Pelosi Announces Impeachment Vote

:auiqs.jpg:

Nonsense, they will testify freely in the Senate. Schiff and Biden will just testify. :113:

No, they won't testify in the Senate, because that would subject them to cross-examination by Democrats. If they could handle that, while helping Trump with their testimony, they would have testified in the House.

Better to fight in the Coliseum than in the lion's den.

The Coliseum often was a lion's den.

That is not the case here.

It was a dubious aphorism. Do you think the witnesses Trump has withheld would testify differently in the Senate, than if they had testified in the House? They would be subject to all the same questions.

They didn't testify in the House because they were extending a finger to the Democrats in a public display over their phony impeachment scam.

Testimony in the Senate will be focused on destroying the Democrats and their flimsy case in a public display.

It's always wise to allow an enemy to hoist itself on its own petard.
 
No, they won't testify in the Senate, because that would subject them to cross-examination by Democrats. If they could handle that, while helping Trump with their testimony, they would have testified in the House.

Better to fight in the Coliseum than in the lion's den.

The Coliseum often was a lion's den.

That is not the case here.

It was a dubious aphorism. Do you think the witnesses Trump has withheld would testify differently in the Senate, than if they had testified in the House? They would be subject to all the same questions.

They didn't testify in the House because they were extending a finger to the Democrats in a public display over their phony impeachment scam.

Testimony in the Senate will be focused on destroying the Democrats and their flimsy case in a public display.

It's always wise to allow an enemy to hoist itself on its own petard.

If they could destroy the Democrats and their flimsy case, they would have done it before it led to impeachment.

Your further philosophical meandering is b.s. You don't wait for your enemy to do himself, if you can squash him like a grape. That's silly.
 
Better to fight in the Coliseum than in the lion's den.

The Coliseum often was a lion's den.

That is not the case here.

It was a dubious aphorism. Do you think the witnesses Trump has withheld would testify differently in the Senate, than if they had testified in the House? They would be subject to all the same questions.

They didn't testify in the House because they were extending a finger to the Democrats in a public display over their phony impeachment scam.

Testimony in the Senate will be focused on destroying the Democrats and their flimsy case in a public display.

It's always wise to allow an enemy to hoist itself on its own petard.

If they could destroy the Democrats and their flimsy case, they would have done it before it led to impeachment.

Your further philosophical meandering is b.s. You don't wait for your enemy to do himself, if you can squash him like a grape. That's silly.

Keep hoping.

I'm looking forward to the show.
 
The Coliseum often was a lion's den.

That is not the case here.

It was a dubious aphorism. Do you think the witnesses Trump has withheld would testify differently in the Senate, than if they had testified in the House? They would be subject to all the same questions.

They didn't testify in the House because they were extending a finger to the Democrats in a public display over their phony impeachment scam.

Testimony in the Senate will be focused on destroying the Democrats and their flimsy case in a public display.

It's always wise to allow an enemy to hoist itself on its own petard.

If they could destroy the Democrats and their flimsy case, they would have done it before it led to impeachment.

Your further philosophical meandering is b.s. You don't wait for your enemy to do himself, if you can squash him like a grape. That's silly.

Keep hoping.

I'm looking forward to the show.

You're the fellow who thinks Trump's appointees will testify in the Senate. You keep hoping. Apparently you've never seen the show. Trump said he'd "love" to have them testify - that's Trumpspeak for ain't gonna happen, in this life or the next.
 
That is not the case here.

It was a dubious aphorism. Do you think the witnesses Trump has withheld would testify differently in the Senate, than if they had testified in the House? They would be subject to all the same questions.

They didn't testify in the House because they were extending a finger to the Democrats in a public display over their phony impeachment scam.

Testimony in the Senate will be focused on destroying the Democrats and their flimsy case in a public display.

It's always wise to allow an enemy to hoist itself on its own petard.

If they could destroy the Democrats and their flimsy case, they would have done it before it led to impeachment.

Your further philosophical meandering is b.s. You don't wait for your enemy to do himself, if you can squash him like a grape. That's silly.

Keep hoping.

I'm looking forward to the show.

You're the fellow who thinks Trump's appointees will testify in the Senate.

Glad to see you're keeping up with the thread. :auiqs.jpg:
 
It was a dubious aphorism. Do you think the witnesses Trump has withheld would testify differently in the Senate, than if they had testified in the House? They would be subject to all the same questions.

They didn't testify in the House because they were extending a finger to the Democrats in a public display over their phony impeachment scam.

Testimony in the Senate will be focused on destroying the Democrats and their flimsy case in a public display.

It's always wise to allow an enemy to hoist itself on its own petard.

If they could destroy the Democrats and their flimsy case, they would have done it before it led to impeachment.

Your further philosophical meandering is b.s. You don't wait for your enemy to do himself, if you can squash him like a grape. That's silly.

Keep hoping.

I'm looking forward to the show.

You're the fellow who thinks Trump's appointees will testify in the Senate.

Glad to see you're keeping up with the thread. :auiqs.jpg:

:auiqs.jpg:

Nonsense, they will testify freely in the Senate.
 
How out of touch are democrats with America?
They are a danger to our national security.. they should be removed

Pelosi to address impeachment process after Judiciary Committee hearing
They are abusing their impeachment power as an election strategy.

image030.png
 
Here are the Articles:
  • Abuse of Power
  • Obstruction of Congress
Details to follow.
 
You don’t even know what a sugar tit is and you’ve gotten all insulted. Proof that you are a closed minded uneducated individual.
Is it anything like whipped cream?
/——-/ Haven’t heard that one in a Coon’s age:
Sugar tit
Sugar tit is a folk name for a baby pacifier, or dummy, that was once commonly made and used in North America and Britain.Wikipedia
 
Where are the principled, and soon to be headless, Stalinist democrats who will stand up to Pelosi's Jihad on the Constitution and Presidency??
 
How out of touch are democrats with America?

I think the [Dem's] big media "mechanism" which keeps Millennials comatose, is proof, that the Democrats are very in touch with the pulse of America.

Millenials maybe, but the rest of us in flyover country? Not so much.
... the rest of us ... Not so much


Beautiful people.

Do I detect a note of sarcasm? Beautiful or not, it appears the Democrats do not have much empathy for the average workin' American Joe and Jane.
 
Do I detect a note of sarcasm?...

No sarcasm. Mainly bc you are very accurate here. About how the Dems/they do not have much empathy for the average hard workin' American if his name is Joe or Jane or Judy ---nor Tom Dikc & Harry.

If you go by the Dems' public actions then the Dems will promote much empathy and sympathy only if that worker is [undocumented and] from Latin America or the Middle East, or most amicably, is from the LGBT community.
 
How out of touch are democrats with America?
They are a danger to our national security.. they should be removed

Pelosi to address impeachment process after Judiciary Committee hearing
TRUMP BROKE HER: Even CNN Admits: ‘Pelosi Gambled and Lost on Impeachment Delay.’

NancyPelosiConfused.sized-770x415xc.jpg

When Pelosi refused to send over the articles of impeachment, progressives everywhere -- but especially in the old, corporatist and radical leftist Fake News Media Cartel -- hailed her for being a master strategist. Oh yes, she was showing Mitch McConnell how it was done. Pelosi was Girlboss. Awesome. Fantastic. Majestic. She was the new and improved Sun Tzu.

Only there was one issue with that talking point: Pelosi may not be stupid as such -- but an Intellectual Heavyweight she is not.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top