Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Look at what you are truly defending, the defender of homosexual behaviorYou are 100% correct Shogun
and, I can show you where homosexuality has taken place for centuries too. The gov is not your club to wield against those whose morals don't mirror your own, negro. If that were the case your ass would still be on a farm picking cotton.
Shogun, the man who defends homosexuality.
Shogun the man who projects homosexuality onto others.
Shogun the man who wants to come out of the closet, but is afraid.
Mexico is a Nation, an independent state.Mexicouh, NONE? NAME A LATINO STATE IN AMERICA, you dumb motherfucker. Name ONE.
yea! MEXICO sure is a fucking latino state in AMERICA, you dumb cock sucker!
Mexico is a Nation, an independent state.Mexico
yea! MEXICO sure is a fucking latino state in AMERICA, you dumb cock sucker!
Mexico has a "Latino" (sic) population.
Mexico is in America.
Or are you so completely retarded that you don't understand some part of the above?
yea.. and THAT is why the LAW OF RETURN applies to non-jews (palis) just like it does for the "let's pack the demographic" jewish population, eh?
Indeed, AMERICA sure does prop up a single ethnicity for the sake of a specific ethnic identity, right? WE IMPORT WHITES IN ORDER TO KEEP EVERYONE ELSE FROM THINKING THAT THIS IS MORE THAN A WHITE NATION, RIGHT STUPID?
Israel is sui generis. Maybe you heard of the Holocaust? The International community turned its collective back on Jews of Nazi Germany, thus, justifying a Jewish state where Jews can live without fear of persecution.
Israel is sui generis. Maybe you heard of the Holocaust? The International community turned its collective back on Jews of Nazi Germany, thus, justifying a Jewish state where Jews can live without fear of persecution.
So stealing land from people who had zero to do with the so called holocaust, and giving it to the Jews, was a way to relieve the European guilt?
So stealing land from people who had zero to do with the so called holocaust, and giving it to the Jews, was a way to relieve the European guilt?
[
Yup lands were stolen, but only because the muslms got their asses kicked in a war.
Jews purchased the land they came to live on.
[
Yup lands were stolen, but only because the muslms got their asses kicked in a war.
Erm... no. The British played a peripheral role in the Arab Revolt, then proceeded to stab the Arabs in the back by promising rightfully Muslim land to European Jewish colonizers.
Arab Revolt - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
They "lost" it after, as I said, European Jews flocked to Palestine in droves and were unrightfully granted ascendancy in the region by their fellow Europeans. Compare the population map I included in my previous post to Israel's boundaries in 1948 and you'll notice that something just isn't quite right.so they lost it a war, or series of wars.
If that's what you call European imperialists imposing an undesired part of their population on a foreign people, then yes, I suppose so.when they lost their land, doens't that mean they got their asses kicked?
Perhaps they should be treated like Jews were in Israel, giving them most of the land in the United States and political power over the rest of the American population that has lived there for hundreds of years.so the american indians have only gotten back a portion of their land..........
If the Palestinians are unable to end Israeli persecution non-violently -- and that certainly appears to be the case -- then violence against Israeli military and governmental targets will become necessary and justified. There is a difference between subjugating a land by force and winning one back using force. There is no breaking bread with those who actively oppress you and your people.war lost by force is the same as war lost by deception. its lost.
Now, I believe the modern version of the conflict is based upon this claim. So fa, in my memory, the palestinians have turned down every deal. Didn't yasser continue to want to push isreal into the sea right up until his death?
So we understand here that a palestinian unilateral establishment of a palestinian state sounds a lot like continuing the plan to take it back by armed conflict.
If the Palestinians are unable to end Israeli persecution non-violently -- and that certainly appears to be the case -- then violence against Israeli military and governmental targets will become necessary and justified. There is a difference between subjugating a land by force and winning one back using force. There is no breaking bread with those who actively oppress you and your people.war lost by force is the same as war lost by deception. its lost.
Now, I believe the modern version of the conflict is based upon this claim. So fa, in my memory, the palestinians have turned down every deal. Didn't yasser continue to want to push isreal into the sea right up until his death?
So we understand here that a palestinian unilateral establishment of a palestinian state sounds a lot like continuing the plan to take it back by armed conflict.
I'd like to be the same way, which is why I oppose any type of violence carried out against Israeli civilians. I cannot sit by and advocate non-violence against the military, however, when Palestinians are still being attacked and oppressed. I'd like to see the conflict ended as peacefully as possible, but that would require concessions and non-violence from both sides.If the Palestinians are unable to end Israeli persecution non-violently -- and that certainly appears to be the case -- then violence against Israeli military and governmental targets will become necessary and justified. There is a difference between subjugating a land by force and winning one back using force. There is no breaking bread with those who actively oppress you and your people.war lost by force is the same as war lost by deception. its lost.
Now, I believe the modern version of the conflict is based upon this claim. So fa, in my memory, the palestinians have turned down every deal. Didn't yasser continue to want to push isreal into the sea right up until his death?
So we understand here that a palestinian unilateral establishment of a palestinian state sounds a lot like continuing the plan to take it back by armed conflict.
Thats what I thought it meant when I first heard it. Same thing we have heard for years.
personanly, I am not a zionist, although I don't live in Israel either. I might feel different if I did.
I am however; one who hates to see people who should be sticking together because they actually have so much in common, resorting to violence.
I am one of those who believes when the bombs go off, we all lose.
I'd like to be the same way, which is why I oppose any type of violence carried out against Israeli civilians. I cannot sit by and advocate non-violence against the military, however, when Palestinians are still being attacked and oppressed. I'd like to see the conflict ended as peacefully as possible, but that would require concessions and non-violence from both sides.If the Palestinians are unable to end Israeli persecution non-violently -- and that certainly appears to be the case -- then violence against Israeli military and governmental targets will become necessary and justified. There is a difference between subjugating a land by force and winning one back using force. There is no breaking bread with those who actively oppress you and your people.
Thats what I thought it meant when I first heard it. Same thing we have heard for years.
personanly, I am not a zionist, although I don't live in Israel either. I might feel different if I did.
I am however; one who hates to see people who should be sticking together because they actually have so much in common, resorting to violence.
I am one of those who believes when the bombs go off, we all lose.
I cannot sit by and advocate non-violence against the military, however, when Palestinians are still being attacked and oppressed. I'd like to see the conflict ended as peacefully as possible, but that would require concessions and non-violence from both sides.
If the Palestinians are unable to end Israeli persecution non-violently -- and that certainly appears to be the case -- then violence against Israeli military and governmental targets will become necessary and justified. There is a difference between subjugating a land by force and winning one back using force. There is no breaking bread with those who actively oppress you and your people.
