Palestine Today

Status
Not open for further replies.
Israeli occupation court takes 13-year-old Palestinian child to the Israeli occupation court and the child screams I want to see my mother

 
Yet another example of "Palestine Today."

"Last Friday, the PLO’s Committee for Interaction with Israeli Society sent a delegation of Palestinian officials to Jaffa for a Ramadan break-fast meal, called “iftar,” with a group of Israelis that included former Meretz party lawmaker David Zucker.


In response, Palestinians expressed their outrage on social media, condemning the meal in “occupied Jaffa,” reported the Jerusalem Post.
 
15094854_1334051596638988_4367982106970119487_n.jpg
 
Question - Quora
"Free Palestine" or as it's being chanted in full during every Jihadi rally: "from the River the Sea, Palestine will be Free"[1] - is the wish of Palestinian Arabs and their supporters to transform the area between the River Jordan and the Mediterranean Sea, another Arab state (number 23) by eliminating the only Jewish state, and either exterminate all the current Jewish inhabitants of Israel, or reduce them to a status of Dhimmis in according with Islam.

Answer your question? If Israel is serious about peace why is their goal Israel's destruction? There will not be a response
 
RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore,

WoW, here is that very same Map Set we talked about last Month; Posting #13, RE: Israeli settlers set fire, Israel initially blamed Palestinians..

(COMMENT)

But I don't want to get into the presentation of misinformation, or the motive for disinformation. I don' think that there is even any benefit by rehashing the timeline of accountability and the corresponding consequences for various actions leading up to any significant and particular event set.

What might be very appropriate is to talk about the backlash and fallout resulting in the presentation of misinformation and disinformation. The more people know just how flawed the Map Set is, the more people will gradually taint the other pro-Arab Palestinian presentations.

Most Respectfully,
R
 
RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore,

WoW, here is that very same Map Set we talked about last Month; Posting #13, RE: Israeli settlers set fire, Israel initially blamed Palestinians..

(COMMENT)

But I don't want to get into the presentation of misinformation, or the motive for disinformation. I don' think that there is even any benefit by rehashing the timeline of accountability and the corresponding consequences for various actions leading up to any significant and particular event set.

What might be very appropriate is to talk about the backlash and fallout resulting in the presentation of misinformation and disinformation. The more people know just how flawed the Map Set is, the more people will gradually taint the other pro-Arab Palestinian presentations.

Most Respectfully,
R
I too find the maps to be misleading.

The first map is labeled "Jewish land" and "Palestinian land." Private property ownership does not remove that land from the country. It is all still Palestinian land.
 
RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Balderdash!

Between 1922 and 1948 the territory in question was under the Administration of the UK. They WERE NOT operating as a colonial power. It was a civil administration much like that used in all the adjacent states (except Saudi Arabia). Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, and Egypt all went through the process as what was customary for that period in history. Oddly enough, all those countries worked through the process. All established new states through the steps to attain self-governing institutions, all, that is, except the Arabs of Palestine in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. And both of those smaller subdivisions were under Arab Occupation (1948-1967) (not British and not Israeli).

You cannot be talking about the territory to which the Palestine Order in Council applied (1922 to 1948), because that Palestine (ie Government of Palestine) was a territory under the mandate.
Indeed, my point is that Palestine has been under foreign military occupation since before its inception and has continued unabated until today. You continuously slime the Palestinians for not accomplishing this or that while they have a gun in their face. The Palestinians cannot accomplish anything until it is decolonized.
(COMMENT)

The discredited and dispicable practice of using the Israelis as a reason for a lack of economic and financial development and markets is bogus. If the Arab Palestinians had not demonstrated the increased level of violence, the security countermeasures, police patrols and checkpoints, as well as barier installations would not have been necessary. This is just another case of the Arab Palestinians lack of cooperation and acceptance of the consequences. For decades, the recurring theme by the Arab Palestinians if to demonstrate a lack of cooperation and indiscriminate assualts against Jewish People (men women and children) then once the aggrevated assualt is responded in kind+, the Arab Palestinian, in childlike care, go running to the International Community and complain about a tightening of countermeasure accross the board.


Most Respectfully,
R
Between 1922 and 1948 the territory in question was under the Administration of the UK.
So what?
 
RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

You have all kinds of miss interpretations here, the least of which is a misunderstanding of the meaning and intent of Judgement #5 Permanent Court of International Justice.

A decide upon a judgment concerning what fair Remedy is due for The Government of the Greek Republic; if any at all.

It was not a Political question as to the nature of what it means to be the Government of Palestine.

For Britain, changing from a military occupation to a Mandate was simply a name change. They maintained their military forces.
✧-✧-✧-✧-✧-✧-✧-✧-✧-✧-✧- Truncated -✧-✧-✧-✧-✧-✧-✧-✧-✧-✧-✧-✧-✧-✧-✧
Palestine was no longer an occupied enemy territory.
(COMMENT)

POINT #1

This is another misrepresentation of the facts. Yes, the Government of Palestine was the successor Government, but the Government of Palestine was just the Framework under which the UK created to effectively handle the establishment of the Jewish National Home and the self-governing institutions under whichthe Arab Palestinians rejected participation.

Page #7 • First Paragraph of the Court's Delivered Judgment • Judgment #5 • Permanent Court of International Justice said:
"part of the Government of Palestine and consequcntly also on the part of His Britannic Majesty's Government, in its capacity as Mandatory Power for Palestine, since the year 1921"
The idea that the Judgement supports some claim that the Arab had some political rights over the territory is nothing more than misinformation and intentional fraud → passed-on so many times, by Arab Palestinian Supporting claimants that should actually know better, the original source is not quite identifiable. Never the less, it works because no one is going to take the time to pull the truth out of the record and sifted Court Decisions.​

POINT #2

To read Article 22 of the League of Nations Covanantis not necessarily the same as to comprehendent it. The Covenant is an agreement between the parties that engaged in it - the Allied Powers of the Great War (WWI). The Arab Palestinians [Arab Higher Committee (AHC)] were heavily influenced by men like General, Ottoman Army (Retired after surrender of Ottoman Empire) Pasha Ahmed Hilmi • and former Ottoman Army Officer (separated after surrender of Ottoman Empire) Amin al-Husseini. Pasha Hilmi, deported early on to the Seychelles Islands, for activities inconsistant with an peaceful endeavors. He was later pardon by the High Commissioner the same way as Amin al-Husseini, in connection with the incitement and encouragement of anti-Jewish riots.

The need for a military contingent in support of the British Administration was under the authority and necessity of Article 43 of the Hague Regulation of 1907. And that contingent was there to deal with the many Enemy held prisioners of war turned anti-Jewish activist, and rioters.

OK, now I call a flag on the play here. All this (and more) has been divulged and rehashed many many times.

POINT #3

Article 22 makes a number of operational guidelines:

• Advanced nations for tutlage.
• Rendering of tutlage until such time as they are able to stand alone.​

The Arab Palestinians have not ever demonstrated that they are able to stand alone, not in any decade since the 1920s. Even today, with the millions and millions of donor dollars received, the are still unable to get a productive and functional government off the ground.

Further, the Ramallah Government is directly involved in providing support to criminal activists involved in Jihadist, Fedayeen, Insurgent, Radicalized incitement, and Asymmetric behaviors of a criminal nature, and providing payment to such entities for thier service.​

( Ω )

Now once again, I remind you that the League of Nations Covenant establishes no promise and incurred no obligation to take any action in the furtherance of the various causes enumerated by the Arab Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The Arab Palestinian is simply not parties to the covenant.

Most Respectfully,
R
The Arab Palestinians have not ever demonstrated that they are able to stand alone, not in any decade since the 1920s.
So? How can you stand alone with a gun in your face?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top