Pay No Attention - Just Another Conspiracy

GotZoom

Senior Member
Apr 20, 2005
5,719
368
48
Cordova, TN
Trial to Start for Ex-Clinton Ex-Staffer

By PAUL CHAVEZ, Associated Press Writer

The federal trial of David Rosen promises to be one that political insiders will watch with interest. Jury selection was scheduled to begin Tuesday in the case against Rosen, a former finance director for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton.

The case could provide ammunition to Republicans seeking to derail her re-election next year and potential 2008 bid for the White House.

Rosen is accused of filing false campaign finance statements in connection with a gala fundraiser for Clinton's successful 2000 senatorial campaign. Rosen has pleaded not guilty to the charges.

If convicted, he faces a maximum sentence of 15 years in prison and up to $250,000 in fines. Clinton, a New York Democrat, has not been accused of doing anything illegal.

An FBI agent's 2002 affidavit said the costs of the gala were deliberately understated "to increase the amount of funds available to New York Senate 2000 for federal campaign activities." However, Justice Department officials recently said they need not prove a possible motive by Rosen.

The organization Judicial Watch, which has pushed officials to look into the fundraiser, filed paperwork with the Senate Ethics Committee on Monday saying Clinton had to have known of the alleged misreporting.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton argued that Clinton closely monitored the Hollywood fundraiser and knew its actual cost was much greater than the $400,000 tab reported in campaign financial filings.

"They're false and she knows them to be false," Fitton said. He equated her situation with the ethics controversy surrounding House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas, who has been criticized for privately funded travel.

Clinton adviser Howard Wolfson on Monday called Judicial Watch's complaint "a meritless publicity stunt by a thoroughly discredited right-wing attack group."

Questions about the fundraiser surfaced after Peter F. Paul, a three-time convicted felon who pleaded guilty in March to securities fraud charges, told the FBI he gave hundreds of thousands of dollars that Clinton's campaign didn't report. He told prosecutors he spent $1.1 million, but Rosen reported the amount as $400,000.

Judicial Watch took the unusual step of providing legal defense work in Paul's criminal case, but Paul later broke with the group, complaining they were using him to raise money from conservatives opposed to the Clintons.
 
..."a meritless publicity stunt by a thoroughly discredited right-wing attack group."

Ah, yes - "thoroughly discredited". And how is it , again, that one attains that fabled status? Oh, yeah - I remember:

Democrats say bad things about you.
 
screw that. investigate it thoroughly. investigate delay and barton as well. anyone else that needs it, gets it. clean out both parties and let the crucifuxions begin.
 
NEVER, REPEAT, NEVER address the charges.. So let's all just "move on"... I've no doubt she'll come out clean. She and her husband learned early on how to just skirt the edges of breaking the law then have "memory lapses" as to the truth....
 
BR-549 said:
NEVER, REPEAT, NEVER address the charges.. So let's all just "move on"... I've no doubt she'll come out clean. She and her husband learned early on how to just skirt the edges of breaking the law then have "memory lapses" as to the truth....

Yep, just change the focus. Works every time. The MSM will pooh-pooh this as just another instance of the "vast right-wing conspiracy" ganging up on Hillary because she's the Democrats "great white hope". (Can't you just hear Katie Couric now?)
 

Forum List

Back
Top