Pelosi: Global Warming is a woman's issue or Will she now get rid of her Boeing 757

Neotrotsky

Council to Supreme Soviet
Dec 12, 2009
10,490
1,280
245
People's Republic
Pelosi: Global Warming is a woman's issue or Will she now get rid of her Boeing 757



The Hill reported,

Speaker of the Duma, Pelosi (D-Calif.)

addressed the Copenhagen climate
change conference today, framing climate change as a women’s issue.

Speaking to a roundtable hosted by the Global Gender and Climate Alliance,
Pelosi said the U.S. has for too long ignored climate change.

“For too long, America has failed to lead on climate change,” she said.
“We have come to Copenhagen to say: ‘Those days are over. America is back.”

Pelosi said women should be particularly concerned about the
detrimental effects of climate change.

“Women have the most to gain and the most to lose in the climate crisis,”
she said. “The impacts are not gender-neutral; as the primary users,
managers, and stewards of natural resources, women feel the consequences first.”


Madame Pelosi's 757

c32paint.jpg




This Jet is the USAF C-32, Boeing 757, which MADAME PELOSI uses


A retired Pan Am, ex Delta pilot, who is supplementing his meager
"delta" retirement at the age of 70+ as a simulator instructor in South Florida.
He does recurrent training for the Air Force pilots that have to fly Pelosi's Jet,
(see below), he told me last week, that the last Pelosi Pilots he had in
the Sim told him that they now have to "Salute" her... Pelosi's Jet

Madame Pelosi wasn't happy with the small jet USAF C-20B, Gulfstream III,
that comes with the Speaker's job...no, Madame Pelosi was aggravated
that this little jet had to stop to refuel, so she ordered a Big Fat 200-seat
USAF C-32, Boeing 757 jet that could get her back to California without stopping!

Many, many legislators walked by and grinned with glee as Joe
informed everyone that Nancy's Big Fat Jet costs us, the
hard working American tax payers, thousands of gallons of fuel every week.
Since she only works 3 days a week, this gas guzzling jet gets fueled
and she flies home to California, cost to the taxpayers of about $60,000, one way!
As Joe put it, 'Unfortunately we have to pay to bring her back on Monday night.'
Cost to us another $60,000.

Folks, that is $480,000 per month and that is an annual cost to the
taxpayers of $5,760,000. No wonder she complains about the cost of this war...
it might cramp her style and she is styling, on my back and yours.
I think of the military families in this country doing without and this woman,
who heads up the most do-nothing Congress in the history of this country,
keeps fueling that jet while doing nothing.

Madame Pelosi wants you and me to conserve our carbon footprint.
She wants us to buy smaller cars and Obama wants us to get a
bicycle pump and air up our tires.

If you think this is outrageous, forward it to all those on your email list!
Keep in mind the figures above do NOT include cost of plane or crew, just fuel!

One wonders what her total package cost us?
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Because she has to go places.

Any other questions?

Sure,

so as a "women" issue, she needs to hurt the "earth" even more to spread the good word?

My how good of her; to think many would say she is a hypocrite

She's a public official. She's supposed to mold public opinion. Costs associated with that responsibility are unavoidable.


Lets hope "mother earth" can forgive her
So when the other party gets into power next election in Congress and after this one term president


The left won't care then- good to know
:razz:
 
She's a public official. She's supposed to mold public opinion. Costs associated with that responsibility are unavoidable.


Lets hope "mother earth" can forgive her
So when the other party gets into power next election in Congress and after this one term president


The left won't care then- good to know

Mother Earth has been beat-up and kicked-around for thousands of years; more so in the last hundred. She doesn't mind taking one for the team if it leads to victory.
 
She's a public official. She's supposed to mold public opinion. Costs associated with that responsibility are unavoidable.

Lets hope "mother earth" can forgive her
So when the other party gets into power next election in Congress and after this one term president


The left won't care then- good to know

Mother Earth has been beat-up and kicked-around for thousands of years; more so in the last hundred. She doesn't mind taking one for the team if it leads to victory.

Oh of course
like when the "green" President had his inaugural

The Obama Inauguration's Carbon Footprint

Using data from the EPA, environmentalist organizations, and various news accounts, the group estimates more than 500 million pounds of CO2 will be released during the four-day inaugural festivities. Among the offenders:

The 600 private jets expected to fly visitors to and from the event will produce 25,320,000 pounds of CO2.
Personal vehicles could account for 262,483,200 pounds of CO2.
The horses in the parade will produce more than 400 pounds of CO2.


And if you don't have an idea what a pound of CO2 really means, consider this: The average household would take 57,598 years to produce as much CO2 as Obama's inauguration.


57,598 years!- well at least Mother Earth knows it is for a good reason
:eusa_whistle:
 
She's a public official. She's supposed to mold public opinion. Costs associated with that responsibility are unavoidable.


Lets hope "mother earth" can forgive her
So when the other party gets into power next election in Congress and after this one term president


The left won't care then- good to know

Mother Earth has been beat-up and kicked-around for thousands of years; more so in the last hundred. She doesn't mind taking one for the team if it leads to victory.

and you know this how ?
 
Lets hope "mother earth" can forgive her
So when the other party gets into power next election in Congress and after this one term president


The left won't care then- good to know

Mother Earth has been beat-up and kicked-around for thousands of years; more so in the last hundred. She doesn't mind taking one for the team if it leads to victory.

Oh of course
like when the "green" President had his inaugural

The Obama Inauguration's Carbon Footprint

Using data from the EPA, environmentalist organizations, and various news accounts, the group estimates more than 500 million pounds of CO2 will be released during the four-day inaugural festivities. Among the offenders:

The 600 private jets expected to fly visitors to and from the event will produce 25,320,000 pounds of CO2.
Personal vehicles could account for 262,483,200 pounds of CO2.
The horses in the parade will produce more than 400 pounds of CO2.


And if you don't have an idea what a pound of CO2 really means, consider this: The average household would take 57,598 years to produce as much CO2 as Obama's inauguration.


57,598 years!- well at least Mother Earth knows it is for a good reason
:eusa_whistle:


It's no different than any other liberal plan, "Do as I say, not as I do".
 
Mother Earth has been beat-up and kicked-around for thousands of years; more so in the last hundred. She doesn't mind taking one for the team if it leads to victory.

Oh of course
like when the "green" President had his inaugural

...

57,598 years!- well at least Mother Earth knows it is for a good reason

So, are you suggesting every American should do everything possible to respect the environment by wisely using resources?

I'm OK with that.

How do we get the word out?
 
Mother Earth has been beat-up and kicked-around for thousands of years; more so in the last hundred. She doesn't mind taking one for the team if it leads to victory.

and you know this how ?

Dramatic license.

To be honest, I've never actually had a conversation with Mother Earth but I think she wouldn't mind not getting beat-up and kicked-around and that she appreciates the help of all those who are working to help her avoid it. I think she might look upon all her friends as a kind of team and would be willing to help them when she can.
 
Mother Earth has been beat-up and kicked-around for thousands of years; more so in the last hundred. She doesn't mind taking one for the team if it leads to victory.

Oh of course
like when the "green" President had his inaugural

...

57,598 years!- well at least Mother Earth knows it is for a good reason

So, are you suggesting every American should do everything possible to respect the environment by wisely using resources?

I'm OK with that.

How do we get the word out?

Maybe we could start with our leaders

we would need good examples from our leaders, but we are not getting that -wouldn't agree?

:eusa_whistle:
 
So, are you suggesting every American should do everything possible to respect the environment by wisely using resources?

I'm OK with that.

How do we get the word out?

Maybe we could start with our leaders

we would need good examples from our leaders, but we are not getting that -wouldn't agree?

No. I wouldn't.

They're doing what they're supposed to be doing. If they unnecessarily curtailed their activities they wouldn't be.

They're supposed to propagate ideas. If they have to go places to do it, that's just a cost of doing business.
 
Pelosi: Global Warming is a woman's issue or Will she now get rid of her Boeing 757



The Hill reported,

Speaker of the Duma, Pelosi (D-Calif.)

addressed the Copenhagen climate
change conference today, framing climate change as a women’s issue.

Speaking to a roundtable hosted by the Global Gender and Climate Alliance,
Pelosi said the U.S. has for too long ignored climate change.

“For too long, America has failed to lead on climate change,” she said.
“We have come to Copenhagen to say: ‘Those days are over. America is back.”

Pelosi said women should be particularly concerned about the
detrimental effects of climate change.

“Women have the most to gain and the most to lose in the climate crisis,”
she said. “The impacts are not gender-neutral; as the primary users,
managers, and stewards of natural resources, women feel the consequences first.”


Madame Pelosi's 757

c32paint.jpg




This Jet is the USAF C-32, Boeing 757, which MADAME PELOSI uses


A retired Pan Am, ex Delta pilot, who is supplementing his meager
"delta" retirement at the age of 70+ as a simulator instructor in South Florida.
He does recurrent training for the Air Force pilots that have to fly Pelosi's Jet,
(see below), he told me last week, that the last Pelosi Pilots he had in
the Sim told him that they now have to "Salute" her... Pelosi's Jet

Madame Pelosi wasn't happy with the small jet USAF C-20B, Gulfstream III,
that comes with the Speaker's job...no, Madame Pelosi was aggravated
that this little jet had to stop to refuel, so she ordered a Big Fat 200-seat
USAF C-32, Boeing 757 jet that could get her back to California without stopping!

Many, many legislators walked by and grinned with glee as Joe
informed everyone that Nancy's Big Fat Jet costs us, the
hard working American tax payers, thousands of gallons of fuel every week.
Since she only works 3 days a week, this gas guzzling jet gets fueled
and she flies home to California, cost to the taxpayers of about $60,000, one way!
As Joe put it, 'Unfortunately we have to pay to bring her back on Monday night.'
Cost to us another $60,000.

Folks, that is $480,000 per month and that is an annual cost to the
taxpayers of $5,760,000. No wonder she complains about the cost of this war...
it might cramp her style and she is styling, on my back and yours.
I think of the military families in this country doing without and this woman,
who heads up the most do-nothing Congress in the history of this country,
keeps fueling that jet while doing nothing.

Madame Pelosi wants you and me to conserve our carbon footprint.
She wants us to buy smaller cars and Obama wants us to get a
bicycle pump and air up our tires.

If you think this is outrageous, forward it to all those on your email list!
Keep in mind the figures above do NOT include cost of plane or crew, just fuel!

One wonders what her total package cost us?

No... she will plant a tree and all will be forgiven... Although how is the tree going to grow once we eliminate CO2?????:eek:
 
So, are you suggesting every American should do everything possible to respect the environment by wisely using resources?

I'm OK with that.

How do we get the word out?

Maybe we could start with our leaders

we would need good examples from our leaders, but we are not getting that -wouldn't agree?

No. I wouldn't.

They're doing what they're supposed to be doing. If they unnecessarily curtailed their activities they wouldn't be.

They're supposed to propagate ideas. If they have to go places to do it, that's just a cost of doing business.

Would that include Papa Obama's date night or trips to play golf ? (did you know he played more golf in 10 months than Bush in eight years?)


Of course it always this way with liberals
send your kids to private schools but don't support vouchers for poor kids to go etc

Health care- congress/ President won't agree to join the gov't plan they want for everyone else

For the left, the words of George Orwell ring true:

" All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others"
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top