Pelosi: ‘Dangerous’ To Let Election Decide Who Will Be President, That’s ‘Weak Position’

[Frannie]

Of course the Left hate free elections.

Just valises they know Americans are not buying their BS witch hunt.

View attachment 290704
Twitter

So who decides?

If libs can win public office then they prefer the unelected Deep State to run the country

The deep state does run the country, the moment Trump bothers them he loses his head

 

[The Original Tree]

Eventually Democrats who still think that party cares about them will realize that they are just being used. Seth Rich paid with his life to get those emails to The American Public, so we all better do something with them and not let his death be in vain.

On a side note: All charges by Sweeden were dropped against Assange which means he was essentially imprisoned in the Bolivian Embassy on false charges right were the Deep State could keep track of him.

"THESE E-MAILS CONTAINED EMAILS TO/FROM DEMOCRATS THAT CONTAINED RACST, SEXIST, HOMOPHOBIC, AND ANTI-SEMITIC CONTENT. Caught red-handed, the Democrats looked straight into the faces of their imbecilic loyal brain-dead indoctrinated constituents and told them: 1) 'Wasn't us...didn't happen'...2) 'Ummm..we were HACKED by the Russians - we're victims...and Trump is responsible'...then refused to turn over their servers for anyone to verify their claim....and with the MSM pushing their lies, snowflake sheep bought it."

 

[toobfreak]

Like I have told you.......these people want to do away with Democracy altogether.

We dodged a big bullet with Trump over Hillary, how many more elections can we keep dodging bullets?
Sooner or later a democrat will win the WH, then we need to undo their power grab, again.

She wanted to open our borders, get rid of the dollar and impose The Amero.

Remember that?

She's one scary bitch.

She's too moderate for the Left.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Of course the Left hate free elections.

Just valises they know Americans are not buying their BS witch hunt.

View attachment 290704
Twitter

That was a dumb comment by her...

2020 is the only chance for the Democrats to remove Trump and she knows that window has closed...

 

[Nostra]

That's a misrepresentation of the argument. Neither Pelosi or Trump come anywhere near being worthy of the offices they hold but I dislike poorly made or misrepresented arguments.

She is saying it's dangerous to allow someone that has done something wrong to just slide and let the election determine the outcome. That would be true. She hasn't made the argument that anything to that level has been done but the argument just based upon the statement would be true.

Bullshit. Learn to read.

They think they have to impeach because they can't let America decide an election again. She is scum.

 

[pknopp]

That's a misrepresentation of the argument. Neither Pelosi or Trump come anywhere near being worthy of the offices they hold but I dislike poorly made or misrepresented arguments.

She is saying it's dangerous to allow someone that has done something wrong to just slide and let the election determine the outcome. That would be true. She hasn't made the argument that anything to that level has been done but the argument just based upon the statement would be true.

Bullshit. Learn to read.

They think they have to impeach because they can't let America decide an election again. She is scum.

Whether that is what she thinks or not is not what I commented on. I commented on what was said and my explaination of what was said is what was said.

 

[Nostra]

That's a misrepresentation of the argument. Neither Pelosi or Trump come anywhere near being worthy of the offices they hold but I dislike poorly made or misrepresented arguments.

She is saying it's dangerous to allow someone that has done something wrong to just slide and let the election determine the outcome. That would be true. She hasn't made the argument that anything to that level has been done but the argument just based upon the statement would be true.

Bullshit. Learn to read.

They think they have to impeach because they can't let America decide an election again. She is scum.

Whether that is what she thinks or not is not what I commented on. I commented on what was said and my explaination of what was said is what was said.

In your first sentence you claim you didn't comment on what she thinks, then in your second sentence you tell us what she was thinking.

What she said was clear...........she doesn't want elections determining who is President.

 

[pknopp]

That's a misrepresentation of the argument. Neither Pelosi or Trump come anywhere near being worthy of the offices they hold but I dislike poorly made or misrepresented arguments.

She is saying it's dangerous to allow someone that has done something wrong to just slide and let the election determine the outcome. That would be true. She hasn't made the argument that anything to that level has been done but the argument just based upon the statement would be true.

Bullshit. Learn to read.

They think they have to impeach because they can't let America decide an election again. She is scum.

Whether that is what she thinks or not is not what I commented on. I commented on what was said and my explaination of what was said is what was said.

In your first sentence you claim you didn't comment on what she thinks, then in your second sentence you tell us what she was thinking.

No, I commented on what she wrote.

What she said was clear...........she doesn't want elections determining who is President.

That isn't what she said.

 

[Dick Foster]

Of course the Left hate free elections.

Just valises they know Americans are not buying their BS witch hunt.

View attachment 290704
Twitter

Right now the worst possible thing for the democrats and any chance any of them has in the upcomong 2020 election is if the impechment makes it to the Senate. It it does there will be so much democratic crap coming to light that just having the label Democrat will be enough to get you tossed out on your ear. And that's a fact that Nancy Pelosi is more than well aware of.

 

[Nostra]

That's a misrepresentation of the argument. Neither Pelosi or Trump come anywhere near being worthy of the offices they hold but I dislike poorly made or misrepresented arguments.

She is saying it's dangerous to allow someone that has done something wrong to just slide and let the election determine the outcome. That would be true. She hasn't made the argument that anything to that level has been done but the argument just based upon the statement would be true.

Bullshit. Learn to read.

They think they have to impeach because they can't let America decide an election again. She is scum.

Whether that is what she thinks or not is not what I commented on. I commented on what was said and my explaination of what was said is what was said.

In your first sentence you claim you didn't comment on what she thinks, then in your second sentence you tell us what she was thinking.

No, I commented on what she wrote.

What she said was clear...........she doesn't want elections determining who is President.

That isn't what she said.

It is exactly what she said.

Learn to read, then get back to me.

 

[Weatherman2020]

That's a misrepresentation of the argument. Neither Pelosi or Trump come anywhere near being worthy of the offices they hold but I dislike poorly made or misrepresented arguments.

She is saying it's dangerous to allow someone that has done something wrong to just slide and let the election determine the outcome. That would be true. She hasn't made the argument that anything to that level has been done but the argument just based upon the statement would be true.

Bullshit. Learn to read.

They think they have to impeach because they can't let America decide an election again. She is scum.

Whether that is what she thinks or not is not what I commented on. I commented on what was said and my explaination of what was said is what was said.

In your first sentence you claim you didn't comment on what she thinks, then in your second sentence you tell us what she was thinking.

No, I commented on what she wrote.

What she said was clear...........she doesn't want elections determining who is President.

That isn't what she said.

She said Democrats can’t let the voters pick Trump as the President, Dufus.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Of course the Left hate free elections.

Just valises they know Americans are not buying their BS witch hunt.

View attachment 290704
Twitter

Maybe the president should have sent blankets and MRE's like that POS obama did instead of weapons that they could use to defend themselves with. Nancy wouldn't be so pissed

 

[pknopp]

That's a misrepresentation of the argument. Neither Pelosi or Trump come anywhere near being worthy of the offices they hold but I dislike poorly made or misrepresented arguments.

She is saying it's dangerous to allow someone that has done something wrong to just slide and let the election determine the outcome. That would be true. She hasn't made the argument that anything to that level has been done but the argument just based upon the statement would be true.

Bullshit. Learn to read.

They think they have to impeach because they can't let America decide an election again. She is scum.

Whether that is what she thinks or not is not what I commented on. I commented on what was said and my explaination of what was said is what was said.

In your first sentence you claim you didn't comment on what she thinks, then in your second sentence you tell us what she was thinking.

No, I commented on what she wrote.

What she said was clear...........she doesn't want elections determining who is President.

That isn't what she said.

She said Democrats can’t let the voters pick Trump as the President, Dufus.

No she said that if a president has done something worthy of prosecution you do not leave an election to rectify that.

I would agree there. Now IMO Trump has done nothing to reach that level but what she said is what she said.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Bullshit. Learn to read.

They think they have to impeach because they can't let America decide an election again. She is scum.

Whether that is what she thinks or not is not what I commented on. I commented on what was said and my explaination of what was said is what was said.

In your first sentence you claim you didn't comment on what she thinks, then in your second sentence you tell us what she was thinking.

No, I commented on what she wrote.

What she said was clear...........she doesn't want elections determining who is President.

That isn't what she said.

She said Democrats can’t let the voters pick Trump as the President, Dufus.

No she said that if a president has done something worthy of prosecution you do not leave an election to rectify that.

I would agree there. Now IMO Trump has done nothing to reach that level but what she said is what she said.

So how many US citizens did Trump kill to earn this wrath?

 

[jknowgood]

That's a misrepresentation of the argument. Neither Pelosi or Trump come anywhere near being worthy of the offices they hold but I dislike poorly made or misrepresented arguments.

She is saying it's dangerous to allow someone that has done something wrong to just slide and let the election determine the outcome. That would be true. She hasn't made the argument that anything to that level has been done but the argument just based upon the statement would be true.

Bwuhahahaha.....

Jonathon Gruber repeatedly declared not only does the Democrats / Democratic party think their loyal idiot supporters, are stupid sheep but that the Democrats / Democratic Party COUNTS on them being stupid so they can get away with the corrupt criminal shit they / the Socialist Democratic Party gets away with.

Like claiming that Mexico would pay for the wall? That kind of stupid?

Address my point or rant away. I'm not interested in your rant.

Well claiming all of America will save $2500 on their insurance is okay?

 

[pknopp]

Whether that is what she thinks or not is not what I commented on. I commented on what was said and my explaination of what was said is what was said.

In your first sentence you claim you didn't comment on what she thinks, then in your second sentence you tell us what she was thinking.

No, I commented on what she wrote.

What she said was clear...........she doesn't want elections determining who is President.

That isn't what she said.

She said Democrats can’t let the voters pick Trump as the President, Dufus.

No she said that if a president has done something worthy of prosecution you do not leave an election to rectify that.

I would agree there. Now IMO Trump has done nothing to reach that level but what she said is what she said.

So how many US citizens did Trump kill to earn this wrath?

The point was that politicians can get away with most anything. We want to hang the homeless though.

Was what happened here more aggregious than ripping off a charity?

 

[pknopp]

That's a misrepresentation of the argument. Neither Pelosi or Trump come anywhere near being worthy of the offices they hold but I dislike poorly made or misrepresented arguments.

She is saying it's dangerous to allow someone that has done something wrong to just slide and let the election determine the outcome. That would be true. She hasn't made the argument that anything to that level has been done but the argument just based upon the statement would be true.

Bwuhahahaha.....

Jonathon Gruber repeatedly declared not only does the Democrats / Democratic party think their loyal idiot supporters, are stupid sheep but that the Democrats / Democratic Party COUNTS on them being stupid so they can get away with the corrupt criminal shit they / the Socialist Democratic Party gets away with.

Like claiming that Mexico would pay for the wall? That kind of stupid?

Address my point or rant away. I'm not interested in your rant.

Well claiming all of America will save $2500 on their insurance is okay?

No, absolutely not. Obama failed at nearly everything he did.

 

[JustAGuy1]

Pelosi is senile and falling fast.

 

[Weatherman2020]

In your first sentence you claim you didn't comment on what she thinks, then in your second sentence you tell us what she was thinking.

No, I commented on what she wrote.

What she said was clear...........she doesn't want elections determining who is President.

That isn't what she said.

She said Democrats can’t let the voters pick Trump as the President, Dufus.

No she said that if a president has done something worthy of prosecution you do not leave an election to rectify that.

I would agree there. Now IMO Trump has done nothing to reach that level but what she said is what she said.

So how many US citizens did Trump kill to earn this wrath?

The point was that politicians can get away with most anything. We want to hang the homeless though.

Was what happened here more aggregious than ripping off a charity?

Pelosi has a 10K sq ft mansion. How many homeless has she taken in?

 

[Kondor3]

Of course the Left hate free elections.

Just valises they know Americans are not buying their BS witch hunt.

View attachment 290704
Twitter

My nomination for Nothingburger-of-the-Week...

Oh, and... Longest-Stretch-for-a-Connection-of-the-Month...