Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
they have no candidate who can win a national election as of yet.
Thaat is why so many better candidates are not running for thre GOP ticket this round.
So Obama not only associates with domestic terrorists and known communists who want to overthrow the nation, but also puts them in his administration, no problem. But Pawlenty pardons a guy before this guy is accused, not convicted, but accused of molesting a child, and Pawlenty is now suddenly unelectable? I dont even know that I support the guy politically and that is completely absurd.
So Obama not only associates with domestic terrorists and known communists who want to overthrow the nation, but also puts them in his administration, no problem. But Pawlenty pardons a guy before this guy is accused, not convicted, but accused of molesting a child, and Pawlenty is now suddenly unelectable? I dont even know that I support the guy politically and that is completely absurd.
This is quite confusing.
Giefer served jail time for statutory rape and is now married to the woman who was the underage girl.
He is now accused of child molestation - and his wife declines to make any comments.
As it turns out, Giefer's wife--the woman he pleaded guilty to statutorily raping in 1994--had already opened a family childcare center next door to their Vernon Center home two months earlier, according to state licensing information.
Susan Giefer has told law enforcement that she was unaware of any sexual activity between her husband and daughter. She declined to comment for this story.
Jeremy Giefer, accused child molester, got Pawlenty pardon to open childcare center - Minneapolis / St. Paul News - The Blotter
This wouldn't be the first time a man has been unfairly charged with child molestation. Who accused him and what are the facts?
The point of this thread was not to slander Mr. Pawlenty. I didn't do it to Huckabee over Clemmons' release, and I won't do it now. The point of this thread was to see how many right-wingers would jump on the ship to defend T-Paw.. and the response was overwhelming.
They love to play the game of.. blame Obama for everything every person he's ever been in contact with has done at some point in their life.. But sure take the high road when it comes to an (R) at the end of someones name.
Case in point.
The point of this thread was not to slander Mr. Pawlenty. I didn't do it to Huckabee over Clemmons' release, and I won't do it now. The point of this thread was to see how many right-wingers would jump on the ship to defend T-Paw.. and the response was overwhelming.
They love to play the game of.. blame Obama for everything every person he's ever been in contact with has done at some point in their life.. But sure take the high road when it comes to an (R) at the end of someones name.
Case in point.
lol, the Point of the thread wasn't to SMEAR Pawlenty...
The point of this thread was not to slander Mr. Pawlenty. I didn't do it to Huckabee over Clemmons' release, and I won't do it now. The point of this thread was to see how many right-wingers would jump on the ship to defend T-Paw.. and the response was overwhelming.
They love to play the game of.. blame Obama for everything every person he's ever been in contact with has done at some point in their life.. But sure take the high road when it comes to an (R) at the end of someones name.
Case in point.
lol, the Point of the thread wasn't to SMEAR Pawlenty...
Nope, it wasn't.
Just to show what partisan assholes the majority of right-wingers are on this board.
Love to play the guilt by association with Obama.. but let it touch a Republican.. damn they get defensive.
Overwhelming because the article - the accusation - falls flat on its face to a ridiculous extent. What, exactly, did Pawlenty do that requires "defending"?The point of this thread was not to slander Mr. Pawlenty. I didn't do it to Huckabee over Clemmons' release, and I won't do it now. The point of this thread was to see how many right-wingers would jump on the ship to defend T-Paw.. and the response was overwhelming.
Who's calling them "useful"?Yeah yeah sure.
and you all are still making excuses for the Obama hanging out with a known Domestic terrorist and that awful Rev. Wright. Pawlenty just pardoned someone. not run with them.
but it's not like we didn't see this coming, this is how you all play to keep your dear leaders in Power. you all are called USEFUL TOOLS.
So Obama not only associates with domestic terrorists and known communists who want to overthrow the nation, but also puts them in his administration, no problem. But Pawlenty pardons a guy before this guy is accused, not convicted, but accused of molesting a child, and Pawlenty is now suddenly unelectable? I dont even know that I support the guy politically and that is completely absurd.
Now you're trying to tell us that the Right had no problem with Obama's paling around?
lol
History revisionism at its finest.
Overwhelming because the article - the accusation - falls flat on its face to a ridiculous extent. What, exactly, did Pawlenty do that requires "defending"?The point of this thread was not to slander Mr. Pawlenty. I didn't do it to Huckabee over Clemmons' release, and I won't do it now. The point of this thread was to see how many right-wingers would jump on the ship to defend T-Paw.. and the response was overwhelming.
The day that liberals apologize for their abominable treatment of Ronald Reagan, Robert Bork, Dan Quayle, Clarence Thomas, Newt Gingrich, Rush Limbaugh, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, John Ashcroft, Donald Rumsfeld, Ann Coulter, Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck, Michelle Bachmann, Paul Ryan and any other conservative who dares to challenge liberal shibboleths is the day they can start to be taken seriously when pointing fingers about character assassination and hypocritical allegations.
Hardly. If the Maurice Clemmons pardon didn't prevent Huckabee from winning the Iowa caucuses in 2008, this certainly won't affect Pawlenty's appeal to voters in the least.Pawlenty is hosed by this.
It does, however, give us another example ad nauseum of what passes for political debate among the Left.
