Paul Says U.S. 'Slipping Into A Fascist System'...

[GuyPinestra]

Slipping?? Nah... Racing headlong would be a lot more accurate...

 

[Ed Spacer]

Based on SEVERAL ACCORDS and agreements our beloved government made from the 1870s to present,we have,little by little,sold our autonomy and power to globalist organizations and progessive globalist conglomerates. Time to end it...now...

 

[Ed Spacer]

Some of our treaties also in little writing have done the same,too.

 

[Contumacious]

Slipping?? Nah... Racing headlong would be a lot more accurate...

That is correct - since the Federal Reserve Board and "income"tax were enacted in 1913.

.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Ron Paul has a unique and consistent philosophy that values individual liberty above all else.

Now I ask you what's not to like about that?

As long as you reject the idea of anyone having any obligation of any sort to community, to the common good, to national unity, etc.,

then of course you can value your own individual selfish 'liberty' above all else.

 

[paulitician]

Just take a closer look around sometime. The Government/Corporations are working very closely together to create their Authoritarian State. Both control just about every aspect of your life. Many don't want to admit this, but it is the reality. American Citizens really are just slaves right now. They can't live & function without Government/Corporations intervening in some way. And now i don't think this can be reversed. It's probably too late. The People have already kneeled & submitted. It really is very sad.

 

[GuyPinestra]

Ron Paul has a unique and consistent philosophy that values individual liberty above all else.

Now I ask you what's not to like about that?

As long as you reject the idea of anyone having any obligation of any sort to community, to the common good, to national unity, etc.,

then of course you can value your own individual selfish 'liberty' above all else.

Ridiculous!

 

[Oddball]

Ron Paul has a unique and consistent philosophy that values individual liberty above all else.

Now I ask you what's not to like about that?

As long as you reject the idea of anyone having any obligation of any sort to community, to the common good, to national unity, etc.,

then of course you can value your own individual selfish 'liberty' above all else.

Right...Your nebulous, subjective socialist trance words can beat up everybody elses!

Chomsky you ain't.

 

[Contumacious]

Ron Paul has a unique and consistent philosophy that values individual liberty above all else.

Now I ask you what's not to like about that?

As long as you reject the idea of anyone having any obligation of any sort to community, to the common good, to national unity, etc.,

then of course you can value your own individual selfish 'liberty' above all else.

Right...Your nebulous, subjective socialist trance words can beat up everybody elses!

Chomsky you ain't.

Right...Your nebulous, subjective freedom trance words can beat up everybody elses!

oddball, you are.

.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Ron Paul has a unique and consistent philosophy that values individual liberty above all else.

Now I ask you what's not to like about that?

As long as you reject the idea of anyone having any obligation of any sort to community, to the common good, to national unity, etc.,

then of course you can value your own individual selfish 'liberty' above all else.

Ridiculous!

Which is more valuable, individual liberty, or the right of the federal government to conscript citizens into the military for the purpose of national defense?

 

[Oddball]

Ron Paul has a unique and consistent philosophy that values individual liberty above all else.

Now I ask you what's not to like about that?

As long as you reject the idea of anyone having any obligation of any sort to community, to the common good, to national unity, etc.,

then of course you can value your own individual selfish 'liberty' above all else.

Of course, many of us see little more selfish than insolent pushy little snots, who seek to impose their mores upon everybody else.

Come to think of it, isn't that what selfish, insolent, pushy little snots like you regularly accuse others of?

 

[paulitician]

Big Brother has a fool-proof scam going at this point. They just use their Corporate partners to do much of the spying and information-gathering on U.S. Citizens. For some reason many Americans think because it's Google or Facebook doing it, everything is just fine. But in reality, they along with Twitter actually work hand & hand with the Government. They're the same entity in the end.

It's a fool-proof way for the Government to spy on Citizens without possibly being held accountable for it. After all, when you use Google or Facebook, you agree to their terms which include monitoring and collecting personal information on you. You agree to those terms voluntarily, so you no longer have a 'reasonable' expectation of privacy. Google,Facebook,Twitter, and many others share their information with the Government. We are now living in a Government/Corporate-controlled Society. But i don't know how to reverse it. Most Americans seem to want to go along. So i'm very pessimistic about anything ever changing. Sadly, it is what it is.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Ron Paul has a unique and consistent philosophy that values individual liberty above all else.

Now I ask you what's not to like about that?

As long as you reject the idea of anyone having any obligation of any sort to community, to the common good, to national unity, etc.,

then of course you can value your own individual selfish 'liberty' above all else.

Right...Your nebulous, subjective socialist trance words can beat up everybody elses!

Chomsky you ain't.

Which is more valuable, individual liberty, or an obligation of the individual to involuntarily contribute money to a public institution charged with the construction and maintenance of a public transportation infrastructure?

 

[GuyPinestra]

As long as you reject the idea of anyone having any obligation of any sort to community, to the common good, to national unity, etc.,

then of course you can value your own individual selfish 'liberty' above all else.

Ridiculous!

Which is more valuable, individual liberty, or the right of the federal government to conscript citizens into the military for the purpose of national defense?

Why this question? We have an all volunteer military.

Should there ever come a time that the draft is reinstated I will support it. Unless, of course, they're looking for troops to oppress our own citizens.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Ron Paul has a unique and consistent philosophy that values individual liberty above all else.

Now I ask you what's not to like about that?

As long as you reject the idea of anyone having any obligation of any sort to community, to the common good, to national unity, etc.,

then of course you can value your own individual selfish 'liberty' above all else.

Of course, many of us see little more selfish than insolent pushy little snots, who seek to impose their mores upon everybody else.

Come to think of it, isn't that what selfish, insolent, pushy little snots like you regularly accuse others of?

Given that you routinely support candidates who get single digit support among normal Americans,

I think the question has already been settled.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Ridiculous!

Which is more valuable, individual liberty, or the right of the federal government to conscript citizens into the military for the purpose of national defense?

Why this question? We have an all volunteer military.

Should there ever come a time that the draft is reinstated I will support it. Unless, of course, they're looking for troops to oppress our own citizens.

Okay, so agree that valuing individual liberty above all else is idiocy.

That was my point.

 

[GuyPinestra]

Which is more valuable, individual liberty, or the right of the federal government to conscript citizens into the military for the purpose of national defense?

Why this question? We have an all volunteer military.

Should there ever come a time that the draft is reinstated I will support it. Unless, of course, they're looking for troops to oppress our own citizens.

Okay, so agree that valuing individual liberty above all else is idiocy.

That was my point.

No, I don't agree. Neither does our Constitution. It enshrines the value of individual liberty, and was written to preserve it in the face of a growing, authoritarian government.

 

[Contumacious]

As long as you reject the idea of anyone having any obligation of any sort to community, to the common good, to national unity, etc.,

then of course you can value your own individual selfish 'liberty' above all else.

Ridiculous!

Which is more valuable, individual liberty, or the right of the federal government to conscript citizens into the military for the purpose of national defense?

Typically , warmongers , war profiteers and neocrazies will ignore the individual right not to be enslaved.

.

 

[JWBooth]

I suggest that Congressman Paul is incorrect. Though he may have shaded his language some as he is in the middle of a campaign.

Racing headlong into fascism would be more accurate.

 

[Oddball]

As long as you reject the idea of anyone having any obligation of any sort to community, to the common good, to national unity, etc.,

then of course you can value your own individual selfish 'liberty' above all else.

Of course, many of us see little more selfish than insolent pushy little snots, who seek to impose their mores upon everybody else.

Come to think of it, isn't that what selfish, insolent, pushy little snots like you regularly accuse others of?

Given that you routinely support candidates who get single digit support among normal Americans,

I think the question has already been settled.

The candidates that I support aren't at issue here, your brand of insolent, snotty selfishness is....And given that your particular mindset is only shared by 20% of the population, at best, you're hardly in any position to claim membership in any kind of a majority.