dilloduck
Diamond Member
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
I believe is the plan is to destroy America with liberalism, and keep Israel as their private little area of supremacy.
Very close----OWN America-- aj might be racist but he ain't dumb
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
I believe is the plan is to destroy America with liberalism, and keep Israel as their private little area of supremacy.
Originally posted by ajwps
You're the one who's inconsistent. The only two classifications of people according to you, are jew and non jew, with jews having all rights to exclusivity and COMPLETE control of society, due to history. I at least acknowledge the existence of 'subdivivisions within the non jew category', as you would understand them.
Your saying that I am inconsistent is incorrect. It seems to you that there are only three classifications of people in the world today. You defined them as 'white people', Jewish people and non-white. Jews have a right to control (not society) but their own country in their declaration of independence due to proven history and reality of world countries.
I like your subdivisions of humanity within the non-Jewish catagory as I have deliniated above.
This conversation with people who haven't the vaguest idea about what they post is tiring and I must go now for more important things. I may return later.
TaTa for now...
Originally posted by dilloduck
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
Originally posted by dilloduck
Originally posted by ajwps
Go Ahead AJ-----take a day to celebrate the idea of freedom-no one will hold it against ya !!!
PARTY ON
Today is a day to celebrate not only well earned freedom but also independence from being just one more English colony. I am taking today and tomorrow to celebrate this amazing and unexplainable event when a small Continental army of a few irregulars beat a well trained and much larger and amply armed Englush army.
If one really thinks about it, there is no way that the early colonists should be able to win a war against a world size power.
Believe it or not....
Originally posted by dilloduck
Americans today think of the War for Independence as a revolution, but in important respects it was also a civil war. American Loyalists, or "Tories" as their opponents called them, opposed the Revolution, and many took up arms against the rebels. Estimates of the number of Loyalists range as high as 500,000, or 20 percent of the white population of the colonies......
In France, enthusiasm for the American cause was high: the French intellectual world was itself in revolt against feudalism and privilege. However, the Crown lent its support to the colonies for geopolitical rather than ideological reasons: the French government had been eager for reprisal against Britain ever since France's defeat in 1763. To further the American cause, Benjamin Franklin was sent to Paris in 1776. His wit, guile and intellect soon made their presence felt in the French capital, and played a major role in winning French assistance.
France began providing aid to the colonies in May 1776, when it sent 14 ships with war supplies to America. In fact, most of the gun powder used by the American armies came from France. After Britain's defeat at Saratoga, France saw an opportunity to seriously weaken its ancient enemy and restore the balance of power that had been upset by the Seven Years' War (the French and Indian War). On February 6, 1778, America and France signed a Treaty of Amity and Commerce, in which France recognized America and offered trade concessions. They also signed a Treaty of Alliance, which stipulated that if France entered the war, neither country would lay down its arms until America won its independence, that neither would conclude peace with Britain without the consent of the other, and that each guaranteed the other's possessions in America. This was the only bilateral defense treaty signed by the United States or its predecessors until 1949.
The Franco-American alliance soon broadened the conflict. In June 1778 British ships fired on French vessels, and the two countries went to war. In 1779 Spain, hoping to reacquire territories taken by Britain in the Seven Years' War, entered the conflict on the side of France, but not as an ally of the Americans. In 1780 Britain declared war on the Dutch, who had continued to trade with the Americans. The combination of these European powers, with France in the lead, was a far greater threat to Britain than the American colonies standing alone.
Originally posted by ajwps
This fool aired all the Zionist dirty laundry right out in public. He'll be in trouble with the council elders, I bet!
Yes and you have exposed your real self to everyone who can read this thread. I'll bet that your 'white folks' back to the Klavern at your next Klu Klux Klan cross burning will be having a few things to say to you.
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
Originally posted by ajwps
You're the one denying the very existence of other races. Your hypocritical racist agenda shows in spades, Schlomo.
What are you ranting about? I have never denied the fact that the human RACE has only one sub-group within its number known as the Asiatic Aryan white people.
You are truly a piece of work with your name calling and nonsensical racist agenda about Israel not having a G-d given right for a haven from all those nations who eventually came to want to destroy them.
What hyperbole you spew....
Originally posted by ajwps
You're the one denying the very existence of other races. Your hypocritical racist agenda shows in spades, Schlomo.
What are you ranting about? I have never denied the fact that the human RACE has only one sub-group within its number known as the Asiatic Aryan white people.
You are truly a piece of work with your name calling and nonsensical racist agenda about Israel not having a G-d given right for a haven from all those nations who eventually came to want to destroy them.
What hyperbole you spew....
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
Historian Maxmueller accepted that there was one ancient race which was the origin of all races of the world. He originally believed that central Asia was the birthplace of humans, who then migrated to other parts of the world. New discoveries later falsified this theory and he came to the conclusion that the most ancient race (which he called Aryans) came from the area around the Himalayas, in India.......
In the dictionary of Dravidas and Kola, the name of India, is given as "Aryanvart" and "Bharata-varsha" which mean, the land of the Aryans, the country ruled by the glorious King Bharata. This means the Dravidas and Kolas were not pre-Aryans living in that country, but actually Aryans.
Thus the supposed event known as the Aryan invasion of India is no more than a convenient imagination of historical speculators. From the beginning, Aryans were born in India and have been living there for four million years without interruption(2).
Originally posted by ajwps
Your putting words in my mouth . I support israel. I just tired of your racial politicking.
That's really big of you.. Your words seem to be a bit bigoted in asking Israel and the United States to end their mutually beneficial partnership and cease claiming that those loans/grants to Israel are not beneficial to both countries.
Who is in your concept of the asiatic aryan white race? Could you provide a link to whatever site may support YOUR conception of VALID races. I want to know more.
http://www.swamishyam.org/everyguide-aryancivi.html
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
Scientists have long suspected that the racial categories recognized by society are not reflected on the genetic level.
But the more closely that researchers examine the human genome -- the complement of genetic material encased in the heart of almost every cell of the body -- the more most of them are convinced that the standard labels used to distinguish people by "race" have little or no biological meaning.
They say that while it may seem easy to tell at a glance whether a person is Caucasian, African or Asian, the ease dissolves when one probes beneath surface characteristics and scans the genome for DNA hallmarks of "race."
As it turns out, scientists say, the human species is so evolutionarily young, and its migratory patterns so wide, restless and rococo, that it has simply not had a chance to divide itself into separate biological groups or "races" in any but the most superficial ways.
"Race is a social concept, not a scientific one," said Dr. J. Craig Venter, head of the Celera Genomics Corporation in Rockville, Md. "We all evolved in the last 100,000 years from the same small number of tribes that migrated out of Africa and colonized the world."
Dr. Venter and scientists at the National Institutes of Health recently announced that they had put together a draft of the entire sequence of the human genome, and the researchers had unanimously declared, there is only one race -- the human race.