- Jan 19, 2010
- 67,560
- 61,784
- 3,605
He started buying weapons in October 2016. Lots of weapons from different suppliers...
Something in 2016 pissed him off.
Something in 2016 pissed him off.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Hmm. I'm thinking that some people are probably better off without the psychotropics. We are so dependent upon drugs. Is that the ONLY way you can feel better. What did people used to do in the old days before the days of Valium and all of these "feel good" prescription drugs? They dealt with it in other ways is what they did.
Look up aspirin's side-effects.
Every medicine has potential side-effects, but the vast majority of people that take a particular medicine never get any side-effects. Or they get some side-effects but they are minor and transient.
Yes, I know that. I know all about the side effects of meds because of my job. However, these are LISTED side effects which means they were observed during clinical trials or reported by patients. Just because it is rare doesn't mean it doesn't happen and with more and more people being medicated and sent on their way, then you can expect that there are going to be more "bad reactions" to these meds. Besides that, mass shootings are rare, so who is to say that these people didn't experience some side effects? Who would deny the possibility of that? No doctor that I know of!
Hmm. I'm thinking that some people are probably better off without the psychotropics. We are so dependent upon drugs. Is that the ONLY way you can feel better. What did people used to do in the old days before the days of Valium and all of these "feel good" prescription drugs? They dealt with it in other ways is what they did.
You might be better off without the psychotropics. But many people are NOT better off without them.
While this is an important thing that needs to be looked at and I don't disagree with you; "virtually every mass shooter" is a bit of a leap. Also the fact that the people on these drugs have mental problems and their underlying problems could be the main impetus not the drugs needs to be taken into account.Las Vegas Strip shooter prescribed anti-anxiety drug in June
Stephen Paddock, who killed at least 58 people and wounded hundreds more in Las Vegas on Sunday with high-powered rifles, was prescribed an anti-anxiety drug in June that can lead to aggressive behavior, the Las Vegas Review-Journal has learned.
Records from the Nevada Prescription Monitoring Program obtained Tuesday show Paddock was prescribed 50 10-milligram diazepam tablets by Henderson physician Dr. Steven Winkler on June 21.
A woman who answered the phone at Winkler’s office would not make him available to answer questions and would neither confirm nor deny that Paddock was ever a patient.
-------------
Yeap. Just about every mass killing in this country from columbine to Sandy Hook to VT to the Aurora shooter and now this.
All of them were on antidepressants or under the SSRI drugs.
We won't hear much about any of this. The pharmaceutical companies advertise on all of those great media networks, don't they?
Gun companies don't though. Get it? Oh, I am sure it may be a coincidence that all of those shooters were all on an SSRI drug.
Some others that the media sort of left out. Robin Williams was on antidepressants. So was Heath Ledger when he died. So was Chris Cornell.
No connection? It was the guns.
Hmm. I'm thinking that some people are probably better off without the psychotropics. We are so dependent upon drugs. Is that the ONLY way you can feel better. What did people used to do in the old days before the days of Valium and all of these "feel good" prescription drugs? They dealt with it in other ways is what they did.
You might be better off without the psychotropics. But many people are NOT better off without them.
I know some people with mental illness (like schizophrenia) NEED them or would have to be institutionalized, but are we better for it? I wonder.
Hmm. I'm thinking that some people are probably better off without the psychotropics. We are so dependent upon drugs. Is that the ONLY way you can feel better. What did people used to do in the old days before the days of Valium and all of these "feel good" prescription drugs? They dealt with it in other ways is what they did.
You might be better off without the psychotropics. But many people are NOT better off without them.
I know some people with mental illness (like schizophrenia) NEED them or would have to be institutionalized, but are we better for it? I wonder.
What is this "WE" that you speak of when referring to an individual's health care plan?
He started buying weapons in October 2016. Lots of weapons from different suppliers...
Something in 2016 pissed him off.
Hmm. I'm thinking that some people are probably better off without the psychotropics. We are so dependent upon drugs. Is that the ONLY way you can feel better. What did people used to do in the old days before the days of Valium and all of these "feel good" prescription drugs? They dealt with it in other ways is what they did.
You might be better off without the psychotropics. But many people are NOT better off without them.
I know some people with mental illness (like schizophrenia) NEED them or would have to be institutionalized, but are we better for it? I wonder.
What is this "WE" that you speak of when referring to an individual's health care plan?
I was talking about WE as in society.
Hmm. I'm thinking that some people are probably better off without the psychotropics. We are so dependent upon drugs. Is that the ONLY way you can feel better. What did people used to do in the old days before the days of Valium and all of these "feel good" prescription drugs? They dealt with it in other ways is what they did.
You might be better off without the psychotropics. But many people are NOT better off without them.
I know some people with mental illness (like schizophrenia) NEED them or would have to be institutionalized, but are we better for it? I wonder.
What is this "WE" that you speak of when referring to an individual's health care plan?
I was talking about WE as in society.
You don't think that WE are better off having thousands of people with mental illness in remission due to medications rather than living in institutions?
Las Vegas Strip shooter prescribed anti-anxiety drug in June
Stephen Paddock, who killed at least 58 people and wounded hundreds more in Las Vegas on Sunday with high-powered rifles, was prescribed an anti-anxiety drug in June that can lead to aggressive behavior, the Las Vegas Review-Journal has learned.
Records from the Nevada Prescription Monitoring Program obtained Tuesday show Paddock was prescribed 50 10-milligram diazepam tablets by Henderson physician Dr. Steven Winkler on June 21.
A woman who answered the phone at Winkler’s office would not make him available to answer questions and would neither confirm nor deny that Paddock was ever a patient.
-------------
Yeap. Just about every mass killing in this country from columbine to Sandy Hook to VT to the Aurora shooter and now this.
All of them were on antidepressants or under the SSRI drugs.
We won't hear much about any of this. The pharmaceutical companies advertise on all of those great media networks, don't they?
Gun companies don't though. Get it? Oh, I am sure it may be a coincidence that all of those shooters were all on an SSRI drug.
Some others that the media sort of left out. Robin Williams was on antidepressants. So was Heath Ledger when he died. So was Chris Cornell.
No connection? It was the guns.
You are off track with this. A sane avid gun enthusiast could use thousands of rounds at the range easily without a cache of weapons. It would be to hard to track or enforce anyways. Suddenly stockpiling a ton of weapons though I can see being a red flag.Buying thousands of rounds of ammunition in 12 months would raise a red flag if we bothered to track ammo sales.
You are off track with this. A sane avid gun enthusiast could use thousands of rounds at the range easily without a cache of weapons. It would be to hard to track or enforce anyways. Suddenly stockpiling a ton of weapons though I can see being a red flag.Buying thousands of rounds of ammunition in 12 months would raise a red flag if we bothered to track ammo sales.
It seems as if these types of shootings really started to pick up in the 80s. I know they happened before then but were a LOT more rare. They are still fairly rare but it seems that after the 80s they started to happen more often. I wonder why that is? When did we start putting people on meds and releasing them and having this revolving door of "therapy" where they take meds for a while, stop and get sick again and then have to come back to the hospital, be restabilized on their meds for about 24 hours and then are released back into society only to end up back into the hospital after they stop their meds again?
With 71.000 consider GETTING some medical advice rather than giving..........zzzzzzzzzHmm. I'm thinking that some people are probably better off without the psychotropics. We are so dependent upon drugs. Is that the ONLY way you can feel better. What did people used to do in the old days before the days of Valium and all of these "feel good" prescription drugs? They dealt with it in other ways is what they did.
Look up aspirin's side-effects.
Every medicine has potential side-effects, but the vast majority of people that take a particular medicine never get any side-effects. Or they get some side-effects but they are minor and transient.
Yes, I know that. I know all about the side effects of meds because of my job. However, these are LISTED side effects which means they were observed during clinical trials or reported by patients. Just because it is rare doesn't mean it doesn't happen and with more and more people being medicated and sent on their way, then you can expect that there are going to be more "bad reactions" to these meds. Besides that, mass shootings are rare, so who is to say that these people didn't experience some side effects? Who would deny the possibility of that? No doctor that I know of!
`
`
I always seek out medical advice from those unqualified to give it.
Just because he's white doesn't mean he needs a "perscribed" excuse.Las Vegas Strip shooter prescribed anti-anxiety drug in June
Stephen Paddock, who killed at least 58 people and wounded hundreds more in Las Vegas on Sunday with high-powered rifles, was prescribed an anti-anxiety drug in June that can lead to aggressive behavior, the Las Vegas Review-Journal has learned.
Records from the Nevada Prescription Monitoring Program obtained Tuesday show Paddock was prescribed 50 10-milligram diazepam tablets by Henderson physician Dr. Steven Winkler on June 21.
A woman who answered the phone at Winkler’s office would not make him available to answer questions and would neither confirm nor deny that Paddock was ever a patient.
-------------
Yeap. Just about every mass killing in this country from columbine to Sandy Hook to VT to the Aurora shooter and now this.
All of them were on antidepressants or under the SSRI drugs.
We won't hear much about any of this. The pharmaceutical companies advertise on all of those great media networks, don't they?
Gun companies don't though. Get it? Oh, I am sure it may be a coincidence that all of those shooters were all on an SSRI drug.
Some others that the media sort of left out. Robin Williams was on antidepressants. So was Heath Ledger when he died. So was Chris Cornell.
No connection? It was the guns.