Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
btw, for me to be wrong on this, Bush would not have had any members of his admin as carry overs from the Clinton administration
and yet he didnt blame himNot at all. For you to be wrong all one has to do is look at Bush's record. Extending the hand of friendship with your fingers crossed behind you back is not friendship, it's gamesmanship.
Carry overs don't mean shit in the divisive stakes. One could argue he kept Tenet on to blame for any intelligence fuck ups during that period...and there were a few of them.
and yet he didnt blame him
you just continue to be massively WRONG
yet you are the one that is still WRONGI said 'one could argue'. I know a Thick-As-Pigshit person like yourself doesn't understand comprehension, but at pretend you do.
As for being wrong, Bush's record speaks for itself...
yet you are the one that is still WRONG
and you call ME that?
LOL
you're looking in a mirror, asshole
he DID work with themWhich part am I wrong about? How he worked with Dems in Congress (snicker)? That part? Or how Cheney (the real power behind the WH), was so lovey dovey with the Dems on Capitol Hill?
Get a new set of glasses Dilbert, your optomotrist is calling....
you lookin at that mirror againYou really are a one-trick pony ain't ya....
but I am curious about the powers that be being upset with the Panetta nomination. is it all a power struggle or based on principles?
Bush had Democrat senate members and their families over to the White House to watch movies and other "reaching out" type offers. He even let Ted Kennedy write Bush's education bill. Of course none of it worked, just like after 9/11 the Democrats couldn't help themselves from turning everything partisan. Personally I thought Bush was an idiot to attempt to reach out to the Democrats - it was a waste of time and effort.
Seems to me that Obama is now Bush II revisited. GW wanted to be a 'domestic president' that brought both sides together. He failed in that, partially because of the election, partially because of the card deal known as 9/11. With that, I don't think he did so bad. But that is for history to decide, right now, I'm in the tiny minority.
Bush never wanted to be a "uniter." That was more of word spin that Karl used. To say that he failed because of 9-11 is a total gross missunderstanding of what happned with this tradegy.
He was handed a chance to unite this country that even a dem could have succeed with. His neo con advisors used this instead to push their personal agenda of the Iraq invasion and used the fear card incessently.
You are a minority who still is clinging to the cognitive dissonance that is the bush administration. And sayin that it is for history to decide is a bullshit cop out. That's like saying we can't put anyone in prison today until history decides if they were really guilty.
Bush pretended to reach out whe he thought he needed help, but old US all to go to hell otherwise.
Uniter, your ass.
Our econom is in shatters after 8 years of his mis rule. Screw history and help those who are out of work or their homes right now. This worrying about your legacy shit is just that: vain shitdreams of future glory.
Another person learning on the job...Great!Just what the CIA needs right now.
Bush never wanted to be a "uniter." That was more of word spin that Karl used. To say that he failed because of 9-11 is a total gross missunderstanding of what happned with this tradegy.
He was handed a chance to unite this country that even a dem could have succeed with. His neo con advisors used this instead to push their personal agenda of the Iraq invasion and used the fear card incessently.
You are a minority who still is clinging to the cognitive dissonance that is the bush administration. And sayin that it is for history to decide is a bullshit cop out. That's like saying we can't put anyone in prison today until history decides if they were really guilty.
Bush pretended to reach out whe he thought he needed help, but old US all to go to hell otherwise.
Uniter, your ass.
Our econom is in shatters after 8 years of his mis rule. Screw history and help those who are out of work or their homes right now. This worrying about your legacy shit is just that: vain shitdreams of future glory.
What are his qualifications for this post?
None as far as I can tell.
Damn!
If there's one thing we need its an effective agency that can gather human intel.
We don't have that now, and much of what has been going on might have been avoided if we had.
Damn! Damn! Damn!
It's a shame that Bush I is so old.
At least that guy had some experience running the CIA.
but bush had none going in, just like panetta, iirc.
i would like to think that the career apparatchiks take care of the nuts and bolts of the agency and the director fights the bureaucratic wars and consults with the president. i don't know that knowledge of how to gather info is as important as knowing what to do with it once you have it.
i agree with you on the need for more humint-sattelites and intercepts are fine as far as they go, but as in all aspects of conflict, you need boots on the ground to win.
