she claims she has plenty in common-with them.

She doesn't realize that she is one of the main reasons they exist.....to protest her.

That's because she is a STUPID bitch!

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California has now identified with certainty the heaviest element known to science.

The new element, Pelosium (PL), has one neutron, 25 assistant neutrons, 88 deputy neutrons, and 198 assistant deputy neutrons, giving it an atomic mass of 312.

These 312 particles are held together by forces called morons, which are surrounded by vast quantities of lepton-like particles called peons.

Pelosium is inert, and has no charge and no magnetism. Nevertheless, it can be detected because it impedes every reaction with which it comes into contact. A tiny amount of Pelosium can cause a reaction that would normally take less than a second, to take from 4 days to 4 years to complete.

Pelosium has a normal half-life of 2 years. It does not decay, but instead undergoes a biennial reorganization in which a portion of the assistant neutrons and deputy neutrons exchange places.

Pelosium mass will increase over time, since each reorganization will promote many morons to become isodopes.

This characteristic of moron promotion leads some scientists to believe that Pelosium is formed whenever morons reach a critical concentration. This hypothetical quantity is referred to as critical morass.

When catalyzed with money, Pelosium becomes Senatorium, an element that radiates just as much energy as Pelosium since it has half as many peons but twice as many morons.

 

[namvet]

'You don't need God anymore, you have us democrats'- Pelosi 2006

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

'You don't need God anymore, you have us democrats'- Pelosi 2006

did she really say that?!??!?!?!

I know she is daft but is she that arrogant too?