Our founding fathers were not conservative

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Agit8r, Dec 11, 2010.

  1. Agit8r
    Offline

    Agit8r Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    4,977
    Thanks Received:
    577
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Ratings:
    +1,041
    there, I said it. Feel free to prove me wrong with empirical fact. go on :eusa_eh:
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 4
  2. westwall
    Offline

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    28,489
    Thanks Received:
    4,866
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +7,057
    That's true. They were however, not statists either.
     
  3. Agit8r
    Offline

    Agit8r Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    4,977
    Thanks Received:
    577
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Ratings:
    +1,041
    that is true. they were not
     
  4. AllieBaba
    Offline

    AllieBaba BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    33,778
    Thanks Received:
    3,647
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +3,648
    Why don't you do your job and prove your point?
     
  5. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    55,010
    Thanks Received:
    10,467
    Trophy Points:
    490
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +11,581
    They obviously weren't conservative. They were revolutionaries, which makes them radicals.
     
  6. AllieBaba
    Offline

    AllieBaba BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    33,778
    Thanks Received:
    3,647
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +3,648
    No it doesn't. When it comes to tyranny, it doesn't take "radicals" to rise against it. It takes people who believe they are obligated to fight tyranny, and liberals don't have a monopoly on that. In fact, they don't even have a place in that.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 4
  7. JakeStarkey
    Offline

    JakeStarkey Platinum Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    93,665
    Thanks Received:
    8,384
    Trophy Points:
    465
    Ratings:
    +12,040
    The Founders were, in the end, "rats" and "anti-rats", the liberals and conservatives for their days. The difference revolved around how much power the national government should have, and of course, Washington and Hamilton and Adams and Madison (initially) and Marshall and Jay and others were all big government dudes.
     
  8. California Girl
    Offline

    California Girl BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    50,338
    Thanks Received:
    8,957
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +8,957
    Funny how each side tries desperately to claim the founders. My theory, they'd be totally ashamed and horrified by both parties. Those dudes would not have belonged to either of these band of fuckers.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 6
  9. Mad Scientist
    Offline

    Mad Scientist Free Speech Aside Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    22,045
    Thanks Received:
    4,759
    Trophy Points:
    262
    Ratings:
    +5,849
    They also wanted total government control, seeing as how it worked out so well with England in charge of the colonies.
     
  10. Agit8r
    Offline

    Agit8r Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    4,977
    Thanks Received:
    577
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Ratings:
    +1,041
    Indeed they would be horrified at "both" of our "two" political parties :(
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

how consertivite were our founding fathers