Partisan Senate report says Bin Laden was "within our grasp."

As did Obama.....and as a matter of fact...Obama said he'd nuke Pakistan!!!!

Indeed he DID...(Not exactly NUKE...but attack a nation that HAD them)...

Tough talk on Pakistan from Obama< 2007

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama said on Wednesday the United States must be willing to strike al Qaeda targets inside Pakistan, adopting a tough tone after a chief rival accused him of naivete in foreign policy.
Obama's stance comes amid debate in Washington over what to do about a resurgent al Qaeda and Taliban in areas of northwest Pakistan that President Pervez Musharraf has been unable to control, and concerns that new recruits are being trained there for a September 11-style attack against the United States.

Obama said if elected in November 2008 he would be willing to attack inside Pakistan with or without approval from the Pakistani government, a move that would likely cause anxiety in the already troubled region.
"If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act, we will," Obama said.

The Illinois Democrat is trying to convince Americans he has the foreign policy heft to be president after a rival candidate, New York Democratic Sen. Hillary Clinton, questioned his readiness to be commander in chief.

[/SNIP]

OBAMA_WARRIOR.jpg


( IMAGE: EIB Network )

But YET? He dithers on Afghanistan...Stay tuned. He will make his announcement from Hallowed Ground...

Unlike Bush who just ignored Al qaeda and Taliban forces in Pakistan, Obama has developed an effective strategy of attacking on two fronts. He has stepped up Predator attacks while encouraging Pakistan to take the offensive from the south.
It is the most pressure Al Qaeda has had in seven years

So where is he---still missing ?
 
Unlike Bush who just ignored Al qaeda and Taliban forces in Pakistan, Obama has developed an effective strategy of attacking on two fronts. He has stepped up Predator attacks while encouraging Pakistan to take the offensive from the south.
It is the most pressure Al Qaeda has had in seven years

Your an idiot...I guess now history has started on January 21, 2009 for you....
Here's some examples of Obama's effective strategery...:rofl:

OBAMA: Here's what I think. When we came in, basically, there had been drift in our Afghan strategy. Everybody acknowledges that
Now, I think we've lost -- we lost that focus for a while and you started seeing a -- a classic case of mission creep where we're just there
US missile strike kills 60 at funeral in Pakistan | World news | The Guardian
US missile hits militants in Pakistan tribal area: officials
BUT THEY KILLED 90 Civilians instead....

Your ass clown's doing a bang up job rightwinger.....
 
Last edited:
Hey, if they attack our towers, we will attack a different country of course for WMD's that didn't exist.

I see. So YOU denounce what Obama is doing? Good to know.

Mall cop, listen. Bush said something about going to war with a acountry that had nothing to do with 9/11 for wmd's that didnt exist.

Try to keep up GED. Try to.
 
We had him trapped in Tora Bora and held back.

Oh....you were there were you...please tell us your war stories tough guy....

Not me..but

Senate Report: Bin Laden Was 'Within Our Grasp' - ABC News

"But the decisions that opened the door for his escape to Pakistan allowed bin Laden to emerge as a potent symbolic figure who continues to attract a steady flow of money and inspire fanatics worldwide. The failure to finish the job represents a lost opportunity that forever altered the course of the conflict in Afghanistan and the future of international terrorism."
 
OK.

What is Kerry and his merry band of Libtards trying to distract us from this week?
Senate report: Bin Laden was 'within grasp' - Afghanistan- msnbc.com

This is timed to be released with Obama's new grand plan that he pondered for weeks (suposely). This is to say that Bush failed but Obama rocked and its really a page from the same political strategy that they have used during the past eight years.

Can anyone else see that he is just using this to get ahead politically? Its probably the reason why he delayed the sannouncement of his new strategy. Its so he can time it right with this report and it will make him look like the great rescuer of American foreign policy. Obama is dicktard for doing that to because how many people died so he can execute his political strategy?
 
Last edited:
OK.

What is Kerry and his merry band of Libtards trying to distract us from this week?
Senate report: Bin Laden was 'within grasp' - Afghanistan- msnbc.com

This is timed to be released with Obama's new grand plan that he pondered for weeks (suposely). This is to say that Bush failed but Obama rocked and its really a page from the same political strategy that they have used during the past eight years.

Can anyone else see that he is just using this to get ahead politically? Its probably the reason why he delayed the sannouncement of his new strategy. Its so he can time it right with this report and it will make him look like the great rescuer of American foreign policy. Obama is dicktard for doing that to because how many people died so he can execute his political strategy?

Bush DID fail

He gave up on Afghanistan and attacked Iraq which was not involved in terrorism.

It will go down as one of the biggest foreign policy blunders in history
 
they don't watch to capture bin laden. it lets them keep expanding wars and using propaganda. i wouldn't be surprised if he is still on the cia payroll.

Little boy blu should comment about things he doesn't understand......:eusa_whistle:

so you are saying I understand this or do you just not communicate your thoughts properly?

Damn you're dumb, here's a summary of all your posts :


attachment.php
 
OK.

What is Kerry and his merry band of Libtards trying to distract us from this week?
Senate report: Bin Laden was 'within grasp' - Afghanistan- msnbc.com

This is timed to be released with Obama's new grand plan that he pondered for weeks (suposely). This is to say that Bush failed but Obama rocked and its really a page from the same political strategy that they have used during the past eight years.

Can anyone else see that he is just using this to get ahead politically? Its probably the reason why he delayed the sannouncement of his new strategy. Its so he can time it right with this report and it will make him look like the great rescuer of American foreign policy. Obama is dicktard for doing that to because how many people died so he can execute his political strategy?

Bush DID fail

He gave up on Afghanistan and attacked Iraq which was not involved in terrorism.

It will go down as one of the biggest foreign policy blunders in history


Huh ?

You should have gave up on smoking crack........
 
This is timed to be released with Obama's new grand plan that he pondered for weeks (suposely). This is to say that Bush failed but Obama rocked and its really a page from the same political strategy that they have used during the past eight years.

Can anyone else see that he is just using this to get ahead politically? Its probably the reason why he delayed the sannouncement of his new strategy. Its so he can time it right with this report and it will make him look like the great rescuer of American foreign policy. Obama is dicktard for doing that to because how many people died so he can execute his political strategy?

Bush DID fail

He gave up on Afghanistan and attacked Iraq which was not involved in terrorism.

It will go down as one of the biggest foreign policy blunders in history


Huh ?

You should have gave up on smoking crack........

No....Bush should have given up the idea that attacking Iraq had anything to do with 9-11
 
OK.

What is Kerry and his merry band of Libtards trying to distract us from this week?
Senate report: Bin Laden was 'within grasp' - Afghanistan- msnbc.com

This is timed to be released with Obama's new grand plan that he pondered for weeks (suposely). This is to say that Bush failed but Obama rocked and its really a page from the same political strategy that they have used during the past eight years.

Can anyone else see that he is just using this to get ahead politically? Its probably the reason why he delayed the sannouncement of his new strategy. Its so he can time it right with this report and it will make him look like the great rescuer of American foreign policy. Obama is dicktard for doing that to because how many people died so he can execute his political strategy?

Bush DID fail

He gave up on Afghanistan and attacked Iraq which was not involved in terrorism.

It will go down as one of the biggest foreign policy blunders in history

No because the whole point was to dislodge the taliban from afghanastan and possibly capture and kill bin laden.

Anyways, even if he did does that really excuse doing this for mere political gain?
 
So Cheney lied and Bush and Franks lied in order to be re-elected. NICE!
 
As did Obama.....and as a matter of fact...Obama said he'd nuke Pakistan!!!!

Indeed he DID...(Not exactly NUKE...but attack a nation that HAD them)...

Tough talk on Pakistan from Obama< 2007

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama said on Wednesday the United States must be willing to strike al Qaeda targets inside Pakistan, adopting a tough tone after a chief rival accused him of naivete in foreign policy.
Obama's stance comes amid debate in Washington over what to do about a resurgent al Qaeda and Taliban in areas of northwest Pakistan that President Pervez Musharraf has been unable to control, and concerns that new recruits are being trained there for a September 11-style attack against the United States.

Obama said if elected in November 2008 he would be willing to attack inside Pakistan with or without approval from the Pakistani government, a move that would likely cause anxiety in the already troubled region.
"If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act, we will," Obama said.

The Illinois Democrat is trying to convince Americans he has the foreign policy heft to be president after a rival candidate, New York Democratic Sen. Hillary Clinton, questioned his readiness to be commander in chief.

[/SNIP]

OBAMA_WARRIOR.jpg


( IMAGE: EIB Network )

But YET? He dithers on Afghanistan...Stay tuned. He will make his announcement from Hallowed Ground...

Unlike Bush who just ignored Al qaeda and Taliban forces in Pakistan, Obama has developed an effective strategy of attacking on two fronts. He has stepped up Predator attacks while encouraging Pakistan to take the offensive from the south.
It is the most pressure Al Qaeda has had in seven years

Totally fucking stupid and ignorant is NO WAY to go through life son. Ronald Reagan had a way of dealing with terrorists, and those that harbored them. Just ask Mo-Mo Khdaffi?

I see by your response that you missed that class too. I was directly involved in that one.
 
Bush DID fail

He gave up on Afghanistan and attacked Iraq which was not involved in terrorism.

It will go down as one of the biggest foreign policy blunders in history


Huh ?

You should have gave up on smoking crack........

No....Bush should have given up the idea that attacking Iraq had anything to do with 9-11

But he appeased the Leftists by going AFTER the Taliban that were harboring Bin-Laden...but wait! HOLD THE FUCKIN' PHONE here...

During the time of GWB? That was where we should have focused...Now that they have their guy in there? Their guy dithers...Now why is that?

Seems to me RW? YOU want it both ways. Life isn't like that son. high time you realized this. And by the WAY? Obama is dammned if he does, Dammned if he doesn't. What a precarious spot to be in eh? Could explain the 'dithering', and why Obama is not a leader at all but one of these...

BAMthePUPPET.jpg


And of course it wouldn't be complete without ONE of these...

EMPTYSUIT.jpg


About Damned time he showed some LEADERSHIP on his own instead of surrounding himself with still more 'CZARS'...

Obama placed himself on a precarious perch...but he just cannot UPSET the left that so roundly Applauded ASTAN, but NOW want OUT?
 
Last edited:
I find it moderately amusing that so many who haven't a clue as to the topography of the Tora Bora area, think it was so easy to just move in a few thousand troops and cut off any chance of a dozen guys on foot or horse back who knew ever little rock and shrub in the area, from sneaking out of that area. Hell they could have moved one mile to a different cave and we never would have found them.

We are talking about some of the most treacherous terrain in the entire world. Just try even using Google Earth and really look at the area.
 

Forum List

Back
Top