#ParisAgreement climate accord fails – CO2 emissions growing worldwide- Trump vindicated for pulling

[Sunsettommy]

Prove it!

Meanwhile you didn't address the rest of my comments at all,

"...people and companies have the power to sign a treaty, they can do their emission reductions on their own, which Trump doesn't fight against."

Snicker....................

Prove it? Look it up if you want to. Learn to do shit without your hand being held all the time.

YOU are the one who made the original claim, therefore it is YOU who has to back it up.

Remember this?

"Yeah a lot of cities, people and companies gave Trump the middle finger and swore to stick by their promises."

Then your comment is dead on arrival since you REFUSED to back it up and by my request.

You have NOTHING to offer here.

^ ironic

You are too dumb to realize that you destroyed your credibility here since you actually REFUSED to back up your claim!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

 

[OldLady]

Did you bother to read the post?

It make clear that America was able to REDUCE their emission (Biggest decline of any nation) , while NOT being a signatory of the Treaty, while 187 of the 195 nations that signed the Treaty have failed to meet the targeted reductions.

Epic Fail!

At least they're trying. It's too bad whatever emissions reductions we've had are now things of the past thanks to Trump's deregulation. Private industry has to step in where the current leadership won't.

They are free to try, but pointedly bashing America over and over for not joining was immature and stupid.

From the link you didn't read, is this:

"The biggest decline came from the United States, where emissions dropped by 0.5%, or 25 Mt, to 4 810 Mt of CO2, marking the third consecutive year of decline."

America is trying and SUCCEEDING!

Again Americans like me are unhappy with European big ugly mouths over America not signing the Treaty. The attacks were nasty and personal, they so far have failed to reduce their emissions which is why I can say they are HYPOCRITES!

They can kindly SHOVE IT!

You look at it as vindication; I look at it as embarrassment that our country refused to kick in its share toward helping in this very important effort. We are one of the biggest polluters, so why should we be off the hook? A lot of those countries haven't got a pot to piss in, and they are the ones who will turn to dirty coal because it's cheapest. That is what the $$$ from us was for.

So you figure the US should foot the bill for these countries who seem to have no problems to buy military weapons and use the military to subdue any opposition. As if any of these countries would use foreign aid $$ for infrastructure or anything else to benefit the general population ...that`s laughable !
In addition to that if "green energy" would actually work as advertised then emissions in Germany where it`s been pushed the hardest should not have increased.

Yeah I saw that typical leftist give money away whine. So boring and predictable, a socialist attempt which gets less transparent every year.

America isn't stopping hypocrite Europe, Africa and Asia from reducing their emissions, therefore you can shut up!

The technology and information are readily available to work with to help reduce emissions. Which is largely unnecessary in the first place since it isn't a danger to planet.

Which is largely unnecessary in the first place since it isn't a danger to planet.
The truth rears its ugly head. Nice defenses, but I figured what was behind them.

 

[OldLady]

So, how does that lead you to believe the Accords were unnecessary?

Did you bother to read the post?

It make clear that America was able to REDUCE their emission (Biggest decline of any nation) , while NOT being a signatory of the Treaty, while 187 of the 195 nations that signed the Treaty have failed to meet the targeted reductions.

Epic Fail!

At least they're trying. It's too bad whatever emissions reductions we've had are now things of the past thanks to Trump's deregulation. Private industry has to step in where the current leadership won't.

They are free to try, but pointedly bashing America over and over for not joining was immature and stupid.

From the link you didn't read, is this:

"The biggest decline came from the United States, where emissions dropped by 0.5%, or 25 Mt, to 4 810 Mt of CO2, marking the third consecutive year of decline."

America is trying and SUCCEEDING!

Again Americans like me are unhappy with European big ugly mouths over America not signing the Treaty. The attacks were nasty and personal, they so far have failed to reduce their emissions which is why I can say they are HYPOCRITES!

They can kindly SHOVE IT!

You look at it as vindication; I look at it as embarrassment that our country refused to kick in its share toward helping in this very important effort. We are one of the biggest polluters, so why should we be off the hook? A lot of those countries haven't got a pot to piss in, and they are the ones who will turn to dirty coal because it's cheapest. That is what the $$$ from us was for.

I look at it as embarrassment that our country refused to kick in its share toward helping in this very important effort.

Did you miss the part where we did our share? The biggest decline came from the United States.....

And we didn't contribute a dime to the global effort to help other countries do the same.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Did you bother to read the post?

It make clear that America was able to REDUCE their emission (Biggest decline of any nation) , while NOT being a signatory of the Treaty, while 187 of the 195 nations that signed the Treaty have failed to meet the targeted reductions.

Epic Fail!

At least they're trying. It's too bad whatever emissions reductions we've had are now things of the past thanks to Trump's deregulation. Private industry has to step in where the current leadership won't.

They are free to try, but pointedly bashing America over and over for not joining was immature and stupid.

From the link you didn't read, is this:

"The biggest decline came from the United States, where emissions dropped by 0.5%, or 25 Mt, to 4 810 Mt of CO2, marking the third consecutive year of decline."

America is trying and SUCCEEDING!

Again Americans like me are unhappy with European big ugly mouths over America not signing the Treaty. The attacks were nasty and personal, they so far have failed to reduce their emissions which is why I can say they are HYPOCRITES!

They can kindly SHOVE IT!

You look at it as vindication; I look at it as embarrassment that our country refused to kick in its share toward helping in this very important effort. We are one of the biggest polluters, so why should we be off the hook? A lot of those countries haven't got a pot to piss in, and they are the ones who will turn to dirty coal because it's cheapest. That is what the $$$ from us was for.

I look at it as embarrassment that our country refused to kick in its share toward helping in this very important effort.

Did you miss the part where we did our share? The biggest decline came from the United States.....

And we didn't contribute a dime to the global effort to help other countries do the same.

Yeah, we've wasted enough money sending it to other countries so they can pretend to reduce their CO2.

 

[Sunsettommy]

At least they're trying. It's too bad whatever emissions reductions we've had are now things of the past thanks to Trump's deregulation. Private industry has to step in where the current leadership won't.

They are free to try, but pointedly bashing America over and over for not joining was immature and stupid.

From the link you didn't read, is this:

"The biggest decline came from the United States, where emissions dropped by 0.5%, or 25 Mt, to 4 810 Mt of CO2, marking the third consecutive year of decline."

America is trying and SUCCEEDING!

Again Americans like me are unhappy with European big ugly mouths over America not signing the Treaty. The attacks were nasty and personal, they so far have failed to reduce their emissions which is why I can say they are HYPOCRITES!

They can kindly SHOVE IT!

You look at it as vindication; I look at it as embarrassment that our country refused to kick in its share toward helping in this very important effort. We are one of the biggest polluters, so why should we be off the hook? A lot of those countries haven't got a pot to piss in, and they are the ones who will turn to dirty coal because it's cheapest. That is what the $$$ from us was for.

So you figure the US should foot the bill for these countries who seem to have no problems to buy military weapons and use the military to subdue any opposition. As if any of these countries would use foreign aid $$ for infrastructure or anything else to benefit the general population ...that`s laughable !
In addition to that if "green energy" would actually work as advertised then emissions in Germany where it`s been pushed the hardest should not have increased.

Yeah I saw that typical leftist give money away whine. So boring and predictable, a socialist attempt which gets less transparent every year.

America isn't stopping hypocrite Europe, Africa and Asia from reducing their emissions, therefore you can shut up!

The technology and information are readily available to work with to help reduce emissions. Which is largely unnecessary in the first place since it isn't a danger to planet.

Which is largely unnecessary in the first place since it isn't a danger to planet.
The truth rears its ugly head. Nice defenses, but I figured what was behind them.

CO2 is GREENING the planet.
CO2 is nearly played out in warm forcing at the 400 ppm level, by the logarithmic curve.
CO2 contributes to increased harvest yields in recent decades.

What "ugly truth" was that?

 

[skookerasbil]

Hey Sun... sorry I didn't notice you beat me to the punch!! But what a wonderful punch it is huh?

 

[Sunsettommy]

Did you bother to read the post?

It make clear that America was able to REDUCE their emission (Biggest decline of any nation) , while NOT being a signatory of the Treaty, while 187 of the 195 nations that signed the Treaty have failed to meet the targeted reductions.

Epic Fail!

At least they're trying. It's too bad whatever emissions reductions we've had are now things of the past thanks to Trump's deregulation. Private industry has to step in where the current leadership won't.

They are free to try, but pointedly bashing America over and over for not joining was immature and stupid.

From the link you didn't read, is this:

"The biggest decline came from the United States, where emissions dropped by 0.5%, or 25 Mt, to 4 810 Mt of CO2, marking the third consecutive year of decline."

America is trying and SUCCEEDING!

Again Americans like me are unhappy with European big ugly mouths over America not signing the Treaty. The attacks were nasty and personal, they so far have failed to reduce their emissions which is why I can say they are HYPOCRITES!

They can kindly SHOVE IT!

You look at it as vindication; I look at it as embarrassment that our country refused to kick in its share toward helping in this very important effort. We are one of the biggest polluters, so why should we be off the hook? A lot of those countries haven't got a pot to piss in, and they are the ones who will turn to dirty coal because it's cheapest. That is what the $$$ from us was for.

I look at it as embarrassment that our country refused to kick in its share toward helping in this very important effort.

Did you miss the part where we did our share? The biggest decline came from the United States.....

And we didn't contribute a dime to the global effort to help other countries do the same.

Did your forget the part where America after cleaning up ugly European based world wars TWICE, spent gobs of money especially after WW2 ended to rebuild Europe then did most of the heavy lifting in defending Europe from the USSR, again with gobs of money for 5 decades, while Europe scaled back their defense because America was the big shield for them.

Then for decades gave away gobs of money to the IMF and other groups to help Africa build their nations up in various ways, including parts of Europe as usual.

Yet after all that Europe pisses on America for not giving away yet more money to do something that doesn't benefit America in any way.

The hell with you hypocrites.

 

[jc456]

Climate Hypocrites going to stop hitting on America over this?

Watts Up With That?
March 26, 2018

The Paris Climate Accords Are Looking More and More Like Fantasy

By David Wallace-Wells

Excerpt:

Remember Paris? It was not even two years ago that the celebrated climate accords were signed — defining two degrees of global warming as a must-meet target and rallying all the world’s nations to meet it — and the returns are already dispiritingly grim.

This week, the International Energy Agency announced that carbon emissions grew 1.7 percent in 2017, after an ambiguous couple of years optimists hoped represented a leveling off, or peak; instead, we’re climbing again.

So, how does that lead you to believe the Accords were unnecessary?

Did you bother to read the post?

It make clear that America was able to REDUCE their emission (Biggest decline of any nation) , while NOT being a signatory of the Treaty, while 187 of the 195 nations that signed the Treaty have failed to meet the targeted reductions.

Epic Fail!

At least they're trying. It's too bad whatever emissions reductions we've had are now things of the past thanks to Trump's deregulation. Private industry has to step in where the current leadership won't.

They are free to try, but pointedly bashing America over and over for not joining was immature and stupid.

From the link you didn't read, is this:

"The biggest decline came from the United States, where emissions dropped by 0.5%, or 25 Mt, to 4 810 Mt of CO2, marking the third consecutive year of decline."

America is trying and SUCCEEDING!

Again Americans like me are unhappy with European big ugly mouths over America not signing the Treaty. The attacks were nasty and personal, they so far have failed to reduce their emissions which is why I can say they are HYPOCRITES!

They can kindly SHOVE IT!

You look at it as vindication; I look at it as embarrassment that our country refused to kick in its share toward helping in this very important effort. We are one of the biggest polluters, so why should we be off the hook? A lot of those countries haven't got a pot to piss in, and they are the ones who will turn to dirty coal because it's cheapest. That is what the $$$ from us was for.

kick in its share of what exactly? looks like we kicked ass and dropped our rate. we kicked ass.

maybe other countries should kick ass as well some day.

 

[Old Rocks]

They are free to try, but pointedly bashing America over and over for not joining was immature and stupid.

From the link you didn't read, is this:

"The biggest decline came from the United States, where emissions dropped by 0.5%, or 25 Mt, to 4 810 Mt of CO2, marking the third consecutive year of decline."

America is trying and SUCCEEDING!

Again Americans like me are unhappy with European big ugly mouths over America not signing the Treaty. The attacks were nasty and personal, they so far have failed to reduce their emissions which is why I can say they are HYPOCRITES!

They can kindly SHOVE IT!

You look at it as vindication; I look at it as embarrassment that our country refused to kick in its share toward helping in this very important effort. We are one of the biggest polluters, so why should we be off the hook? A lot of those countries haven't got a pot to piss in, and they are the ones who will turn to dirty coal because it's cheapest. That is what the $$$ from us was for.

So you figure the US should foot the bill for these countries who seem to have no problems to buy military weapons and use the military to subdue any opposition. As if any of these countries would use foreign aid $$ for infrastructure or anything else to benefit the general population ...that`s laughable !
In addition to that if "green energy" would actually work as advertised then emissions in Germany where it`s been pushed the hardest should not have increased.

Yeah I saw that typical leftist give money away whine. So boring and predictable, a socialist attempt which gets less transparent every year.

America isn't stopping hypocrite Europe, Africa and Asia from reducing their emissions, therefore you can shut up!

The technology and information are readily available to work with to help reduce emissions. Which is largely unnecessary in the first place since it isn't a danger to planet.

Which is largely unnecessary in the first place since it isn't a danger to planet.
The truth rears its ugly head. Nice defenses, but I figured what was behind them.

CO2 is GREENING the planet.
CO2 is nearly played out in warm forcing at the 400 ppm level, by the logarithmic curve.
CO2 contributes to increased harvest yields in recent decades.

What "ugly truth" was that?

Another dumb fuck repeats a lie, and pretends he doesn't know it is a lie.

 

[skookerasbil]

You look at it as vindication; I look at it as embarrassment that our country refused to kick in its share toward helping in this very important effort. We are one of the biggest polluters, so why should we be off the hook? A lot of those countries haven't got a pot to piss in, and they are the ones who will turn to dirty coal because it's cheapest. That is what the $$$ from us was for.

So you figure the US should foot the bill for these countries who seem to have no problems to buy military weapons and use the military to subdue any opposition. As if any of these countries would use foreign aid $$ for infrastructure or anything else to benefit the general population ...that`s laughable !
In addition to that if "green energy" would actually work as advertised then emissions in Germany where it`s been pushed the hardest should not have increased.

Yeah I saw that typical leftist give money away whine. So boring and predictable, a socialist attempt which gets less transparent every year.

America isn't stopping hypocrite Europe, Africa and Asia from reducing their emissions, therefore you can shut up!

The technology and information are readily available to work with to help reduce emissions. Which is largely unnecessary in the first place since it isn't a danger to planet.

Which is largely unnecessary in the first place since it isn't a danger to planet.
The truth rears its ugly head. Nice defenses, but I figured what was behind them.

CO2 is GREENING the planet.
CO2 is nearly played out in warm forcing at the 400 ppm level, by the logarithmic curve.
CO2 contributes to increased harvest yields in recent decades.

What "ugly truth" was that?

Another dumb fuck repeats a lie, and pretends he doesn't know it is a lie.

All that anger.... doesn't look good for the optics in this thread. Actually....it kind of makes it look like Sunset Tommy is publicly cleaning your clock.

Anger.... always the clear sign that the progressive is getting pwned in the argument.

 

[Sunsettommy]

You look at it as vindication; I look at it as embarrassment that our country refused to kick in its share toward helping in this very important effort. We are one of the biggest polluters, so why should we be off the hook? A lot of those countries haven't got a pot to piss in, and they are the ones who will turn to dirty coal because it's cheapest. That is what the $$$ from us was for.

So you figure the US should foot the bill for these countries who seem to have no problems to buy military weapons and use the military to subdue any opposition. As if any of these countries would use foreign aid $$ for infrastructure or anything else to benefit the general population ...that`s laughable !
In addition to that if "green energy" would actually work as advertised then emissions in Germany where it`s been pushed the hardest should not have increased.

Yeah I saw that typical leftist give money away whine. So boring and predictable, a socialist attempt which gets less transparent every year.

America isn't stopping hypocrite Europe, Africa and Asia from reducing their emissions, therefore you can shut up!

The technology and information are readily available to work with to help reduce emissions. Which is largely unnecessary in the first place since it isn't a danger to planet.

Which is largely unnecessary in the first place since it isn't a danger to planet.
The truth rears its ugly head. Nice defenses, but I figured what was behind them.

CO2 is GREENING the planet.
CO2 is nearly played out in warm forcing at the 400 ppm level, by the logarithmic curve.
CO2 contributes to increased harvest yields in recent decades.

What "ugly truth" was that?

Another dumb fuck repeats a lie, and pretends he doesn't know it is a lie.

Yawn, go back to your sandbox.

 

[Sunsettommy]

So you figure the US should foot the bill for these countries who seem to have no problems to buy military weapons and use the military to subdue any opposition. As if any of these countries would use foreign aid $$ for infrastructure or anything else to benefit the general population ...that`s laughable !
In addition to that if "green energy" would actually work as advertised then emissions in Germany where it`s been pushed the hardest should not have increased.

Yeah I saw that typical leftist give money away whine. So boring and predictable, a socialist attempt which gets less transparent every year.

America isn't stopping hypocrite Europe, Africa and Asia from reducing their emissions, therefore you can shut up!

The technology and information are readily available to work with to help reduce emissions. Which is largely unnecessary in the first place since it isn't a danger to planet.

Which is largely unnecessary in the first place since it isn't a danger to planet.
The truth rears its ugly head. Nice defenses, but I figured what was behind them.

CO2 is GREENING the planet.
CO2 is nearly played out in warm forcing at the 400 ppm level, by the logarithmic curve.
CO2 contributes to increased harvest yields in recent decades.

What "ugly truth" was that?

Another dumb fuck repeats a lie, and pretends he doesn't know it is a lie.

All that anger.... doesn't look good for the optics in this thread. Actually....it kind of makes it look like Sunset Tommy is publicly cleaning your clock.

Anger.... always the clear sign that the progressive is getting pwned in the argument.

He has no argument to offer, just immature rants.

 

[skookerasbil]

Yeah I saw that typical leftist give money away whine. So boring and predictable, a socialist attempt which gets less transparent every year.

America isn't stopping hypocrite Europe, Africa and Asia from reducing their emissions, therefore you can shut up!

The technology and information are readily available to work with to help reduce emissions. Which is largely unnecessary in the first place since it isn't a danger to planet.

Which is largely unnecessary in the first place since it isn't a danger to planet.
The truth rears its ugly head. Nice defenses, but I figured what was behind them.

CO2 is GREENING the planet.
CO2 is nearly played out in warm forcing at the 400 ppm level, by the logarithmic curve.
CO2 contributes to increased harvest yields in recent decades.

What "ugly truth" was that?

Another dumb fuck repeats a lie, and pretends he doesn't know it is a lie.

All that anger.... doesn't look good for the optics in this thread. Actually....it kind of makes it look like Sunset Tommy is publicly cleaning your clock.

Anger.... always the clear sign that the progressive is getting pwned in the argument.

He has no argument to offer, just immature rants.

Yep.... and notice the level of anger and misery?

I have been in this form for 9 years now and you know how many alarmist are regulars in here? Three or four and Old Rocks is the only one who's been around for all that time..... which has resulted in 9 years of split my sides laughing fun. It's the only thing that keeps me coming back.... to see these people's heads exploding at the lack of progress on their side. I exist in here just to point out that fact.....

Everything has blown up in their face over the last 10 years.... Al Gore is now irrelevant. Cap-and-trade is dead. Paris...dead. climate legislation passed in the United States in the last 10 years = zero. Renewable energy? Still a joke. Electric cars....laughable sales numbers compared to conventional vehicles. And when has climate change ever come up in a presidential debate? Exactly zero times..... so for the alarmist losing is historic. Every single time they come and post and here they get run out of the building. And just when you thought it couldn't get any worse for them along comes President Trump who goes and nukes the EPA.

Is it satisfying to see the skeptics dominating? It sure is s*** is.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Which is largely unnecessary in the first place since it isn't a danger to planet.
The truth rears its ugly head. Nice defenses, but I figured what was behind them.

CO2 is GREENING the planet.
CO2 is nearly played out in warm forcing at the 400 ppm level, by the logarithmic curve.
CO2 contributes to increased harvest yields in recent decades.

What "ugly truth" was that?

Another dumb fuck repeats a lie, and pretends he doesn't know it is a lie.

All that anger.... doesn't look good for the optics in this thread. Actually....it kind of makes it look like Sunset Tommy is publicly cleaning your clock.

Anger.... always the clear sign that the progressive is getting pwned in the argument.

He has no argument to offer, just immature rants.

Yep.... and notice the level of anger and misery?

I have been in this form for 9 years now and you know how many alarmist are regulars in here? Three or four and Old Rocks is the only one who's been around for all that time..... which has resulted in 9 years of split my sides laughing fun. It's the only thing that keeps me coming back.... to see these people's heads exploding at the lack of progress on their side. I exist in here just to point out that fact.....

Everything has blown up in their face over the last 10 years.... Al Gore is now irrelevant. Cap-and-trade is dead. Paris...dead. climate legislation passed in the United States in the last 10 years = zero. Renewable energy? Still a joke. Electric cars....laughable sales numbers compared to conventional vehicles. And when has climate change ever come up in a presidential debate? Exactly zero times..... so for the alarmist losing is historic. Every single time they come and post and here they get run out of the building. And just when you thought it couldn't get any worse for them along comes President Trump who goes and nukes the EPA.

Is it satisfying to see the skeptics dominating? It sure is s*** is.

Warmist/alarmists don't even realize that all those large El-Nino's since the 1980's is a sign of a cooling world. In a warming world there would be FEWER El-Nino's as it was in the early Holocene when they were almost non existent for a first few thousand years. The time of Climatic Optimum was almost free of El-Nino's.

 

[watchingfromafar]

People can’t see the forest for the trees.
Animals breath in O2 and exhale CO2
Plants breath in CO2 and exhale O2
It is a perpetual cycle that sustains all living things

 

[skookerasbil]

Climate treaties are a huge ruse....always fall waaaaaaaay short of stated goals. They are a bone thrown to the climate hystrical to keep them happy. They help only those who invest in clean energy. Doy.....if the US disappeared from the earth tomorrow by 2100 temps would drop just 0.1 degrees. You climate crusader bozos are a bunch of suckers.

 

[mamooth]

Warmist/alarmists don't even realize that all those large El-Nino's since the 1980's is a sign of a cooling world.

What brought on that fit of babbling about El Nino, a topic that nobody was talking about? Whatsamatta, did you get tired of wetting yourself over the tales of socilaists that your masters use to keep you scared and obedient?

In a warming world there would be FEWER El-Nino's as it was in the early Holocene when they were almost non existent for a first few thousand years.

You're trying to compare just-out-of-the-ice-age conditions, when the ocean had very different temperature profile, with the present? That's dumb.

The time of Climatic Optimum was almost free of El-Nino's.

Okay, but the world wasn't warming then. You're not very good at this. But then, if you weren't absolutely helpless concerning science and logic, you wouldn't be a denier. I suggest you go back to crying about phantom socialists.

Also, the thread topic is fail. If CO2 emissions aren't being decreased fast enough, then the logical response is for more political pressure to decrease them. The idiot response is "well, it wasn't perfect, so it's useless!".

 

[mamooth]

Climate treaties are a huge ruse....

Except when they succeed, as with ozone or acid rain, and even with CO2

Skook, don't you ever get tired of being a sucker? I mean, you didn't know about the treaties and their success. That means someone suckered you.

 

[Sunsettommy]

A few months ago, a report comes out showing that the Paris Climate Treaty was only the latest in a row of FAILED climate treaties going back to 1992, from the Heartland Institute.

Poland and the Failure of Paris Climate Commitments

January 11, 2019
By H. Sterling Burnett

Excerpt:

Actions speak louder than words. And the actions of nations around the world show the 2015 Paris climate agreement, like the climate agreements before it, is not worth the paper it is printed on.

Environmentalists were discouraged at how little progress was made at the 24th Conference of the Parties (COP24) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) in Katowice, Poland, from December 2 to December 14.

Diplomats failed to either “welcome,” the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) September 2018 report on the costs of climate change or ratchet up the required greenhouse gas emission reductions beyond what was agreed to in Paris in 2015, as the IPCC’s report said they must to avoid serious environmental harm. Negotiators also failed to address funding for developing countries to grow economically while adapting to climate change. Instead, in a moment of unmerited self-congratulation, at the close of the conference, government bureaucrats in attendance gave themselves a standing ovation for developing an unenforceable rulebook for tracking and counting carbon dioxide emissions. That tepid accomplishment hardly merited a single handclap, much less the millions of dollars governments spent and thousands of tons of carbon dioxide they spewed sending their climate mandarins to Poland.

In 1992, 165 countries signed the UNFCC, agreeing to “stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere.” To do so, 43 industrialized countries agreed to implement voluntary measures to stabilize their greenhouse gas emissions at 1990 levels by the year 2000. They missed that target badly.

Despite the 1992 agreement, carbon dioxide emissions increased. Therefore, in 1997, parties to the UNFCC negotiated a new treaty: the Kyoto Protocol. Under this treaty, the same developed countries agreed to legally-binding greenhouse gas emission reductions averaging 5 percent below 1990 levels by 2012.

History repeated itself, with the parties to the Kyoto Protocol missing their greenhouse gas emission reduction targets by a wide margin—with no penalties forthcoming.

This brings us to Paris in 2015, when 196 countries agreed to cut or stabilize greenhouse gas emissions at levels necessary to prevent the Earth from warming as far as possible below two degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels. The U.N. recently estimated this would mean cutting global greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent by 2030 and producing net zero emissions by 2050.

No country is on target to meet those commitments. In fact, carbon dioxide emissions are increasing, not dropping. In short, the Paris agreement, for all the lofty words spoken in support of it in Poland, is all but kaput.

Here are just a few facts demonstrating why the Paris agreement is doomed to fail.

LINK

================================================
If the retards stop fighting Nuclear power production, Nuclear Fusion research, there would be less need for Coal and Gas in the future.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Climate treaties are a huge ruse....

Except when they succeed, as with ozone or acid rain, and even with CO2

Skook, don't you ever get tired of being a sucker? I mean, you didn't know about the treaties and their success. That means someone suckered you.

"Acid Rain" and "Ozone Hole" was never a real problem, thus your claims of success is absurd.

Rain is naturally acid (around 5.5 ph.) in the first place, Ozone "hole" occurs naturally anyway as it was measured back in the 1950's. despite the high solar output at the time.