Outgun them when you can’t disarm them

[Flanders]

Mitt Romney walked into the lion’s den carrying an unloaded gun when he spoke at a National Rifle Association forum. A Steve Kornacki piece in Solon tells us:

You might think the gun rights group would be deeply suspicious of Mitt Romney, who signed a ban on assault weapons and small handguns as governor of Massachusetts and assured voters there that “I don’t line up with the NRA.”

Romney is also on record in support of gun registration. That position is far more anti-Second Amendment than is a ban on assault rifles. For the umpteenth time: Registration is the final step before confiscation.

Kornacki goes on to put in a plug for Hussein:

And you might think its members would have at least grudging appreciation for Barack Obama’s presidential record, which includes signing a law to allow loaded guns in national parks and which is devoid of any major push for gun ownership restrictions – even as two gun-related tragedies captured national attention.

Kornacki should know that Hussein is not going to poke a sleeping lion. He even tells us why:

The gun control turning point came in 2000, when Al Gore lost a number of states – West Virginia, Kentucky, Missouri, Ohio, Arkansas and even his native Tennessee – with substantial populations of rural and small-town lower-income white voters that Clinton had carried 1992 and ’96.

And this:

The Kerry campaign bent over backward to avoid the perceived mistakes that Gore had made. ”This campaign is 180 degrees different from 2000,” Kerry’s state director in West Virginia bragged before the election. But the result was the same. Actually, it was worse: Kerry lost West Virginia by 13 points, compared to only six for Gore in ’00. And Kerry failed to win back any of those crucial, gun-friendly states that Gore had lost to Bush. Nationally, Gore had lost gun owners to Bush by 25 points. Kerry lost them by 27.

Friday, Apr 13, 2012 2:47 PM 18:08:15 EDT
When Democrats gave up on guns
The NRA’s attacks on Barack Obama are a reminder of the futility of his party’s 2nd Amendment strategy
By Steve Kornacki

When Democrats gave up on guns - Salon.com

Instead of mounting a frontal assault on the Second Amendment by trying to disarm law-abiding Americans, Hussein’s strategy is to outgun them. It is a pity he is not trying to outgun America’s enemies since he cannot disarm them either.

Hussein’s sneak attack on the Second Amendment began in July 2008 when he said:

Obama calls for civilian paramilitary force - YouTube

Pundits never mention it but funding is in the Affordable Care Act only it’s called the Ready Reserve Corps. Spending billions of tax dollars organizing and arming millions of street punks, dedicated Communists, angry America-haters, and drug-soaked radicals from the Alinsky School of Revolution would neuter the Second Amendment more effectively than repeal. Hussein’s armed goons will make nasty groping airport screeners look like humanitarians on a mission from God.

To imply that Hussein the Community Organizer is somehow a staunch defender of the Second Amendment is a testament to spin and doublespeak. In all things Hussein succeeds in appearing to be the exact opposite of what he is. I cannot think of another politician, living or dead, who pulled it off to the extent Hussein is getting away with it. Or perhaps he simply has more to lie about.

Gingrich and the Second Amendment

Newt Gingrich addressed the NRA forum after Romney. There is no doubt that he is far more trustworthy on the Second Amendment than is Romney. That should have given me hope Gingrich would pick up some momentum ending in an open convention. Sad to say Gingrich’s resurrection would have gained more traction had he NOT tied a good idea to the United Nations:

“A Gingrich presidency will submit to the UN a treaty that extends the right to bear arms as a human right to every person on the planet.” Every world citizen, he said, “deserves the right to defend themselves from those who exploit, imprison, or kill them.” For his latest big idea, Gingrich earned a standing ovation from the crowd of roughly 5,000.

Newt Gingrich Calls for Universal Right to Bear Arms at NRA Forum
by Michael Ames | April 13, 2012 7:05 PM EDT

Newt Gingrich Calls for Universal Right to Bear Arms at NRA Forum - The Daily Beast

Romney is a New World Order—United Nations guy. Gingrich did not help himself by suggesting a UN treaty. Giving the UN credibility is not the way to separate his views from Romney’s tenuous support of the Second Amendment. Being one very nervous conservative, any mention of the United Nations scares the hell out of me unless it calls for shutting the place down à la Ron Paul.

Bottom line: Newt is smart enough to know that the UN would never agree to such a treaty, and he surely knew that the UN has been pushing for a worldwide ban on all hand guns. This Youtube video is a MUST-MUST-MUST-SEE for everyone who is interested in learning about the UN’s attack on the Second Amendment:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tO0k9SHljCc&feature=player_embedded]United Nations and the Global gun ban - YouTube[/ame]

Hussein gets the final word

Hussein can hardly be called Second Amendment friendly since he is in favor of the UN’s Gun Control Treaty. He and his UN-loving pals in the Senate would ratify it today if they had the required number of votes:

Obama Continues Pushing UN Gun Control Treaty

Finally, the thugs in Hussein’s civilian national security force would not be covered by the UN’s Gun Control Treaty because they would enjoy the same status enjoyed by government-armed goons in every dictatorship. This old saw has never been truer: When guns are outlawed only the outlaws will have guns.

 

[Douger]

Your masters don't like guns. They're oily and dirty and loud. They have peones for security. It's just money ! What ? You cant afford private security ? Useless eater.

 

[Flanders]

Your masters don't like guns. They're oily and dirty and loud. They have peones for security. It's just money ! What ? You cant afford private security ? Useless eater.

To Douger: Do you ever make sense? Maybe the creatures living on your home planet in a faraway galaxy understand garbled thoughts expressed in verbal shorthand, but earthlings demand more clarity.

 

[Sallow]

Amendment 2 - Right to Bear Arms. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The second amendment is nothing what you "gun righters" think it is. It is a prescribed method for maintaining a ground force..without having to have a professional army. There is no right to wild west justice, hunting, or anything else you guys imagine.

It's terrible that the NRA continues to push for the unfettered access of guns to every imbecile with an agenda. Some 40K citizens and LEOs die each year because of this insanity. And unsatisfied with that bloodbath..the NRA continues to push for more absurd laws..like "Stand your ground". Hopefully..that was the bridge to far.

 

[Flanders]

Amendment 2 - Right to Bear Arms. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The second amendment is nothing what you "gun righters" think it is. It is a prescribed method for maintaining a ground force..without having to have a professional army. There is no right to wild west justice, hunting, or anything else you guys imagine.

It's terrible that the NRA continues to push for the unfettered access of guns to every imbecile with an agenda. Some 40K citizens and LEOs die each year because of this insanity. And unsatisfied with that bloodbath..the NRA continues to push for more absurd laws..like "Stand your ground". Hopefully..that was the bridge to far.

To Sallow: In addition to Supreme Court decisions try the Founding Fathers:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VMy5S1UuKQ&feature=player_detailpage]Founding Fathers: The Right to Bear Arms - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Wry Catcher]

All Second Amendment arguments aside, too many innocent Americans are killed by guns. The NRA and its minions have never addressed this issue and never will. The gun business is profitable and the hysteria "They'll take your guns" is nothing more than fear mongering by those whose sole fear is the loss of the golden goose.

My position is very simple, keep whatever weapon one needs IN their home. If they are too scared to leave home without it, they should stay home. The simple fact of having a firearm in one's custody and control is little different than someone under the influence of alcohol. Both make the actor 'brave' and more likely to engage another than if sober or unarmed.

I suspect Zimmerman is an example of what can go wrong when unvetted and poorly trained citizens are allowed to walk our streets armed with deadly weapons. He and others are more likely to put themselves in harms way, thinking a firearm will protect them can unwittingly create the situation where they or others are killed or wounded.

 

[Flanders]

Wry Catcher;5128020

All Second Amendment arguments aside, too many innocent Americans are killed by guns. The NRA and its minions have never addressed this issue and never will. The gun business is profitable and the hysteria "They'll take your guns" is nothing more than fear mongering by those whose sole fear is the loss of the golden goose.

To Wry Catcher: You are presenting the same old argument: The gun is the villain.

Too many innocent victims are killed by vicious individuals with a gun. The NRA has addressed that distinction time and time again.

My position is very simple, keep whatever weapon one needs IN their home. If they are too scared to leave home without it, they should stay home.

To Wry Catcher: That’s unbelievably naive. Try telling gang members and assorted criminals to stay home.

The simple fact of having a firearm in one's custody and control is little different than someone under the influence of alcohol. Both make the actor 'brave' and more likely to engage another than if sober or unarmed.

To Wry Catcher: Hardly. There is no evidence that drinking alcohol encourages the fatal violence associated with guns in the hands of criminals. And let’s not overlook “Happy drunks.”

It is interesting that you relate alcohol to guns. Let me remind you that in the early part of the 20th century sick do-gooders joined with Socialists in order to save mankind by prohibiting alcohol. Instead of saving anybody they gave the country organized crime:

Amendment XVIII​

Section 1.

After one year from the ratification of this article the manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors within, the importation thereof into, or the exportation thereof from the United States and all territory subject to the jurisdiction thereof for beverage purposes is hereby prohibited.

Section 2.

The Congress and the several states shall have concurrent power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Section 3.

This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of the several states, as provided in the Constitution, within seven years from the date of the submission hereof to the states by the Congress.

Today’s do-gooder freaks are joining with big government butchers in order to save mankind by disarming everyone except the people they need as bodyguards. You might ask yourself what the country will get this time around if law-abiding Americans lose their Right to own guns?

I suspect Zimmerman is an example of what can go wrong when unvetted and poorly trained citizens are allowed to walk our streets armed with deadly weapons. He and others are more likely to put themselves in harms way, thinking a firearm will protect them can unwittingly create the situation where they or others are killed or wounded.

To Wry Catcher: Deadly weapons? Does that include knives, clubs, and stones? No matter the weapon the user is the villain not the weapon. Even if you could eliminate every object that can be used to kill, you are still left with individuals who will kill with their bare hands. In short: The gun is not the problem; so why is the United Nations hellbent on disarming everyone?

 

[The Gadfly]

All Second Amendment arguments aside, too many innocent Americans are killed by guns. The NRA and its minions have never addressed this issue and never will. The gun business is profitable and the hysteria "They'll take your guns" is nothing more than fear mongering by those whose sole fear is the loss of the golden goose.

My position is very simple, keep whatever weapon one needs IN their home. If they are too scared to leave home without it, they should stay home. The simple fact of having a firearm in one's custody and control is little different than someone under the influence of alcohol. Both make the actor 'brave' and more likely to engage another than if sober or unarmed.

I suspect Zimmerman is an example of what can go wrong when unvetted and poorly trained citizens are allowed to walk our streets armed with deadly weapons. He and others are more likely to put themselves in harms way, thinking a firearm will protect them can unwittingly create the situation where they or others are killed or wounded.

Wry,
Those assertions are almost funny. I maintain a VERY non-aggressive posture when I'm carrying, right down to eye contact and body language. Usually, that's because I think I might be in a high-threat environment, and I'm not looking for trouble; I'm merely alert, should trouble come looking for me. Now, If I'm not carrying (at least not anything that's legally considered a weapon; I always have something that can be improvised), I will maintain a slightly more aggressive posture, appropriate to both the threat level, and the need for deterrence. This is my preferred mode, 90% of the time, because it gives me more options; with a gun, the weapon and distance are really my only two defenses, and the last thing I need or want is an unpleasant surprise at arm's length.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Amendment 2 - Right to Bear Arms. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The second amendment is nothing what you "gun righters" think it is. It is a prescribed method for maintaining a ground force..without having to have a professional army. There is no right to wild west justice, hunting, or anything else you guys imagine.

This is a lie.

It's terrible that the NRA continues to push for the unfettered access of guns to every imbecile with an agenda.

This is a strawman, and a lie.

Some 40K citizens and LEOs die each year because of this insanity.

Another lie.

Clearly, the truth is not your friend.

 

[M14 Shooter]

All Second Amendment arguments aside, too many innocent Americans are killed by guns.

One is "too many".

The NRA and its minions have never addressed this issue and never will.

This is a lie. The NRA has never addressed the issue the way YOU think it should be addressed, which is not the same thing.

The gun business is profitable and the hysteria "They'll take your guns" is nothing more than fear mongering by those whose sole fear is the loss of the golden goose.

Never the great many of those who -would- take away guns if they did not think trying to do so would get them voted out of office.

My position is very simple, keep whatever weapon one needs IN their home. If they are too scared to leave home without it, they should stay home.

How does your right to self-defense end at your front door?
How does your right to arms end at your front door?

The simple fact of having a firearm in one's custody and control is little different than someone under the influence of alcohol. Both make the actor 'brave' and more likely to engage another than if sober or unarmed.

OK...
Should we then treat alcohol the way we treat gun or treat guns the way we treat alcohol?

I suspect Zimmerman is an example of what can go wrong when unvetted and poorly trained citizens are allowed to walk our streets armed with deadly weapons.

"An" example of what "can" go wrong?

Of the hundresds of thousands of people in the US that hold a CCW, how many similar cases have there been?

 

[Sallow]

Amendment 2 - Right to Bear Arms. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The second amendment is nothing what you "gun righters" think it is. It is a prescribed method for maintaining a ground force..without having to have a professional army. There is no right to wild west justice, hunting, or anything else you guys imagine.

This is a lie.

It's terrible that the NRA continues to push for the unfettered access of guns to every imbecile with an agenda.

This is a strawman, and a lie.

Some 40K citizens and LEOs die each year because of this insanity.

Another lie.

Clearly, the truth is not your friend.

Naw..it's the truth.

The lie is what you guys put out there on a daily basis.

The Continental Army was DISBANDED shortly after the revolution.

Got it?

 

[Flanders]

The second amendment is nothing what you "gun righters" think it is. It is a prescribed method for maintaining a ground force..without having to have a professional army. There is no right to wild west justice, hunting, or anything else you guys imagine.

This is a lie.


This is a strawman, and a lie.

Some 40K citizens and LEOs die each year because of this insanity.

Another lie.

Clearly, the truth is not your friend.

Naw..it's the truth.

The lie is what you guys put out there on a daily basis.

The Continental Army was DISBANDED shortly after the revolution.

Got it?

To Sallow: Nice misdirection! Here’s the chronology:

1783: The war ends.

1783: Treaty of Paris signed. MOST of the Continental Army disbanded.

1788: US Constitution ratified.

1791: Bill of Rights (including the Right to own guns) ratified.

 

[old navy]

This thread needs a little gun porn. Here's a few of mine.

 

[M14 Shooter]

The second amendment is nothing what you "gun righters" think it is. It is a prescribed method for maintaining a ground force..without having to have a professional army. There is no right to wild west justice, hunting, or anything else you guys imagine.

This is a lie.


This is a strawman, and a lie.

Some 40K citizens and LEOs die each year because of this insanity.

Another lie.

Clearly, the truth is not your friend.

Naw..it's the truth.

Another lie.

I -defy- you to prove true your assertions.
Of course, this is something you know you cannot do.
And thus, your lies.

 

[Flanders]

You have to love Newt Gingrich for standing up for the Second Amendment in so definitive a manner. Still, I wish he had not given the United Nations an ounce of legitimacy by suggesting this country submit a treaty for the universal Right to own guns. To my way of thinking it amounts to the US asking the UN for permission to speak for those people living in dictatorships. The only way individual freedom from government tyranny will move forward for those people is to get rid of the United Nations. The UN, more than any other institution, has successfully moved America and the world away individual liberties.

Hussein is conning American women to get their vote while he guarantees brutality against women will increase:

The Small Arms Treaty and the U.N.’s project on International Small Arms Control Standards seek to impose global restrictions on gun ownership that would apply to Americans and the citizens of every country that ratified the agreements. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has pledged to support the treaty, an excuse for governments everywhere to empower themselves and limit their citizens instead of the other way around.

Connecting Hillary Clinton to the brutality done to women in dictatorships should go a long way toward dispelling the myth feminazis have been spreading for so long.

Hussein & Company refuse to acknowledge that the most brutal of men have guns in dictatorships, and they all work for the government. Nobody is talking about disarming them; so there is nothing to lose by arming everybody else. Nothing to lose unless you are a member of a ruling class.

NOTE: Ruling classes do want get rid of nuclear weapons because they know they could have their asses blown away along with the rest of us.

Our own ruling class does not care a whit about bringing savagery to even more women. Their support of the UN’s Small Arms Treaty proves it. America’s ruling class fears the spread of individual liberties so much they are determined to replace America’s freedoms with UN treaties.

Gingrich nails this one to perfection:

As long as we’re limited to fighting over the Left’s gun control agenda we’re debating on their terms. We have to go on offense.

Right on. Go on the offense by shutting down the United Nations.

The Right to Bear Arms is a Human Right
by Newt Gingrich
Posted 04/18/2012 ET

At the United Nations, the governments (and the dictatorships) of the world are conspiring to deny their people a means to defend their families and their liberty.

The Small Arms Treaty and the U.N.’s project on International Small Arms Control Standards seek to impose global restrictions on gun ownership that would apply to Americans and the citizens of every country that ratified the agreements. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has pledged to support the treaty, an excuse for governments everywhere to empower themselves and limit their citizens instead of the other way around.

As long as we’re limited to fighting over the Left’s gun control agenda we’re debating on their terms. We have to go on offense.

The Constitution does not give us the right to bear arms. It says the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. We already have the right, because it doesn’t come from government—it comes from God.

Our founders understood this right is essential to the defense of liberty. It was a lesson they learned firsthand at the Battles of Lexington and Concord, 237 years ago this week. As David Hackett Fischer’s Paul Revere’s Ride recounts, in order to quench the beginnings of the American Revolution, British soldiers marched to confiscate gunpowder and other militia supplies, an act that they hoped would incapacitate the colonial rebels. Thus, it was in defense of the right to bear arms as a means of securing the other liberties that the first battle of the American Revolution was fought.

As the Second Amendment implies, the right to bear arms isn’t given to us by the government, and it isn’t just an American right. It is a human right. As a fundamental component of self-defense, the right to bear arms is intimately tied to those universal truths expressed in our Declaration of Independence—that all men have rights to life and liberty, with which they are endowed by their Creator. And they have not just a right but a duty to throw off despotic government.

These truths are universal. The Second Amendment is an amendment for all mankind.

Every person on the planet has the right to defend themselves from those who would oppress them, exploit them, harm them, or kill them.

Far fewer women would be raped, far fewer children would be killed, far fewer towns would be destroyed, and far fewer dictators would survive if people everywhere on the planet had this God-given right to bear arms recognized. Mass killings and rapes like those that took place in Darfur might have been prevented if the people had the right and the means to defend themselves. When citizens have the power to defend themselves against a violent and tyrannical regime, governments think twice about trampling the lives and liberty of the people.

The United Nations has an extensive Declaration of Human Rights, including the right to join a labor union and the right to social services and security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood or old age.

Nowhere does it provide for the right to keep and bear arms that in many places around the world is so critical to self-defense. And the Small Arms Treaty is a deliberate attempt to restrict these human rights.

I believe the United States should submit to the U.N. a treaty that extends the right to bear arms as a human right to every person on the planet.

It is critical not just for those living under oppressive regimes, but for the many people who live in conditions in which the government cannot secure their safety. From dangerous neighborhoods even here in the United States to lawless regions of the world run by gangs and warlords, firearms are often the only means of personal security.

When criminals have weapons, taking away the right to bear arms is nothing less than eliminating the right to self-defense. Only the elites, who’ve never had to live in a dangerous place or fear for their own lives, could be so confident that denying ordinary citizens the right to bear arms would make everyone safer.

It isn’t enough to watch people move from one dictatorship to another, nations lurching from disaster to disaster. In submitting a treaty to the U.N. guaranteeing that right, America can represent its trust in the basic decency of millions of people around the world and our belief that the God-given rights in the Declaration of Independence apply to them, too. We can let them know that if they had a government that recognized their inherent rights; a government that understood that they were a citizens, not subjects; a government that understood it is government which is to be limited, not people, they too would the chance to pursue happiness and live in safety.

That’s the message our president and secretary of state should be standing up for, not a document designed for the protection of dictators.

The Right to Bear Arms is a Human Right - HUMAN EVENTS

 

[peach174]

Amendment 2 - Right to Bear Arms. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The second amendment is nothing what you "gun Rights" think it is. It is a prescribed method for maintaining a ground force..without having to have a professional army. There is no right to wild west justice, hunting, or anything else you guys imagine.

It's terrible that the NRA continues to push for the unfettered access of guns to every imbecile with an agenda. Some 40K citizens and LEOs die each year because of this insanity. And unsatisfied with that bloodbath..the NRA continues to push for more absurd laws..like "Stand your ground". Hopefully..that was the bridge to far.

The Founders in their writings clearly state that they wanted an arm populace. That we have the right to overthrow our government if it ever becomes a dictatorship or a tyrannical government, when our government does not listen to the people and our redresses are ignored.

In 2010 we had 12,996 gun deaths.
No where even near 40,000 like you stated.
This data is right from the FBI reports.
Gun crime statistics by US state: download the data. Visualised | World news | guardian.co.uk

 

[M14 Shooter]

This is a lie.


This is a strawman, and a lie.


Another lie.

Clearly, the truth is not your friend.

Naw..it's the truth.

Another lie.

I -defy- you to prove true your assertions.
Of course, this is something you know you cannot do.
And thus, your lies.

What's that? No response?

Just to refresh your memory, to prove you are not a liar, you need to show:

-The second amendment is nothing what you "gun righters" think it is.

-That the secomd Amendment is a prescribed method for maintaining a ground force, without having to have a professional army.

-That the 2nd has nothing to do with the right to "wild west justice", hunting, or "anything else [we] imagine."

-That the NRA continues to push for the unfettered access of guns to every imbecile with an agenda.

-Some 40K citizens and LEOs die each year because of the "insanity".


C'mon, liar. Show us the "truth" of yuor claims.

 

[Mr. Jones]

Outgun them when you can’t disarm them -

Activist Post: Why Does The Department Of Homeland Security Need 450 Million Hollow Point Bullets?

ATK Secures .40 Caliber Ammunition Contract with Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (DHS, ICE) - MarketWatch

 

[Flanders]

Outgun them when you can’t disarm them -

Activist Post: Why Does The Department Of Homeland Security Need 450 Million Hollow Point Bullets?

ATK Secures .40 Caliber Ammunition Contract with Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (DHS, ICE) - MarketWatch

To Mr. Jones: Thanks for posting an interesting turn of events that appears to support the title of this thread.

I wonder if the government needs all of that ammo to fight criminals? Apparently, the mayors of two major cities think gun ownership is about criminals:

During a Super Bowl commercial that ran in local markets, New York City Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and Boston Mayor Thomas Menino promoted gun control, saying, "We don't agree on much, but we both support the Second Amendment and believe America must do more to keep guns out of the hands of criminals."

Naturally, the best way to keep guns out of criminal hands is to disarm law-biding citizens. Thank God the NRA is not fooled:

The influential National Rifle Association has been particularly vocal in warning of what it sees as the threat to gun owners if Mr. Obama wins a second term.

NRA spokeswoman Stephanie Samford said, "Obama is a serious threat to the Second Amendment. He has a history of being anti-gun. With a second term, there is a lot he could do to infringe on our rights to keep and bear arms."

Here’s a fun question I’ve been asking for years:

If you could make one of two organizations go away forever which one would you choose —— the NRA or the ACLU?

Note that the government is buying ammo, and Americans are buying guns.

Obama is named gun ‘salesman of the year’
Industry cites uncertainty over policy
By Tim Devaney - The Washington Times
Thursday, April 19, 2012

Obama is named gun 'salesman of the year' - Washington Times

 

[SayMyName]

Mitt Romney walked into the lion’s den carrying an unloaded gun when he spoke at a National Rifle Association forum. A Steve Kornacki piece in Solon tells us:

Pundits never mention it but funding is in the Affordable Care Act only it’s called the Ready Reserve Corps. Spending billions of tax dollars organizing and arming millions of street punks, dedicated Communists, angry America-haters, and drug-soaked radicals from the Alinsky School of Revolution would neuter the Second Amendment more effectively than repeal. Hussein’s armed goons will make nasty groping airport screeners look like humanitarians on a mission from God.

To imply that Hussein the Community Organizer is somehow a staunch defender of the Second Amendment is a testament to spin and doublespeak. In all things Hussein succeeds in appearing to be the exact opposite of what he is. I cannot think of another politician, living or dead, who pulled it off to the extent Hussein is getting away with it. Or perhaps he simply has more to lie about.

Gingrich and the Second Amendment

Newt Gingrich Calls for Universal Right to Bear Arms at NRA Forum
by Michael Ames | April 13, 2012 7:05 PM EDT

Newt Gingrich Calls for Universal Right to Bear Arms at NRA Forum - The Daily Beast

Obama Continues Pushing UN Gun Control Treaty

Finally, the thugs in Hussein’s civilian national security force would not be covered by the UN’s Gun Control Treaty because they would enjoy the same status enjoyed by government-armed goons in every dictatorship. This old saw has never been truer: When guns are outlawed only the outlaws will have guns.

Good stuff. Thanks for sharing. The video was excellent.