Pelosi- "It is the biggest bang for the buck when you do food stamps and unemployment

You do realize that the CBO only scores the assumptions given to them by politicians and bureaucrats - and that they can't add anything resembling a reasonable assumption to the mix, don't you?
 
Uh...yes it is.

They scored and ranked various policies based upon assumptions provided by either Congress or some Administration Functionaries.

That is what the CBO does - hence the pure FICTION of the ObamaCare score, as well as this huge multiplier nonsense for transfer payments to the unemployed.
 
Uh...yes it is.

They scored and ranked various policies based upon assumptions provided by either Congress or some Administration Functionaries.

Oy. A score is a cost estimate of a piece of legislation.

This, on the other hand, is similar to the budget options books that CBO produces--analysis of the economic effects of various policy options Congress could choose to pursue. Their discussion of their modeling approach is available on page 14.
 
This is why Progressives need to lose at least 75 seats in each of the next three election cycles
 
Uh...yes it is.

They scored and ranked various policies based upon assumptions provided by either Congress or some Administration Functionaries.

Oy. A score is a cost estimate of a piece of legislation.

This, on the other hand, is similar to the budget options books that CBO produces--analysis of the economic effects of various policy options Congress could choose to pursue. Their discussion of their modeling approach is available on page 14.


They are performing a financial analysis based upon biased assumptions from politicians and bureaucrats in order to regurgitate a predetermined result.

You can quibble with semantics - but the analysis is political, not financially or economically realistic.
 
Yeah, what a nut. She must actually read CBO reports:

website_graphic.png


And Economic Research Service papers. Egregious!

Where does the government get it's money?
From food stamp recipient's and unemployed people?

Or from people who actually contribute?
 
The CBO (and many on this board) operate under the faulty assumption that is there is a "multiplier effect" of dollars spent. So one dollar spent by the government produces 1.5-$3 of activity in society.
It doesn't. The actual multiplier is less than one. Gov't has to get that money from somewhere. So it is depressing economic activity in one place while juicing it in another. And then there is the toll for the troll, since the programs cost money to administer.
and btw, John McCain labored under this mis-impression as well. So it isn't just Democrats.
So every dollar spent by the gov't actually diminishes economic activity. Obviously you can't do away with all gov't, but decreasing its scope would result in far more economic activity than handing out food stamps.
 
Just amazing, i hate that bitch.

What she is really saying is that she wants to secure a voter base that is so entrenched in entitlements that they fear to vote, or would never dream of voting against anything that would take their entitlements away.

Lets stimulate the economy by creating a class of people solely dependent on food stamps and welfare.

Lets create a class of people that have no need to work and have no aspiration to work as the "system" will take care of you because its good for the economy.

Lets create a class of people who are totally dependent on the government and have no motivation to support themselves.

Lets create a class of people so lazy the idea of working for a living would never cross their minds.
 
Just amazing, i hate that bitch.

What she is really saying is that she wants to secure a voter base that is so entrenched in entitlements that they fear to vote, or would never dream of voting against anything that would take their entitlements away.

Lets stimulate the economy by creating a class of people solely dependent on food stamps and welfare.

Lets create a class of people that have no need to work and have no aspiration to work as the "system" will take care of you because its good for the economy.

Lets create a class of people who are totally dependent on the government and have no motivation to support themselves.

Lets create a class of people so lazy the idea of working for a living would never cross their minds.

nice....and hey lets not forget, obama care is an out so people can follow their muse....


We see it as an entrepreneurial bill, a bill that says to someone, if you want to be creative and be a musician or whatever, you can leave your work, focus on your talent, your skill, your passion, your aspirations because you will have health care.


Pelosi to Aspiring Musicians: Quit Your Job, Taxpayers Will Cover Your Health Care | CNSnews.com

certifiable.....
 
Just amazing, i hate that bitch.

What she is really saying is that she wants to secure a voter base that is so entrenched in entitlements that they fear to vote, or would never dream of voting against anything that would take their entitlements away.

Lets stimulate the economy by creating a class of people solely dependent on food stamps and welfare.

Lets create a class of people that have no need to work and have no aspiration to work as the "system" will take care of you because its good for the economy.

Lets create a class of people who are totally dependent on the government and have no motivation to support themselves.

Lets create a class of people so lazy the idea of working for a living would never cross their minds.

nice....and hey lets not forget, obama care is an out so people can follow their muse....


We see it as an entrepreneurial bill, a bill that says to someone, if you want to be creative and be a musician or whatever, you can leave your work, focus on your talent, your skill, your passion, your aspirations because you will have health care.


Pelosi to Aspiring Musicians: Quit Your Job, Taxpayers Will Cover Your Health Care | CNSnews.com

certifiable.....

That shows how stuid she really is. What if everybody left their job to be creative? Who would pay the bills? Where would the government get it's money?
 
Just amazing, i hate that bitch.

What she is really saying is that she wants to secure a voter base that is so entrenched in entitlements that they fear to vote, or would never dream of voting against anything that would take their entitlements away.

Lets stimulate the economy by creating a class of people solely dependent on food stamps and welfare.

Lets create a class of people that have no need to work and have no aspiration to work as the "system" will take care of you because its good for the economy.

Lets create a class of people who are totally dependent on the government and have no motivation to support themselves.

Lets create a class of people so lazy the idea of working for a living would never cross their minds.

nice....and hey lets not forget, obama care is an out so people can follow their muse....


We see it as an entrepreneurial bill, a bill that says to someone, if you want to be creative and be a musician or whatever, you can leave your work, focus on your talent, your skill, your passion, your aspirations because you will have health care.


Pelosi to Aspiring Musicians: Quit Your Job, Taxpayers Will Cover Your Health Care | CNSnews.com

certifiable.....

That shows how stuid she really is. What if everybody left their job to be creative? Who would pay the bills? Where would the government get it's money?

From "The RIch" of course!
 
nice....and hey lets not forget, obama care is an out so people can follow their muse....


We see it as an entrepreneurial bill, a bill that says to someone, if you want to be creative and be a musician or whatever, you can leave your work, focus on your talent, your skill, your passion, your aspirations because you will have health care.


Pelosi to Aspiring Musicians: Quit Your Job, Taxpayers Will Cover Your Health Care | CNSnews.com

certifiable.....

That shows how stuid she really is. What if everybody left their job to be creative? Who would pay the bills? Where would the government get it's money?

From "The RIch" of course!

What happens when you run out of "the rich" then where does the government get it's money?
 
Yeah, what a nut. She must actually read CBO reports:

website_graphic.png


And Economic Research Service papers. Egregious!

Problem is you forget to mention that unemployment and food-stamps are the federal government's main tool for "stabilizing" the economy during a recession. A recession the CBO claims ended the Summer of 09'. Plus this is a federal government tool...not an indicator of a good private sector environment.

Jobs are being lost yet Obama still claims we're heading in the right direction. Does that mean we're headed toward more unemployment and a worsening economy?

Yes...food-stamps are important in a poor economy but all they do is perpetuate the problem rather then solve it. So the Dems contend that this is the only acceptable option when it's not. That indicates a mindset that businesses fear which is the primary cause of the poor job outlook.
 

Forum List

Back
Top