Opposed to Prop 8 - You're Gay!

[del]

Oh. You need it spelled out because you are so fucking stoopid. What is the most common claim about the definition of marriage? It is between a man and a woman. That is a definition based on gender:

Male
+
Female

To say two women (females) cannot be "married" is gender based discrimination you sooper sonic stoopid fuck. Tomorrow we will work on fire being hot and water being wet. (I know....it's a stretch but I'm optimistic!)

whatever, alice. if you want to call it gender discrimination, knock yourself out. the fact that the same situation applies to men would seem to negate your thesis, but then, you're not real sharp so i couldn't expect you to see that.

ROTFL!!!!!

Yes. The same thing applies to men you stoopid fucking ****. That also shows it is gender discrimination so let me spell it out even more for you because you're way behind.

If the common mantra is marriage is:

Male
+
Female

That means it is gender discrimination to say:

Male
+
Male

Cannot be married.

It also means:

Female
+
Female

Cannot be married.

Why? What is the factor?

GENDER! How the fuck can you be this stoopid and post on your own? You have a Poster Helper don't you? Lol....unbelievably stoopid bitch!

you're projecting again, sweetie.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

That your best argument?

I was simply pointing out we don't have a government based solely on "the will of the people" you closet cocksucking butt-fudge munching moron.

I never said we did dumbass. Correct me if I'm wrong but, weren't you defending the lifestyles of cocksucking butt-fudge munching morons?

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Why is so important for you to spread the hate? Why do you keep your bullshit to yourself?

Hate? Where have I spreaded hatred? Why don't you homosexuals keep your bullshit to yourselves? Oh that's right, if you did that then no one would notice you and you would never have a chance to get the acceptance you so desire. Your kind may be tolerated, but you will never get the validation you seek.

And thanks for answering the question.

For one I am not a homosexual. Which proves you have no clue first off. Second you posted a very biased right wing article. Try finding proof of your claims, without using some right wing christian blog or group. And they don't want your validation, for one most are above you. You have no clue what you are talking about, so please stop pretending you do.

Sure your not. Oh and I'll find my proof where ever I choose, the fact is I really don't need proof. The articles I presented were not proven to be untrue or inaccurate in totality. You focused on a few key aspects thinking that would erase all of the stats the article presented and you failed. I know that your homosexual lifestyle is unnatural and abominable and I understand that you and your ilk will disagree. Que sera, sera.

 

[del]

Hate? Where have I spreaded hatred? Why don't you homosexuals keep your bullshit to yourselves? Oh that's right, if you did that then no one would notice you and you would never have a chance to get the acceptance you so desire. Your kind may be tolerated, but you will never get the validation you seek.

And thanks for answering the question.

For one I am not a homosexual. Which proves you have no clue first off. Second you posted a very biased right wing article. Try finding proof of your claims, without using some right wing christian blog or group. And they don't want your validation, for one most are above you. You have no clue what you are talking about, so please stop pretending you do.

Sure your not. Oh and I'll find my proof where ever I choose, the fact is I really don't need proof. The articles I presented were not proven to be untrue or inaccurate in totality. You focused on a few key aspects thinking that would erase all of the stats the article presented and you failed. I know that your homosexual lifestyle is unnatural and abominable and I understand that you and your ilk will disagree. Que sera, sera.

of course you don't, you're a bigot.

 

[CurveLight]

of course you didn't.

are you this stupid in real life? gender discrimination? really?

Oh. You need it spelled out because you are so fucking stoopid. What is the most common claim about the definition of marriage? It is between a man and a woman. That is a definition based on gender:

Male
+
Female

To say two women (females) cannot be "married" is gender based discrimination you sooper sonic stoopid fuck. Tomorrow we will work on fire being hot and water being wet. (I know....it's a stretch but I'm optimistic!)

whatever, alice. if you want to call it gender discrimination, knock yourself out. the fact that the same situation applies to men would seem to negate your thesis, but then, you're not real sharp so i couldn't expect you to see that.

whatever, alice. if you want to call it gender discrimination, knock yourself out. the fact that the same situation applies to men would seem to negate your thesis, but then, you're not real sharp so i couldn't expect you to see that.

ROTFL!!!!!

Yes. The same thing applies to men you stoopid fucking ****. That also shows it is gender discrimination so let me spell it out even more for you because you're way behind.

If the common mantra is marriage is:

Male
+
Female

That means it is gender discrimination to say:

Male
+
Male

Cannot be married.

It also means:

Female
+
Female

Cannot be married.

Why? What is the factor?

GENDER! How the fuck can you be this stoopid and post on your own? You have a Poster Helper don't you? Lol....unbelievably stoopid bitch!

you're projecting again, sweetie.

When you're shown to be wrong you toss out "projecting." How original.

 

[del]

Oh. You need it spelled out because you are so fucking stoopid. What is the most common claim about the definition of marriage? It is between a man and a woman. That is a definition based on gender:

Male
+
Female

To say two women (females) cannot be "married" is gender based discrimination you sooper sonic stoopid fuck. Tomorrow we will work on fire being hot and water being wet. (I know....it's a stretch but I'm optimistic!)

whatever, alice. if you want to call it gender discrimination, knock yourself out. the fact that the same situation applies to men would seem to negate your thesis, but then, you're not real sharp so i couldn't expect you to see that.

ROTFL!!!!!

Yes. The same thing applies to men you stoopid fucking ****. That also shows it is gender discrimination so let me spell it out even more for you because you're way behind.

If the common mantra is marriage is:

Male
+
Female

That means it is gender discrimination to say:

Male
+
Male

Cannot be married.

It also means:

Female
+
Female

Cannot be married.

Why? What is the factor?

GENDER! How the fuck can you be this stoopid and post on your own? You have a Poster Helper don't you? Lol....unbelievably stoopid bitch!

you're projecting again, sweetie.

When you're shown to be wrong you toss out "projecting." How original.

no, when i see some ignorant asshat ascribing his behavior to me, i call it projecting.

see how that works? probably not.

tell me more about how opposition to gay marriage is gender bias- i love a good chuckle.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

For one I am not a homosexual. Which proves you have no clue first off. Second you posted a very biased right wing article. Try finding proof of your claims, without using some right wing christian blog or group. And they don't want your validation, for one most are above you. You have no clue what you are talking about, so please stop pretending you do.

Sure your not. Oh and I'll find my proof where ever I choose, the fact is I really don't need proof. The articles I presented were not proven to be untrue or inaccurate in totality. You focused on a few key aspects thinking that would erase all of the stats the article presented and you failed. I know that your homosexual lifestyle is unnatural and abominable and I understand that you and your ilk will disagree. Que sera, sera.

of course you don't, you're a bigot.

We are all bigots to a degree, even you.

 

[CurveLight]

whatever, alice. if you want to call it gender discrimination, knock yourself out. the fact that the same situation applies to men would seem to negate your thesis, but then, you're not real sharp so i couldn't expect you to see that.

you're projecting again, sweetie.

When you're shown to be wrong you toss out "projecting." How original.

no, when i see some ignorant asshat ascribing his behavior to me, i call it projecting.

see how that works? probably not.

tell me more about how opposition to gay marriage is gender bias- i love a good chuckle.

I never said opposition to gay marriage is gender bias. Obviously you cannot keep up so let me help you out. Again.

It was claimed Jim Crow laws are incomparable to same sex marriage being illegal. I countered by pointing out discrimination based on gender applies to anti-discrimination laws based on race as well so they are comparable. See, the discrimination is from the legal aspect and not the cultural. So, if the State says it will recognize the marriage of:

Male
+
Female

But deny the same legal recognition to two people who are

Female
+
Female

Or

Male
+
Male

That means the State is discriminating based on.......drum roll please......Gender. Denying legal recognition of marriage to same-sex couples is the Jim Crow of gender discrimination.

Let me know if you need it explained for the seventh time you fucking genius.

 

[del]

Sure your not. Oh and I'll find my proof where ever I choose, the fact is I really don't need proof. The articles I presented were not proven to be untrue or inaccurate in totality. You focused on a few key aspects thinking that would erase all of the stats the article presented and you failed. I know that your homosexual lifestyle is unnatural and abominable and I understand that you and your ilk will disagree. Que sera, sera.

of course you don't, you're a bigot.

We are all bigots to a degree, even you.

even me?

cool

 

[del]

When you're shown to be wrong you toss out "projecting." How original.

no, when i see some ignorant asshat ascribing his behavior to me, i call it projecting.

see how that works? probably not.

tell me more about how opposition to gay marriage is gender bias- i love a good chuckle.

I never said opposition to gay marriage is gender bias. Obviously you cannot keep up so let me help you out. Again.

It was claimed Jim Crow laws are incomparable to same sex marriage being illegal. I countered by pointing out discrimination based on gender applies to anti-discrimination laws based on race as well so they are comparable. See, the discrimination is from the legal aspect and not the cultural. So, if the State says it will recognize the marriage of:

Male
+
Female

But deny the same legal recognition to two people who are

Female
+
Female

Or

Male
+
Male

That means the State is discriminating based on.......drum roll please......Gender. Denying legal recognition of marriage to same-sex couples is the Jim Crow of gender discrimination.

Let me know if you need it explained for the seventh time you fucking genius.

so opposition to gay marriage is based on gender, but it's not gender bias.

damn, it must be hard work to be this fucking clueless.

kudos

 

[CurveLight]

no, when i see some ignorant asshat ascribing his behavior to me, i call it projecting.

see how that works? probably not.

tell me more about how opposition to gay marriage is gender bias- i love a good chuckle.

I never said opposition to gay marriage is gender bias. Obviously you cannot keep up so let me help you out. Again.

It was claimed Jim Crow laws are incomparable to same sex marriage being illegal. I countered by pointing out discrimination based on gender applies to anti-discrimination laws based on race as well so they are comparable. See, the discrimination is from the legal aspect and not the cultural. So, if the State says it will recognize the marriage of:

Male
+
Female

But deny the same legal recognition to two people who are

Female
+
Female

Or

Male
+
Male

That means the State is discriminating based on.......drum roll please......Gender. Denying legal recognition of marriage to same-sex couples is the Jim Crow of gender discrimination.

Let me know if you need it explained for the seventh time you fucking genius.

so opposition to gay marriage is based on gender, but it's not gender bias.

damn, it must be hard work to be this fucking clueless.

kudos

I clearly pointed out I was talking from the legal perspective in relation to Jim Crow laws and explained it but keep pretending you don't see you are wrong.

 

[Gadawg73]

I'm a part of society and I've shown how homosexuality does nothing to enhance society and may in fact hinder it. If that wasn't the answer you were looking for then , oh well.

Homosexuality by definition was a sexual perversion.

Some statistics about the Homosexual lifestyle:

* One study reports 70% of homosexuals admitting to having sex only one time with over 50% of their partners (3)
* One study reports that the average homosexual has between 20 and 106 partners per year (6). The average heterosexual has 8 partners in a lifetime
* Many homosexual sexual encounters occur while drunk, high on drugs, or in an orgy setting (7)
* Many homosexuals don't pay heed to warnings of their lifestyles: "Knowledge of health guidelines was quite high, but this knowledge had no relation to sexual behavior" (16)
* Homosexuals got homosexuality removed from the list of mental illnesses in the early 70s by storming the annual American Psychiatric Association (APA) conference on successive years. "Guerrilla theater tactics and more straight-forward shouting matches characterized their presence" (2). Since homosexuality has been removed from the APA list of mental illnesses, so has pedophilia (except when the adult feels "subjective distress") (27)
* Homosexuals account for 3-4% of all gonorrhea cases, 60% of all syphilis cases, and 17% of all hospital admissions (other than for STDs) in the United States (5). They make up only 1-2% of the population
* Homosexuals live unhealthy lifestyles, and have historically accounted for the bulk of syphilis, gonorrhea, Hepatitis B, the "gay bowel syndrome" (which attacks the intestinal tract), tuberculosis and cytomegalovirus (27)
* 73% of psychiatrists say homosexuals are less happy than the average person, and of those psychiatrists, 70% say that the unhappiness is NOT due to social stigmatization (13)
* 25-33% of homosexuals and lesbians are alcoholics (11)
* Of homosexuals questioned in one study reports that 43% admit to 500 or more partners in a lifetime, 28% admit to 1000 or more in a lifetime, and of these people, 79% say that half of those partners are total strangers, and 70% of those sexual contacts are one night stands (or, as one homosexual admits in the film "The Castro", one minute stands) (3). Also, it is a favorite past-time of many homosexuals to go to "cruisy areas" and have anonymous sex
* 78% of homosexuals are affected by STDs (20)
* Judge John Martaugh, chief magistrate of the New York City Criminal Court has said, "Homosexuals account for half the murders in large cities" (10)
* Captain William Riddle of the Los Angeles Police says, "30,000 sexually abused children in Los Angeles were victims of homosexuals" (10)
* 50% of suicides can be attributed to homosexuals (10)
* Dr. Daniel Capron, a practicing psychiatrist, says, "Homosexuality by definition is not healthy and wholesome. The homosexual person, at best, will be unhappier and more unfulfilled than the sexually normal person" (10). For other psychiatrists who believe that homosexuality is wrong, please see National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality
* It takes approximately $300,000 to take care of each AIDS victim, so thanks to the promiscuous lifestyle of homosexuals, medical insurance rates have been skyrocketing for all of us(10)
* Homosexuals were responsible for spreading AIDS in the United States, and then raised up violent groups like Act Up and Ground Zero to complain about it. Even today, homosexuals account for well over 50% of the AIDS cases in the United States, which is quite a large number considering that they account for only 1-2% of the population
* Homosexuals account for a disproportionate number of hepatitis cases: 70-80% in San Francisco, 29% in Denver, 66% in New York City, 56% in Toronto, 42% in Montreal, and 26% in Melbourne (8)
* 37% of homosexuals engage in sadomasochism, which accounts for many accidental deaths. In San Francisco, classes were held to teach homosexuals how to not kill their partners during sadomasochism (8)
* 41% of homosexuals say they have had sex with strangers in public restrooms, 60% say they have had sex with strangers in bathhouses, and 64% of these encounters have involved the use of illegal drugs (8)
* Depending on the city, 39-59% of homosexuals are infected with intestinal parasites like worms, flukes and amoebae, which is common in filthy third world countries (8)
* The median age of death of homosexuals is 42 (only 9% live past age 65). This drops to 39 if the cause of death is AIDS. The median age of death of a married heterosexual man is 75 (8)
* The median age of death of lesbians is 45 (only 24% live past age 65). The median age of death of a married heterosexual woman is 79 (8)
* Homosexuals are 100 times more likely to be murdered (usually by another homosexual) than the average person, 25 times more likely to commit suicide, and 19 times more likely to die in a traffic accident (8)
* 21% of lesbians die of murder, suicide or traffic accident, which is at a rate of 534 times higher than the number of white heterosexual females aged 25-44 who die of these things(8)
* 50% of the calls to a hotline to report "queer bashing" involved domestic violence (i.e., homosexuals beating up other homosexuals) (18)
* About 50% of the women on death row are lesbians (12).


Homosexuals prey on children.


* 33% of homosexuals ADMIT to minor/adult sex (7)
* There is a notable homosexual group, consisting of thousands of members, known as the North American Man and Boy Love Association ( NAMBLA). This is a child molesting homosexual group whose cry is "SEX BEFORE 8 BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE." This group can be seen marching in most major homosexual parades across the United States
* Homosexuals commit more than 33% of all reported child molestations in the United States, which, assuming homosexuals make up 2% of the population, means that 1 in 20 homosexuals is a child molestor, while 1 in 490 heterosexuals is a child molestor (19)
* 73% of all homosexuals have had sex with boys under 19 years of age (9)
* Many homosexuals admit that they are pedophiles: "The love between men and boys is at the foundation of homosexuality" (22)
* Because homosexuals can't reproduce naturally, they resort to recruiting children. Homosexuals can be heard chanting "TEN PERCENT IS NOT ENOUGH, RECRUIT, RECRUIT, RECRUIT" in their homosexual parades. A group called the "Lesbian Avengers" prides itself on trying to recruit young girls. They print "WE RECRUIT" on their literature. Some other homosexuals aren't as overt about this, but rather try to infiltrate society and get into positions where they will have access to the malleable minds of young children (e.g., the clergy, teachers, Boy Scout leaders, etc.) (8). See the DC Lesbian Avengers web page, and DC Lesbian Avengers Press Release, where they threaten to recruit little boys and girls. Also, see AFA Action Alert.


The homosexual agenda.


* The homosexual agenda includes desensitizing the public: "The first order of business is desensitization of the American public concerning gays and gay rights.....To desensitize the public is to help it view homosexuality with indifference instead of with keen emotion. Ideally, we would have straights register differences in sexual preferences the way they register different tastes for ice cream or sports games....At least in the beginning, we are seeking public desensitization and nothing more. We do not need and cannot expect a full 'appreciation' or 'understanding' of homosexuality from the average American. You can forget about trying to persuade the masses that homosexuality is a good thing. But if only you can get them to think that it is just another thing...then your battle for legal and social rights is virtually won" (25)
* Part of the homosexual agenda is to get the public to affirm their filthy lifestyle, as one homosexual admitted in the October 1987 homosexual rally on Washington: "We are no longer seeking just a right to privacy and a protection from wrong. We also have a right -- as heterosexual Americans already have -- to see government and society affirm our lives" (27)
* Part of the homosexual agenda is to turn people from Christianity: "The teaching that only male-female sexual activity within the bounds and constraints of marriage is the only acceptable form should be reason enough for any homosexual to denounce the Christian religion" (1)
* Homosexuals knowingly lied (and still lie) about the 10% figure (i.e., homosexuals make up 10% of the population). As Tom Stoddard (formerly of the Lambda Legal Defense Fund) said, "We used that figure when most gay people were entirely hidden to try to create an impression of our numerousness" (17).


The true number of homosexuals.


* The Kinsey study of 1948, which homosexuals often cite to say that 10% of the population is homosexual, actually says that only 4% of the population is EXCLUSIVELY homosexual. This study involved a disproportionate number of people who had been in jail for sex crimes (hardly a random sample of the population). Kinsey also did perverse studies involving young boys and pedophiles. Information on Kinsey
* Current research shows that the true percentage of homosexuals is in the 1-2% range (15,23,26,28). Consider how small this number is when compared to most of the numbers above.


Homosexuals aren't discriminated against in employment, so why should they be a protected class?


* The average yearly income of a homosexual is $55,430.00 (most of which is disposable because no children to take care of!). The average of the general population is $32,144.00. The average of blacks is $12,166.00 (24)
* 59.6% of homosexuals are college graduates. 18.0% of the general population are college graduates (24). Too bad they aren't smart enough to listen to God. "Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools" (Romans 1:22)
* 49.0% of homosexuals hold professional/managerial positions. 15.9% of the general population hold such positions (24). Where's the job discrimination?


Sexual Orientation


• A phrase that has come up recently in this earth is "sexual orientation." This is a phrase made up by homosexuals to try to make themselves look less filthy than they really are. The purpose of the phrase is to take the spotlight from what these perverts do, and put it on the notion that they are just poor, mistreated people, who simply are attracted to members of the same sex - as if they aren't engaging in activity forbidden by God Almighty. "Sexual orientation," as used today, has nothing to do with sexual activity (yeah, right), but only refers to who or what a particular person is attracted to. If you think that people of other "sexual orientations" are just fine, let's see what other "sexual orientations" you would necessarily have to accept as wholesome and pure. If you're not going to discriminate based on "sexual orientation", then you must not discriminate against any of the following. Bestiality, pedophile, necrophilia., exhibitionism, fetishism, frotteurism, masochism, sadism, transvestitism, voyeurism. If you discriminate against any of these, you're a hypocrite. These "sexual orientations" are generally known as "paraphilias", and are mental disorders - just like homosexuality used to be (29).

The Statistics on Homosexuality and its Effects

How is it that those you persecute and make outrageous accusations about are better educated and make more $ than the norm?
Could it be they are productive citizens?
You know there is a difference between a legal and illegal sexual orientation in the law so why do you repeat stupid shit you know is false?
Ideology forces you to repeat lies when you know they are lies.
You need to move to Iran. They agree with all of yiur ides there. Delta is ready when U R.

That's it? I was expecting a much more intelligent debate. You homosexuals aren't as smart they say you are.

Who are "they"?
If you are "expecting a much more intelligent debate" then you are out of luck.
You are not intelligent and you are one half of the "debate".
I am a 55 year old straight male that is a defender of freedom.
You are unAmerican. A true American and patriot of freedom seeks to PROTECT the rights of everyone, especially the ones he may detest the most.
You have no clue. Your prejudices have blinded you.
You Iranians aren't as smart as YOU say you are.

 

[Gadawg73]

Hate? Where have I spreaded hatred? Why don't you homosexuals keep your bullshit to yourselves? Oh that's right, if you did that then no one would notice you and you would never have a chance to get the acceptance you so desire. Your kind may be tolerated, but you will never get the validation you seek.

And thanks for answering the question.

For one I am not a homosexual. Which proves you have no clue first off. Second you posted a very biased right wing article. Try finding proof of your claims, without using some right wing christian blog or group. And they don't want your validation, for one most are above you. You have no clue what you are talking about, so please stop pretending you do.

Sure your not. Oh and I'll find my proof where ever I choose, the fact is I really don't need proof. The articles I presented were not proven to be untrue or inaccurate in totality. You focused on a few key aspects thinking that would erase all of the stats the article presented and you failed. I know that your homosexual lifestyle is unnatural and abominable and I understand that you and your ilk will disagree. Que sera, sera.

Hate to inform you Haji but here in America we go by THE LAW.
Something about the US Constitution. I know that ruffles your turban so hold onto your camel a little tighter.
Religous beliefs do not apply here in America Haji. We are a nation of LAWS, not men.

 

[CurveLight]

For one I am not a homosexual. Which proves you have no clue first off. Second you posted a very biased right wing article. Try finding proof of your claims, without using some right wing christian blog or group. And they don't want your validation, for one most are above you. You have no clue what you are talking about, so please stop pretending you do.

Sure your not. Oh and I'll find my proof where ever I choose, the fact is I really don't need proof. The articles I presented were not proven to be untrue or inaccurate in totality. You focused on a few key aspects thinking that would erase all of the stats the article presented and you failed. I know that your homosexual lifestyle is unnatural and abominable and I understand that you and your ilk will disagree. Que sera, sera.

Hate to inform you Haji but here in America we go by THE LAW.
Something about the US Constitution. I know that ruffles your turban so hold onto your camel a little tighter.
Religous beliefs do not apply here in America Haji. We are a nation of LAWS, not men.

I'm always reminded of that when I see people getting paid by the government to not work on December 25th of every year.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

How is it that those you persecute and make outrageous accusations about are better educated and make more $ than the norm?
Could it be they are productive citizens?
You know there is a difference between a legal and illegal sexual orientation in the law so why do you repeat stupid shit you know is false?
Ideology forces you to repeat lies when you know they are lies.
You need to move to Iran. They agree with all of yiur ides there. Delta is ready when U R.

That's it? I was expecting a much more intelligent debate. You homosexuals aren't as smart they say you are.

Who are "they"?
If you are "expecting a much more intelligent debate" then you are out of luck.
You are not intelligent and you are one half of the "debate".
I am a 55 year old straight male that is a defender of freedom.
You are unAmerican. A true American and patriot of freedom seeks to PROTECT the rights of everyone, especially the ones he may detest the most.
You have no clue. Your prejudices have blinded you.
You Iranians aren't as smart as YOU say you are.

I'm an Iranian and you're gay. What's your point?

 

[Lonestar_logic]

For one I am not a homosexual. Which proves you have no clue first off. Second you posted a very biased right wing article. Try finding proof of your claims, without using some right wing christian blog or group. And they don't want your validation, for one most are above you. You have no clue what you are talking about, so please stop pretending you do.

Sure your not. Oh and I'll find my proof where ever I choose, the fact is I really don't need proof. The articles I presented were not proven to be untrue or inaccurate in totality. You focused on a few key aspects thinking that would erase all of the stats the article presented and you failed. I know that your homosexual lifestyle is unnatural and abominable and I understand that you and your ilk will disagree. Que sera, sera.

Hate to inform you Haji but here in America we go by THE LAW.
Something about the US Constitution. I know that ruffles your turban so hold onto your camel a little tighter.
Religous beliefs do not apply here in America Haji. We are a nation of LAWS, not men.

Exactly and under the law marriage has been defined as a union between one man and one woman. See the Defense of Marriage Act or Murphy v Ramsey where the US Supreme Court said the exact same thing.

Turban, camel, Haji? Were you born stupid or have you been working at it for 55 years?

Oh and the Constitution says nothing about marriage. You may want to try reading it sometime.

 

[CurveLight]

Sure your not. Oh and I'll find my proof where ever I choose, the fact is I really don't need proof. The articles I presented were not proven to be untrue or inaccurate in totality. You focused on a few key aspects thinking that would erase all of the stats the article presented and you failed. I know that your homosexual lifestyle is unnatural and abominable and I understand that you and your ilk will disagree. Que sera, sera.

Hate to inform you Haji but here in America we go by THE LAW.
Something about the US Constitution. I know that ruffles your turban so hold onto your camel a little tighter.
Religous beliefs do not apply here in America Haji. We are a nation of LAWS, not men.

Exactly and under the law marriage has been defined as a union between one man and one woman. See the Defense of Marriage Act or Murphy v Ramsey where the US Supreme Court said the exact same thing.

Turban, camel, Haji? Were you born stupid or have you been working at it for 55 years?

Oh and the Constitution says nothing about marriage. You may want to try reading it sometime.

You're clueless as usual. All DOMA did was give States the option to not recognize marriages from other States. It definitely did not literally define marriage as one man and one woman on the basic fact people under 18 can legally get married in several States.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Hate to inform you Haji but here in America we go by THE LAW.
Something about the US Constitution. I know that ruffles your turban so hold onto your camel a little tighter.
Religous beliefs do not apply here in America Haji. We are a nation of LAWS, not men.

Exactly and under the law marriage has been defined as a union between one man and one woman. See the Defense of Marriage Act or Murphy v Ramsey where the US Supreme Court said the exact same thing.

Turban, camel, Haji? Were you born stupid or have you been working at it for 55 years?

Oh and the Constitution says nothing about marriage. You may want to try reading it sometime.

You're clueless as usual. All DOMA did was give States the option to not recognize marriages from other States. It definitely did not literally define marriage as one man and one woman on the basic fact people under 18 can legally get married in several States.

Have you read DOMA? No I didn't think so. I posted it in one of these threads, you may want to read it. It explicitly (sp) states that marriage is a union between one man and one woman.

The Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) defines marriage as a legal union between one man and one woman for purposes of all federal laws, and provides that states need not recognize a marriage from another state if it is between persons of the same sex. 37 states have their own Defense of Marriage Acts (DOMAs), while 2 more states have strong language that defines marriage as one man and one woman. There are 30 states that have constitutional amendments protecting traditional marriage, including the three states (Arizona, California, and Florida) that passed constitutional amendments in November 2008.

DOMAwatch.org - Federal Defense of Marriage Act

In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word “marriage” means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word “spouse” refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.

 

[CurveLight]

Exactly and under the law marriage has been defined as a union between one man and one woman. See the Defense of Marriage Act or Murphy v Ramsey where the US Supreme Court said the exact same thing.

Turban, camel, Haji? Were you born stupid or have you been working at it for 55 years?

Oh and the Constitution says nothing about marriage. You may want to try reading it sometime.

You're clueless as usual. All DOMA did was give States the option to not recognize marriages from other States. It definitely did not literally define marriage as one man and one woman on the basic fact people under 18 can legally get married in several States.

Have you read DOMA? No I didn't think so. I posted it in one of these threads, you may want to read it. It explicitly (sp) states that marriage is a union between one man and one woman.

The Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) defines marriage as a legal union between one man and one woman for purposes of all federal laws, and provides that states need not recognize a marriage from another state if it is between persons of the same sex. 37 states have their own Defense of Marriage Acts (DOMAs), while 2 more states have strong language that defines marriage as one man and one woman. There are 30 states that have constitutional amendments protecting traditional marriage, including the three states (Arizona, California, and Florida) that passed constitutional amendments in November 2008.

DOMAwatch.org - Federal Defense of Marriage Act

In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word “marriage” means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word “spouse” refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.

It definitely did not literally define marriage as one man and one woman on the basic fact people under 18 can legally get married in several States.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

You're clueless as usual. All DOMA did was give States the option to not recognize marriages from other States. It definitely did not literally define marriage as one man and one woman on the basic fact people under 18 can legally get married in several States.

Have you read DOMA? No I didn't think so. I posted it in one of these threads, you may want to read it. It explicitly (sp) states that marriage is a union between one man and one woman.

The Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) defines marriage as a legal union between one man and one woman for purposes of all federal laws, and provides that states need not recognize a marriage from another state if it is between persons of the same sex. 37 states have their own Defense of Marriage Acts (DOMAs), while 2 more states have strong language that defines marriage as one man and one woman. There are 30 states that have constitutional amendments protecting traditional marriage, including the three states (Arizona, California, and Florida) that passed constitutional amendments in November 2008.

DOMAwatch.org - Federal Defense of Marriage Act

In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word “marriage” means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word “spouse” refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.

It definitely did not literally define marriage as one man and one woman on the basic fact people under 18 can legally get married in several States.

Damn you people are stupid. Try reading the damn act!!

H.R.3396 -- Defense of Marriage Act (Enrolled Bill [Final as Passed Both House and Senate] - ENR)


--H.R.3396--

H.R.3396


One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To define and protect the institution of marriage.


Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Defense of Marriage Act'.

SEC. 2. POWERS RESERVED TO THE STATES.

(a) IN GENERAL- Chapter 115 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding after section 1738B the following:

`Sec. 1738C. Certain acts, records, and proceedings and the effect thereof

`No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such relationship.'.

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 115 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1738B the following new item:

`1738C. Certain acts, records, and proceedings and the effect thereof.'.

SEC. 3. DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE.

(a) IN GENERAL- Chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

`Sec. 7. Definition of `marriage' and `spouse'

`In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word `marriage' means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word `spouse' refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.'.
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 6 the following new item:

`7. Definition of `marriage' and `spouse'.'.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.

Bill Text - 104th Congress (1995-1996) - THOMAS (Library of Congress)