Discussion in 'USMB Breaking News' started by Mrs. M., Jan 3, 2016.
Uh huh. Juries are always right!
Who said they are heroes? You are making stuff up.
No, they are likely inside as supporters.
History has no precedent. It's all about what have you done for me lately in America these days
The OP states they asked permission for the burn and it was given. In addition, being called back after release because a judge thinks you did not serve enough time initially is concerning.
Oregon Considers Wall to Keep Out Angry White Men - The New Yorker
BURNS, OREGON —A majority of Oregonians favor building a twenty-foot wall along the border of their state to prevent angry white men from getting in, a poll released on Monday shows.
The survey indicates that Oregonians are fed up with irate male Caucasians pouring into their state and bringing with them guns, violence, and terrorism. Oregon Considers Wall to Keep Out Angry White Men - The New Yorker
“This used to be such a nice state,” said Oregon State Senator Carol Foyler, a pro-wall lawmaker. “Since the angry white men came here, parts of it are unrecognizable.”
They were found guilty because they never denied it-they admitted their guilt. One was a controlled burn for invasive species that ,spilled onto 136 acres of federal land. The second was to stop a fire caused by lightning, by back burning, which burned one acre of federal land. They admitted to them. Damages were determined to be less than $1000 for both, yet the feds charged them with terrorism. Ridiculous.
The jury agreed with the charges
The authorities need to bite the bullet and let the pipes freeze, by turning the electricity off. Once frostbite sets in, they'll surrender, so that doctors can pry their guns from their cold, dead fingers.
Separate names with a comma.