Padded Bikini Bras for 8 Year Old Girls? WTF?

Well at least the boys will know where the girls keep thier cooties.

On a serious note.

I wouldn't want my kids playing with a girl that got clothing like that from her parents.
It's not the girls fault she has no adults to set an example around.

I always wonder what the mother was thinking when a child is dressed trashy and what the hell was the father thinking
 
I don't understand your reply to HG's concern.

This is something I don't get, not at all.

At 20 you are not mature enough to drink booze or buy porn.
At 18 you are mature enough to put your life on the line and serve your country.At 16 you get to endager the lives of other by getting a drivers license.
At 13, you are not old enough, mature enough to do any of that. But you are mature enough to make the solo decision to snuff out the life of an unborn child.

You will excuse me if I'm confused how this works.

You can actually join the Military when you are 17 as long as a parent signs for you.

But you can't buy smokes...
 
Do you think thats right? I mean I thought you were responsible for your children until they were 18 or the whatever the legal age for an adult is in your state, if I had a daughter and found out she had an abortion without telling me I would be mortified, how could the States do this to the parents?

if they're old enough to be bonking, don't you think that train has left the station?

You mean to tell me that a 14 year old who has sex and gets pregnant has the wherewithal and understanding of abortion and all it entails (physically, psychologically and emotionally), and that her parent's needn't be notified .. that she can make that call all on her own?

:eusa_hand:

Not. A. Chance.


Even if she did, she's a minor. How can she legally consent to a medical procedure in the first place? :dunno:

I don't think she can even consent to surgery to correct harelip within a legal guardian giving the go-ahead
 
Last edited:
if they're old enough to be bonking, don't you think that train has left the station?

Nevertheless, parents need to know, thats my take. The way I see it you don't get the right to any privacy until your paying rent, if kids can make choices like getting abortions the needs for parents are out dated.

but parents aren't going to know. often it's a step parent or some other adult in the household who is responsible for the pregnancy in the first place. second i've always been of a mind that you can't legislate familial relationships that way. what you're talking about is forcing a terrified girl to go to a judge for intervention if, for whatever reason, she can't/won't go to the parent.

Not quite. when she goes to the clinic, the workers there are supposed to be required reporters. They should notify the authorities. Then the child should be placed with a guardian and seen by a psychologist. Together, the girls, the legal guardian, and the medical professionals can decide what's best for the girl physically and psychologically. Meanwhile, the guilty party should be taken into custody and dealt with by the legal system.

When she goes to the clinic, the clinic should be required to notify the authorities of any crime committed before proceeding. What is achieved by killing her unborn child then retuning her to her the situation in the name of 'privacy'?
 
Nevertheless, parents need to know, thats my take. The way I see it you don't get the right to any privacy until your paying rent, if kids can make choices like getting abortions the needs for parents are out dated.

but parents aren't going to know. often it's a step parent or some other adult in the household who is responsible for the pregnancy in the first place. second i've always been of a mind that you can't legislate familial relationships that way. what you're talking about is forcing a terrified girl to go to a judge for intervention if, for whatever reason, she can't/won't go to the parent.

Not quite. when she goes to the clinic, the workers there are supposed to be required reporters. They should notify the authorities. Then the child should be placed with a guardian and seen by a psychologist. Together, the girls, the legal guardian, and the medical professionals can decide what's best for the girl physically and psychologically. Meanwhile, the guilty party should be taken into custody and dealt with by the legal system.

When she goes to the clinic, the clinic should be required to notify the authorities of any crime committed before proceeding. What is achieved by killing her unborn child then retuning her to her the situation in the name of 'privacy'?

The term is "mandatoryi reporter" and this is one of the way the industry fucks our children over. SINCE they don't have to release any actual data (with names and ages, for example) they are protected from any sort of consequence for butchering little girls without reporting the fact that they'll ILLEGALLY having sex, which is of course RAPE when it concerns minors. So they aren't doing their job. All under the umbrella of "protecting the privacy" of the girls.

Of course, the only person who is protected is the dirtbag that knocked them up, and the butchers who aren't even remotely abiding by the Hippocratic oath or even the law. Complete free pass for those douches. The girl is exploited by the abortion industry and the guy who knocks her up, parents are blissfully ignorant of any ongoing sexual abuse, but that abortion golden goose keeps pumping out eggs.
 
And they don't report. In most cases, the girls don't even provide a name. And nobody asks. 13 y.o. is pregnant and doesn't want to share information? That's okay, sweetie, just put your feet in the stirrups, we won't say a word.
 
If you're talking about the sexualization of children, it's going to come up. It's not like we were talking about how to solve for inequalities and someone piped up "x < 2 is the reason the mandatory reporters in the abortion industry ignore the law!"
 
jesus-crucified-in-the-womb.jpg
 
so... this turned into an abortion thread, eh?
It's a thread about sexuality and children.

You knew where we'd end up.

I dunno.. it seems that the subject could be ice cream flavors and 1970s soft rock music and someone, somewhere will find an aborted fetus to raise on a cross.

And shortly thereafter someone else will raise the sperm donor with no say in the matter on a cross. :thup:
 
It's a thread about sexuality and children.

You knew where we'd end up.

I dunno.. it seems that the subject could be ice cream flavors and 1970s soft rock music and someone, somewhere will find an aborted fetus to raise on a cross.

And shortly thereafter someone else will raise the sperm donor with no say in the matter on a cross. :thup:


...way to still be bitter about old mudholes stomped in your ass, Mani. sad.... You must feel like Danny Bonaduce in the 80's.
 
Last edited:
This is something I don't get, not at all.

At 20 you are not mature enough to drink booze or buy porn.
At 18 you are mature enough to put your life on the line and serve your country.At 16 you get to endager the lives of other by getting a drivers license.
At 13, you are not old enough, mature enough to do any of that. But you are mature enough to make the solo decision to snuff out the life of an unborn child.

You will excuse me if I'm confused how this works.

You can actually join the Military when you are 17 as long as a parent signs for you.

But you can't buy smokes...

Yup or even watch a porno, but you can kill a fucking Talib with a fully loaded M-16.:doubt:
 
On the other hand, why would undeveloped girls need to wear any kind of bathing suit top at all? I think it's sort of creepy that they do. Like little muslim girls with head coverings.

You think it's creepy that girls wear tops and compare it to a head scarf?

That's nuts beyond my ability to understand.

Unless you are a nudist, then it makes some sense.
I wouldn't label myself as a nudist but I do think we teach our children to be ashamed of their bodies in our culture and that is not doing them any good. In our zeal to protect our children we instill anxiety in them.
 
Nevertheless, parents need to know, thats my take. The way I see it you don't get the right to any privacy until your paying rent, if kids can make choices like getting abortions the needs for parents are out dated.

but parents aren't going to know. often it's a step parent or some other adult in the household who is responsible for the pregnancy in the first place. second i've always been of a mind that you can't legislate familial relationships that way. what you're talking about is forcing a terrified girl to go to a judge for intervention if, for whatever reason, she can't/won't go to the parent. i feel the same way about forcing women to notify their husband/boyfriend or anyone else in the event they want to terminate a pregnancy.

i know why you say what you do. but it's such a complex issue and people who demand parental consent are generally (not always) just trying to put up another barrier to safe access to abortion.


Unbelievable.

Using your logic, underage girls should be able to get whatever elective surgery they wish, without parental consent.

logic clearly isn't your thing.
 
On the other hand, why would undeveloped girls need to wear any kind of bathing suit top at all? I think it's sort of creepy that they do. Like little muslim girls with head coverings.

You think it's creepy that girls wear tops and compare it to a head scarf?

That's nuts beyond my ability to understand.

Unless you are a nudist, then it makes some sense.
I wouldn't label myself as a nudist but I do think we teach our children to be ashamed of their bodies in our culture and that is not doing them any good. In our zeal to protect our children we instill anxiety in them.

I don't agree teaching them to protect themselves is teaching shame. Being whorish in never considered to be in good taste.
 

Forum List

Back
Top