Palestine as Kosovo?

Who translated your video Marc39, Mossad. The Israelis will never be free until they allow the Palstinians to be free.

What happens when I open this book, moron, will I turn into a zionazi like you...:eusa_whistle:


You're not too bright. Pallies were offered statehood in 2000 at Camp David, in the presence of Bill Clinton. Israel accepted the offer. The Pallies rejected the offer.

You see, dumbass, the Pallies would rather collect welfare as refugees for 60 years rather than try to form a viable society.

The Pallies are losers just like you.

Not bright? You're downright stoopid. Is 'Pallie' your racist term like '******'.

Camp David was described correctly as "subordinating Palestinian rights to Israeli needs". The Jews and US were trying to get the Palestinians to give up the right of return in return for a limited version of a Palestinian statelet which would be heavily subjected to Israeli 'security needs' and would be at the mercy of Israeli millitary intervention. Allied to this was Clintons need to score big in his political career; it was likened to the ole 'glass beads for land' that the whitey's used to pull on the native Americans.

The Palestinian people are a beautiful, highly educated and creative people who you should try to love and respect :eusa_clap:

Camp David was a bogus deal. It merely formalized the occupation.
 
You're not too bright. Pallies were offered statehood in 2000 at Camp David, in the presence of Bill Clinton. Israel accepted the offer. The Pallies rejected the offer.

You see, dumbass, the Pallies would rather collect welfare as refugees for 60 years rather than try to form a viable society.

The Pallies are losers just like you.

Not bright? You're downright stoopid. Is 'Pallie' your racist term like '******'.

Camp David was described correctly as "subordinating Palestinian rights to Israeli needs". The Jews and US were trying to get the Palestinians to give up the right of return in return for a limited version of a Palestinian statelet which would be heavily subjected to Israeli 'security needs' and would be at the mercy of Israeli millitary intervention. Allied to this was Clintons need to score big in his political career; it was likened to the ole 'glass beads for land' that the whitey's used to pull on the native Americans.

The Palestinian people are a beautiful, highly educated and creative people who you should try to love and respect :eusa_clap:

Camp David was a bogus deal. It merely formalized the occupation.

Bill Clinton offered 100% of Gaza, 95% of the West Bank, a capitol in Jerusalem and a $30 billion foreign aid package to Arafat.

Arafat rejected the offer, which Clinton writes in his memoir was so "good" that he was "surprised" Arafat walked away from it.

Saudi intermediary Prince Bandar told Arafat he committed a crime not only against the Pallies, but, against the Arab world in rejecting the Camp David offer of statehood.

There is no Israeli occupation as the West Bank is not sovereign Arab land. It is Israeli land under the terms of the binding Palestine Mandate.

Now, you know.
 
Camp David was described correctly as "subordinating Palestinian rights to Israeli needs". The Jews and US were trying to get the Palestinians to give up the right of return in return for a limited version of a Palestinian statelet which would be heavily subjected to Israeli 'security needs' and would be at the mercy of Israeli millitary intervention. Allied to this was Clintons need to score big in his political career; it was likened to the ole 'glass beads for land' that the whitey's used to pull on the native Americans.

The Palestinian people are a beautiful, highly educated and creative people who you should try to love and respect :eusa_clap:

Except, Saudi Arabian negotiations intermediary Prince Bandar ordered Arafat to accept the Camp David offer because it was so rich that such an offer would never be offered, again.

Thus, you really are utterly clueless.
 
The Palestinian people are a beautiful, highly educated and creative people who you should try to love and respect :eusa_clap:

The Palestinians are just garden variety Arabs. Thus, you are clueless.

Former PLO leader Zuheir Mohsen...
The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct Palestinian people to oppose Zionism.
Zuheir Mohsen - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


You enjoy being made a complete fool of? LOL
 
Not bright? You're downright stoopid. Is 'Pallie' your racist term like '******'.

Camp David was described correctly as "subordinating Palestinian rights to Israeli needs". The Jews and US were trying to get the Palestinians to give up the right of return in return for a limited version of a Palestinian statelet which would be heavily subjected to Israeli 'security needs' and would be at the mercy of Israeli millitary intervention. Allied to this was Clintons need to score big in his political career; it was likened to the ole 'glass beads for land' that the whitey's used to pull on the native Americans.

The Palestinian people are a beautiful, highly educated and creative people who you should try to love and respect :eusa_clap:

Camp David was a bogus deal. It merely formalized the occupation.

Bill Clinton offered 100% of Gaza, 95% of the West Bank, a capitol in Jerusalem and a $30 billion foreign aid package to Arafat.

Arafat rejected the offer, which Clinton writes in his memoir was so "good" that he was "surprised" Arafat walked away from it.

Saudi intermediary Prince Bandar told Arafat he committed a crime not only against the Pallies, but, against the Arab world in rejecting the Camp David offer of statehood.

There is no Israeli occupation as the West Bank is not sovereign Arab land. It is Israeli land under the terms of the binding Palestine Mandate.

Now, you know.

The "generous" offer.
Israel would control the borders.
Israel would control imports and exports.
Israel would control the movement of People.
Israel would control the water.
Israel reserved the "right" to invade, kidnap, and kill anytime.

How could Arafat pass up a deal like that?
 
Camp David was described correctly as "subordinating Palestinian rights to Israeli needs". The Jews and US were trying to get the Palestinians to give up the right of return in return for a limited version of a Palestinian statelet which would be heavily subjected to Israeli 'security needs' and would be at the mercy of Israeli millitary intervention. Allied to this was Clintons need to score big in his political career; it was likened to the ole 'glass beads for land' that the whitey's used to pull on the native Americans.

The Palestinian people are a beautiful, highly educated and creative people who you should try to love and respect :eusa_clap:

Except, Saudi Arabian negotiations intermediary Prince Bandar ordered Arafat to accept the Camp David offer because it was so rich that such an offer would never be offered, again.

Thus, you really are utterly clueless.

The Saudis are puppets of the US and regularly prostitute themselves for US big business interests.

The Joos wanted to get an agreement in which the Palestinians gave up the right of return, this is why they were willing to 'give' the Palestinians some limited authority over a bit of Palestine. If there was no right of return why was it top of the Joo wish list, jerkoff?

Thus (blah), it is you who is clueless.
 
Last edited:
The Palestinians are just garden variety Arabs. Thus, you are clueless.

"Garden variety", like cabbages perhaps, is this more typical Jewish racism? Thus, I am educated and you are a racist.

Former PLO leader Zuheir Mohsen...

He was entitled to his opinion; he was leader of a minor pro-Syrian faction in the PLO and was not in line with PLO policy.

You enjoy being made a complete fool of? LOL

You greatly overstate your success in this discussion, dolt. The day you make a complete fool of me is the day you will make the full metabolic transition to an ass :lol:
 
I would recommend you watch this video, "We Desire Death Like You Desire Life"
YouTube - Hamas - "We desire death like you desire life"

As for any occupation, there is only an Arab occupation. Arabs invaded the land thousands of years after Jews had previously been living there.

Open a book, moron.

Who translated your video Marc39, Mossad. The Israelis will never be free until they allow the Palstinians to be free.

What happens when I open this book, moron, will I turn into a zionazi like you...:eusa_whistle:

You're not too bright. Pallies were offered statehood in 2000 at Camp David, in the presence of Bill Clinton. Israel accepted the offer. The Pallies rejected the offer.

You see, dumbass, the Pallies would rather collect welfare as refugees for 60 years rather than try to form a viable society.

The Pallies are losers just like you.
"Maps of the U.S.-Israel proposals at Camp David show a salient, east of Jerusalem, bisecting the West Bank, and a northern salient virtually dividing the northern from the central canton. I have the maps if you want them.

"The current map considerably extends these salients and the isolation of East Jerusalem. My maps are from the leading Israeli scholars, Ron Pundak, the Director of the Shimon Peres Center.

"The crucial issue at Camp David was territorial, not the refugee issue, for which Arafat agreed to a pragmatic solution, as Pundak, the leading scholar, reveals.

"No Palestinian could accept the cantonization, including the U.S. favorite, Mahmoud Abbas.

"Clinton -- we don't have to debate it, because Clinton recognized that Palestinian objections had validity, and in December 2000 proposed his parameters, which went some way toward satisfying Palestinian rights.

"In Clinton's words, "Barak and Arafat had both accepted these parameters as the basis for further efforts. Both have expressed some reservations."

"The reservations were addressed at a high level meeting in Taba, which made considerable progress and might have led to a settlement, but Israel called them off.

"That one week at Taba is the only break in 30 years of U.S.-Israeli rejectionism.

"High-level informal negotiations continued, leading to the Geneva Accord of December of 2002, welcomed by virtually the entire world, rejected by Israel, dismissed by Washington.

"That could have been the basis for a just peace. It still can. By then, however, Bush-Sharon bulldozers were demolishing any basis for it."

Israel and Palestine
 
Who translated your video Marc39, Mossad. The Israelis will never be free until they allow the Palstinians to be free.

Arabs translated the video, Georgie girl.

Pallies can never be free when Hamas oppresses them, denies them freedom of speech and of protest and throws acid in the faces of women who dress immodestly.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YVWk8qjsU8]YouTube - Hamas Imposing Sharia Law In Gaza[/ame]
 
"Maps of the U.S.-Israel proposals at Camp David show a salient, east of Jerusalem, bisecting the West Bank, and a northern salient virtually dividing the northern from the central canton. I have the maps if you want them.

chomsky.info/debates

Georgie girl, Chomsky is a linguistics teacher, not an authority on international affairs.
For this reason, Chomsky has never even once in 40 years been consulted by the White House, the Congress or the media.

Clinton offered the Pallies 100% of Gaza, 95% of the West Bank, a capital in Jerusalem and $30 billion in foreign aid.
Arafat rejected the offer.

It's fun smacking you down, repeatedly, Georgie girl. Keep it up!
 
Last edited:
"Now that documents from 1947 have become declassified, the reality of the Zionists’ military and political strategy—a plan of massacres and ethnic cleansing to remove the Palestinians—no longer is secret, the author noted. 'The ethnic cleansing of Palestine was carried out the only way ethnic cleansing can be—by means of terror.'

"Some Israeli supporters appear at San Francisco pro-Palestinian demonstrations carrying signs reading 'Israeli is here to stay,' Becker observed.

'“Since Israel has the fifth largest military in the world, is protected by the largest military power in the world, and gets assistance and weapons, why would anyone feel it necessary to carry signs that say ‘Israel is here to stay,’” he wondered. “It’s not really a sign of feeling secure, but feeling insecure.

"And what is the basis of the insecurity? Is it that they are going to be overwhelmed militarily, when they are the only nuclear power in the Middle East? They are not going to be overwhelmed militarily by the Palestinians. They are not going to be overwhelmed militarily by their neighboring states.

"The threat that Israel and its supporters perceive is an existential threat, not in some great philosophical sense, but in the most fundamental sense of the word "existential"—that is, that the Palestinians exist.”'

Richard Becker
 

Forum List

Back
Top