Our founding fathers were not conservative

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Agit8r, Dec 11, 2010.

  1. Agit8r
    Offline

    Agit8r Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,299
    Thanks Received:
    354
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +445
    there, I said it. Feel free to prove me wrong with empirical fact. go on :eusa_eh:
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 4
  2. westwall
    Offline

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    24,542
    Thanks Received:
    3,939
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +4,688
    That's true. They were however, not statists either.
     
  3. Agit8r
    Offline

    Agit8r Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,299
    Thanks Received:
    354
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +445
    that is true. they were not
     
  4. AllieBaba
    Offline

    AllieBaba BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    33,778
    Thanks Received:
    3,647
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +3,647
    Why don't you do your job and prove your point?
     
  5. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    54,025
    Thanks Received:
    10,204
    Trophy Points:
    490
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +10,802
    They obviously weren't conservative. They were revolutionaries, which makes them radicals.
     
  6. AllieBaba
    Offline

    AllieBaba BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    33,778
    Thanks Received:
    3,647
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +3,647
    No it doesn't. When it comes to tyranny, it doesn't take "radicals" to rise against it. It takes people who believe they are obligated to fight tyranny, and liberals don't have a monopoly on that. In fact, they don't even have a place in that.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 4
  7. JakeStarkey
    Offline

    JakeStarkey Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    84,062
    Thanks Received:
    7,455
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +9,136
    The Founders were, in the end, "rats" and "anti-rats", the liberals and conservatives for their days. The difference revolved around how much power the national government should have, and of course, Washington and Hamilton and Adams and Madison (initially) and Marshall and Jay and others were all big government dudes.
     
  8. California Girl
    Offline

    California Girl BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    50,339
    Thanks Received:
    8,957
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +8,957
    Funny how each side tries desperately to claim the founders. My theory, they'd be totally ashamed and horrified by both parties. Those dudes would not have belonged to either of these band of fuckers.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 6
  9. Mad Scientist
    Offline

    Mad Scientist "Remain Calm People!" Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    20,901
    Thanks Received:
    4,438
    Trophy Points:
    262
    Location:
    Trinity Site
    Ratings:
    +5,094
    They also wanted total government control, seeing as how it worked out so well with England in charge of the colonies.
     
  10. Agit8r
    Offline

    Agit8r Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,299
    Thanks Received:
    354
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +445
    Indeed they would be horrified at "both" of our "two" political parties :(
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

how consertivite were our founding fathers