Peer reviewed paper shows no warming for at least 20 years.

[RollingThunder]

Oh, Walleyed, you swallow the lies and propaganda that your puppet masters spoon into your head and ignore the testimony of the actual scientists. You are such a retard!!!

New Evidence on Warming Ocean
NOAA
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
(Government publication - free to reproduce)

Recent studies show the world’s ocean is heating up as it absorbs most of the extra heat being added to the climate system from the build-up of heat-trapping gases in the atmosphere. In fact, more than 90 percent of Earth’s warming during the past 50 years has gone into the ocean. Warming has been observed even in the bottom-most reaches of the ocean, but most of the heat is accumulating in the ocean’s near-surface layers.

The implications of a warmer ocean are considerable. First, because water expands as it warms, ocean heating is responsible for much of the sea-level rise we’ve observed. Further, the ocean will hold the vast amount of heat it has accumulated because it warms and cools much more slowly than air. This makes sense if you’ve ever noticed how much quicker it is to heat the air in a room than the water in a swimming pool — and how much longer the pool holds its heat.

The colors on the map (top) show where and how much the heat content within the upper 2,460 feet (750 m) of the ocean had changed in 2009, compared to the average from 1993 to 2009. NOAA and NASA scientists produced the map using a combination of data from satellite altimeters and within-ocean thermometer readings collected by Argo floats and shipboard measurements. Scientists use these measurements to better understand the ocean’s roles in Earth’s climate system, and to help them more accurately predict future weather and climate patterns. Red and blue areas show where the upper ocean’s warmth rose or fell from its average value by as much as 3 billion Joules per square meter compared to the average — that’s enough energy in one square meter alone to power a 100-watt light bulb continuously for nearly a year. White areas indicate little or no change; gray areas represent land.

The solid black trend line on the graph (bottom) shows the ocean’s yearly average heat content from 1955 through 2009, as compared to the long-term baseline (gray line at zero). The thin red line shows the running 3-month average over that same span. Though there are year-to-year ups and downs, notice there has been a significant overall increase in the ocean’s heat content over the last 55 years. That ocean heat content change equals the energy needed to power eleven 1200-watt hair dryers for all 6.9 billion people now on the planet continuously over those same 55 years. It is also about 2.5 billion times greater than the energy released by the bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima.

For more information, please see the NOAA 2009 Annual State of the Climate Report, published on July 28, 2010. A NOAA press release about the report is also available.

Top map courtesy of Gregory Johnson and John Lyman, NOAA / JIMAR, and Josh Willis, NASA. Trend graph courtesy of Sydney Levitus, NOAA. Dot chart courtesy of Sara Veasey, NOAA.

I hardly consider NOAA to be a BS source.

Well good! Glad to hear you agree with the findings of the NOAA scientists that I just cited. LOL. Too bad you're still too retarded to understand the difference between what the NOAA and NASA scientists actually report and the cherry-picked, spun-up distortions of their reports that you scrape off of those idiotic denier cult blogs that are your primary sources.

Here's another report you should like from the climate scientists at NOAA that refutes the idiotic premise of this thread.

Past Three Decades Warmest on Record
NOAA
Friday, September 3, 2010
(Government publication - free to reproduce)

Fossil fuels contain the carbon drawn out of the atmosphere by land and ocean plants over millions of years. More than a century ago, Earth scientists speculated that burning those fuels—returning that huge pool of carbon to the air so rapidly—would warm the climate.

In the past few decades, the evidence that those century-old speculations were true has become unmistakable. The maps above show where temperatures each decade from 1850-2000 were above (red) or below (blue) the 1961-1990 average. Places with no data are colored gray.

Averaging temperature anomalies over time spans of decades or longer is a better way to understand how climate is changing than comparing individual years. That’s because even with global warming from greenhouse gases, natural climate patterns or events (such as El Niño cycles or massive volcanic eruptions) are the main reason why any individual year is warmer or cooler than another.

The most obvious trend revealed by these maps is the shift to the warm (red) end of the color scale in recent decades. In the earlier maps in the series, regional-scale warm anomalies come and go from one decade to the next—what you would expect from natural climate variability. Toward the end of the series, however, the warmer-than-average conditions become more widespread, persistent, and intense—what you would expect from human-caused global warming.

In the State of the Climate in 2009 report, an international team of climate scientists concluded, “Each of the last three decades was warmer than all earlier decades in the instrumental record and each set a new and statistically significant record, culminating in the 2000s, which was the warmest decade of all.”

 

[skookerasbil]

Oh, Walleyed, you swallow the lies and propaganda that your puppet masters spoon into your head and ignore the testimony of the actual scientists. You are such a retard!!!

New Evidence on Warming Ocean
NOAA
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
(Government publication - free to reproduce)

Recent studies show the world’s ocean is heating up as it absorbs most of the extra heat being added to the climate system from the build-up of heat-trapping gases in the atmosphere. In fact, more than 90 percent of Earth’s warming during the past 50 years has gone into the ocean. Warming has been observed even in the bottom-most reaches of the ocean, but most of the heat is accumulating in the ocean’s near-surface layers.

The implications of a warmer ocean are considerable. First, because water expands as it warms, ocean heating is responsible for much of the sea-level rise we’ve observed. Further, the ocean will hold the vast amount of heat it has accumulated because it warms and cools much more slowly than air. This makes sense if you’ve ever noticed how much quicker it is to heat the air in a room than the water in a swimming pool — and how much longer the pool holds its heat.

The colors on the map (top) show where and how much the heat content within the upper 2,460 feet (750 m) of the ocean had changed in 2009, compared to the average from 1993 to 2009. NOAA and NASA scientists produced the map using a combination of data from satellite altimeters and within-ocean thermometer readings collected by Argo floats and shipboard measurements. Scientists use these measurements to better understand the ocean’s roles in Earth’s climate system, and to help them more accurately predict future weather and climate patterns. Red and blue areas show where the upper ocean’s warmth rose or fell from its average value by as much as 3 billion Joules per square meter compared to the average — that’s enough energy in one square meter alone to power a 100-watt light bulb continuously for nearly a year. White areas indicate little or no change; gray areas represent land.

The solid black trend line on the graph (bottom) shows the ocean’s yearly average heat content from 1955 through 2009, as compared to the long-term baseline (gray line at zero). The thin red line shows the running 3-month average over that same span. Though there are year-to-year ups and downs, notice there has been a significant overall increase in the ocean’s heat content over the last 55 years. That ocean heat content change equals the energy needed to power eleven 1200-watt hair dryers for all 6.9 billion people now on the planet continuously over those same 55 years. It is also about 2.5 billion times greater than the energy released by the bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima.

For more information, please see the NOAA 2009 Annual State of the Climate Report, published on July 28, 2010. A NOAA press release about the report is also available.

Top map courtesy of Gregory Johnson and John Lyman, NOAA / JIMAR, and Josh Willis, NASA. Trend graph courtesy of Sydney Levitus, NOAA. Dot chart courtesy of Sara Veasey, NOAA.

I hardly consider NOAA to be a BS source.

Well good! Glad to hear you agree with the findings of the NOAA scientists that I just cited. LOL. Too bad you're still too retarded to understand the difference between what the NOAA and NASA scientists actually report and the cherry-picked, spun-up distortions of their reports that you scrape off of those idiotic denier cult blogs that are your primary sources.

Here's another report you should like from the climate scientists at NOAA that refutes the idiotic premise of this thread.

Past Three Decades Warmest on Record
NOAA
Friday, September 3, 2010
(Government publication - free to reproduce)

Fossil fuels contain the carbon drawn out of the atmosphere by land and ocean plants over millions of years. More than a century ago, Earth scientists speculated that burning those fuels—returning that huge pool of carbon to the air so rapidly—would warm the climate.

In the past few decades, the evidence that those century-old speculations were true has become unmistakable. The maps above show where temperatures each decade from 1850-2000 were above (red) or below (blue) the 1961-1990 average. Places with no data are colored gray.

Averaging temperature anomalies over time spans of decades or longer is a better way to understand how climate is changing than comparing individual years. That’s because even with global warming from greenhouse gases, natural climate patterns or events (such as El Niño cycles or massive volcanic eruptions) are the main reason why any individual year is warmer or cooler than another.

The most obvious trend revealed by these maps is the shift to the warm (red) end of the color scale in recent decades. In the earlier maps in the series, regional-scale warm anomalies come and go from one decade to the next—what you would expect from natural climate variability. Toward the end of the series, however, the warmer-than-average conditions become more widespread, persistent, and intense—what you would expect from human-caused global warming.

In the State of the Climate in 2009 report, an international team of climate scientists concluded, “Each of the last three decades was warmer than all earlier decades in the instrumental record and each set a new and statistically significant record, culminating in the 2000s, which was the warmest decade of all.”

Just want to point out that the NOAA is a fraud. Posting up a link from the NOAA is like Chevrolet posing up a link that the Corvette is the best sports car in the world!!!


This forum is ripe with dummies.

 

[RollingThunder]

Oh, Walleyed, you swallow the lies and propaganda that your puppet masters spoon into your head and ignore the testimony of the actual scientists. You are such a retard!!!

New Evidence on Warming Ocean
NOAA
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
(Government publication - free to reproduce)

Recent studies show the world’s ocean is heating up as it absorbs most of the extra heat being added to the climate system from the build-up of heat-trapping gases in the atmosphere. In fact, more than 90 percent of Earth’s warming during the past 50 years has gone into the ocean. Warming has been observed even in the bottom-most reaches of the ocean, but most of the heat is accumulating in the ocean’s near-surface layers.

The implications of a warmer ocean are considerable. First, because water expands as it warms, ocean heating is responsible for much of the sea-level rise we’ve observed. Further, the ocean will hold the vast amount of heat it has accumulated because it warms and cools much more slowly than air. This makes sense if you’ve ever noticed how much quicker it is to heat the air in a room than the water in a swimming pool — and how much longer the pool holds its heat.

The colors on the map (top) show where and how much the heat content within the upper 2,460 feet (750 m) of the ocean had changed in 2009, compared to the average from 1993 to 2009. NOAA and NASA scientists produced the map using a combination of data from satellite altimeters and within-ocean thermometer readings collected by Argo floats and shipboard measurements. Scientists use these measurements to better understand the ocean’s roles in Earth’s climate system, and to help them more accurately predict future weather and climate patterns. Red and blue areas show where the upper ocean’s warmth rose or fell from its average value by as much as 3 billion Joules per square meter compared to the average — that’s enough energy in one square meter alone to power a 100-watt light bulb continuously for nearly a year. White areas indicate little or no change; gray areas represent land.

The solid black trend line on the graph (bottom) shows the ocean’s yearly average heat content from 1955 through 2009, as compared to the long-term baseline (gray line at zero). The thin red line shows the running 3-month average over that same span. Though there are year-to-year ups and downs, notice there has been a significant overall increase in the ocean’s heat content over the last 55 years. That ocean heat content change equals the energy needed to power eleven 1200-watt hair dryers for all 6.9 billion people now on the planet continuously over those same 55 years. It is also about 2.5 billion times greater than the energy released by the bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima.

For more information, please see the NOAA 2009 Annual State of the Climate Report, published on July 28, 2010. A NOAA press release about the report is also available.

Top map courtesy of Gregory Johnson and John Lyman, NOAA / JIMAR, and Josh Willis, NASA. Trend graph courtesy of Sydney Levitus, NOAA. Dot chart courtesy of Sara Veasey, NOAA.

I hardly consider NOAA to be a BS source.

Well good! Glad to hear you agree with the findings of the NOAA scientists that I just cited. LOL. Too bad you're still too retarded to understand the difference between what the NOAA and NASA scientists actually report and the cherry-picked, spun-up distortions of their reports that you scrape off of those idiotic denier cult blogs that are your primary sources.

Here's another report you should like from the climate scientists at NOAA that refutes the idiotic premise of this thread.

Past Three Decades Warmest on Record
NOAA
Friday, September 3, 2010
(Government publication - free to reproduce)

Fossil fuels contain the carbon drawn out of the atmosphere by land and ocean plants over millions of years. More than a century ago, Earth scientists speculated that burning those fuels—returning that huge pool of carbon to the air so rapidly—would warm the climate.

In the past few decades, the evidence that those century-old speculations were true has become unmistakable. The maps above show where temperatures each decade from 1850-2000 were above (red) or below (blue) the 1961-1990 average. Places with no data are colored gray.

Averaging temperature anomalies over time spans of decades or longer is a better way to understand how climate is changing than comparing individual years. That’s because even with global warming from greenhouse gases, natural climate patterns or events (such as El Niño cycles or massive volcanic eruptions) are the main reason why any individual year is warmer or cooler than another.

The most obvious trend revealed by these maps is the shift to the warm (red) end of the color scale in recent decades. In the earlier maps in the series, regional-scale warm anomalies come and go from one decade to the next—what you would expect from natural climate variability. Toward the end of the series, however, the warmer-than-average conditions become more widespread, persistent, and intense—what you would expect from human-caused global warming.

In the State of the Climate in 2009 report, an international team of climate scientists concluded, “Each of the last three decades was warmer than all earlier decades in the instrumental record and each set a new and statistically significant record, culminating in the 2000s, which was the warmest decade of all.”

Just want to point out that the NOAA is a fraud.

All you ever manage to "point out", kooker, is the fact that you're severely retarded in addition to your rampant insanity, and you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground.

This forum is ripe with dummies.

Indeed!!! You and your denier cult butt buddies. And you're one of the most idiotic of them.

 

[westwall]

Well good! Glad to hear you agree with the findings of the NOAA scientists that I just cited. LOL. Too bad you're still too retarded to understand the difference between what the NOAA and NASA scientists actually report and the cherry-picked, spun-up distortions of their reports that you scrape off of those idiotic denier cult blogs that are your primary sources.

Here's another report you should like from the climate scientists at NOAA that refutes the idiotic premise of this thread.

Past Three Decades Warmest on Record
NOAA
Friday, September 3, 2010
(Government publication - free to reproduce)

Fossil fuels contain the carbon drawn out of the atmosphere by land and ocean plants over millions of years. More than a century ago, Earth scientists speculated that burning those fuels—returning that huge pool of carbon to the air so rapidly—would warm the climate.

In the past few decades, the evidence that those century-old speculations were true has become unmistakable. The maps above show where temperatures each decade from 1850-2000 were above (red) or below (blue) the 1961-1990 average. Places with no data are colored gray.

Averaging temperature anomalies over time spans of decades or longer is a better way to understand how climate is changing than comparing individual years. That’s because even with global warming from greenhouse gases, natural climate patterns or events (such as El Niño cycles or massive volcanic eruptions) are the main reason why any individual year is warmer or cooler than another.

The most obvious trend revealed by these maps is the shift to the warm (red) end of the color scale in recent decades. In the earlier maps in the series, regional-scale warm anomalies come and go from one decade to the next—what you would expect from natural climate variability. Toward the end of the series, however, the warmer-than-average conditions become more widespread, persistent, and intense—what you would expect from human-caused global warming.

In the State of the Climate in 2009 report, an international team of climate scientists concluded, “Each of the last three decades was warmer than all earlier decades in the instrumental record and each set a new and statistically significant record, culminating in the 2000s, which was the warmest decade of all.”

Just want to point out that the NOAA is a fraud.

All you ever manage to "point out", kooker, is the fact that you're severely retarded in addition to your rampant insanity, and you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground.

This forum is ripe with dummies.

Indeed!!! You and your denier cult butt buddies. And you're one of the most idiotic of them.

Sure thing junior. Until you eleveate your insults above the third grade level no one gives a poo what you have to say Your posts are classified as noise. I doubt anyone reads them. I sure as hell don't anymore. They are all the same blather and bloviation.

 

[RollingThunder]

Just want to point out that the NOAA is a fraud.

All you ever manage to "point out", kooker, is the fact that you're severely retarded in addition to your rampant insanity, and you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground.

This forum is ripe with dummies.

Indeed!!! You and your denier cult butt buddies. And you're one of the most idiotic of them.

Sure thing junior. Until you eleveate your insults above the third grade level no one gives a poo what you have to say

LOL. You mean it takes a higher class of insults to get you to pay attention to the facts? I'll work on that, you clueless cretin.

Your posts are classified as noise.

Your posts are classified as 'meaningless drivel & bald faced lies from denier cult blogs parroted by a deluded imbecile'.

I doubt anyone reads them.

I doubt you can read, at least with any degree of comprehension higher than a third grader's.

I sure as hell don't anymore.

And yet you always seem to post one of your famously fatuous and factually mistaken responses to the factual scientific information I provide. LOL.

They are all the same blather and bloviation.

LOL. Yeah, right, all that "blather" from the scientists at NOAA, NASA, NSIDC and dozens and dozens of other scientific agencies, institutions, societies, organizations and universities that I regularly quote and cite and that your little denier cult brain can't handle without exploding so you block it all out and deny reality by labeling it all "blather". LOL. You are such a sad, confused, brainwashed little peabrain, walleyed, and yet you imagine you understand climate science better than the actual experts and professionals who have actually done the research. You're really quite hilarious.